Back to Journals » Journal of Blood Medicine » Volume 13

Phenotype, Allele and Genotype Frequency of ABO and Rhesus D Blood Groups of Blood Donors at the North Gondar District Blood Bank, Northwest Ethiopia

Authors Woldu B, Melku M , Shiferaw E , Biadgo B , Abebe M , Gelaw Y 

Received 14 November 2021

Accepted for publication 23 December 2021

Published 6 January 2022 Volume 2022:13 Pages 11—19


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Martin H Bluth

Berhanu Woldu,1 Mulugeta Melku,1 Elias Shiferaw,1 Belete Biadgo,2 Molla Abebe,2 Yemataw Gelaw1

1Department of Hematology and Immunohematology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia; 2Department of Clinical Chemistry, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

Correspondence: Yemataw Gelaw Email [email protected]

Background: Knowledge of the ABO and RhD group distribution is essential for blood banks inventory and assuring quality blood transfusion services. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of ABO and RhD phenotype, allele, and genotype among blood donors at North Gondar District Blood Bank from 2010 to 2012, Northwest Ethiopia.
Methods: The data of the current study were obtained from registration logbooks of blood donors registered. The ABO and RhD grouping was done by using commercially available monoclonal antibodies (anti-A, anti-B and anti-D) by slide methods. Results with no agglutination by anti-D antibody were confirmed using anti-human globulin test. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using SPSS version 20. The allele and genotype frequency of the donors was determined by Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium assumption. The difference between the observed and expected frequency was tested by online Chi-square calculator. P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Among 6471 blood donors, 82.1%, 94.1% and 55.4% were males, replacement donors and in the age group of 21– 30 years, respectively. Blood group O (47.04%) and blood group AB (4.81%) were the dominant and least common, respectively. The distribution of the RhD negative blood group was 5.76%. The distribution of A, B and O alleles was 0.1714, 0.1433 and 0.6859, respectively. Moreover, the genotype frequency of AA, AO, BB, BO, AB and OO was 0.0294, 0.2350, 0.0205, 0.1966, 0.0491 and 0.4704, respectively. The genotype frequency of DD, Dd and dd was 0.5774, 0.3649 and 0.0576, respectively. The result showed that there was no statistically significant difference between observed and expected allele and genotype frequency (P-value > 0.05).
Conclusion: Blood group O and AB were the most and least prevalent, respectively. The allele and genotype frequency of the population was fulfilled the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium assumption. This finding might be useful for blood transfusion services.

Keywords: ABO blood group, blood donor, Ethiopia, RhD


Blood is essential for transporting oxygen, nutrients, wastes and hormones in the body. The ABO blood group system is the most clinically important blood group system, which was discovered by Karl Landsteiner in 19001 and awarded the Nobel Prize in 1930. The fourth type of blood group was also discovered by Alfred Von Decastello and Adriano Sturli and named blood group AB, in 1902.2 The rhesus (Rh) blood group system is the second most significant blood group system. Depending on the presence of the D antigen on the red cell, the blood group system has two phenotypes; RhD positive and RhD negative. The ABO and RhD genes are found at chromosomes 9 and 1, respectively. Proteins and carbohydrates, bided to lipids or protein, are the blood group determining red blood cells antigens.3

Even there are about 100 blood group systems with 500 antigens, the ABO blood group systems are the most clinically important blood group systems in blood transfusion and organ transplantation services.4,5 A and B antigens are highly antigenic and have naturally occurring antibodies in human plasma which are missing the corresponding antigen and can cause hemolysis in vivo. The Rh blood group system is the second most clinically significant blood group with regard to transfusion. In addition to this, they are also important in the context of genetic studies, identifying of medico-legal issues and tracing family history.5

The presence of ABO antigens in red blood cells is depending on glycosyltransferases, which add sugars to the antecedent substance. However, a specific sets of epitopes and the RhD protein make up the D antigen.6

The ABO blood groups are determined by using anti-sera (anti-A, anti-B and anti-AB) to detect the presence of A and B antigens. Additionally, known red cells antigens can be used to diagnose anti-A and anti-B in the plasma and called backward grouping. ABO and Rh phenotypes, allele and gene frequency differ broadly according to races and geographical borders.3,7–9

