Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 8

Patient education preferences in ophthalmic care

Authors Rosdahl J, Swamy L, Stinnett S, Muir K

Received 30 January 2014

Accepted for publication 11 March 2014

Published 25 April 2014 Volume 2014:8 Pages 565—574


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Jullia A Rosdahl, Lakshmi Swamy, Sandra Stinnett, Kelly W Muir

Department of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Background: The learning preferences of ophthalmology patients were examined.
Methods: Results from a voluntary survey of ophthalmology patients were analyzed for education preferences and for correlation with race, age, and ophthalmic topic.
Results: To learn about eye disease, patients preferred one-on-one sessions with providers as well as printed materials and websites recommended by providers. Patients currently learning from the provider were older (average age 59 years), and patients learning from the Internet (average age 49 years) and family and friends (average age 51 years) were younger. Patients interested in cataracts, glaucoma, macular degeneration, and dry eye were older; patients interested in double vision and glasses were younger. There were racial differences regarding topic preferences, with Black patients most interested in glaucoma (46%), diabetic retinopathy (31%), and cataracts (28%) and White patients most interested in cataracts (22%), glaucoma (22%), and macular degeneration (19%).
Conclusion: Most ophthalmology patients preferred personalized education: one-on-one with their provider or a health educator and materials (printed and electronic) recommended by their provider. Age-related topics were more popular with older patients, and diseases with racial risk factors were more popular with high risk racial groups.

patient education, eye disease, cataracts, macular degeneration, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]