Back to Journals » Risk Management and Healthcare Policy » Volume 13

Parental Knowledge and Attitude Regarding E-Cigarette Use in Saudi Arabia and the Effect of Parental Smoking: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors Sabbagh HJ , Khogeer LN, Hassan MHA , Allaf HK

Received 13 March 2020

Accepted for publication 27 July 2020

Published 18 August 2020 Volume 2020:13 Pages 1195—1205

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S253749

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Marco Carotenuto



Heba Jafar Sabbagh,1 Layla Nizar Khogeer,2 Mona Hassan Ahmed Hassan,3 Hanaa Khalil Allaf2

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 2Pediatric Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 3Department of Biostatistics, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Correspondence: Heba Jafar Sabbagh
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box: 80200, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Tel +966 505668481
Email [email protected]

Introduction: E-cigarette use has been on the rise among children and adolescents. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of the health hazards and laws regarding e-cigarette use among parents in Saudi Arabia. In addition, we evaluated the effect of parental smoking on parent’s knowledge.
Methods: This study was conducted with parents of children below 18 years of age in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Jeddah was divided into four areas (north, south, east, and west) and in each area, the largest shopping mall was selected. Data were gathered using a self-administered questionnaire.
Results: Out of 1386 parents, 61.7% were smokers, 13.3% reported that their children used e-cigarettes, and 73.6% did not discuss e-cigarette use with their children. In total, 77.3% of parents thought it was important to be educated about e-cigarette use. However, their ability to discuss e-cigarette use with their children was 13.9% lower than their ability to discuss regular cigarette smoking with their children. Parents who were smokers were more accepting of their children using e-cigarettes (P< 0.0001). Mothers who smoked were more accepting than fathers of their children using e-cigarettes (P< 0.0001).
Conclusion: Parents reported a lack of knowledge and attitudes regarding e-cigarette use. Parental smoking, especially among mothers, was statistically significantly related to their e-cigarette use knowledge and attitudes. Parents agreed that it was important to educate parents regarding e-cigarette use.

Keywords: electronic-cigarette, smoking, Saudi Arabia, parental smoking

Introduction

The use of e-cigarettes has been on the rise among children and adolescents.13 E-cigarettes, also called nicotine delivery systems, use battery power and heating elements to vaporize a nicotine-containing solution to be inhaled by the user. Hence, e-cigarettes are called vapors due to the inhalation and exhalation of vapors.2,4 The nicotine-containing solutions come in various flavors and nicotine content. E-cigarettes are marketed as a safer alternative for smokers to inhale nicotine and as an aid in smoking cessation, although the scientific literature regarding the latter is mixed.5,6 Nicotine has several side effects, including a highly addictive quality and a negative effect on brain development from the prenatal period into adolescence.7 Additionally, nicotine can be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal disorders.8 Furthermore, nicotine decreases the immune response and negatively impacts oral and reproductive health. By various mechanisms, nicotine can lead to cancers by affecting cell proliferation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and DNA maturation.9 Moreover, the direct contact of nicotine with oral and pharyngeal tissues can cause irritation, burning, increased salivation, nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea.10 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported an outbreak of lung injury in 2019, associated with e-cigarette use.11 They recommended refraining from the use of e-cigarettes and vaping products, as they found that over 1.78 million students in middle and high schools in the USA reported trying e-cigarettes.12

Recent studies have shown that e-cigarette use among teens has surpassed tobacco cigarette use.13,14 A UK study reported a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use (37.3%) compared to traditional cigarettes (26.5%) among students aged 15–16 years.2 Significant factors associated with children beginning to smoke included exposure to parental smoking, sibling or peer smoking; peer pressure; easy access to smoking and nonsmoking forms of tobacco.1517

Parental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior can be conveyed to children.1820 An example of such a phenomenon includes gambling and drinking. It was found that heavy parental drinking resulted in earlier and heavier drinking among adolescents.21 Moreover, higher levels of gambling were found among adolescents whose parents were involved or approved of gambling.22

In Saudi Arabia, smoking is a major public health issue. It is widespread, mostly among males with 20–23.5% and females with 0.31–1.5%.23,24 Smoking is more acceptable for males than for females.25 In addition, Algorinees et al (2016)26 who assessed adolescent smoking habits among students in Northern Saudi Arabia reported that 65.7% of smokers started smoking when they were 18 years old with a mean daily usage of 7.98 cigarettes.