The frequency and distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups differ by ethnicity even in the same region. In Ethiopia, the frequencies of ABO and Rh blood groups have been investigated in some areas of the country. These studies showed that the frequency of the O blood group was the dominant followed by A, B and AB.10–13 Concerning to Rh blood group, about 7.0 −19.37% of the donors were RhD negative14 with the highest prevalence in Gambella (Ethiopia) (19.37%).10

Detection of the Rh system is imperative to avoid the erythroblastosis fetalis; which frequently occurred when an RhD negative mother carries an RhD positive fetus and during the second birth causes the death of the fetus. Knowing the frequency of ABO and RhD blood groups in a particular population is crucial for efficient management of blood bank inventor, even for local transfusion services.9 Thus, the main objective of the current study was to determine the frequency and distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups among blood donors at the North Gondar district blood bank.

Methods and Materials

Study Area, Design and Population

This study was a retrospective study carried out at the University of Gondar hospital’s distinct blood bank. The distinct blood bank is located at Gondar Town which was found 727 Km north of the capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. The blood groups of donors of either sex, donating during the period of three years (2010–2012) were studied. The blood bank provides transfusion services to approximately about five million people in North Gondar and neighboring districts. Annually, the blood bank collects about 2500 units of blood. The majority of the collected blood is used for emergency, surgical and gynecological cases.

The source population was all replacement and voluntary blood donors who donate at the University of Gondar Hospital’s distinct blood bank and the study populations were donors who had donated between the year of 2010 and 2012. They are eligible for blood donation if donors are apparently healthy, none anemic (greater 12g/dl and 13g/dl hemoglobin for female and male, respectively) and aged between 18 and 65 years. The donors should be 45 kilograms and above for 350-millimeter unit donation and greater than 50 kilograms for 450-millimeter unit donation. Moreover, they should have normal vital signs (temperature <37co, blood pressure; diastolic; 70–90 mmHg, systolic; 100–150 mmHg) and be free from any sexually transmitted infections including human immune virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and syphilis (Blood Donor Medical Assessment Guideline, National Blood Bank Service of Ethiopia, 2017).

Sample Size and Sampling Technique

All blood donors who donated blood at the North Gondar District Blood Bank from 2010 to 2012 were study populations. A total of 6471 blood donors were included. All the blood donors were selected by the censuses sampling technique.

Laboratory Tests

Blood grouping was determined by using commercially accessible blood grouping anti-sera; anti-A, anti-B and anti-D (ERYCLONE anti-A, anti-B and anti-D monoclonal antibodies) by using the tile method. A drop of donor blood was placed on three places on a clean white tile. Then each antiserum was added and mixed with each blood drop with the help of an applicator stick. The presence of agglutination was indicating the presence of the corresponding Blood groups antigen. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium assumption was used for the determination of the frequencies of alleles A, B, O, D and d, and expressed as a proportion.

Data Collection and Analysis

Demographic data of the donor like age, sex and occupation were obtained from the blood bank registration log book. The collected data were entered into Epi Info 3.5.1 and then transformed to SPSS Version 20 for analysis. The descriptive statistics were presented in the form of tables. The observed phenotype, allelic and genotypic frequency of the ABO and Rh blood group was compared by using chi-square test (calculated by online Chi-square calculator; available from considering the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium assumption. According to Hardy–Weinberg assumption, the allelic and genotypic frequencies of the population will remain stable from generation to generation, provided that there is no mutation, no migration, and no natural selection in a large population with random mating. Therefore, if the locus of ABO with three alleles are, “O”, “A” and “B” and then the frequency of the alleles “O”, “A” and “B” will be designated by r, p and q, respectively and the frequencies of the O, A, B, and AB phenotypes are r2, (p2 + 2pr), (q2 + 2qr), and 2pq, respectively.

So, the allele frequency of O, A and B can be estimated from the ABO phenotype by the following formula.

