Managing Diagnosis, Treatment, and Burden of Disease in Hereditary Angioedema Patients with Normal C1-Esterase Inhibitor

Introduction

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, chronic, and debilitating genetic disorder characterized by recurrent and unpredictable swelling episodes that primarily affect the subcutaneous and/or submucosal tissues of the extremities, larynx, face, abdomen, and genitals.^1–3 Most cases of HAE are caused by mutations in the serpin family G member 1 gene (SERPING1), leading to deficient (type I) or dysfunctional (type II) C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) protein and subsequent dysregulation of the kallikrein–bradykinin cascade.^1–3 Dysregulation of the kallikrein–bradykinin cascade is associated with excessive production of bradykinin and consequent increases in vascular permeability resulting in episodes of edema.^1,3,4

Type I and type II HAE are collectively termed HAE-C1-INH, which is characterized by the detection of lower than normal plasma levels and/or functionality of the C1-INH protein and lower than normal plasma levels of complement component 4 (C4) in laboratory tests.^3,4 However, some patients present with a third type of HAE, termed HAE-nI-C1-INH, which was first described in the year 2000 and is characterized by an absence of mutations in SERPING1.^5–7 Whereas it is documented in the literature that HAE-C1-INH has an estimated prevalence of 1 in 50,000 people,^1,8 the prevalence, etiology, and pathophysiology of HAE-nI-C1-INH are less certain.^1,9–11 Furthermore, the diagnosis of HAE-nI-C1-INH represents a significant challenge. This is in part because patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH typically demonstrate normal plasma levels of C1-INH and C4 proteins and normal C1-INH functionality during laboratory analysis.^3,9

For the purpose of reliability, it is important to note that it is recommended that laboratory tests for C1-INH level and functionality are repeated one to three months later in patients with suspected HAE to confirm the results.¹² In addition, it has been reported in the literature that these laboratory tests can give rise to ambiguous results if patient blood samples are not handled carefully in such a way that decay of functional C1-INH is avoided prior to processing.^12–14 If such decay does occur prior to processing of a sample, this may consequently lead to a patient with HAE-nI-C1-INH being misdiagnosed with HAE-C1-INH (if sufficient additional tests are not performed), further complicating investigations into the true prevalence of HAE-nI-C1-INH.

Although mutations in the coagulation factor XII gene (FXII), angiopoietin-1 gene (ANGPT1), plasminogen gene (PLG), kininogen-1 gene (KNG1), myoferlin gene (MYOF), and heparan sulfate glucosamine 3-O-sulfotransferase-6 gene (HS3ST6) have been identified in some patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH, the genetic cause is still unknown in the majority of cases (see Figure 1 and Table 1 for the proposed roles of these genes in the fibrinolytic system, the kallikrein/kinin system, and the development of angioedema).^{6,9,13,15–24} Additionally, mutations in FXII are estimated to account for only up to 25% of patients diagnosed with HAE-nI-C1-INH, and the prevalence of other known mutations in this patient population are less well characterized.^11,22

Figure 1 Mutations in genes linked to some forms of HAE-nI-C1-INH and their roles within the fibrinolytic and kallikrein/kinin systems.20,21,24,25 Adapted from Bork K, Machnig T, Wulff K, Witzke G, Prusty S, Hardt J. Clinical features of genetically characterized types of hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):289. Creative Commons.21 Abbreviations: ANGPT1, angiopoietin-1; ANGPT1, angiopoietin-1 gene; B2R, bradykinin B2 receptor; C1-INH, C1-esterase inhibitor; FXII, coagulation factor XII; FXII, coagulation factor XII gene; FXIIa, activated coagulation factor XII; FXIIf, coagulation factor XII fragment; HAE-nI-C1-INH, hereditary angioedema with normal C1-esterase inhibitor levels; HMWK, high molecular weight kininogen; HS3ST6, heparan sulfate glucosamine 3-O-sulfotransferase-6; HS3ST6, heparan sulfate glucosamine 3-O-sulfotransferase-6 gene; KNG1, kininogen-1 gene; MYOF, myoferlin gene; PAI, plasminogen activator inhibitor; PLG, plasminogen; PLG, plasminogen gene; scuPA, single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator; Syn2, syndecan-2; Tie2, tyrosine-protein kinase; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

