Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Postoperative Radiotherapy Alone for Larynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with Lymphovascular Invasion: A Propensity Score Matching Study
Authors Yu S, Zhu Y, Shi X, Hu K, Bai C, Diao W, Zhu X, Gao Z, Chen X
Received 20 February 2020
Accepted for publication 9 May 2020
Published 29 May 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 4063—4071
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Antonella D'Anneo
Shuting Yu,1 Yingying Zhu,1 Xiaohua Shi,2 Ke Hu,3 Chunmei Bai,4 Wenwen Diao,1 Xiaoli Zhu,1 Zhiqiang Gao,1 Xingming Chen1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Radiotherapy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Xingming Chen
Tel +86 13901077778
Purpose: To date, no guidelines have been proposed for the ideal treatment of postoperative larynx squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) patients with lymphovascular invasion due to a lack of similar studies. The present study was conducted to compare the survival and toxicity in LSCC patients with lymphovascular invasion receiving either postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) or postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT). The results can be applied for more appropriate treatment of these patients.
Patients and Methods: Three hundred eighty-eight eligible LSCC patients with lymphovascular invasion were enrolled in this retrospective study. Survival and treatment-related toxicities were compared in the POCRT and PORT group using propensity score matching (PSM) methodology (1:1).
Results: Five-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of all patients were 48.7%, 58.2%, and 56.0%, respectively. Significantly, higher RFS rates (P=0.040) were found in the POCRT group than the PORT group in the PSM cohort. In the multivariate analysis, higher OS, DSS, and RFS rates were observed in the POCRT group than the PORT group (P=0.049, 0.024, and 0.011 respectively). Patients in the POCRT group presented more acute toxicities than those in the PORT group such as hematological toxicities (25.0% vs 0.9%, P< 0.001) and mucositis (35.0% vs 19.1%, P=0.002).
Conclusion: In the context of no ideal treatment for LSCC patients with lymphovascular invasion, the present study proposes POCRT as a preferable modality compared with PORT, as POCRT was associated with higher RFS rates. Higher RFS, DFS, and OS rates were also observed in the POCRT group in the multivariate analysis.
Keywords: head and neck carcinoma, larynx carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion, propensity score, chemoradiotherapy, survival
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]