The allele frequency obtained by this formula from the observed phenotype frequency is called observed or unadjusted allele frequency. It is clear that the sum of all allelic frequencies should be one. However, it is true if the observed frequencies of the phenotypes had no deviation from the expected values. However, due to some factors, the observed phenotype frequency may deviate from the expected value. Hence, the summation of the allele frequencies can also deviate from one. The deviation (d) can be calculated as follows; d= 1- (p+q+r); then the allelic frequencies should be corrected by:

;; and (corrected or adjusted allele frequency). The phenotype and genotype frequency, recalculated from the corrected allele frequency is called expected phenotype and genotype frequency, respectively and can be estimated from corrected allelic frequencies by the following formula.

Expected frequency of phenotype A: pc2 + 2pcrc (AA genotype +2*AO genotype)

Expected frequency of phenotype B: qc2 + 2qcrc (BB genotype +2*BO genotype)

Expected frequency of phenotype O: rc2 (OO genotype)

Expected frequency of phenotype AB: 2pcqc (2*AB genotype)

Concerning the Rh blood groups, there are only two phenotypes; RhD positive (DD + Dd) and RhD negative (dd). Therefore, if D and d alleles have p and q frequencies respectively, the frequency of RhD negative is equal to q2 and the allele frequencies will be and p = 1- q. However, we cannot investigate the deviation, because we have no degree of freedom.15

Data Quality Assurance

The data quality was assured by following standard operation procedures, double entry. In addition, the quality of reagents used to determine the blood groups were checked by running the known blood sample.


About 6471 blood donors have participated in the study. From these study participants 5311 (82.1%), 3586 (55.4%), 6089 (94.1%) and 1842 (28.5%) were male, 21–30 age group, replacement donor and students, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 The Socio Demographic Characteristics of Blood Donors at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Blood Bank (N = 4671)

ABO and Rh Phenotype, Allele, and Genotype Frequency

Out of the study participants 47.04%, 26.44%, 21.71% and 4.81% were had blood group O, A, B and AB phenotypes, respectively. The expected ABO phenotype distribution was 46.98%, 26.42%, 21.69% and 4.91% which was similar to the observed frequency (Chi-squared (3, N = 6471) = 0.16, P-value: 0.984). The current result also revealed that 94.24% of the donors were RhD positive. The observed and adjusted (corrected) allele distribution of A, B and O were 0.1714, 0.1433 and 0.6859; and 0.1713, 0.1433 and 0.6854, respectively. The result showed that there was no significant difference between the observed and corrected allele frequency (Chi-squared (2, N = 6471) = 0; P-value: 1).

The observed ABO genotype frequency of the donors was 0.0294, 0.2350, 0.0205, 0.1966, 0.0491 and 0.4704 for AA, AO, BB, BO, AB and OO, respectively. On the other hand, the corrected ABO genotype frequency was 0.0293, 0.2348, 0.0205, 0.1964, 0.0491 and 0.4698 for AA, AO, BB, BO, AB and OO, respectively (had no significant difference from the observed genotype frequency; Chi-squared (2, N = 6471) = 0; P-value: 1). The Rh genotype frequency was 0.5774, 0.3649 and 0.0576 for DD, Dd and dd, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 Phenotype, Allele, and Genotype Frequency of ABO and Rh Among Blood Donors at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Blood Bank (N = 6471)

Phenotype distribution of ABO and Rh blood group of donors also showed that there was no significant ABO and Rh phenotype distribution difference with age (chi-squared (28, N = 6471) = 27.86, P-value = 0.472). Moreover, the result showed that the ABO and Rh phenotype distribution had no statistical significance difference between male and female (chi-squared (7, N = 6471) = 7.649, P-value = 0.365) (Table 3).

Table 3 ABO Blood Group Distribution Regarding to Age and Sex (N = 6471)


Knowing the distribution of ABO and RhD blood groups is imperative for blood bank inventory and transfusion services. It also helps to decide the way of mobilization of voluntary blood donors. In addition, understanding of ABO and RhD blood groups are valuable in studying population genetics, resettlement trend and settling certain medico-legal problems specifically disputed parentage and taking protective measures against blood group-associated diseases.16

The current result showed that most of the donors (89.7%) were from young age groups (<40 years old). The highest frequency of young donors in the current study might be due to over concentration on the selection of students’ donors. The finding was similar to studies found in Madagascar17 and Saudi Arabia18 which reported that most of the donors were the youngest age groups. The least donors were found in >50 years old age group. This might be due that the elderly age groups might defer frequently than the young age groups. Studies revealed that deferral significantly increased as age increased due to abnormal blood pressure.19,20

