ROCK2 Promotes Osteosarcoma Growth and Glycolysis by Up-Regulating HKII via Phospho-PI3K/AKT Signalling
Authors Deng B, Deng J, Yi X, Zou Y, Li C
Received 5 September 2020
Accepted for publication 24 October 2020
Published 18 January 2021 Volume 2021:13 Pages 449—462
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Seema Singh
Binbin Deng,1,* Jianyong Deng,1,* Xuan Yi,1 Yeqing Zou,2 Chen Li1
1Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People’s Republic of China; 2Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Chen Li
Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 1 Minde Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province 330006, People’s Republic of China
Email [email protected]
Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 1 Minde Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province 330006, People’s Republic of China
Email [email protected]
Background: Osteosarcoma (OS) is a malignant bone tumour that exhibits a high mortality. While tumours thrive in a state of malnutrition, the mechanism by which OS cells adapt to metabolic stress through metabolic reprogramming remains unclear.
Methods: We analysed the expression of ROCK2 in osteosarcoma tissues by RT-qPCR and Western blot. Cell proliferation were analysed using CCK8, EdU and colony formation assays. The level of cell glycolysis was detected by glucose-6 phosphate, glucose consumption, lactate production and ATP levels.
Results: Herein, our study showed that ROCK2 expression in OS tissues was higher than in adjacent tissues. Functional assays have demonstrated that ROCK2 contributes to the growth of OS cells by inducing aerobic glycolysis. The current study revealed that ROCK2 knockdown decreased the levels of mitochondrial hexokinase II (HKII). And also indicated that ROCK2 served as a key enzyme in glycolysis and that it served an important role in tumour growth. A significant positive correlation was identified between the mRNA and protein expressions of ROCK2 and HKII, further demonstrating that ROCK2-induced glycolysis and proliferation was dependent on HKII expression in OS cells. Mechanistically, ROCK2 promotes HKII expression by activating the phospho-PI3K/AKT signalling pathway.
Conclusion: Taken together, the results of the current study linked the two drivers of OS growth and aerobic glycolysis and identified a new mechanism of ROCK2 control in OS.
Keywords: ROCK2, HKII, osteosarcoma, proliferation, glycolysis
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant tumour of the bone, with an incidence rate of ~1–3% worldwide.1 And it’s particularly common in children and adolescents, followed by individuals over 50 years of age.2 OS often occurs in the long bones of the limbs near the growth plate at the end of metaphyseal plate3 and is composed of malignant osteoblasts that produce immature bone or osteoid tissue. Histologically, the cell types can be subdivided into conventional, low-grade central, periosteal, parotid gland cells, telangiectasia, chondrogenic cells and small cells.4,5 OS is highly malignant and prone to distant metastasis at early stages. Despite the rapid development of clinical laboratory technology and surgery, the long-term survival rate of patients with OS remains low, particularly in patients with chemotherapy-resistant tumours, as evidenced by a 5-year survival rate of ~20%.6,7 OS treatment is limited by a lack of understanding regarding the mechanism behind OS recombination and metabolism in a unique tumour microenvironment. Therefore, studies assessing the regulatory metabolic targets of OS are urgently required, and insight into this molecular mechanism may reveal novel therapies and approaches that may improve the prognosis of patients.
Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) is a downstream effector of the Rho subfamily of small GTPases.8 They are activated following interaction with Rho GTPases and regulate the actin cytoskeleton through a series of pathways that regulate cell migration, cell adhesion and tumour cell invasion.9 Study have shown that ROCK2 could regulate the contraction, adhesion, migration, proliferation and apoptosis of tumour cells.10 Previous studies have also determined that ROCK2 is highly expressed in various types of tumours, including liver,11 breast,12 prostate13 and lung cancer,14 and that high expression of ROCK2 is closely associated with poor prognosis. Overexpression of ROCK2 enhances tumour growth, while ROCK2 silencing markedly inhibits tumour growth in many types of cancer.15 In addition, studies have also reported that ROCK2 acts as a protein kinase, increasing the phosphorylation of substrate proteins.16,17 Although current studies have confirmed the increased expression of ROCK2 in osteosarcoma tissues, the mechanism by which it regulates osteosarcoma growth has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, it is extremely important to elucidate the molecular mechanism of ROCK2 in osteosarcoma.