Table 1 Summary of Genes That Have Been Identified to Contain Mutations in Patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH and the Proposed Roles of Such Mutations in Angioedema

In a systematic review of the literature, patients with FXII HAE-nI-C1-INH were most frequently identified in Brazil, France, Spain, and Germany, with a smaller number of cases located in Turkey, Australia, Luxembourg, Morocco, and Italy.²¹ Patients with PLG HAE-nI-C1-INH were more frequently identified in Germany, with a smaller number of cases located in Greece, Bulgaria, Spain, France, Italy, Japan, and the United States of America.²¹ In the same systematic review, patients with ANGPT1 HAE-nI-C1-INH were identified in Italy, and patients with KNG1 HAE-nI-C1-INH were identified in Germany.²¹ However, further investigation is required to obtain a clearer picture of the global distribution of clinical and genetic diagnoses of HAE-nI-C1-INH.

The purpose of this review is to raise further awareness of the clinical features of HAE-nI-C1-INH. The current unmet needs associated with diagnosis and treatment of HAE-nI-C1-INH will be highlighted, emphasizing the need for healthcare professionals to remain vigilant for potential cases of this form of HAE.

Diagnosis of HAE-nI-C1-INH

Clinical Presentation

HAE has a variable clinical course that is associated with multiple signs and symptoms of disease.¹ Hallmarks of both HAE-C1-INH and HAE-nI-C1-INH include recurrent angioedema that results in cutaneous and subcutaneous swelling, painful abdominal symptoms when the gastrointestinal tract is implicated, and respiratory symptoms when the airway is involved.¹

In contrast to the typical disease course of HAE-C1-INH, patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH usually experience their first symptoms of disease in late adolescence or early adulthood rather than during childhood.^1,9,27,28 In a study of 138 patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH, the mean age of symptom onset was 26.8 years and only 8% of the patients experienced their first HAE attack before 10 years of age.^5,29

Assessment of 295 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HAE-nI-C1-INH indicated that the main known triggers for swelling attacks were hormones (68.3%), stress (59.6%), trauma (47.6%), and dental treatment (13.9%).³⁰ Patients with symptoms of HAE-nI-C1-INH are predominantly female, and exposure to estrogens (eg, during the use of oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, and pregnancy) is often linked to exacerbation of the course of disease.^9,21,31–34 In a survey of 57 patients with FXII HAE-nI-C1-INH by the French National Center of Reference for Angioedema, exposure to estrogens was associated with HAE attacks in 95% (36/38) of symptomatic patients.^33,35 In the same study, attacks were exacerbated during pregnancy and associated with the ingestion of estrogen-containing oral contraceptives in 67% (24/36) of symptomatic patients.^33,35

Although the attacks experienced by patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH tend to look clinically similar to those that occur in patients with HAE-C1-INH, it is documented in the literature that swelling of the face, tongue, and oropharynx appear to occur more frequently in HAE-nI-C1-INH than in HAE-C1-INH.^{1,10,11,29,36} A recent systematic literature review identified several clinical features of disease that appear to be more common in some forms of genetically identified HAE-nI-C1-INH versus other forms.²¹ In this review, it was noted that estrogen use appears to have a more pronounced aggravating effect on HAE attacks in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH with an FXII mutation versus those with HAE-nI-C1-INH due to other mutations.²¹ In addition, the occurrence of hemorrhage at the swelling site appears to be more common in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH with an FXII mutation versus those with HAE-nI-C1-INH due to other mutations.²¹ Notably, a higher frequency of tongue swelling is reported in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH with a PLG mutation versus those with HAE-nI-C1-INH due to other mutations and, in some instances, has been reported as the only clinical manifestation of the disease.²¹ Erythema marginatum, which is common in HAE-C1-INH, was not observed in any of the HAE-nI-C1-INH cases captured in this systematic literature review.²¹ Another study identified rare instances of joint pain that were independent of swelling episodes and unresponsive to immunosuppressant medications in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH.³⁷