Many types of nicotine delivery devices exist in Saudi Arabia, including cigarettes, e-cigarettes, hookas, and shisha. Although the general attitude toward smoking is negative, with frequent anti-smoking education and strict laws, smoking in adolescence was reported to be 20.2% in girls and 31.8% in boys with an increasing appeal.27 Anti-smoking rules include prohibiting the sale of tobacco products to minors, a ban on indoor public smoking, and prohibiting the manufacturing and agriculture of tobacco and tobacco-related products.28 No evidence was found on the prevalence of electronic-cigarette vaping in Saudi Arabia. However, one study investigated the prevalence of electronic-cigarette use among health science students and showed higher percentages of electronic cigarette (27.7%) vaping compared to conventional smoking (14.1%).29 Thus, the importance of assessing parental knowledge of the dangers of e-cigarettes and providing the proper environment and education for their children is implied. There is a need to study these factors to prevent the use of e-cigarettes among children. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess parental knowledge and attitudes regarding e-cigarette health hazards and the related laws among parents in Saudi Arabia. In addition, we evaluated the relationship between parental knowledge of e-cigarettes’ health hazards, related laws and the parents’ own proclivity to be smokers.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This cross-sectional study was conducted with parents of children younger than 18 years living in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia. The data collection began in June 2018 and ended in April 2019. The city of Jeddah was divided into four sections: North, South, East, and West. The largest shopping mall in each area was selected (four shopping centers), and self-administered written questionnaires were distributed at the site. In these malls, data collectors were positioned in one area and were enquiring all adults if they were parents to participate in the research. They tried to include all parents willing to participate in a one-week schedule for each mall, including an afternoon (from 5 pm to 8 pm) and a morning (10 am to 12pm) rotations.

Inclusion criteria included parents that had unaffected medically free children, less than 18 years old, and spoke Arabic. Parents of children that are medically compromised or affected with congenital anomalies such as cleft lip and palate were excluded from the study. The sample size was estimated using OpenEpi, an online program. The prevalence of smoking in Saudi Arabia was 22.6%,30,31 the design effect was selected as 3 for the cluster sample, and the confidence level was selected as 95%. Accordingly, the sample size was 807, and the absolute precision was 5%. From a cluster sample of four shopping malls distributed around Jeddah, 1386 parents agreed to participate in this research.

Methods

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of KAUFD (132–11-18) for this study. An informative written consent was signed by participating parents. Parents were provided with a self-administered questionnaire constructed after a thorough literature review.15,32-34 The questionnaire was sent to two experts in the field for content validity, and they interviewed 20 mothers for face validity. The questionnaire was modified accordingly. In order to avoid bias in designing the questionnaire, we followed Barnard and Anita’s catalog to avoid potential biases prior to the questionnaire’s administration.32 The questionnaire contained the following: (i) questions on socio-demographic data, including parental age; child’s gender, with family income divided to three levels (lower class with a monthly income of less than 7000 SAR (1863.33 USD), middle class with a monthly income of 7000 SAR (1863.33 USD), to 20,000 SAR (5323.79 USD), and higher class with a monthly income higher than 20,000 SAR (5323.79 USD)), place of residence, parental education and parental job description. If the parents had more than one child, the youngest was selected.

(ii) Questions to assess parental smoking prevalence and a history of regular smoking and e-cigarette use, including the status of the parent’s smoking/vaping behavior; (1) if they were current smokers/vapor users, (2) ever smoker/vaper users, or (3) ever smoker/vapor users even if tried it once in their life (seven questions).