Aerobic glycolysis, also known as the Warburg effect, is an important feature of cancer and is characterized by an increase in glucose conversion to lactic acid, independent of oxygen.18 The Warburg effect allows tumour cells to metabolise glucose to a greater extent than normal cells, providing an energy source for tumour cell growth. Glycolysis provides sufficient energy for tumour cells, which enhances the tolerance of cells to ischemia and hypoxia, allows cells to avoid apoptosis caused by the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation and allows tumour cells to synthesize cellular constituents during rapid growth.19–21 Metabolism provides a rich source of material and growing evidence has indicated that aerobic glycolysis serves a critical role in the proliferation of OS cells.22,23 The rate-limiting enzyme in glycolysis is hexokinase II, which encodes a rate-limiting gluconeogenesis enzyme that has been reported to serve a tumour-promoting effect in many types of cancer.24–26 HKII overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with cancer.27 However, the underlying mechanism of HKII regulation in OS remains unclear. In addition, previous studies have confirmed that ROCK2 affects the glycolysis of tumour cells,28 And our previous research have confirmed that ROCK2 can stabilize the expression of glycolytic rate-limiting enzyme PFKFB3, however, we have not explored the effect of ROCK2 on glycolysis in osteosarcoma, which is congruent to the results of the present study, which demonstrated that ROCK2 and HKII expression was increased in OS. The current study hypothesized that ROCK2 may affect the aerobic glycolysis of OS by regulating the expression of HKII. Previous studies have demonstrated that the HKII protein can be activated by the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway29 and other studies have reported that ROCK2 affects the phosphorylation of substrate proteins.17 Therefore, the current study speculated that ROCK2 promoted HKII expression by activating PI3K/AKT signalling via phosphorylation.
The present study revealed the expression level of ROCK2 in patients with OS, indicating that ROCK2 affected the level of glycolysis and growth in OS cells by promoting the expression of HKII. In addition, ROCK2 was demonstrated to further regulate HKII expression by activating the phospho-PI3K/AKT signalling pathway. In summary, the results of the present study may provide new targets for the treatment of patients with OS.
Materials and Methods
A total of 43 OS samples and adjacent specimens were obtained from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University and the Jiangxi Cancer Hospital (Table 1). A pathologist diagnosed all specimens as OS and samples were frozen and stored at −80°C for until further analysis. The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Table 1 Correlation Between ROCK2 Expression and the Clini-Copathological Characteristics of the Osteosarcoma Patients
Cell Lines and Cell Culture
Human osteosarcoma cells (U2-OS, Saos-2, 143B and MG-63) and the normal cell line, hfoBI-19, were purchased from The Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Cells were cultured in 10% FBS (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2. Medium was changed every 1–2 days, and cells were plated at 80–90% confluency for a 1:3 passage.
Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), Western Blotting and Co-Immunoprecipitation
RT-qPCR, Western blotting and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) were performed as previously described.9 The primer sequences for PCR were as follows: ROCK2 forward, 5ʹ-GGTATCTGTACATGGTAATGG-3ʹ and reverse, 5ʹ-GGAGTGTATTGCATCCAGAG-3ʹ; HKII forward, 5ʹ-GGCAATGAAACCAAAGCCAGGAG-3ʹ and reverse, 5ʹ-GGAAGGAGGAGCCAGAAGC-3ʹ; GAPDH forward, 5ʹ-CCTGCCGGTGACTAACCCTG-3ʹ and reverse, 5ʹ-AGTTAAAAGCAGCCCTGGTG-3ʹ. The antibodies of Western blot were as follow: ROCK2 (Abcam 1:1000 dilution), HKII (Abcam 1:1000 dilution), BCL-2 (Abcam 1:2000 dilution), BAX (Abcam 1:2500 dilution), AKT/P-AKT (Abcam 1:500 dilution) PI3K/P-PI3K (Abcam 1:1000 dilution), GAPDH (Abcam 1:5000 dilution).