Prodromes are thought to occur in many patients with symptomatic HAE-C1-INH;^38,39 however, further research is required to characterize them in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH. Reports of prodromal fatigue and malaise have been documented in the literature for patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH as well as rare incidences of hemorrhages and/or bruising immediately before swelling becomes apparent.⁴⁰

Guidelines for Diagnosis

HAE can be differentiated from mast cell–mediated angioedema by several features. First, HAE is not associated with the formation of urticaria or pruritus.¹ Second, HAE swelling attacks tend to progress to maximum severity over the course of several hours and are generally longer lasting than the attacks associated with mast cell–mediated angioedema.¹ In support of this, reports in the literature indicate that symptoms of HAE can last for up to five days if left untreated.³ Third, HAE attacks do not respond to common treatments that target mast cells, including antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrines.¹

The United States Hereditary Angioedema Association Medical Advisory Board recommends that diagnosis of HAE-nI-C1-INH be based on the following clinical criteria:^1,5,41–43 the patient has a documented history of recurrent angioedema with no signs of concomitant urticaria and no use of medication that is known to cause angioedema, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors;⁴⁴ laboratory testing indicates that the patient has normal, or close to normal, plasma levels of C4 and C1-INH antigens and normal C1-INH functionality; and the patient either has a genetic mutation in one of the genes known to be associated with HAE-nI-C1-INH or has a family history of recurrent angioedema episodes that were non-responsive to high-dose antihistamine therapy for at least one month or for a time interval that would be expected to be associated with three or more angioedema attacks (Figure 2). Other supportive evidence for an HAE-nI-C1-INH diagnosis includes non-responsiveness to other mast cell–targeted therapies such as omalizumab, a history of rapid and durable responses to medications targeting the bradykinin pathway, and documented episodes of predominant and visible angioedema or, in patients with abdominal symptoms, documented evidence of edema in the bowel wall observed by computed tomography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging.^1,5,41–43 Similarly, the World Allergy Organization / European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines for the management of HAE also recommend that a diagnosis of HAE-nI-C1-INH be confirmed through laboratory testing of C1 levels and function, genetic testing for known HAE-nI-C1-INH mutations, and family history.¹³

Figure 2 Diagnostic algorithms for (a) HAE-C1-INH and (b) HAE-nI-C1-INH, based on the known clinical and genetic characteristics of the diseases. Presence of the supportive evidence shown in the boxes with blue outlines is not required for a confirmed diagnosis of HAE.1,45,46 Abbreviations: ANGPT1, angiopoietin-1 gene; C1-INH, C1-esterase inhibitor; C4, complement component 4; CT, computed tomography; FXII, coagulation factor XII gene; HAE, hereditary angioedema; HAE-C1-INH, hereditary angioedema due to C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction; HAE-nI-C1-INH, hereditary angioedema with normal C1-esterase inhibitor levels; KNG1, kininogen-1 gene; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PLG, plasminogen gene; SERPING1, serpin family G member 1 gene. Notes: *A lack of efficacy of high-dose antihistamine therapy (eg, cetirizine at 40 mg/day or the equivalent) should be documented for at least one month or for an interval that is expected to be associated with three or more angioedema attacks, whichever is longer. 45,46 Required evidence for diagnosis, Supportive evidence for diagnosis (not essential for diagnosis).

A recent algorithm has also been published in the literature to help clinicians further investigate patients with suspected HAE-nI-C1-INH.⁴⁵ According to this algorithm (Figure 2), it would be beneficial for patients with suspected HAE-nI-C1-INH to undergo allelic screening for the c.983C>A mutation in FXII, regardless of whether they have a positive family history of the condition or not.⁴⁵ If this allelic screen is negative, then suggested further investigations include Sanger sequencing of exon 9 of FXII alongside genotyping of PLG, KNG1, and ANGPT1.⁴⁵ If mutations are not detected in these genes, the algorithm indicates that patients with a family history of the condition are more likely to have HAE-nI-C1-INH presenting as unknown HAE and patients without a family history are more likely to have idiopathic non-histaminergic acquired angioedema.⁴⁵ However, next-generation sequencing should be considered in both cases to improve diagnostic accuracy.⁴⁵

