Role of inspiratory capacity on dyspnea evaluation in COPD with or without emphysematous lesions: a pilot study
Received 17 May 2017
Accepted for publication 1 August 2017
Published 30 September 2017 Volume 2017:12 Pages 2823—2830
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Charles Downs
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Russell
Liwei Cui,1 Xiuli Ji,2 Mengshuang Xie,1 Shuang Dou,1 Wei Wang,1 Wei Xiao1
1Department of Respiratory Disease, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 2Department of Pulmonary Disease, Jinan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jinan, People’s Republic of China
Background: Since forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) shows a weak correlation with patients’ symptoms in COPD, some volume parameters may better reflect the change in dyspnea symptoms after treatment. In this article, we investigated the role of inspiratory capacity (IC) on dyspnea evaluation among COPD patients with or without emphysematous lesions.
Methods: In this prospective study, 124 patients with stable COPD were recruited. During the baseline visit, patients performed pulmonary function tests and dyspnea evaluation using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. Partial patients underwent quantitative computerized tomography scans under physicians’ recommendations, and emphysematous changes were assessed using the emphysema index (EI; low attenuation area [LAA]% −950). These subjects were then divided into the emphysema-predominant group (LAA% −950≥9.9%) and the non-emphysema-predominant group (LAA% −950<9.9%). After treatment for ~1 month, subjects returned for reevaluation of both pulmonary function parameters and dyspnea severity. Correlation analysis between the change in IC (∆IC) and dyspnea (∆mMRC) was performed.
Results: Correlation analysis revealed that ∆IC was negatively correlated with ∆mMRC (correlation coefficient [cc], −0.490, P<0.001) in the total study population, which was stronger than that between ∆FEV1 and ∆mMRC (cc, −0.305, P=0.001). Patients with absolute ∆mMRC >1 were more likely to exhibit a marked increase in IC (≥300 mL) than those with absolute ∆mMRC ≤1 (74.36% versus 35.29%; odds ratio [OR], 5.317; P<0.001). In the emphysema-predominant group, only ∆IC strongly correlated with ∆mMRC (cc, −0.459, P=0.005), while ∆FEV1 did not (P>0.05).
Conclusion: IC could serve as an effective complement to FEV1 in COPD patients undergoing dyspnea evaluation after treatment. For COPD patients with predominant emphysematous lesions, an increase in IC is particularly more suitable for explaining dyspnea relief than FEV1.
Keywords: IC, COPD, mMRC score, quantitative computerized tomography, emphysema index
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]