OS and adjacent tissues were fixed in paraffin, sectioned, deparaffinized and blocked using 5% bovine serum albumin for 30 min. Sections were then incubated with anti-ROCK2 (1:200; Abcam) and anti-HKII (1:200; Abcam) antibodies. Secondary antibodies were subsequently applied for visualization. ROCK2 and HKII are graded according to the staining intensity, and the positive intensity is determined according to the percentage of positive cells in the total cells.
Short Interfering (sh)RNA Plasmids and Construct
Plasmids encoding shRNA against ROCK2 and HKII were synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. Vectors and pcDNA3.1(+)-ROCK2 and HKII were also obtained from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. OS cells were transfected with shRNA plasmids, pcDNA3.1(+)-ROCK2 and HKII using Lipofectamine® 3000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol.
Cell Growth Assays
Following trypsinization, OS cell lines were seeded (1.0x104 cells/well) into 96-well plates with different treatment factors and counted. After a specified length of time, cell growth was assessed under different processing factors using a cell counting kit (CCK8) assay in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. An EdU assay was performed as previously described.30
Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) and Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR)
The Extracellular Flow Analyzer XF96 (Seahorse Bioscience) was used to measure cell glycolysis. Cell mitochondrial respiration was determined using the XF Cell Mitosis Stress Test kit and the Glycolysis Stress Test kit (each, Seahorse Bioscience), respectively. Each assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of Nanchang University. A total of 1x107 OS cells in 100 ul PBS were counted following trypsinization and injected into the dorsal side of nude mice (male BALB/c-nu/nu; age, 5 weeks). After tumour formation, mice were observed every 5 days. Tumour volumes were measured for 35 days. After anaesthesia, tumour tissues from each group were collected and weighed, after which they were fixed in 4% neutral paraformaldehyde for subsequent experimentation. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University and was performed in accordance with the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (revised 1985).
All data obtained from the current study were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and analysed using GraphPad Prism 7 and SPSS 19.0 software following at least 3 independent repeats. Differences between two groups were analyzed using t-tests or Student’s t-tests, Multiple groups comparisons were performed with the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the post hoc test was Student-Newman-Keuls test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
ROCK2 is Upregulated in OS Tissue and Cells
To clarify the role of ROCK2 in the development of OS, ROCK2 expression was detected in OS and corresponding adjacent tissues. Following RT-qPCR and Western blotting, the mRNA and protein levels of ROCK2 were revealed in tumour tissue (Figure 1A and B). IHC was subsequently performed, the results of which revealed an increased expression of ROCK2 in cancer tissue. As shown in Figure 1C, ROCK2 was overexpressed in 72.09% (31/43) of all OS tissues examined, while weak positive staining was observed in corresponding adjacent non-tumour tissues. The expression of ROCK2 in OS cell lines (MG-63, 143B, U2-OS, and Saos-2) and in the normal cell line, hfoBI-19, was determined. The results revealed an increased expression of ROCK2 in OS cells (Figure 1D and E). These data indicated that ROCK2 is overexpressed in OS tissue and cells.