Challenges Associated with Obtaining a Confirmed Diagnosis

Findings from an International Patient Experience of HAE study indicate that 43% of 313 patients waited more than a year after their first swelling attack to seek medical help.^47,48 In the same study, patients reported visiting an average of 4.4 physicians before receiving a confirmed diagnosis of HAE, with 65% receiving prior misdiagnoses.^47,48

Providing a confirmed diagnosis of HAE-nI-C1-INH represents a substantial challenge for clinicians because there remains a significant unmet need for a validated biochemical test and/or biomarker that could specifically identify patients with this form of HAE.^1,5 Furthermore, significant heterogeneity in clinical presentation and disease course among affected patients has been reported in the literature.⁵

Although a positive family history of HAE can aid diagnosis, the rate of occurrence of de novo mutations in HAE-nI-C1-INH is currently unknown.⁴² For comparative purposes, at least one-quarter of patients who receive a diagnosis of HAE-C1-INH are found to have de novo mutations and, therefore, no ancestral family history of the condition.^42,49 Furthermore, the low penetrance of HAE-nI-C1-INH could result in a patient having affected family members who are asymptomatic and therefore undiagnosed.⁵ In an Italian study that included 32 females with HAE-nI-C1-INH caused by mutations in FXII, 44.4% were asymptomatic.³⁴

Although genetic testing can help to provide a confirmed diagnosis, not all clinicians know about, or have access to, licensed laboratories that are able to use customized whole-exon sequencing processes to identify patients with mutations in genes that are confirmed to be associated with HAE-nI-C1-INH.^1,42 In addition, some patients may present with clinical features and laboratory test results (eg, normal levels of C1-INH and C4) that point towards a diagnosis of HAE-nI-C1-INH in the absence of mutations in the genes that are currently known to be associated with the condition, thus hindering a conclusive diagnosis.¹ In these cases, a de novo mutation might be responsible for the patient’s symptoms; therefore, a diagnosis of HAE-nI-C1-INH cannot be completely ruled out.

Patients without a confirmed HAE diagnosis can experience significant difficulties obtaining insurance coverage for long-term treatment costs.^5,50,51 In many cases, treatment response to a trial course of therapy specific to HAE can form part of the diagnostic process for patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH and can help to justify the decision for consideration of long-term access to an on-demand medication and/or access to prophylactic treatment.^50,52

Treatment of HAE-nI-C1-INH

Treatment Challenges

Failure to respond to treatment with corticosteroids and antihistamines frequently forms part of the diagnostic criteria for HAE-nI-C1-INH and is indicative of the absence of histamine degranulation and mast cell degranulation as pathological features of the disease.^1,5 Early clinical evidence suggests that bradykinin might play an important role in many cases of HAE-nI-C1-INH, particularly in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH due to mutations in FXII and PLG, but it is currently unclear whether it is implicated as the main mediator of edema in all forms of HAE-nI-C1-INH.^{13,24,34,53,54} As a result, treatment of HAE-nI-C1-INH remains suboptimal, with further research required; however, it is important to emphasize that therapeutic options that have been approved for HAE-C1-INH should not be withheld from patients with HAE of unknown genetic cause in the meantime.¹

Often, discontinuation of exogenous estrogens is the first step in the treatment of women with suspected HAE-nI-C1-INH prior to initiation of any other therapies, including long-term prophylactics.^1,36 Because of the absence of robust data from clinical trials and approved therapies specific to HAE-nI-C1-INH, treatment of patients is usually based on clinical experience with HAE-C1-INH and comprises on-demand (injectable ecallantide, injectable icatibant, and C1-INH concentrate infusion) and prophylactic (intravenous or subcutaneous C1-INH concentrate, injectable lanadelumab, and, more recently, oral berotralstat) agents that either directly or indirectly modulate the metabolism of bradykinin.^{1,5,13,34,59–61} The proposed modes of action of these therapies in HAE-nI-C1-INH are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Proposed Mode of Action of Treatments Offered to Patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH

In a recent systematic review, it was reported that on-demand and long-term prophylactic treatments of 43 patients with genetically confirmed HAE-nI-C1-INH commonly included the use of C1-INH concentrate, icatibant, progestins, and tranexamic acid.²¹ Although examples of oral berotralstat use in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH are currently limited in the literature, a case report of a patient with a severe needle phobia suggests that berotralstat can provide an effective option where the use of injectable lanadelumab and icatibant is less unfeasible.⁵⁰

In addition, findings from a recent retrospective case series of 23 patients indicate that the strategies used to treat patients with HAE-C1-INH, including prophylactic and on-demand therapies, may also be beneficial in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH.⁹ In this study, treatment regimens and outcomes were found to vary widely between patients, highlighting the need for personalized HAE-nI-C1-INH treatment plans.⁹ Furthermore, in another study of six patients with confirmed HAE-nI-C1-INH, one patient responded well to tranexamic acid but not to C1-INH concentrate, four patients usually responded well to C1-INH concentrate, and one patient responded exclusively to icatibant during acute HAE attacks.⁴² In addition, the importance of the availability of on-demand therapies for patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH was clearly demonstrated, even in individuals who were already receiving long-term prophylactic treatment.⁹ It is crucial that both physicians and patients recognize the value of early treatment in preventing HAE attacks from progressing in severity.¹

It is important to consider that treatment response may also depend on the genetic subtype of HAE-nI-C1-INH that a patient presents with; therefore, a failed response to one therapeutic agent does not necessarily mean that HAE can be ruled out. In the literature, there are reports of attempts to customize treatment strategies in patients with genetically confirmed HAE-nI-C1-INH caused by mutations in either FXII or PLG.²¹ Use of on-demand icatibant treatment by 13 patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH due to the c.988A>G mutation in PLG for a combined total of 201 acute episodes of facial swelling, abdominal swelling, and tongue swelling was shown to shorten the duration of attacks by 88%.⁵⁴ In the same study, use of plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate by 12 patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH due to the aforementioned mutation for a combined total of 74 acute episodes of facial, abdominal, and tongue swelling was shown to decrease the duration of attacks by 44%.⁵⁴ Furthermore, long-term prophylaxis resulted in a mean reduction in attack frequency of 93.9% with an antifibrinolytic (tranexamic acid; three patients), 83.3% with an attenuated androgen (danazol; three patients), and 46.3% with a progestin (desogestrel; six patients).⁵⁴ In contrast, corticosteroid and antihistamine use in these patients during acute attacks or for long-term prophylaxis resulted in a high number of non-responders.⁵⁴

In a separate study, 11 female patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH due to mutations in FXII who were treated with plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate for a total of 143 facial swelling episodes experienced reduced attack durations (mean ± standard deviation [SD] duration: 26.6 ± 10.1 hours) versus the durations of 88 prior untreated facial swelling episodes (mean ± SD duration: 64.1 ± 28.0 hours).⁵³ Long-term prophylaxis resulted in a mean reduction in attack frequency of 100% with danazol (three women), 99.8% with progestins after discontinuation of estrogen-containing oral contraceptives (16 women), and 93.8% with tranexamic acid (four women).⁵³

However, in a study of 21 patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH of unknown genetic cause who were taking tranexamic acid as a prophylactic treatment, only 11 experienced a consistent and persistent reduction in attack rate and 10 discontinued because of lack of efficacy, further highlighting the importance of a personalized approach to HAE therapy.³⁴ It is also important to note that without a biomarker or a biochemical test to help predict treatment response to medications that target the bradykinin pathway, this often means that both patients with confirmed HAE-nI-C1-INH and those with suspected HAE-nI-C1-INH can go through lengthy trials of various treatments before finding one that is right for them.^5,9,59