In the current finding, most of the donors (82.1%) were males. This was comparable with other studies conducted in Madagascar17 and India.21–23 The reason might be the fact that males might be easily qualifying through the selection processes in donor recruitment. The other reason might be the difference in blood donation practice between males and females. Studies conducted in Ethiopia,24,25 Nigeria26 and Saudi Arabia27 were supported that males had more blood donation practice than women. Indeed, other studies supported males and females had no significant difference in blood donation practice.20,28,29 The other reason might be due to the high deferral rate in females. Studies showed that females were more defer than males19,30,31 due to being more anemic compared to males.19,20

World Health Organization and other international and national organizations advised that blood donations must be voluntary and unpaid. This ensures the availability of a constant and safe blood supply.32 However, this finding showed that the majority (94.1%) of the donors were replacement donors. This might be due to the poor blood donation practice in Ethiopia. Other researches done in the area demonstrated that blood donation practice was low.25,33 The finding was similar to the studies conducted in Tanzania,4 Egypt34 and Saudi Arabia,18 but, contradicted to a study conducted in India where the voluntary blood donors accounted for 87.75% of the donors.35 The discrepancy might be attributed to difference in knowledge, attitude and practice of blood donation between the populations.

The genes accountable for the ABO blood groups have always taken a meticulous prototype for its circulation. In the current finding, the O blood group was the dominant ABO blood group with a frequency of 47.04%, followed by the A blood group (26.44%), B blood group (21.71%) and AB blood group (4.8%), which concluded that O>A>B>AB. Various other findings were showed that the O blood group was the most dominant blood group with the order of O>A>B>AB.11,36–40 Of course, there was a difference in the proportion of the phenotype frequency. For example, the prevalence of the O blood group was 61.82% in Mexican Population38 where as in the current study it was 47.04%. The variation might be due to race differences. In contrast to this finding, studies done in India41 and Pakistan42 revealed that the B blood group was the dominant phenotype, followed by O, A and AB blood group. On the other hand, studies done in Nepal43 and Egypt44 indicated that A blood group phenotype was the dominant blood group followed by O, B and AB. Moreover, studies in some European countries (Switzerland, Portugal and Greek) showed that A blood group was the dominant phenotype followed by O, B and AB.45–47

The current finding also showed that 94.24% and 5.76% of blood donors were RhD positive and RhD negative, respectively. This was similar to a study conducted in Kumaon,16 Mexico38 and Ethiopia.11 However, this finding was different from the other findings done in Uganda,48 Egypt,44 Kenya,40 Sudan49 and Gambella (Ethiopia).10 It showed that the RhD negative frequency was higher than Kenya (3.9% vs.5.76%) Sudan (2% vs 5.76% and Uganda (2% vs 5.76%) and it was lower than the t study done in Egypt (14.4% vs 5.76%) and Gambella (Ethiopia) (19.37% vs 5.76%).

In this study, the distribution of the allele A, B, and O were 0.1714, 0.1433 and 0.6859, respectively (allele frequency of O>A>B). This sequence was similar to the study done in Nigeria,50 Cameroon51 and Sudan.52 However, it was different from the studies done in Guinea,53 Nigeria54,55 and Madagascar17 where B allele frequency was higher than A allele frequency (O>B>A). On the other hand, the genotype frequency of AA, AO, BB, BO, AB and OO were 0.0294, 0.2350, 0.0205, 0.1966, 0.0491 and 0.4704, respectively. The finding revealed that the phenotypic distribution of the blood groups in the general study population groups were in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium expectations (P-value > 0.05). The finding was supported by the other studies done in Ethiopia11 and Cameroon.51 However, a study done in Lagos (Nigeria) found significant difference between the expected and the observed phenotypic frequencies of the blood groups, which violated Hardy–Weinberg law.56

Limitation of the Study

The method of blood group determination was done by using the tile slide method and this might miss the detection of weak antigens.