ROCK2 Promotes the Growth of OS in vitro and in vivo
To further explore the functional role of ROCK2 in OS, the shRNA was used to knockdown the expression of ROCK2 in U2OS and MG-63 OS cells (Figure 2A and B; Supplementary Figure. S1). As present in Figure 2C–D and Supplementary Figure. S4 A–B, the results of the CCK8 and EdU assays revealed that ROCK2 downregulation significantly inhibited the growth of OS cells in vitro. Additionally, a colony formation assay was performed to detect OS cell clones in shROCK2- and shNC-treated cells (Figure 2E). The results of flow cytometry demonstrated a significant increase in apoptosis following ROCK2 downregulation (Figure 2F and Supplementary Figure. S4 C). Additionally, the expression of B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) and Bcl-2-associated protein X was analysed via Western blotting (Supplementary Figure. S2). The expression of ROCK2 following ROCK2 overexpression was subsequently evaluated (Figure 3A and B). As present in Figure 3C–D and Supplementary Figure. S5 A–B, OS cell proliferation was significantly increased in P-ROCK2 cells. Consistent with the aforementioned results, the colony formation assay revealed that ROCK2 overexpression increased OS cell growth (Figure 3E). Furthermore, the results of flow cytometry indicated a significant decrease in apoptosis following ROCK2 upregulation (Figure 3F and Supplementary Figure. S5 C).
To confirm the role of ROCK2 in tumour formation in vivo, OS cells (U2-OS and 143B) were over- and under-expressed with ROCK2. The effect of ROCK2 on tumour formation in nude mice was subsequently established. After 5 weeks of growth, ROCK2-knockdown U2-OS cells (U2-OS/shROCK2) exhibited reduced tumour growth in nude mice (Figure 2G). Consistent with this result, the average tumour weights of mice bearing U2-OS/shROCK2 cells were significantly decreased (Figure 2H and I), and the expression of Ki-67 was also decreased in ROCK2-knockdown group (Supplementary Figure. S3), while ROCK2-overexpressing 143B cells (143B/p-ROCK2) resulted in significantly increased tumour growth compared with respective control cells (Figure 3G). Tumours in mice bearing 143B/p-ROCK2 cells were markedly increased in size compared with those of their respective controls (Figure 3H and I). In summary, these data indicated that ROCK2 regulated the growth of OS in vivo and in vitro.
ROCK2 Affects the Level of Glycolysis in OS Cells
Given that aerobic glycolysis is indicative of changes to cellular metabolism, this shift is ubiquitous in tumour cells. Therefore, the current study investigated whether ROCK2 affected the metabolism OS cells. As presented in Figure 4A–D, glucose-6 phosphate levels, glucose consumption, lactate production and ATP levels were all significantly reduced in OS cells where ROCK2 expression was downregulated. In contrast, ROCK2 overexpression produced the opposite affects in Saos-2 cells (Figure 4E–H).
To further confirm the role of ROCK2 in the glycolytic hydrolysis of OS, OS cell glycolysis was determined via ECAR. As presented in Figure 4I, ROCK2 knockdown significantly decreased the glycolytic rate and capacity of U2-OS cells, whereas ROCK2 overexpression increased ECAR in Saos-2 cells (Figure 4K). The current study assessed OCR, an indicator of mitochondrial respiration. The results revealed that U2-OS/shROCK2 cells exhibited an increased OCR (Figure 4J), whereas ROCK2 overexpression produced the opposite effect in Saos-2 cells (Figure 4L). In summary, the results indicated that ROCK2 may promote aerobic glycolysis and inhibit mitochondrial respiration in OS cells.
ROCK2 Positively Regulates HKII Expression
Hexokinase, a key enzyme in glycolysis, has been revealed to serve a crucial role in the regulation of glycolysis. Among the enzymes that participate in glycolysis, HKII is of particularly importance. Previous studies have confirmed that HKII is upregulated in liver,31 colorectal32 and lung cancer.33 Since HKII is closely associated with the proliferation of tumour cells and in order to confirm the expression of HKII in OS, the current study detected the expression of HKII in OS tissues via RT-qPCR and Western blotting (Figure 5A–C). The results of IHC confirmed the increased expression of HKII in OS (Figure 5D). Scatter plots revealed that ROCK2 and HKII mRNA and protein levels were positively correlated with OS tissues (Figure 5E and F). The expression of HKII in OS cells was further confirmed via RT-qPCR and Western blotting (Figure 5G–H).