Pregnancy and HAE-nI-C1-INH Treatment

Therapeutic options for HAE are more limited during pregnancy and careful management of the patient is required.^7,35 Experience of treating pregnant patients for HAE-nI-C1-INH attacks is limited to case reports and small case series in the literature.³⁵ Therefore, it is recommended that a management plan coordinated by a clinician who is specialized in HAE is put in place as early as possible after a patient becomes pregnant. Long-term prophylaxis of pregnant patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH has been described in the literature with no reported complications.^35,62 Ideally, C1-INH concentrate should be made available at the patient’s maternity center and/or home so that treatment can be initiated as quickly as possible when an HAE attack begins.^35,63

Comorbidities and HAE-nI-C1-INH Treatment

A recent population-based cohort study of 239 patients with HAE-C1-INH identified an increased risk of the following comorbidities versus a control cohort of 2383 individuals from the general population:⁶⁴ cardiovascular disease, including hypertension and arterial or venous thromboembolic disease; hyperlipidemia; and autoimmune diseases. Higher prescription rates for drugs targeting hypertension, hypothyroidism, and hyperlipidemia were also observed in patients with HAE versus the general population.⁶⁴

It is also documented that difficulties in obtaining a timely diagnosis of HAE, uncertainties around disease progression, and administration of treatment can result in anxiety and depression.^9,65,66 One survey study of 26 patients with HAE-C1-INH indicated that 39% and 15% of patients experienced depression and anxiety, respectively.⁶⁵

It is important to note that treatment choice can play a significant role in reducing the impact of anxiety and depression in patients with HAE. In a study of 37 patients with HAE, of whom four had been diagnosed with HAE-nI-C1-INH, it was demonstrated that patients who were receiving long-term prophylactic therapy had significantly lower scores for anxiety and depression versus those who were not.⁶⁶ Furthermore, in a recent case report, a patient with HAE-nI-C1-INH who declined a trial course of treatment with injectable lanadelumab and icatibant because of a severe needle phobia reported a significant improvement in anxiety levels when receiving prophylactic treatment with oral berotralstat.⁵⁰ This highlights the benefits of adopting a personalized approach to HAE management that takes into account a patient’s comorbidities and preferences.⁵⁰

Understanding comorbidities in patients with HAE is important because treatment for one condition may change the risk of another.⁶⁴ Use of attenuated androgens, such as danazol and oxandrolone, as prophylactic treatments can contribute to the comorbidities experienced by patients with HAE.⁶⁴ Long-term danazol use has been associated with atherogenic indices in the literature. Studies indicate that long-term androgen use may be associated with increased risks of hypertension, deep vein thrombosis, and liver cancer.^67–70

Although a full investigation of comorbidities in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH has not yet been described in the literature, it is expected that these patients may experience a greater range of comorbidities because of older age at diagnosis and the psychological impact of managing a form of HAE that is less well studied. A recent study identified five cases of HAE-nI-C1-INH, three of which were complicated by epilepsy.⁷¹ In one of these patients, administration of plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate during episodes of epileptic seizure and angioedema resulted in suppression of the seizures within 8 to 16 minutes, whereas medication specific to epilepsy had not been able to completely relieve the patient of their symptoms.⁷¹ In another of the three patients, plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate and icatibant were effective at treating impaired consciousness during epileptic seizures.⁷¹ Both cases underscore the impact that untreated HAE-nI-C1-INH can have on other comorbidities.⁷¹ In contrast, no cases of epilepsy were identified in the 13 patients with HAE-C1-INH who were part of the same study, suggesting further investigation is required to determine if the prevalence of epilepsy is higher among patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH.⁷¹

A case of pancreatitis has also been reported in the literature for a patient with HAE-nI-C1-INH caused by a mutation in FXII.⁷² Although this patient did not receive any HAE-specific treatment to try to resolve the episode of pancreatitis, two other patients in the same study with HAE-C1-INH and pancreatitis responded well to treatment with icatibant, which is an antagonist of the bradykinin B2 receptor that has previously been shown to suppress induced pancreatitis.⁷²

