Role of palliative resection of the primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in patients with unresectable metastatic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors Zhou B, Zhan C, Ding Y, Yan S, Zheng S
Received 27 November 2017
Accepted for publication 9 January 2018
Published 23 February 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 975—982
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Justinn Cochran
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Carlos E Vigil
Bo Zhou,1 Canyang Zhan,2 Yuan Ding,1 Sheng Yan,1 Shusen Zheng1
1Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, 2Department of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Background: Treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in patients with unresectable metastatic liver disease has long been a controversial issue. This systematic review aims to summarize the existing evidence concerning the value of primary tumor resection in this group of patients.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis were performed. The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched to identify articles that compared palliative primary tumor resection and nonsurgical regimens in patients with PNETs and unresectable liver metastases. Relevant articles were identified in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome was overall survival. The included studies were evaluated for heterogeneity and publication bias.
Results: Overall, 10 studies were included in the analysis. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. These studies included 1,226 patients who underwent a resection of the primary tumor and 1,623 patients who did not undergo surgery. The median overall survival was 36–137 and 13.2–65 months in the surgical and nonsurgical groups, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 35.7–83 and 5.4%–50%, respectively, in these two groups. The meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in liver tumor burden (odds ratio [OR] =1.51, 95% CI: 0.59–3.89, P=0.39) or tumor grade (OR =2.88, 95% CI: 0.92–9.04, P=0.07) among patients who underwent surgery and nonsurgical therapy. Furthermore, patients who underwent an aggressive surgical approach appeared to have a higher tumor grade. However, the meta-analysis demonstrated that patients who underwent primary tumor resection had better overall survival (P<0.001), with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.30–0.45). No publication bias was detected.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the palliative resection of the primary tumor in patients with PNETs and unresectable liver metastases can increase survival, although a bias toward a more aggressive surgical approach in patients with better performance status, less advanced disease, or a tumor located in the body or tail of the pancreas appears likely. RCTs with longer follow-up periods are required to confirm the advantages of palliative primary tumor resection for PNETs.
Keywords: pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, surgery, liver metastases, prognosis
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]