To verify whether ROCK2 regulates HKII expression, ROCK2 was up- and down-regulated in OS cells, the results of which demonstrated that ROCK2 knockdown significantly reduced the mRNA and protein expression of HKII in U2-OS and MG-63 cells. In contrast, ROCK2 overexpression significantly increased HKII protein and mRNA levels in Saos-2 and 143B cells (Figure 5I and J). Taken together, these results indicated that ROCK2 positively regulates the expression of HKII in OS cells.
ROCK2 Regulates Glycolysis and Cell Proliferation Depending on the Expression of HKII
As aforementioned, HKII was determined to be a downstream gene of glycolysis. The current study therefore upregulated the expression of HKII in U2-OS cells that were previously treated to knockdown ROCK2. Successful HKII overexpression was confirmed via immunoblotting (Figure 6A). The results of CCK8 and EdU assays revealed that HKII overexpression restored the proliferation of shROCK2-treated cells (Figure 6B–C and Supplementary Figure. S6 A). The results also demonstrated that HKII overexpression restored glucose-6 phosphate levels, glucose consumption, lactate production and ATP levels in shROCK2-treated cells (Figure 6D–G).
The expression of HKII was silenced in p-ROCK2 OS cells. Western blot analysis confirmed that HKII expression was increased in P-ROCK2 cells and that its expression was inhibited following HKII silencing (Figure 6H). Similarly, OS cell proliferation was also inhibited (Figure 6I–J and Supplementary Figure. S6 B). Further studies confirmed that silencing HKII in P-ROCK2 inhibited glucose-6 phosphate levels, glucose consumption, lactate production and ATP levels (Figure 6K–N). In conclusion, ROCK2 regulated glucose metabolism and proliferation in OS cells depending on the expression of HKII.
ROCK2 Regulates HKII Expression by Activating the Phosphorylated PI3K/AKT Signalling Pathway
To further investigate the mechanism by which ROCK2 regulates HKII expression, it was determined whether ROCK2 and HKII could be intrinsically bound. However, the results of Co-IP revealed no intrinsic link between them (Figure 7A). Additionally, it has been reported that HKII is affected by PI3K/AKT signalling pathways29 and that AKT phosphorylates HKII at Thr-473.34 Previous studies have also confirmed that ROCK2 acts as a protein kinase that affects the phosphorylation of substrate proteins.16,17 Therefore, the current study hypothesized that ROCK2 may promote HKII expression by activating the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway. To verify this hypothesis, ROCK2 expression was reduced and immunoblotting revealed that total AKT and PI3K levels did not change. However, levels of phosphorylated AKT and PI3K decreased significantly (Figure 7B). Furthermore, AKT and PI3K phosphorylation was significantly increased in cells in which ROCK2 was upregulated (Figure 7C). To further verify whether ROCK2 regulates the expression of HKII by activating phosphorylated PI3K/AKT and whether it affects OS growth, ROCK2 was overexpressed and OS cells were treated with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (10 μM). Western blot analysis confirmed that HKII expression was inhibited (Figure 7D). The results of the CCK8 and EdU assay also indicated that OS growth was inhibited (Figure 7E and F; Supplementary Figure. S7). The results indicated that ROCK2 activated AKT and PI3K via phosphorylation, which induced HKII expression and further promoted the growth of OS cells.
Although the prognosis and treatment of OS has improved, patient survival rates remain poor.35 Therefore, a better understanding of the biological properties of OS is essential. In recent years, the importance of metabolic reprogramming in tumorigenesis and progression has been confirmed. Metabolic reprogramming is considered one of the important features of cancer. OS seriously affects adolescent health and due to OS exhibiting varying degrees of metabolic dependence, survival rates are extremely low. Therefore, understanding the basis of OS from a metabolic perspective may provide novel insights into this disease. The current study demonstrated that ROCK2 expression was upregulated in OS and that it serves a key role in the reprogramming of glucose metabolism in this type of cancer. Therefore, studying the molecular and regulatory mechanisms of glucose metabolism reprogramming may provide more evidence for OS targeted therapy.