The current finding showed that the majority blood group was “O” and the least frequent was AB. Regarding Rh blood group, RhD positive takes the great share over RhD negative blood groups. The females’ blood donation practice was very low and it is important to improve it by improving health status and the knowledge about blood donation. The current finding might provide knowledge about the genetic distribution and polymorphism of ABO and RhD blood groups among the blood donors at the University of Gondar hospital’s distinct blood bank. This would be valuable to those who are interested in the genetic study, physicians and other stakeholders, particularly those who are involved in blood transfusion program activities.

Data Sharing Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author and can access on reasonable request.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was conducted per the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was conducted after obtaining ethical clearance from the Ethical review board of the School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar. Permission was also obtained from the University of Gondar Hospital Laboratory head before the data collection. The data was accessed and complied with relevant data protection and privacy regulations by using anonymous. However, since the study was a retrospective review of blood donors’ records, informed consent from the study participants was not sought.


The authors like to acknowledge the School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar and University of Gondar Hospital Laboratory head.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


There was no funding source for this study.


The authors declare that there have no conflicts of interest.


1. Garratty G, Dzik W, Issitt PD, Lublin DM, Reid ME, Zelinski T. Terminology for blood group antigens and genes – historical origins and guideline in the new millennium. Transfusion. 2000;40:477–489. doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40040477.x

2.. Von decastella A, Sturli A. Ureber die iso agglutinine in serum gesunder and Kranaker Menschen. Mfiner Med WSchr. 1902;49:1090–1095.

3. Dhot PS, Nair V, Swarup D, Sirohi D, Ganguli P. Cord blood stem cell banking and transplantation. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70:989–992. doi:10.1007/BF02723826

4. Jahanpour O, Pyuza JJ, Ntiyakunze EO, Mremi A, Shao ER. ABO and rhesus blood group distribution and frequency among blood donors at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi, Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):738. doi:10.1186/s13104-017-3037-3

5. Agrawal A, Tiwari AK, Mehta N, et al. ABO and Rh (D) group distribution and gene frequency; the first multicentric study in India. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2014;8(2):121–125. doi:10.4103/0973-6247.137452

6. Avent ND, Reid ME. The Rh blood group system: a review. J Am Soc Hematol. 2000;95:375–387.

7. Lasky LC, Lane TA, Miller JP. In utero or ex utero cord blood collection: which is better? Transfusion. 2002;42:1261–1267. doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.t01-1-00177.x

8. Wall DA, Noffsinger JM, Mueckl KA, et al. Feasibility of an obstetrician-based cord blood collection network for unrelated donor umbilical cord blood banking. J Matern Fetal Med. 1997;6:320–323. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199711/12)6:6<320::AID-MFM4>3.0.CO;2-Q

9. Enosolease M, Bazuaye G. Distribution of ABO and Rh- D blood groups in the Benin area of Niger-Delta: implication for regional blood transfusion. Asian J Transf Sci. 2008;2(1):3–5. doi:10.4103/0973-6247.39502

10. Golassa L, Tsegaye A, Erko B, Mamo H. High rhesus (Rh (D)) negative frequency and ethnic-group based ABO blood group distribution in Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):1–5. doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2644-3

11. Tesfaye K, Petros Y, Andargie M. Frequency distribution of ABO and Rh (D) blood group alleles in Silte Zone, Ethiopia. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2015;16:71–76. doi:10.1016/j.ejmhg.2014.09.002

12. Tiruneh A, Yetneberk T, Gelaw M, Eshetie D. Frequency of ABO and Rh blood group distribution at Debre Tabor blood bank, Amhara Region, North-Central Ethiopia. A six-year retrospective survey. J Blood Med. 2020;11:357. doi:10.2147/JBM.S266624

13. Alemu M, Abrha G, Bugssa G, Tedla K. Frequency of ABO and Rh (D) blood groups and hemoglobin threshold among pregnant women in family guidance association, Mekelle model clinic, North Ethiopia. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2014;5(12):892–895.