(iii) Questions to assess parental e-cigarette knowledge such as the knowledge of its risk to health, knowledge of the related laws and policies, and knowledge of the addicting properties of e-cigarettes using a yes/no/I do not know choice to answer the questions (seven questions).

(iv) Questions to assess parental attitudes towards children’s e-cigarettes usage using a 5-point Likert scale (with “5” being strongly-agree and “1” being strongly disagree), such as if they thought e-cigarette use could cause addiction or if they thought the usage of e-cigarettes was better than regular cigarettes, if they accepted their children’s use of e-cigarettes and if their attitude differed toward e-cigarette use according to their child’s gender (eight questions).

(v) Questions on the parental ability to discuss e-cigarettes with their children and if they thought they needed to be educated using yes/no answers (two questions).

Parental smoking/vaping activity was categorized into: father only (father was the only smoker and/or vapor user), mother only (mother was the only smoker and/or vapor user), both (both parents were smoker and/or vapor users) and neither (non-users’ parents) for comparisons. Parents were enquired to sign a written consent form.

Patient and Public Involvement

During the initial formation of the research idea, questions were asked, and literature reviews were initiated, as well as multiple community and public members were contacted. The raw data were made available for involved parents and were sent to any of the parents who gave the data collectors their contact information.

Statistical Analysis

The results included descriptive information displayed as frequency and percentages for categorical variables and a mean with a standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. To assess the effect of parental smoking on their knowledge and attitudes, a chi-square and t-test were used, respectively, with a 0.05 significance level.

Results

Of the 1386 parents who participated in this research, 780 (56.3%) of the mothers and 571 (41.2%) of the fathers were in the age range of 25–44 years. Regarding socioeconomic status (SES), 200 (14.5%) mothers were working as teachers, university instructors, or lecturers. On the other hand, 509 (36.7%) fathers were working in the private sector and 440 (31.7%) were working in the governmental sector. The monthly income for 803 (57.9%) of the included families was middle class ranging from 7000 to 20,000 SR (see Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of the Sample According to Their Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors. (N=1386)

As for parental smoking history, 621 fathers (44.8%), 35 mothers (2.5%), and 217 both parents (15.7%) reported being a smoker or having ever smoked or used e-cigarettes (of any type) including even once in their lifetime as opposed to nonsmokers who had never tried smoking or used e-cigarettes at any time. In addition, the prevalence of paternal smoking was 616 (44.4%), prevalence of parental cigarette smokers was 430 (31%), and prevalence of parental e-cigarette users was 109 (7.9%). Both parents were smokers in 210 (15.2%) cases, smoked regular cigarettes in 93 (6.7%) cases and engaged in vaping in 13 (0.9%) cases. However, mothers were the sole smokers in the family in 46 (3.3%) of cases with regular cigarette smoking and 14 (1%) for e-cigarette use. When parents were asked if they had a son or a daughter who were e-cigarette users, 184 (13.3%) of parents answered “Yes” (Table 2).

Table 2 Distribution of the Sample According to Parental Smoking/Vaping. (N= 1386)

As for parental knowledge regarding use of e-cigarettes, 770 parents (55.6%) reported that e-cigarettes were not an effective way to quit smoking, 992 parents (71.6%) knew that e-cigarettes were related to health problems, 659 (47.5%) reported that e-cigarettes did not have the lowest incidence of cancer, 485 (35%) knew that e-cigarettes were not declared by the Food and Drug Association (FDA) as a means of smoking cessation.35 Of the parents, 590 (49.8%) reported that indoor e-cigarette vaping was not permitted, and 580 (41.8%) reported that minors were not allowed to buy e-cigarettes in Saudi Arabia. Both these are facts declared by the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Health.30 However, the prevalence of parents answering “I do not know” in the knowledge questions ranged from 38.2% to 62.6%. In addition, 532 (38.4%) and 532 (73.2%) of parents did not discuss regular cigarettes or e-cigarettes with their children, respectively; 114 (8.2%) and 156 (11.3%) of parents disagreed that they were confident in their ability to discuss regular cigarettes and e-cigarettes with their children respectively; and 1072 parents (77.3%) strongly agreed to the need to be educated regarding e-cigarettes. For attitude questions, parents strongly agreed that e-cigarettes caused addiction (608 [43.9%]), that e-cigarettes are better than regular smoking for their children (66 [4.80%]), that their children could smoke regular cigarettes (34 [2.5%]), that their children could use e-cigarettes (20 [1.4%]), and that their sons could smoke/use e-cigarettes more than their daughters (23 [2.7%]). See Supplementary Table 1.