Members of the Rho GTPase family are important regulators of cell migration, proliferation and apoptosis.10 The stimulation of contraction and adhesion is achieved by inducing the formation of actin stress fibres and focal adhesions of fibroblasts, as well as by modulating surface integrins to aggregate platelets and lymphocytes. Recent research has confirmed that ROCK2 is highly expressed in liver, colon and kidney cancer, and that its expression is closely associated with poor patient prognosis.36,37 And ROCK2 silencing significantly inhibits tumour cell growth and metastasis, and promotes cell apoptosis. Our previous studies have also confirmed that ROCK2 was significantly up-regulated in OS, Interestingly, our research also confirmed that after down-regulating the expression of ROCK2, its metastasis was significantly reduced in vivo and in vitro. On the contrary, after overexpression, it significantly promoted its invasion and migration (Supplementary Figure. S7). The current study revealed a novel mechanism by which OS promotes glycolysis and cell proliferation. The study confirmed that ROCK2 and HKII were upregulated in OS tissues and cells, and that these two proteins were positively correlated. Furthermore, experimental data also demonstrated that HKII expression was significantly reduced after ROCK2 expression was silenced and that aerobic glycolysis and OS cell proliferation were also inhibited. HKII upregulation via ROCK2 knockdown reversed the decrease in OS cell proliferation and aerobic glycolysis, whereas HKII downregulation significantly attenuated the increase in cell proliferation and aerobic glycolysis induced by ROCK2 overexpression. Overall, the results revealed a novel mechanism whereby ROCK2 regulates HKII and thus affects the growth and glycolysis of OS cells.
The present study evaluated the molecular mechanism by which ROCK2 regulates HKII. Since ROCK2 stabilizes the expression of substrate proteins, the results of Co-IP confirmed that ROCK2 and HKII cannot bind. However, previous studies have reported that HKII is regulated by the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway.29 ROCK2 activates substrate proteins via phosphorylation. The present study silenced the expression of ROCK2 and demonstrated that total levels of PI3K and AKT did not change following treatment. In addition, the level of PI3K/AKT phosphorylation was significantly inhibited. In contrast, ROCK2 overexpression activated PI3K and AKT phosphorylation. Following ROCK2 overexpression and subsequent treatment with the PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, it was demonstrated that HKII expression was inhibited. The results revealed a novel mechanism for ROCK2 in the regulation of HKII expression via the activation of PI3K/AKT by means of phosphorylation.
The current study demonstrated that ROCK2 is upregulated in OS. The results also revealed that ROCK2 may promote OS cell growth and aerobic glycolysis. Furthermore, the aerobic glycolysis and proliferation of OS cells was demonstrated to rely on HKII. The results also indicated that ROCK2 activated phosphorylated PI3K/AKT and regulated HKII expression. Based on the current results, ROCK2 may be used as a potential biomarker for the future diagnosis and treatment of OS.
ROCK2, Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 2; HKII, hexokinase II; OS, osteosarcoma; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR; shRNA, short interfering RNA; OCR, oxygen consumption rate; ECAR, extracellular acidification rate.
Data Sharing Statement
All the data in the manuscript are available upon reasonable request.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
In the study, the use of human data and human tissue was clearly approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, and informed consents were obtained from each patient. The use of All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University and was performed in accordance with the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (revised 1985).
Consent for Publication
We thank Elsevier’s English Language Editing service for editing the manuscript.
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81760487 and 81860530), the Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (no. 20202BABL216056 and 20181BBG70026) and the Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (no. GJJ190014).