14. Ayenew AA. Prevalence of rhesus D-negative blood type and the challenges of rhesus D immunoprophylaxis among obstetric population in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2021;7(1):8. doi:10.1186/s40748-021-00129-3

15. Saadat M. Estimation of allelic frequencies for ABO and Rh blood groups. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2015;16(2):205. doi:10.1016/j.ejmhg.2015.01.001

16. Garg P, Upadhyay S, Chufal SS, Hasan Y, Tayal I. Prevalance of ABO and rhesus blood groups in blood donors: a study from a tertiary care teaching hospital of Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2014;8(12):16–19. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2014/8108.4092

17. Randriamanantany Z, Rajaonatahina D, Razafimanantsoa F, et al. Phenotypic and allelic profile of ABO and Rhésus D blood group system among blood donor in Antananarivo. Int J Immunogenet. 2012;39(6):477–479. doi:10.1111/j.1744-313X.2012.01120.x

18. Elsafi SH. Demographical pattern of blood donors and pre-donation deferral causes in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. J Blood Med. 2020;11:243. doi:10.2147/JBM.S254168

19. Agnihotri N. Whole blood donor deferral analysis at a center in Western India. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2010;4(2):116. doi:10.4103/0973-6247.67035

20. Kandasamy D, Shastry S, Chenna D, Mohan G. Blood donor deferral analysis in relation to the screening process: a single-center study from southern India with emphasis on high hemoglobin prevalence. J Blood Med. 2020;11:327. doi:10.2147/JBM.S265461

21. Girish CJ, Chandrashekhar TN, Ramesh Babu K, Kantikar SM. ABO and Rhesus blood group distribution among Malnad region blood donors. Res Rev Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2(3):25–30.

22. PatelPiyush A, PatelSangeeta P, Jigesh S, Haren O. Frequency and distribution of blood groups in blood donors in western Ahmedabad – a hospital based study. National J Med Res. 2012;2(2):207–210.

23. Giri PA, Yadav S, Parhar GSet al. Frequency of ABO and rhesus blood groups: a study from a rural tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Int J Biol Med Res. 2011;2(4):988–990.

24. Malako D, Yoseph F, Bekele ML. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice and associated factors of blood donation among health care workers in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Hematol. 2019;19(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12878-019-0140-9

25. Melku M, Terefe B. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of adult population towards blood donation in Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. J Blood Transfus. 2016;2016:7949862. doi:10.1155/2016/7949862

26. Nwogoh B, Aigberadion U, Nwannadi AI. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of voluntary blood donation among healthcare workers at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. J Blood Transfus. 2013;2013:797830. doi:10.1155/2013/797830

27. Alsalmi MA, Almalki HM, Alghamdi AA, Aljasir BA. Knowledge, attitude and practice of blood donation among health professions students in Saudi Arabia; A cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(7):2322. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_415_19

28. Dejene M, Tefera A, Dires A, Gedamu S, Getachew Y, Ademe S. Low blood donation practice of health sciences college students in Northeast Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. J Blood Med. 2021;12:43. doi:10.2147/JBM.S287398

29. Melku M, Asrie F, Shiferaw E, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding blood donation among graduating undergraduate health science students at the University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018;28(5):571–582. doi:10.4314/ejhs.v28i5.8

30. Valerian DM, Mauka WI, Kajeguka DC, et al. Prevalence and causes of blood donor deferrals among clients presenting for blood donation in northern Tanzania. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206487. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206487

31. Okoroiwu HU, Asemota EA. Blood donors deferral prevalence and causes in a tertiary health care hospital, southern Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):510. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4352-2

32. Abbas A. Frequency of ABO and Rh D blood groups among Sudanese blood donors attending central blood bank in Wad Medani, Gezira State, Sudan. 2017.

33. Enawgaw B, Yalew A, Shiferaw E. Blood donors’ knowledge and attitude towards blood donation at North Gondar district blood bank, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):729. doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4776-0

34. Abdel Messih IY, Ismail MA, Saad AA, Azer MR. The degree of safety of family replacement donors versus voluntary non-remunerated donors in an Egyptian population: a comparative study. Blood Transfusion. 2014;12(2):159–165. doi:10.2450/2012.0115-12

35. Sehgal P, Garg D. Patterns of voluntary and replacement blood donors in a tertiary care center: a retrospective study. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(8):3368. doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20173524

36. Nwauche CA, Ejele OA. ABO and Rhesus antigens in a cosmopolitan Nigeria population. Niger J Med. 2004;13(3):263–266.

37. Olaniyan TO, Ajibola BM, Rasong Het al. Blood group and rhesus factor pattern among indigenes of FCT, Abuja, Nigeria. J Community Med Health Educ. 2013;3:208.

