Back to Journals » ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research » Volume 10

Relapse prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis of brexpiprazole treatment in adult patients with schizophrenia in the USA

Authors Aigbogun MS, Liu S, Kamat SA, Sapin C, Duhig AM, Citrome L

Received 19 December 2017

Accepted for publication 7 June 2018

Published 16 August 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 443—456


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Amy Norman

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Xing Lin Feng

Myrlene S Aigbogun,1 Sizhu Liu,2 Siddhesh A Kamat,1 Christophe Sapin,3 Amy M Duhig,2 Leslie Citrome4

1Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization, Inc, Princeton, NJ, USA; 2Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Xcenda, Palm Harbor, FL, USA; 3Global Analytics, Lundbeck, Paris, France; 4Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA

Objective: This study used a decision-analytic framework to assess the cost-effectiveness of brexpiprazole vs comparator branded therapies for reducing relapses and hospitalizations among adults with schizophrenia from a US payer perspective.
Methods: An economic model was developed to assess patients with stable schizophrenia initiating treatment with brexpiprazole (1–4 mg), cariprazine (1–6 mg), or lurasidone (40–80 mg) over a 1-year period. After 6 months, patients remained on treatment or discontinued due to relapse, adverse events, or other reasons. Patients who discontinued due to relapse or adverse events were assumed to have switched to other therapy, and those who discontinued due to other reasons were assumed to have received no therapy. Primary outcomes were incremental cost per relapse avoided and hospitalization avoided, and the secondary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted.
Results: Brexpiprazole was associated with the highest per-patient clinical effectiveness (avoided relapses 0.637, avoided hospitalizations 0.719, QALYs 0.707) among comparators, followed by cariprazine (avoided relapses 0.590, avoided hospitalizations 0.683, QALYs 0.683) and lurasidone (avoided relapses 0.400, avoided hospitalizations 0.536, QALYs 0.623). Annual per-patient health-care costs were lowest for brexpiprazole ($20,510), followed by cariprazine ($22,282) and lurasidone ($25,510). Brexpiprazole was the least costly and most effective treatment strategy for all outcomes. Results were sensitive to relapse rates and daily cost of brexpiprazole. Limitations include data principally obtained from drug-specific randomized withdrawal studies and lack of direct-comparison trials.
Conclusion: This analysis evaluated brexpiprazole treatment for the reduction of schizophrenia relapses and hospitalizations over a 1-year period compared to other recently available branded antipsychotics, and excluded generic antipsychotic treatments. Brexpiprazole treatment may lead to clinical benefits and medical cost savings, and provides a cost-effective treatment option for patients relatively to other branded second-generation antipsychotics.

Keywords: schizophrenia, cost-effectiveness, relapse prevention, cost-benefit, indirect analysis, event avoided, hospitalization avoided, brexpiprazole

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]