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
1. Matsuda K, Miyoshi H, Hiraoka K, et al. Elevated expression of transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3 (TACC3) is associated with a poor prognosis in osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(9):1848–1855. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000379
2. Lu Y, Wang Q, Zhou Y, et al. Overexpression of p62 is associated with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotypes in osteosarcoma. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(6):9889–9895. doi:10.3892/ol.2018.8579
3. Dekkers IA, Cleven A, Lamb HJ, Kroon HM. Primary osteosarcoma of the breast. Radiographics. 2019;39(3):626–629. doi:10.1148/rg.2019180181
4. Li Y, Ye T, Gu Q, Dong L, Chen G, Lu S. Primary, cardiac, fibroblastic osteosarcoma: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(1):e9543. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000009543
5. Turner H, Seguin B, Worley DR, et al. Prognosis for dogs with stage III osteosarcoma following treatment with amputation and chemotherapy with and without metastasectomy. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2017;251(11):1293–1305. doi:10.2460/javma.251.11.1293
6. Yu D, Zhang S, Feng A, et al. Methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatinum regimen is still the preferred option for osteosarcoma chemotherapy: a meta-analysis and clinical observation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(19):e15582. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000015582
7. Zhang Y, Zhao H, Xu W, Jiang D, Huang L, Li L. High expression of PQBP1 and low expression of PCK2 are associated with metastasis and recurrence of osteosarcoma and unfavorable survival outcomes of the patients. J Cancer. 2019;10(9):2091–2101. doi:10.7150/jca.28480
8. Zaim M, Isik S. DNA topoisomerase iIbeta stimulates neurite outgrowth in neural differentiated human mesenchymal stem cells through regulation of Rho-GTPases (RhoA/Rock2 pathway) and nurr1 expression. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):114. doi:10.1186/s13287-018-0859-4
9. Qiu Y, Yuan R, Zhang S, et al. Rock2 stabilizes beta-catenin to promote tumor invasion and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;467(4):629–637. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.10.103
10. Loirand G, Touyz RM. Rho kinases in health and disease: from basic science to translational research. Pharmacol Rev. 2015;67(4):1074–1095. doi:10.1124/pr.115.010595
11. Hu K, Wang Z, Tao Y. [Suppression of hepatocellular carcinoma invasion and metastasis by Rho-kinase inhibitor Fasudil through inhibition of BTBD7-ROCK2 signaling pathway]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2014;39(12):1221–1227. Chinese. doi:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2014.12.001
12. Wang HF, Takenaka K, Nakanishi A, Miki Y. BRCA2 and nucleophosmin coregulate centrosome amplification and form a complex with the Rho effector kinase ROCK2. Cancer Res. 2011;71(1):68–77. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0030
13. Kroiss A, Vincent S, Decaussin-Petrucci M, et al. Androgen-regulated microRNA-135a decreases prostate cancer cell migration and invasion through downregulating ROCK1 and ROCK2. Oncogene. 2015;34(22):2846–2855. doi:10.1038/onc.2014.222
14. Vigil D, Kim TY, Plachco A, et al. ROCK1 and ROCK2 are required for non-small cell lung cancer anchorage-independent growth and invasion. Cancer Res. 2012;72(20):5338–5347. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2373
15. Zhang X, Liu X, Zhou W, et al. Fasudil increases temozolomide sensitivity and suppresses temozolomide-resistant glioma growth via inhibiting ROCK2/ABCG2. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):190. doi:10.1038/s41419-017-0251-9
16. Nagai Y, Matoba K, Kawanami D, et al. ROCK2 regulates TGF-beta-induced expression of CTGF and profibrotic genes via NF-kappaB and cytoskeleton dynamics in mesangial cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;317(4):F839–F851. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00596.2018
17. Soliman H, Nyamandi V, Garcia-Patino M, et al. ROCK2 promotes ryanodine receptor phosphorylation and arrhythmic calcium release in diabetic cardiomyocytes. Int J Cardiol. 2019;281:90–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.075
18. Kobayashi Y, Banno K, Kunitomi H, et al. Warburg effect in gynecologic cancers. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(3):542–548. doi:10.1111/jog.13867