38. Canizalez-Román A, Campos-Romero A, Castro-Sánchez JA, et al. Blood groups distribution and gene diversity of the ABO and Rh (D) Loci in the Mexican population. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–11. doi:10.1155/2018/1925619

39. Jaff MS. ABO and rhesus blood group distribution in Kurds. J Blood Med. 2010;1:143. doi:10.2147/JBM.S12262

40. Lyko J, Gaertner H, Kaviti JN, Kariithi MW, Akoto B. [Blood-group systems ABO and RH in the Kenyan population]. Folia Med Cracov. 1992;33(1–4):85–92. Polish.

41. Rajshree B, Raj JY. Distribution of ABO blood group and RH (D) factor in Western Rajasthan. Natl J Med Res. 2013;3(1):73–75.

42. Rahman M, Lodhi Y. Frequency of ABO and Rhesus blood groups in blood donors in Punjab. Pak J Med Sci. 2004;20(4):315–318.

43. Pramanik T, Pramanik S. Distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups in Nepalese medical students: a report. East Mediterr Health J. 2000;6(1):156–158. doi:10.26719/2000.6.1.156

44. Swelem O, Goubran F, Younis S, Kamel N. ABO, RH phenotypes and kell blood groups frequencies in an Egyptian population. Omnia. 2018;6(2):70–73.

45. Volken T, Crawford RJ, Amar S, Mosimann E, Tschaggelar A, Mansouri Taleghani B. Blood group distribution in Switzerland - a historical comparison. Transfus Med Hemother. 2017;44(4):210–216. doi:10.1159/000479191

46. Jesus C, Hesse C, Rocha C, et al. Prevalence of antibodies to a new histo-blood system: the FORS system. Blood Transfus. 2018;16(2):178–183. doi:10.2450/2016.0120-16

47. Lialiaris T, Digkas E, Kareli D, et al. Distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups in Greece: an update. Int J Immunogenet. 2011;38(1):1–5. doi:10.1111/j.1744-313X.2010.00958.x

48. Apecu RO, Mulogo EM, Bagenda F, Byamungu A. ABO and Rhesus (D) blood group distribution among blood donors in rural south western Uganda: a retrospective study. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):1–4. doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2299-5

49. Hassan FM. Frequency of ABO subgroup ABO and Rh (D) blood groups in major Sudanese ethnic groups. Pak J Med Res. 2010;49(1). Available from: Accessed December 29, 2021.

50. Faduyile F, Ojewale A, Osuolale F. Frequency of ABO and Rhesus blood groups among blood donors in Lagos, Nigeria. Int J Med Sci Biomed Res. 2016;5(3):114–121. doi:10.14194/ijmbr.5.3.2

51. Ndoula S, Noubiap J, Nansseu J, Wonkam A. Phenotypic and allelic distribution of the ABO and R hesus (D) blood groups in the C ameroonian population. Int J Immunogenet. 2014;41(3):206–210. doi:10.1111/iji.12114

52. Khalil I, Phrykian S, Farr A. Blood group distribution in Sudan. Gene Geography. 1989;3(1):7–10.

53. Loua A, Lamah M, Haba N, Camara M. Frequency of blood groups ABO and rhesus D in the Guinean population. Transfus Clin Biol. 2007;14(5):435–439. doi:10.1016/j.tracli.2007.12.008

54. Kulkarni A, Peter B, Ibazebo R, Dash B, Fleming A. The ABO and Rhesus groups in the north of Nigeria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1985;79(1):83–88. doi:10.1080/00034983.1985.11811891

55. Falusi A, Ademowo O, Latunji C, et al. Distribution of ABO and RH genes in Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2000;29(1):23–26.

56. Iyiola O, Igunnugbemi O, Bello O. Gene frequencies of ABO and Rh (D) blood group alleles in Lagos, South-West Nigeria. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2012;13(2):147–153. doi:10.1016/j.ejmhg.2011.08.006

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.