A statistically significant difference was found between non-smoking/vaping parents and smoking/vaping parents, especially for mothers when asked if e-cigarettes were; an effective way to quit smoking; could cause health problems; were related to cancer compared to regular cigarette smoking, were declared by the FDA as a means of smoking cessation; if indoor e-cigarette vaping was permitted in Saudi Arabia; if minors were allowed to buy e-cigarettes in Saudi Arabia; if they discussed regular cigarette smoking with their children; their acceptance of their children smoking/vaping and their ability to discuss smoking/vaping with their children (P<0.05). Non-smoking/vaping mothers statistically significantly educated their children more on smoking/vaping effects and recognized the health impact of e-cigarettes compared to smoking/vaping mothers. However, they were statistically significantly less aware of the FDA and Saudi rules regarding indoor smoking/vaping. Although not significant, there was a greater tendency for smoking/vaping mothers to accept their sons' e-cigarette vaping (mean 1.33±.0.89) compared to non-smoking/vaping mothers (mean=1.24±0.808) with P=0.053. See Table 37. The α reliability for knowledge questions was 0.68, for attitude questions was 0.51, and for behavior questions was 0.61.

Table 3 Distribution of the Sample According to Current Parental Vaping Users and Both Their Knowledge and Behavior Answers

Table 4 Distribution of the Sample According to Current Parental Smoking and Both Their Knowledge and Behavior Answers

Table 5 Distribution of the Sample According to Current Parental Smoking/Vaping Users and Both Their Knowledge and Behavior Answers

Table 6 Distribution of the Sample According to Ever Parental Smoking/Vaping Users Even if Tried It Once in Their Life and Both Their Knowledge and Behavior Answers

Table 7 Distribution of the Sample According to Parental Attitude Questions in Relation to Their Nicotine Use (N=1386)

Discussion

This study aimed to evaluate parental attitudes and knowledge regarding e-cigarette use and the effect of parental smoking/vaping. Patel et al (2019), who evaluated parental e-cigarette awareness and attitude in the USA, reported that one-third of adolescents’ parents and more than half of children’s parents showed no concern about their own child’s e-cigarettes use.36 This is crucially important as parental perceptions of smoking/vaping can be taught passively to their children. This was supported by Topa et al in a systematic review and meta-analysis that suggested that personal background factors including family patterns and parental attitudes toward smoking were key factors influencing their children’s beliefs regarding smoking and the susceptibility to become smokers.37 This was based on the most recent version of the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior which links personal attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, to an individual’s behavior and behavioral intentions.38

The prevalence of parental cigarette smoking and e-cigarettes reported in this study was 41% and 6.3%, respectively. This percentage was higher than that reported for the general Saudi population for smoking regular cigarettes (21.4%) and e-cigarette use reported in the USA 1.21%.31,34 However, maternal smoking prevalence (3.3%) was similar to that reported in the Saudi population study (3.9%).39 This could indicate that parenting motivates honesty in declaring information compared to the total population which includes adults aged 18 years and above.40 In addition, this study found a significant difference between the prevalence of maternal and paternal smoking which is supported by several studies that investigated the prevalence of smoking. Males smoking behavior was always greater than females.29,41-43

Children’s e-cigarette prevalence in this cross-sectional study (13.3%) was expected to be underestimated, as smoking children tend to hide smoking from their parents.44 However, it was slightly lower than the prevalence of regular tobacco smoking reported in Medina (15.17%) and the northern region of Saudi Arabia (19.5%).26,32

This study assessed parental e-cigarette knowledge and attitudes. It reports a gap of knowledge regarding e-cigarette use among parents as parents reported “I do not know” in 38.2% to 62.6% of the knowledge questions.

