Relationship of inferior vena cava collapsibility to ultrafiltration volume achieved in critically ill hemodialysis patients
Received 16 February 2018
Accepted for publication 9 May 2018
Published 23 July 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 195—209
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Pravin Singhal
Matthew J Kaptein,1,2 John S Kaptein,2 Zayar Oo,2 Elaine M Kaptein2
1Division of Nephrology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA; 2Division of Nephrology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Background: Ultrasound (US) assessment of intravascular volume may improve volume management of dialysis patients. We investigated the relationship of intravascular volume evaluated by inferior vena cava (IVC) US to net volume changes with intermittent hemodialysis (HD) in critically ill patients.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 113 intensive care unit patients in 244 encounters had clinical assessment of intravascular volume followed by US of respiratory/ventilatory variation of IVC diameter, and had HD within 24 h. IVC collapsibility index (IVC CI)=(IVCmax–IVCmin)/IVCmax*100%. Volume management was guided by clinical data plus IVC US findings. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) was categorized by severity from none to inability to tolerate HD.
Results: Linear regression correlating n-weighted proportions of encounters achieving net volume removal of ≥0.5 L, ≥1.0 L, ≥1.5 L, and ≥2.0 L strongly correlated across the range of IVC CI (R2=0.87–0.64). Sensitivity and specificity analysis showed IVC CI was a better predictor than IVCmax of achieving net ultrafiltration (UF) volumes. Mean central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, and cardiac output were poor predictors by logistic regression and receiver operating curve analyses. IVC CI <20% was the approximate optimal cutoff for achieving ≥0.5 L to ≥2.0 L net UF volumes. Net volume change achieved tended to be less than recommended and may have been limited by the development of IDH. Severity of IDH did not correlate with UF rate in mL/kg/h. χ2 analysis showed pre-US clinical intravascular volume assessments had poor concordance with IVC CI categories.
Conclusion: IVC US may be a useful tool for predicting whether critically ill patients will achieve volume removal with HD.
Keywords: inferior vena cava ultrasound, intravascular volume, intradialytic hypotension, intermittent hemodialysis/ultrafiltration, critical illness, end-stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease, acute kidney injury
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]