MiR-101 Protects Against the Cerebral I/R Injury Through Regulating JAK2/STAT3 Signaling Pathway

Introduction

Stroke has become the fifth cause of death in the USA.^1,2 Approximately 87% of strokes are ischemic,³ and ischemic stroke is always characterized by acute loss of neurons, astroglia, and oligodendroglia and disruption of synaptic architecture due to cerebral artery occlusion.⁴ Although several clinical trials have been conducted, there is no established treatment to reduce the neurological deficits caused by ischemic stroke.^5,6 Many patients suffering from stroke often remain disabled after active therapies.⁷ Therefore, well understanding the specific mechanism in ischemic stroke will contribute to identifying and developing new therapeutic targets.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), which are approximately 20 nucleotides in length and lack protein-coding capacity, can regulate many target genes at post-transcriptional level.⁸ Previous studies have reported that miRNAs play important roles in neuroprotection and post-stroke recovery. For instance, miR-148b inhibits proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells through attenuating Wnt/β-catenin pathway in mouse ischemic stroke model.⁹ MiR-9a-5p protects against ischemia injury through regulating ATG5-mediated autophagy.¹⁰ MiR-15a/16-1 antagomir attenuates ischemic brain injury in the experimental stroke.¹¹ MiRNA-27b downregulation promotes neurogenesis through activating the AMPK signaling pathway.¹² In addition, neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs)-based treatment is a potential therapeutic approach for stroke. A series of miRNAs are considered promising biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis and targets for controlling the proliferation, differentiation, and migration of NSPCs.¹³ It has been demonstrated that miR-101 is dramatically reduced in numerous human cancers and has potent anti-tumor effects through inhibiting cell proliferation and metastasis.¹⁴ MiR-101 inhibits cell proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cancer by directly targeting STMN1.¹⁵ MiR-101 also suppresses breast cancer cell proliferation and enhances their sensitivity to oxidative stress via Nrf2 signaling pathway.¹⁶ However, its role in neurogenesis after ischemic stroke remains unclear.

Studies have shown that JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway could regulate different biological processes in human cancer cells, including proliferation, differentiation, invasion, and migration.¹⁷ IL-6 secreted by cancer-associated fibroblasts could promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of gastric cancer via JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.¹⁸ LncRNA PICART1 suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis of lung cancer cells by inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 pathway.¹⁹ Increasing evidence indicated that JAK/STAT pathway plays a crucial role in regulating ischemic stroke-induced inflammatory neuronal damages.²⁰ Constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT pathway has been observed in cerebral ischemia.²¹ All these indicate that JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway has an important impact on ischemic stroke. Recently, miRNAs have been identified as major regulators of the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in cerebral ischemic injury.²⁰ Therefore, our study focused on the mechanism underlying the interaction between miR-101 and JAK2/STAT3 pathway in ischemic stroke.

Here, our study first demonstrated that miR-101 was significantly downregulated in both brain tissues of rats with I/R injury and OGD/R-induced neuronal cells. Further, our results identified that JAK2 was a target of miR-101 with two specific-binding sites. Moreover, our study revealed that miR-101 attenuated ischemic brain injury by inhibiting the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, which provided a novel therapeutic target for ischemic stroke.

Materials and Methods

Cell Isolation and Culture

Neuronal cells were isolated from the cerebral cortex of SD rats (approximately 17-days old) as previously described.²² Cells were cultured at 37 °C with 95% air and 5% CO₂ in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin.

OGD/R Model

The neurons were exposed to OGD/R as previously described.²³ Briefly, neuronal cells were exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) for 2 h and transferred into DMEM media containing glucose under normal conditions for reoxygenation. Control cells were cultured in glucose-containing DMEM under normal conditions.

MCAO/R Model

Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (approximately 8–10 weeks and weighing 270 ± 17 g) were purchased from Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital. All experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital. Procedures operated in this research were completed in keeping with the standards set out in the Health Laboratory Animal Care and Use Guidelines of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital. The MCAO/R model was constructed as previously described.²⁴ Briefly, rats were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine. A piece of 6-0 monofilament nylon suture with its cusp slightly rounded by heat was plugged via the right internal carotid artery to the base of the middle cerebral artery. After 2 h, blood flow was restored by removing the suture. Sham control animals were subjected to similar operations to expose the carotid arteries without occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. After 2 h of MCAO, rats were allowed to reperfusion for 24 h. The mortality rate of the MCAO model rats is 10%.

Cell Transfection

In specific experiments, neuronal cells were transfected with miR-101 mimics, inhibitor, and corresponding controls by Lipofectamine 2000 kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After transfection for 48h, cells were subjected to OGD/R treatment and collected for the subsequent experiments.

Cortical Injection

Cortical injections were performed as previously reported.²⁵ Briefly, lentiviral sh-JAK2 or NC control was mixed with cationic lipid polybrene for 15 min at 37°C, and 7 μL of the mixture was administered. 100 μM miR-101 mimics, miR-101 inhibitor or NC controls were mixed with the siRNA-Mate for 20 min and subjected to cortical injection. In short, rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (10%) and placed in the stereotactic apparatus (anteroposterior 0.8 mm, mediolateral 1.6 mm, depth 3.5 mm). After injection, rats were exposed to MCAO/R and used for the subsequent experiments.

Measurement of Infarct Volume

After MCAO/R, rats were sacrificed. The brains were quickly removed and cut into 1.0 mm-thick coronal sections. The sections were incubated with 0.5% 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) solution at 37°C for 15 min, observed, and scanned with a computer. The infarct volume shown in the images was analyzed using ImagePro Plus1 6.0 software.

Animal Model Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Following cerebral ischemia, rats were tested for neurological deficits and scored on a 5-point scale as previously described.²⁶ Rats were excluded if the following occurred: (1) Anesthesia accident; (2) severe hemorrhage during the operation, (3) death or apparent surgical injury; (4) died before the sampling; (5) subarachnoid hemorrhage during the sampling; and (6) brain tissue infarction. The included rats were scored 0 point if no observable neurological deficits (normal), 1 point if failing to extend right forepaw (mild), 2 points if circling to the contralateral side (moderate), 3 points if falling down to the left side, and 4 points if unable to move by themselves and losing consciousness.

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNAs of the cultured cells or brain tissues were extracted using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed using the M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase kit. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed by a SYBR Green-based Rotor-Gene RG-3000A. The relative expression change of target genes was analyzed by the 2^−ΔΔCt method with U6-snRNA and GAPDH as the internal references. The primers used in this study were miR-101 forward 5ʹ-GTACAGTACTGTGATAACTGA-3ʹ and reverse 5ʹ-TGCGTGTCGTG GAGTC-3ʹ; JAK2 forward 5ʹ-GGGAGGTGGTCGCTGTAAAA-3ʹ and reverse 5ʹ-ACCAGCACT GTAGCACACTC-3ʹ; U6 forward 5ʹ-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3ʹ and reverse 5ʹ-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3ʹ; and GAPDH forward 5ʹ-CCTCG TCCCGTAGACAAAATG-3ʹ and reverse 5ʹ-TCTCCACTTTGCCACTGCAA-3ʹ.

Western Blot

Total proteins of the cultured cells or brain tissues were extracted using RIRP lysis buffer. Approximate equal protein was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. After blocking in TBS-Tween buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 5% nonfat milk, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween-20 (pH 7.5), the membrane was incubated with 1:500 diluted primary antibodies against JAK2 (ab108596, Abcam), STAT3 (ab119352, Abcam), p-STAT3 (ab30647, Abcam) or GAPDH (1:1000, ab9485, Abcam) overnight at 4°C. Finally, the membrane was exposed to secondary antibodies labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (1:5000, ab6721, Abcam) for 1 h. The target proteins were detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence kit and analyzed using the Blot AP System.

Luciferase Reporter Assay

The luciferase reporter plasmid containing wild-type (WT) JAK2-3′-UTR and mutant (MUT) JAK2-3′-UTR were constructed and co-transfected with miR-101 mimic or NC control into neuronal cells using Lipofectamine 2000. After transfection for 48 h, cells were collected, and the Renilla luciferase activities were detected by the dual-luciferase assay system.

MTT Assay

Cell viability was detected using MTT Cell Viability Assay Kit. Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well plates and cultured overnight. After that, 10 μL of MTT stock solution was added to each well. Cells were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. The formed crystal substances were dissolved in 100 μL of dissolution reagent, and the absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate absorbance reader.