Many parents (38.2%) were unaware of the FDA stance on e-cigarette use as a smoking cessation device and even a certain percentage believed it to be effective 87 (6.3%), although the FDA has not approved e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation device.35 However, it was found by this study that when mothers were smokers/vapers, they statistically significantly tended to accept their children’s smoking/vaping more than non-smoking/vaping mothers. This could support Anand et al (2015) whose study reported a positive relationship between both adolescence and maternal e-cigarette use.45 In addition, smoking/vaping mothers significantly discussed smoking/vaping with their children less compared to those who were non-smokers/vapers (P<0.001). This could be supported with the planned behavior theory which relates maternal attitudes to their actions.38 Furthermore, it was suggested that maternal education was a focal point when planning an educational program that will eventually affect the prevalence of smoking in a positive manner. This supports the findings of Patel et al (2019) who reported the necessity of establishing a school-parent communication effort to control children’s e-smoking use.36 Moreover, 77.3% of parents in this study strongly agreed that it is important to be educated on the use of e-cigarettes.

The lack of parental knowledge regarding e-cigarette use could be because it is a recent trend in the market compared to well-established and popular regular smoking. This study calls for an immediate action for parental education to control the increase in the prevalence of e-cigarette use and that it should be seriously taken into consideration.

In addition, parents have a greater tendency to accept their son’s e-cigarette use more than their daughter’s. This finding was also reported by Wali (2011) in his study on smoking habits in Saudi Arabia.46 He related this gender acceptance variation to cultural restriction.

One limitation of this study was that we were not able to select parents randomly in shopping malls. In addition, by conducting the study in shopping malls, we expected to recruit mainly families with middle to high SES. However, this could be considered an advantage as e-cigarette use was reported to be predominant in high SES families.47 In addition, there were more mothers than fathers which could have resulted in an unbalanced sample that was not distributed among the general population. However, this could also be related to the site of the sample recruitment (shopping malls) which are comprised of more females than males. This was supported by Sohail et al (2015) who reported a higher frequency of shopping women compared to men in Saudi Arabia.48 Future studies that include various regions, schools, and the effect of various smoking/vaping prevention programs along with educational and community services are suggested.

Conclusion

Parents reported a lack of knowledge and attitudes regarding e-cigarette use. Parental smoking/vaping, especially among mothers was statistically significantly related to their e-cigarette knowledge and attitudes. Most parents agreed to the importance of educating parents on e-cigarettes.

Data Sharing Statement

Extra data are available by emailing the corresponding author “HJS”.

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of KAUFD (132-11-18).

Acknowledgment

I would like to acknowledge Rawaa Abduljabbar who participated in data entry.

Author Contributions

Heba Sabbagh: Designing the study, acquisition, preforming the analysis, and interpretation of data. Contributed in writing and editing the manuscript. Mona Hassan: edited the manuscript. Layla Khogeer: Contributed in designing the work, collecting the data and writing the paper. Hanaa Allaf: Contributed in, collecting the data and writing the paper.

All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

funding agencies This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.

References

1. AAPD. American academy of pediatric dentistry. Policy on electronic cigarettes. Ref Manual. 2019;39:75–77.

2. De Lacy E, Fletcher A, Hewitt G, Murphy S, Moore G. Cross-sectional study examining the prevalence, correlates and sequencing of electronic cigarette and tobacco use among 11–16-year olds in schools in Wales. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e012784. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012784

3. Chapman SLC, Wu L-T. E-cigarette prevalence and correlates of use among adolescents versus adults: a review and comparison. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;54:43–54. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.005

4. Gentzke AS, Creamer M, Cullen KA, et al. Vital signs: tobacco product use among middle and high school students—United States, 2011–2018. Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(6):157. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6806e1

5. Sutfin EL, McCoy TP, Morrell HER, Hoeppner BB, Wolfson M. Electronic cigarette use by college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;131(3):214–221. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.001

6. Grana RA, Ling PM. “Smoking revolution”: a content analysis of electronic cigarette retail websites. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(4):395–403. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.12.010

7. Hartmann‐Boyce J, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Begh R, Stead LF, Hajek P. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2016;9.

8. Dwyer JB, McQuown SC, Leslie FM. The dynamic effects of nicotine on the developing brain. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;122(2):125–139. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.02.003

9. Sonnenberg A, Hüsmert N. Effect of nicotine on gastric mucosal blood flow and acid secretion. Gut. 1982;23(6):532–535. doi:10.1136/gut.23.6.532

10. Mishra A, Chaturvedi P, Datta S, Sinukumar S, Joshi P, Garg A. Harmful effects of nicotine. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2015;36(1):24. doi:10.4103/0971-5851.151771

11. Misery L. Nicotine effects on skin: are they positive or negative? Exp Dermatol. 2004;13(11):665–670. doi:10.1111/j.0906-6705.2004.00274.x

12. Blount BC, Karwowski MP, Shields PG, et al. Vitamin E acetate in bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid associated with EVALI. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):697–705. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1916433

13. Control CfD, Prevention. Notes from the field: electronic cigarette use among middle and high school students-United States, 2011–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(35):729.

14. Johnston LD, Miech RA, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Patrick ME. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2018: Overview, Key Findings on Adolescent Drug Use. Institute for Social Research; 2019.

15. Natto ZS. Dental students’ knowledge and attitudes about electronic cigarettes: a cross‐sectional study at one Saudi university. J Dent Educ. 2020;84(1):27–33. doi:10.21815/JDE.019.162

16. Soni P, Raut D. Prevalence and pattern of tobacco consumption in India. Int Res J Soc Sci. 2012;1:36–43.

17. Soneji S, Barrington-Trimis JL, Wills TA, et al. Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(8):788–797. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1488

18. Alves J, Perelman J, Soto-Rojas V, et al. The role of parental smoking on adolescent smoking and its social patterning: a cross-sectional survey in six European cities. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2017;39(2):339–346. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdw040

19. Murray M, Kiryluk S, Swan A. Relation between parents’ and children’s smoking behaviour and attitudes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985;39(2):169–174. doi:10.1136/jech.39.2.169

20. Kotha SB, Alabdulaali RA, Dahy WT, Alkhaibari YR, Albaraki ASM, Alghanim AF. The influence of oral health knowledge on parental practices among the Saudi parents of children aged 2–6 years in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent. 2018;8(6):565. doi:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_341_18

21. Khanduri N, Singhal N, Mitra M, Rohatgi S. Knowledge, attitude, and practices of parents toward their children’s oral health: a questionnaire survey in Bhairahawa (Nepal). Int J Pedodont Rehab. 2018;3(2):59. doi:10.4103/ijpr.ijpr_31_17

22. Vermeulen-Smit E, Koning IM, Verdurmen JEE, Van der Vorst H, Engels RCME, Vollebergh WAM. The influence of paternal and maternal drinking patterns within two-partner families on the initiation and development of adolescent drinking. Addict Behav. 2012;37(11):1248–1256. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.06.005

23. McComb JL, Hanson WE. Problem gambling on college campuses. NASPA J. 2009;46(1):1–29.

24. Demography Survey; 2016. Available from: https://www.stats.gov.sa/sites/default/files/en-demographic-research-2016_4.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2020.

25. Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Smoking statistics in Saudi Arabia. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/HealthAwareness/EducationalContent/Anti-Smoking/Documents/احصائيات%20آفة%20التدخين.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2020.

26. Algorinees RM, Alreshidi IGK, Alateeq MFM, et al. Prevalence of cigarette smoking usage among adolescent students in northern saudi arabia. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):3839–3843.

27. Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Smoking affect woman’s beauty and femininity. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/HealthAwareness/EducationalContent/Anti-Smoking/Documents/التدخين%20يخدش%20جمال%20وأنوثة%20المرأة.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2020.

28. Abdelwahab SI, El-Setohy M, Alsharqi A, Elsanosy R, Mohammed UY. Patterns of use, cessation behavior and socio-demographic factors associated with smoking in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional multi-step study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(2):655–660. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2016.17.2.655

29. Moradi-Lakeh M, El Bcheraoui C, Tuffaha M, et al. Tobacco consumption in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013: findings from a national survey. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):611. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1902-3

30. Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The executive regulations of anti-smoking law issued by royal decree no. (M/56). 28/07/1436H. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Rules/Documents/Anti-Tobacco-Executive-Regulations.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2020.

31. Qanash S, Alemam S, Mahdi E, Softah J, Touman AA, Alsulami A. Electronic cigarette among health science students in Saudi Arabia. Ann Thorac Med. 2019;14(1):56. doi:10.4103/atm.ATM_76_18

32. Al-Zalabani A, Kasim K. Prevalence and predictors of adolescents’ cigarette smoking in Madinah, Saudi Arabia: a school-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):17. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1363-8

33. Shaikh A, Ansari HT, Ahmad Z, et al. Knowledge and attitude of teenagers towards electronic cigarettes in Karachi, Pakistan. Cureus. 2017;9(7).

34. Hafiz A, Rahman MM, Jantan Z. Factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice of e-cigarette among adult population in KOSPEN areas of Kuching district, Sarawak, Malaysia. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2019;6(6):2300. doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20192288

35. Fact or fiction: what to know about smoking cessation and medications. FDA consumer updates. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/fact-or-fiction-what-know-about-smoking-cessation-and-medications. Accessed July 31, 2020.

36. Patel M, Czaplicki L, Perks SN, et al. Parents’ awareness and perceptions of JUUL and other E-cigarettes. Am J Prev Med. 2019;57(5):695–699. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2019.06.012

37. Topa G, Moriano JA. Theory of planned behavior and smoking: meta-analysis and SEM model. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2010;1:23. doi:10.2147/SAR.S15168

38. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

39. Choi BC, Pak AW. Peer reviewed: a catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(1).

40. Bureau JS, Mageau GA. Parental autonomy support and honesty: the mediating role of identification with the honesty value and perceived costs and benefits of honesty. J Adolesc. 2014;37(3):225–236. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.12.007

41. Smoking in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: findings from the Saudi Health Interview Survey; 2013. Available from: http://www.healthdata.org/sites/default/files/files/Projects/KSA/Smoking-KSA-Findings-from-the-Saudi-Health-Interview-Survey.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2020.

42. Ministry of Health, Riyadh. Report on tobacco control program of ministry of health in Saudi Arabia; 2009. Available from: http://www.sa-tcp.com/newsite/user/pdf/REPORT_ON_TCP.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2020.

43. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, country profile. Saudi Arabia; 2019. Available from: http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/policy/country_profile/sau.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2020.

44. Ditre JW, Coraggio JT, Herzog TA. Associations between parental smoking restrictions and adolescent smoking. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(6):975–983. doi:10.1080/14622200802087549

45. Anand V, McGinty KL, O’Brien K, Guenthner G, Hahn E, Martin CA. E-cigarette use and beliefs among urban public high school students in North Carolina. J Adolesce Health. 2015;57(1):46–51. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.018

46. Wali SO. Smoking habits among medical students in Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2011;32(8):843–848.

47. Simon P, Camenga DR, Morean ME, et al. Socioeconomic status and adolescent e-cigarette use: the mediating role of e-cigarette advertisement exposure. Prev Med. 2018;112:193–198. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.019

48. Sohail MS. Gender differences in mall shopping: a study of shopping behaviour of an emerging nation. J Market Consum Behav Emerg Mark. 2015;1(1):36–46.

Creative Commons License © 2020 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.