Burden of Disease in Patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH

Because of the episodic nature of the disease, lack of awareness among healthcare professionals, lack of uniform diagnostic criteria, and a lack of approved therapeutics for HAE-nI-C1-INH, the burden of disease for patients remains significant.^5,73

Burden of Disease Associated with Diagnostic Delays

It has been documented in the literature that all forms of HAE impose a significant burden on a patient’s quality of life, education, and work opportunities.⁴⁸ A combination of non-specific presenting symptoms and lack of a routinely available diagnostic test mean that many patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH face a series of prior misdiagnoses, which can cause significant disruption to daily life and lead to unnecessary surgical interventions.^5,48,74

During the time between a patient’s first HAE attack and receipt of a confirmed diagnosis of HAE, they may make multiple trips to physicians and emergency departments, which can result in loss of faith in a system that appears to be unable to diagnose or treat their condition.^48,75 In a recent case series of 23 patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH, an average delay of greater than 10 years between the onset of HAE symptoms and receipt of a confirmed diagnosis was detected.⁹ Lack of an accurate, early diagnosis can leave patients struggling with unexplained and unmanaged symptoms for prolonged periods of time, which can cause significant anxiety and depression.⁹ These feelings of anxiety and depression can be worsened by the knowledge that upper airway swelling episodes can be potentially life-threatening if they are not treated appropriately and in a timely manner.^3,5,29

Abdominal pain is one of the most common symptoms of HAE, frequently leading to misdiagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders.^9,72,76 A retrospective study of 52 patients with normal C1-INH levels indicates that diagnoses of acute abdominal pain (n=16/52; 30.8%) and appendicitis (n=9/16; 56.2%) were frequently made. Furthermore, 81.2% of the patients diagnosed with acute abdominal pain underwent unnecessary invasive surgical procedures.⁷⁴ In support of this, a case series of 23 patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH indicates that a substantial percentage had a medical history of some form of abdominal surgery, including hysterectomy, oophorectomy, appendectomy, or cholecystectomy.⁹

Burden of Disease Associated with Treatment

Adopting a personalized shared decision-making approach that takes patient preferences into account can be a valuable tool for managing the burden of treatment in patients with HAE. In a survey study of 149 patients with HAE-C1-INH, 76% reported having a personalized treatment plan for their condition versus only 50% of 37 patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH.⁷⁷ In addition, 88% of the 149 patients with HAE-C1-INH versus 76% of the 37 patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH reported having on-demand treatments available, and a smaller proportion of patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH (17%) reported receiving prophylactic therapy versus patients with HAE-C1-INH (66%). Notably, 85% of the patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH who participated in this study indicated that, in general, at least three-quarters of their attacks would be severe enough to adversely affect their quality of life if left untreated.⁷⁷

However, even with a treatment plan in place, the burden of treatment can be significant for patients with HAE.⁷⁸ Route of treatment administration can be an important consideration for many patients because it has a significant impact on both adherence to therapy and the perceived success of disease management.^52,78 In a survey study of 75 patients with HAE-C1-INH, almost all users of prophylactic therapy indicated that, despite liking their current medication, they would prefer an oral option if available because they believed that this would be a better fit with their lifestyle versus an injectable treatment.⁷⁹ In this same study, 67% of users of prophylactic therapy (including both intravenous and subcutaneous therapies) agreed that avoiding needles was the primary reason they would try an oral prophylactic medicine.

There is also some early evidence in the literature that therapy may need to be trialed for longer in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH versus in patients with HAE-C1-INH before treatment response is evaluated, which could exacerbate anxiety and frustration. For example, in a study of 22 patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH, the median time to resolution of swelling attacks following treatment with icatibant was found to be longer in patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH versus resolution in patients with type I HAE-C1-INH.⁵⁹ Therefore, more research and clinical trials are needed to determine optimum therapy regimens for patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH.