Flow Cytometry Analysis

Cell apoptosis was quantified by flow cytometry analysis (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Briefly, cells were trypsinized and resuspended in PBS. Then, 100 μL of 1x binding buffer was added to each sample, followed by adding 5 μL Annexin V fluorescein isothiocyanate (Annexin V-FITC, BD Biosciences) and 5 μL propidium iodide (BDBiosciences). The samples were incubated in the dark for 20 min and subjected to flow cytometry after washed three times with PBS. The apoptotic rate was detected using the FACS Calibur flow cytometry and quantified by FlowJo software.

Statistical Analysis

SPSS software (version 18.0) was used for statistical analysis. All experiments were repeated at least three times, and data are presented as means ±SD. The difference between two groups was determined by Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered as the significant threshold.

Results

miR-101 Was Significantly Downregulated After I/R Injury

To explore the effects of miR-101 on ischemic brain damage, neuronal cells were subjected to OGD/R. The results indicated that neuronal cells subjected to OGD/R showed a significantly reduced cell growth (p < 0.01) (Figure 1A), increased apoptotic rate (p < 0.01) (Figure 1B) and decreased miR-101 expression (p < 0.01) (Figure 1C). Furthermore, rats subjected to MCAO/R also exhibited obviously increased neurological scores (p < 0.01) (Figure 1D) and infarct volume (p < 0.01) (Figure 1E), suggesting that MCAO/R could lead to neurologic dysfunction and severe cerebral infarction. Meanwhile, miR-101 was significantly decreased in brain tissues (p < 0.01) (Figure 1F) and plasma (p < 0.01) (Figure 1G) of rats with I/R injury compared with the sham group. These results indicated that miR-101 was closely associated with cerebral I/R injury.

Figure 1 MiR-101 was significantly downregulated after I/R in vitro or in vivo. (A–C) The neuronal cells were exposed to OGD/R. (A) The cell viability was measured by MTT assay (n = 3). (B) The apoptotic rate was detected by flow cytometry (n = 3). (C) The mRNA level of miR-101 was evaluated by qRT-PCR (n = 3). (D–G) Rats were exposed to MCAO/R. (D) Neurobehavioral outcomes (n = 6). (E) Infarct volumes (n = 6). (F and G) The mRNA level of miR-101 in brain tissues (F) and plasma (G) was evaluated by qRT-PCR (n = 6). Data were presented as mean ± SD. **p < 0.01.

MiR-101 Overexpression Protected Neurons Against OGD/R-Induced Injury in vitro

Next, miR-101 mimics or inhibitor were transfected into neuronal cells, and the cell viability and apoptotic rate were evaluated. We firstly detected the transfection efficiency of miR-101 mimics and inhibitor, and the results showed that miR-101 mimics significantly increased miR-101 expression and miR-101 inhibitor decreased miR-101 expression (p < 0.01) (Figure 2A). Moreover, miR-101 mimics significantly attenuated OGD/R-induced growth defect in neuronal cells (p < 0.01) while miR-101 inhibitor exacerbated OGD/R-induced neuronal cell death (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B). Furthermore, OGD/R-induced neuronal cell apoptosis was reversed by miR-101 mimics (p < 0.01) and promoted remarkedly by miR-101 inhibitor (p < 0.05) (Figure 2C). These data indicated that miR-101 overexpression efficiently protected neurons against OGD/R-induced injury in vitro.

Figure 2 MiR-101 upregulation protected neuronal cells against OGD/R-induced injury in vitro. (A) The neuronal cells were transfected with miR-101 mimics, miR-NC, miR-101 inhibitor, or NC inhibitor. The transfection efficiency was evaluated by qRT-PCR. (B and C) The neuronal cells were transfected with miR-101 mimics, miR-NC, miR-101 inhibitor, or NC inhibitor. Then cells were exposed to OGD/R. (C) Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay. (C) The apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry. Data were presented as mean ± SD. N =3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

MiR-101 Overexpression Attenuated Ischemic Brain Injury in vivo

To confirm the protective role of miR-101 in cerebral I/R injury, miR-101 mimics or inhibitor were subcutaneously injected into the cerebral cortex of rats with I/R injury. QRT-PCR results showed that miR-101 mimics significantly increased miR-101 expression (p < 0.01) and miR-101 inhibitor decreased its expression in vivo (p < 0.01) (Figure 3A). MiR-101 mimics remarkedly decreased I/R-induced neurological scores in rats (p < 0.01) (Figure 3B). Meanwhile, the infarct volume of rats with I/R injury was significantly reduced by miR-101 mimics (p < 0.01) and obviously exacerbated by miR-101 inhibitor (p < 0.05) (Figure 3C). These results confirmed the protective effect of miR-101 in ischemic brain injury.

Figure 3 MiR-101 upregulation attenuated ischemic brain injury in vivo. MiR-101 mimics, miR-NC, miR-101 inhibitor, or NC inhibitor were subjected to cortical injection, and rats were then exposed to MCAO/R. (A) MiR-101 mRNA level was evaluated by qRT-PCR. (B) Neurobehavioral outcomes. (C) Infarct volumes. Data were presented as mean ± SD. N = 6. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

JAK2 Was a Direct Target of miR-101

To explore how miR-101 exerts its protective effect in ischemic brain injury, miRNA database microRNA.org (http://www.microrna.org/microrna/home.do) was used to predict the potential targets of miR-101. The results indicated that JAK2 had two potential interactional sites with miR-101 (Figure 4A). Then, the luciferase reporter plasmids containing wild-type 3′-UTR of JAK2 (WT) or mutant-type 3′-UTR of JAK2 (MUT) were constructed and co-transfected with miR-101 mimics or miR-NC into neuronal cells. The luciferase reporter assay indicated that miR-101 mimics significantly inhibited the expression of WT 3′-UTR of JAK2 and exhibited no obvious change in MUT 3′-UTR of JAK2 both in site 1 and site 2 (p < 0.01) (Figure 4B). Moreover, JAK2 mRNA level was significantly upregulated in OGD/R-induced neuronal cells (p < 0.01). In addition, JAK2 mRNA expression was inhibited by miR-101 mimics (p < 0.01) and promoted by miR-101 inhibitor (p < 0.05) (Figure 4C). Similarly, JAK2 protein level was significantly upregulated in OGD/R-induced neuronal cells (p < 0.01). MiR-101 mimics downregulated JAK2 protein level (p < 0.01), and miR-101 inhibitor remarkedly increased JAK2 expression (p < 0.05) (Figure 4D). These results indicated that JAK2 was a target of miR-101.

Figure 4 JAK2 was a target of miR-101. (A) The interactional sites between miR-101 and JAK2. (B) The luciferase activities were detected by the dual-luciferase assay system. (C and D) The neuronal cells were transfected with miR-101 mimics, miR-NC, miR-101 inhibitor, or NC inhibitor. Then cells were exposed to OGD/R. The mRNA level (C) and protein level (D) of JAK2 were evaluated. Data were presented as mean ± SD. N = 3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

JAK2 Downregulation Suppressed Neuronal Cell Apoptosis and Ischemic Brain Injury

To further explore whether miR-101 could promote ischemic brain injury through JAK2, sh-JAK2 (silencing of JAK2), or sh-NC control were transfected into neuronal cells or subcutaneously injected into the cerebral cortex of rats with I/R injury. In vivo, sh-JAK2 significantly decreased JAK2 at both mRNA (p < 0.01) (Figure 5A) and protein levels (p < 0.01) (Figure 5B) compared with sh-NC. The phosphorylation level of STAT3 was significantly increased in OGD/R-induced neuronal cells (p < 0.01), and sh-JAK2 dramatically decreased the phosphorylation level of STAT3 compared with sh-NC (p < 0.01) (Figure 5C). Sh-JAK2 could attenuate OGD/R-induced growth defect (p < 0.05) (Figure 5D) and inhibit OGD/R-induced apoptosis (p < 0.05) (Figure 5E) in neuronal cells compared with sh-NC. In vitro, JAK2 expression was remarkedly upregulated in the ischemic brain, and sh-JAK2 efficiently downregulated JAK2 expression in both mRNA (p < 0.01) (Figure 5F) and protein (p < 0.01) levels (Figure 5G) in the ischemic brain compared with sh-NC. Moreover, sh-JAK2 efficiently decreased the neurological scores (p < 0.01) (Figure 5H) and infarct volume (p < 0.05) (Figure 5I). These data indicated that sh-JAK2 suppressed neuronal cell apoptosis in vitro and protected against ischemic brain injury in vivo.

Figure 5 Sh-JAK2 suppressed neuronal cell death and ischemic brain injury. (A–E) The neuronal cells were transfected with sh-JAK2 or sh-NC, and cells were exposed to OGD/R or not. (A) JAK2 mRNA level was evaluated by qRT-PCR (n = 3). (B and C) The protein levels of JAK2 (B) and p-STAT3 (C) were evaluated by Western blot (n = 3). (D) Cell viability was detected by MTT assay (n = 3). (E) The apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry (n = 3). (F–I) Cortical injection of sh-JAK2 or sh-NC, and rats were then exposed to MCAO/R or not. (F) JAK2 mRNA level was evaluated by qRT-PCR (n = 6). (G) JAK2 protein level was evaluated by Western blot (n = 6). (H) Neurobehavioral outcomes (n = 6). (I) Infarct volumes (n = 6). Data were presented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

MiR-101 Protected Ischemic Brain Injury by Targeting JAK2

To confirm whether miR-101 inhibited ischemic brain injury by regulating JAK2 expression, the OGD/R-induced neuronal cells were co-transfected with miR-101 mimics and sh-JAK2, or miR-101 inhibitor and sh-JAK2. The results indicated that additional sh-JAK2 significantly downregulated JAK2 expression compared with miR-mimics group (p < 0.05), and co-transfection of miR-101 inhibitor and sh-JAK2 obviously attenuated miR-101 inhibitor-promoted JAK2 expression (p < 0.05) (Figure 6A). Meanwhile, co-transfection of miR-101 mimics and sh-JAK2 significantly downregulated p-STAT3 level compared with miR-101 mimics group (p < 0.05), while co-transfection of miR-101 inhibitor and sh-JAK2 obviously attenuated miR-101 inhibitor-promoted p-STAT3 expression compared with miR-101 inhibitor (p < 0.05) (Figure 6B). Moreover, additional sh-JAK2 promoted neuronal cell growth compared with miR-101 mimics (p < 0.05) and protected miR-101 inhibitor-caused growth defect in OGD/R-induced neuronal cells (p < 0.05) (Figure 6C). For apoptosis, additional sh-JAK2 significantly inhibited neuronal cell apoptosis compared with miR-101 mimics group (p < 0.05) while additional sh-JAK2 inhibited miR-101 inhibitor-induced apoptosis (p < 0.05) (Figure 6D). Further, additional sh-JAK2 more effectively decreased the infarct volume caused by miR-101 mimics (p < 0.05), and protected against miR-101 inhibitor- exacerbated cerebral infarction volume (p < 0.05) (Figure 6E). These data demonstrated that miR-101 inhibited ischemic brain injury partly by suppressing JAK2 expression.

Figure 6 MiR-101 protected ischemic brain injury through targeting JAK2. (A–D) The neuronal cells were transfected with miR-101 mimics or miR-101 inhibitor, or co-transfected with miR-101 mimics and sh-JAK2, or miR-101 inhibitor and sh-JAK2, then cells were exposed to OGD/R or not. (A and B) The protein levels of JAK2 (A) and p-STAT3 (B) were evaluated by Western blot (n = 3). (C) The cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay (n = 3). (D) The apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry (n = 3). (E) Rats were subjected to cortical injection of miR-101 mimics, miR-101 inhibitor, or cortical co-injection with miR-101 mimics and sh-JAK2, or miR-101 inhibitor and sh-JAK2, and were then exposed to MCAO/R. Infarct volume in rats with cerebral I/R injury (n = 6). Data were presented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p <0.01.

Discussion

Ischemic stroke is a common injury-caused neurological disease with a higher mortality and disability rates.²⁷ Cognitive dysfunction often follows a stroke, and a clinical report has suggested it occurs in 50–75% of patients.²⁸ Although the survival rate of patients has been improved with the development of medical technology, the disability rate has still increased accordingly.²⁹ Hence, the identification of novel therapeutic targets in ischemic stroke is more urgent and can help clinicians to develop efficient therapeutic strategies.

Neuronal cell death is considered a critical part of stroke pathophysiology, and a variety of miRNAs have been identified to exert their roles in the progression of ischemic injury by inducing brain cell death. MicroRNAs as critical regulators of gene expression are important for functions including neuronal development, synapse formation. MiR-101 is a highly abundant miRNA in the brain tissue. The regulatory function of miR-101 mainly involves brain development, neuronal differentiation, neurogenesis regulation, glial cell and astrocyte differentiation, and other biological processes. MiR-101 has been identified to play an important anti-tumor role in various human cancers. MiR-101 overexpression augments cytotoxicity and reduces chemoresistance to chemotherapeutic reagent cisplatin (CDDP) in liver cancer cell line HepG2 cells through inhibiting the DNA-PKcs/Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway.³⁰ Circular RNA circVAPA is upregulated and exerts oncogenic properties by sponging miR-101 in colorectal cancer.³¹ MiR-101 has been reported to inhibit Nrf2 expression from impeding breast cancer cell proliferation and enhancing their sensitivity to oxidative stress.¹⁶ Meanwhile, abnormal miR-101 expression can be considered as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in different malignancies, including bladder cancer, mantle cell lymphoma, gastric cancer, and cervical cancer.^32–35 In addition, miR-101 is also regarded as an efficient medicinal target to act its function. Berberine (BBR) can suppress endometrial cancer cell growth and metastasis through regulating miR-101/COX-2 axis.³⁶ Studies have shown that miR-101 regulates hippocampal neuronal substance expression and amylin metabolism.³⁷ However, the role of miR-101 in ischemic stroke has not been reported. In this study, we demonstrated that miR-101 was significantly downregulated in brain tissues of rats with I/R injury and OGD/R-induced neuronal cells, suggesting its protective effect in ischemic stroke. To determine its role, miR-101 overexpression and inhibition assays were performed. The results indicated that miR-101 upregulation protected against cerebral I/R injury, and miR-101 downregulation exacerbated cerebral I/R injury both in vitro and in vivo. These results confirmed the protective effect of miR-101 in ischemic stroke.

As known, under cerebral ischemic conditions, activation of JAK2 and STAT3 pathway contributes to neuronal damage.³⁸ Moreover, the neuroprotective effects of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway inhibitor have also been identified and developed in the treatment of focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat model.³⁸ Atractylenolide III (A III), a sesquiterpene lactone, could reduce complications associated with ischemia partly through JAK2/STAT3-dependent mitochondrial fission in microglia.⁴⁰ S14G-humanin (HNG), generated by replacement of Ser14 with glycine, exerts neuroprotective effects against OGD/R by reactivating through JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.⁴¹ In this study, we found that JAK2 downregulation inhibits neuronal cell apoptosis and ischemic brain injury, confirming that JAK2/STAT3 pathway is an efficient drug target for ischemic stroke. Moreover, in ischemic stroke, miRNAs have been identified to act crucial regulatory functions through directly targeting JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. miR-216a overexpression significantly induced neuroprotection against ischemic injury through targeting JAK2.²⁰ In addition, JAK2/STAT3 pathway was also regulated by ncRNAs in many human cancers. LncRNA SNHG16 has been identified to act as an oncogene by directly sponging miR-135a and activating the JAK2/STAT3 pathway in gastric cancer.⁴² LncRNA PICART1 can inhibit cell proliferation and promote apoptosis in lung cancer cells via inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 pathway.¹⁹ miRNA-133b and miRNA-135a have been reported to promote apoptosis by activating the JAK2/STAT3 pathway in renal carcinoma.⁴³ MicroRNA-146a can promote the growth of acute leukemia cells by downregulating the expression of ciliary neurotrophic factor receptor and activating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.⁴⁴ Studies have shown that miR101 could affect cell growth in rats with hepatopulmonary syndrome by inhibiting the JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Here, our results identified that JAK2 was a target of miR-101 with two binding sites. The luciferase reporter assay confirmed that miR-101 mimics could remarkedly decrease the expression of WT 3′-UTR of JAK2, while showed no obvious impact on MUT 3′-UTR of JAK2, confirming that miR-101 negatively regulates JAK2 by directly targeting 3′-UTR of JAK2.

Further, we found that miR-101 mimics also inhibited p-STAT3 level and miR-101 inhibitor increased p-STAT3 level. Moreover, additional sh-JAK2 efficiently attenuated miR-101 inhibitor exacerbated ischemic injury and enhanced the protective effect of miR-101 mimic. All these indicate that MiR-101 might protect brain I/R damage by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. However, the exact relationship between miR-101 and cerebral infarction needs to be investigated further. Because the effect of miR-101 might provide a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of ischemic injury, further studies may pave the way for the clinical usage of miR-101.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that miR-101 exerts a protective role in ischemic brain injury. Specifically, miR-101 prevented ischemic brain injury by targeting JAK2 and then inhibiting the STAT3 pathway. Our study suggested that miR-101/JAK2 might be a potential therapeutic target.