Back to Journals » ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research » Volume 6

Retrospective database analysis of clinical outcomes and costs for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding among women enrolled in US Medicaid programs

Authors Bonafede M, Miller J, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Lukes AS, Meyer N, Lenhart GM

Received 17 May 2014

Accepted for publication 8 July 2014

Published 8 October 2014 Volume 2014:6 Pages 423—429


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Machaon M Bonafede,1 Jeffrey D Miller,1 Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso,2 Andrea S Lukes,3 Nicole M Meyer,1 Gregory M Lenhart1

1Truven Health Analytics, Cambridge MA, 2Mayo Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rochester, MN, 3Women's Wellness Clinic and Research Center, Durham, NC, USA

Background: Women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) may be treated surgically with hysterectomy or global endometrial ablation (GEA), an outpatient procedure. We compared the costs and clinical outcomes of these surgical procedures for AUB among women in Medicaid programs.
Methods: The Truven Health MarketScan® Medicaid Multi-State Database was used to identify Medicaid women aged 30–55 years with AUB who newly initiated GEA or hysterectomy (index event) during 2006–2010. Patients were required to have 12 months of continuous enrollment pre-index and post-index. Baseline characteristics were assessed in the pre-index period; health care utilization and costs (2011 USD), treatment complications, and reinterventions were assessed in the post-index period.
Results: Of 1,880 women who met the study criteria (mean age 40.7 years), 53.4% were Caucasian, 33.1% were African-American, and 2.3% were Hispanic; many (42.8%) received their Medicaid eligibility due to disability. Similar proportions received GEA (50.9%) or hysterectomy (49.1%). At baseline, both groups also had similar Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity scores (0.65), and use of antibiotics (69.4%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (56.3%), and oral contraceptives (5.3%). More hysterectomy patients than GEA patients had a treatment-related complication (52% versus 36%, respectively, P<0.001). Initial treatment costs were higher for hysterectomy ($11,270) than for GEA ($3,958, P<0.001); monthly gynecology-related costs in the remainder of the year were not significantly different for hysterectomy ($63) and GEA ($16, P=0.11).
Conclusion: Hysterectomy was nearly three times more costly than GEA for initial treatment of AUB, and associated with more treatment-related complications. These results may be informative in the context of new federal mandates for Medicaid expansion, which are likely to focus on cost savings through use of outpatient treatments such as GEA.

Keywords: abnormal uterine bleeding, menorrhagia, endometrial ablation, hysterectomy, Medicaid

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]


Other articles by this author:

Economic impact of longer battery life of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in Sweden

Gadler F, Ding Y, Verin N, Bergius M, Miller JD, Lenhart GM, Russell MW

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research 2016, 8:657-666

Published Date: 31 October 2016

Cost-effectiveness of edoxaban versus rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the US

Miller JD, Ye X, Lenhart GM, Farr AM, Tran OV, Kwong WJ, Magnuson EA, Weintraub WS

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research 2016, 8:215-226

Published Date: 20 May 2016

Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population

Bonafede MM, Kalra VB, Miller JD, Fajardo LL

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research 2015, 7:53-63

Published Date: 12 January 2015

Readers of this article also read:

Emerging and future therapies for hemophilia

Carr ME, Tortella BJ

Journal of Blood Medicine 2015, 6:245-255

Published Date: 3 September 2015

Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles

Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889

Published Date: 16 April 2014

Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon

Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779

Published Date: 15 November 2012

A novel preparation method for silicone oil nanoemulsions and its application for coating hair with silicone

Hu Z, Liao M, Chen Y, Cai Y, Meng L, Liu Y, Lv N, Liu Z, Yuan W

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5719-5724

Published Date: 12 November 2012

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010