Although the development and approval of an array of therapeutics for HAE has helped to reduce the overall burden of disease; improve patient quality of life; and take some of the strain off urgent care, emergency departments, and hospitals, it is also important to note that the economic burden of acute and long-term therapies is high.⁵¹ Specifically, concerns about the financial impact of these therapies on healthcare systems have resulted in the implementation of numerous barriers to and limitations on patient access to them.⁵¹ Therefore, insurance coverage for treatment costs associated with the use of on-demand and prophylactic treatments for HAE is often dependent upon patients having a confirmed diagnosis.^50,51

Burden of HAE-nI-C1-INH During Pregnancy

Evidence in the literature indicates that women diagnosed with HAE-C1-INH have a variable disease course during pregnancy, with hormonal changes not the only influential factor.^35,80–82 A recent study of 45 pregnancies in 26 women diagnosed with HAE-nI-C1-INH indicates that the rate of spontaneous abortion (n=8/45; 17.8%) was comparable to that expected for women without HAE-nI-C1-INH.³⁵ However, HAE attacks occurred in 24 of 37 (64.7%) of the pregnancies and were more frequent in the first trimester (41.7%) versus the second (12.5%) and third (20.8%) trimesters.³⁵ Furthermore, of the 15 patients who experienced HAE attacks both before and during their first pregnancy, 9 (60%) reported a worsening in attack frequency. Therefore, pregnancy may worsen the course of HAE-nI-C1-INH disease for some patients, causing significant levels of anxiety. This anxiety may be further exacerbated by the knowledge that obstetrical complications need to be ruled out at the time of attack^35,63 and, as discussed above, therapeutic options for HAE are limited during pregnancy.^35,63 In addition, patients may encounter challenging disparities in healthcare resources, including restrictions on the availability of plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate (which has some dependence on geographical location) and barriers to obtaining insurance coverage for the cost of treatment, meaning treatment access could be dependent upon the patient’s financial situation in some cases.^35,63,83

Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of HAE-nI-C1-INH

Based on the literature reviewed in this article, we recommend following the diagnostic algorithm proposed by the US Hereditary Angioedema Association.¹ Where able, we also recommend pursuing genetic testing as described in Figure 2b. The importance of encouraging physicians to undertake and their patients to undergo genetic testing when HAE-nI-C1-INH is suspected should not be underestimated, since this will aid the reliability of diagnosis and contribute to further understanding of the etiology of the disease. However, we recognize the need for a clinical diagnosis should genetic testing be unavailable or inconclusive.

Effective treatment of HAE-nI-C1-INH requires trial and error of recommended medications, including those approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for HAE-C1-INH. Importantly, the use of some medications to treat HAE-nI-C1-INH may be off-label. Particular attention should be given to the duration of the treatment trial with high-dose antihistamines. A lack of efficacy of high-dose antihistamine therapy should be documented for at least one month or for an interval that is expected to be associated with three or more angioedema attacks, which might exceed one month for some patients. We recommend trying more than one of the treatments that are used for mast cell–mediated angioedema, including omalizumab. In patients with a confirmed diagnosis of factor XII mutation, tranexamic acid could be trialed. Comorbidities associated with the treatment of HAE-nI-C1-INH should be appropriately monitored and managed using a shared decision-making approach between the physician and the patient wherever possible. Comorbidities that are specifically associated with the disease course of HAE-nI-C1-INH should also be regularly reviewed and discussed with patients to enable implementation of an individualized treatment plan that can successfully aid optimization of quality of life.

Conclusions

The prevalence of HAE-nI-C1-INH remains unclear, with difficulties in diagnosis and the lack of a confirmed and specific biochemical test and/or biomarker highlighting the need for healthcare professionals to remain vigilant for potential cases of this form of HAE. Although current research suggests that most of the forms of HAE-nI-C1-INH that have been genetically identified to date may be due to different biochemical disturbances in the kallikrein/kinin and fibrinolytic systems, further research is required to fully elucidate the pathological mechanisms of the disease. Therefore, raising awareness of the presenting features of HAE-nI-C1-INH within both the clinical setting and the general public is critical to aid earlier suspicion and diagnosis of the disease. Furthermore, adopting a personalized approach to HAE-nI-C1-INH treatment is essential to help address the current and significant unmet needs in this patient population.