19. Li H, Xu H, Xing R, et al. Pyruvate kinase M2 contributes to cell growth in gastric cancer via aerobic glycolysis. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215(6):152409. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2019.04.001
20. Lim SO, Li CW, Xia W, et al. EGFR signaling enhances aerobic glycolysis in triple-negative breast cancer cells to promote tumor growth and immune escape. Cancer Res. 2016;76(5):1284–1296. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2478
21. Pavlides S, Vera I, Gandara R, et al. Warburg meets autophagy: cancer-associated fibroblasts accelerate tumor growth and metastasis via oxidative stress, mitophagy, and aerobic glycolysis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;16(11):1264–1284. doi:10.1089/ars.2011.4243
22. Shen Y, Zhao S, Wang S, et al. S1P/S1PR3 axis promotes aerobic glycolysis by YAP/c-MYC/PGAM1 axis in osteosarcoma. EBioMedicine. 2019;40:210–223. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.038
23. Xiao Q, Wei Z, Li Y, et al. miR186 functions as a tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma cells by suppressing the malignant phenotype and aerobic glycolysis. Oncol Rep. 2018;39(6):2703–2710. doi:10.3892/or.2018.6394
24. Zhao X, Lu C, Chu W, et al. MicroRNA-124 suppresses proliferation and glycolysis in non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting AKT-GLUT1/HKII. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(5):1010428317706215. doi:10.1177/1010428317706215
25. Liu C, Wang X, Zhang Y. The roles of HK2 on tumorigenesis of cervical cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819871306. doi:10.1177/1533033819871306
26. Liu CC, Chou KT, Hsu JW, et al. High metabolic rate and stem cell characteristics of esophageal cancer stem-like cells depend on the Hsp27-AKT-HK2 pathway. Int J Cancer. 2019;145(8):2144–2156. doi:10.1002/ijc.32301
27. Jiang X, Zhang Z, Song C, et al. Glaucocalyxin A reverses EMT and TGF-beta1-induced EMT by inhibiting TGF-beta1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway in osteosarcoma. Chem Biol Interact. 2019;307:158–166. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2019.05.005
28. Chen W, Gong P, Guo J, et al. Glycolysis regulates pollen tube polarity via Rho GTPase signaling. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(4):e1007373. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007373
29. Zhang T, Zhu X, Wu H, et al. Targeting the ROS/PI3K/AKT/HIF-1alpha/HK2 axis of breast cancer cells: combined administration of polydatin and 2-Deoxy-d-glucose. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(5):3711–3723. doi:10.1111/jcmm.14276
30. Deng X, Yi X, Deng J, et al. ROCK2 promotes osteosarcoma growth and metastasis by modifying PFKFB3 ubiquitination and degradation. Exp Cell Res. 2019;385(2):111689. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111689
31. Jiao L, Zhang HL, Li DD, et al. Regulation of glycolytic metabolism by autophagy in liver cancer involves selective autophagic degradation of HK2 (hexokinase 2). Autophagy. 2018;14(4):671–684. doi:10.1080/15548627.2017.1381804
32. Wang H, Peng R, Chen X, et al. Effect of HK2, PKM2 and LDHA on cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(4):5553–5560. doi:10.3892/ol.2018.8005
33. Lu Z, Guo Y, Zhang X, et al. ORY-1001 suppresses cell growth and induces apoptosis in lung cancer through triggering HK2 mediated warburg effect. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1411. doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01411
34. Song W, Wang Z, Gu X, et al. TRIM11 promotes proliferation and glycolysis of breast cancer cells via targeting AKT/GLUT1 pathway. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:4975–4984. doi:10.2147/OTT.S207723
35. Song K, Song J, Lin K, et al. Survival analysis of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results population-based study. Int Orthop. 2019;43(8):1983–1991. doi:10.1007/s00264-019-04348-4
36. Kalender ME, Demiryurek S, Oztuzcu S, et al. Association between the Thr431Asn polymorphism of the ROCK2 gene and risk of developing metastases of breast cancer. Oncol Res. 2009;18(11):583–591. doi:10.3727/096504010X12767359113767
37. Pranatharthi A, Thomas P, Udayashankar AH, et al. RhoC regulates radioresistance via crosstalk of ROCK2 with the DNA repair machinery in cervical cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):392. doi:10.1186/s13046-019-1385-7
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF]