Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 4
Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?
Authors Pinakin Gunvant, Robert D Newcomb, Elliot M Kirstein, et al
Published 28 June 2010 Volume 2010:4 Pages 611—616
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S11105
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 3
Pinakin Gunvant1, Robert D Newcomb2, Elliot M Kirstein3, Victor E Malinovsky4, Richard J Madonna5, Richard E Meetz 4
1Southern College of Optometry, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; 2The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA; 3The Glaucoma and Diabetes Eye Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; 4Indiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana, USA; 5State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, USA
Purpose: To evaluate if using the Ehlers correction factor on the intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) improves its agreement with the PASCAL dynamic contour tonometer (DCT).
Patients and methods: A total of 120 eyes of 120 individuals were examined. Participants underwent IOP measurement with both the DCT and the GAT and central corneal thickness measurement. The Ehlers correction factor was applied on the GAT IOP measurements to calculate Ehlers-corrected GAT IOP. The agreement between the DCT and GAT, and DCT and Ehlers-corrected GAT IOP was analyzed. The analyses were repeated by stratifying the data by race.
Results: The mean IOP of the GAT, DCT, and the Ehlers-corrected GAT was 15.30, 16.78, and 14.68 mmHg, respectively. The agreement as assessed by Bland–Altman plot for the GAT with the DCT and DCT and Ehlers-corrected GAT IOP was +4.1 to −6.9 and +4.15 to −8.25 mmHg, respectively. The results were similar even when stratifying the data by race.
Conclusion: Using Ehlers correction factor to account for the effect of corneal parameters on the IOP measured by the GAT worsens the agreement with the DCT. This effect remains even when stratifying the data by race.
Keywords: dynamic contour tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, tonometric correction factors, central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Other articles by this author:
Macular pigment optical density: repeatability, intereye correlation, and effect of ocular dominance
Davey PG, Alvarez SD, Lee JY
Clinical Ophthalmology 2016, 10:1671-1678
Published Date: 29 August 2016
Fabry disease: a survey of visual and ocular symptoms
Davey PG
Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:1555-1560
Published Date: 19 August 2014
Assessing the need and benefits of home tonometers in the management of patients with glaucoma
Davey PG, Nouri K, Zaczyk S
Clinical Optometry 2013, 5:19-27
Published Date: 25 July 2013
Predicting the necessity of LASIK enhancement after cataract surgery in patients with multifocal IOL implantation
Gunvant P, Ablamowicz A, Gollamudi S
Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1281-1285
Published Date: 8 September 2011
Readers of this article also read:
Causative factors for formation of toxic islet amyloid polypeptide oligomer in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Jeong HR, An SSA
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1873-1879
Published Date: 19 November 2015
Mutations in presenilin 2 and its implications in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementia-associated disorders
Cai Y, An SSA, Kim SY
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1163-1172
Published Date: 14 July 2015
Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles
Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889
Published Date: 16 April 2014
Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban in healthy Chinese subjects [Corrigendum]
Cui Y, Song Y, Wang J, Yu Z, Schuster A, Barrett YC, Frost C
Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014, 6:61-62
Published Date: 27 March 2014
Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon
Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779
Published Date: 15 November 2012
A novel preparation method for silicone oil nanoemulsions and its application for coating hair with silicone
Hu Z, Liao M, Chen Y, Cai Y, Meng L, Liu Y, Lv N, Liu Z, Yuan W
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5719-5724
Published Date: 12 November 2012
Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy
Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088
Published Date: 27 July 2012
Particle size reduction to the nanometer range: a promising approach to improve buccal absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs
Rao S, Song Y, Peddie F, Evans AM
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:1245-1251
Published Date: 20 June 2011
Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection
Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant
Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711
Published Date: 14 July 2010
Characterization of complexation of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate) thermoresponsive cationic nanogels with salmon sperm DNA
Jim Moselhy, Tasnim Vira, Fei-Fei Liu, et al
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2009, 4:153-164
Published Date: 24 August 2009
