Back to Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 18

Malnutrition, Frailty, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Rural Older Adults in Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors Huynh NTH, Nguyen TTT , Pham HKT , Huynh NTH, Nguyen NT, Cao NT, Dung DV

Received 24 January 2023

Accepted for publication 13 April 2023

Published 26 April 2023 Volume 2023:18 Pages 677—688

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S405847

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Maddalena Illario



Nhung Thi Hong Huynh,1 Tran To Tran Nguyen,2,3 Huy Kien Tai Pham,3,4 Ngoc Thi Hong Huynh,1 Ngoan Thi Nguyen,1 Ngoc Thanh Cao,2 Do Van Dung5

1Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh, Tra Vinh Province, Vietnam; 2Department of Geriatrics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 3Department of Geriatrics, Gia Dinh People’s Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 4Department of Oriental Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 5Faculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Correspondence: Tran To Tran Nguyen, Department of Geriatrics, 1 Ly Thuong Kiet Street, Ward 7, Tan Binh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Tel +84 979635889, Email [email protected]; [email protected]

Purpose: Rural older adults are more likely to be malnourished than urban older adults, particularly those living in lower-middle-income countries like Vietnam. Therefore, this study aimed to address the prevalence of malnutrition and its association with frailty and health-related quality of life in older rural Vietnamese adults.
Participants and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥ 60 years) living in a rural province in Vietnam. Nutritional status was determined using the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF), and frailty was evaluated using the FRAIL scale. The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) was used to evaluate health-related quality of life.
Results: Among the 627 participants, 46 (7.3%) were malnourished (MNA-SF score < 8), and 315 (50.2%) were at risk of malnutrition (MNA-SF score: 8– 11). Individuals with malnutrition had significantly higher rates of impairments in instrumental activities of daily living and activities of daily living than those without malnutrition (47.8% vs 27.4% and 26.1% vs 8.7%, respectively). The prevalence of frailty was 13.5%. Risk of malnutrition and malnutrition were associated with high risks of frailty, with odds ratios of 2.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16– 3.93) and 4.78 (1.86− 12.32), respectively. Furthermore, the MNA-SF score was positively correlated with eight domains of the health-related quality of life among rural older adults.
Conclusion: The prevalence rates of malnutrition, risk of malnutrition, and frailty were high among older adults in Vietnam. A strong association was observed between nutritional status and frailty. Therefore, this study reinforces the importance of screening for malnutrition and risk of malnutrition among older rural individuals. Further studies should explore whether early nutritional intervention reduces the risk of frailty among older adults and increase their health-related quality of life in the Vietnamese population.

Keywords: FRAIL scale, general health, MNA-SF, nutritional status, psychological stress, SF-36

Introduction

Nutrition is critical in maintaining health and quality of life among older adults, who are vulnerable to malnutrition due to several contributing factors, including chronic diseases, loss of teeth, and decreasing appetite.1,2 Hence, malnutrition remains a serious public health concern among older adults, particularly those in lower-middle-income countries like Vietnam.3 According to data published by the World Health Organization, the prevalence of malnutrition in older people ranges from 1.3% to 47.8%, and it is much higher in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income countries.4 An Indian study reported that 17.9% of older people had malnutrition and approximately 60% were at risk of malnutrition.5 Another study in Malaysia6 found that the prevalence rates of malnutrition and risk of malnutrition in older adults were 7.3% and 23.4%, respectively.

Figure 1 Flow chart of recruitment of the participants in the study.

Factors contributing to malnutrition in older adults include age-related anorexia, chronic diseases, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and frailty.7 Another significant aspect of malnutrition in older adults is its adverse consequences, including sarcopenia, frailty, and falls.8 Approximately 70% of malnourished older individuals have frailty.9 Malnutrition and frailty are interrelated. Long-term malnutrition including insufficient protein and energy intake can result in weight loss, exhaustion, slow walking speed, and low physical activity which are components of the frailty phenotype.10,11 Malnutrition plays an important mechanism in frailty pathogenesis and is a target of frailty treatment.12,13 Further, frailty is a major indicator of malnutrition.7 Functional impairment in frail older adults such as impairments in carrying out activities such as shopping, travel, and meal preparation may lead to social isolation, food apathy, and decreased food intake.7,10 Furthermore, malnutrition and frailty have several common pathophysiological pathways such as weight loss, chronic diseases, cognitive and physical risk factors.9 Malnutrition also increases the risks of infection, hospital admission, and mortality.14 In particular, older people with malnutrition have a lower quality of life than those without malnutrition.15

Vietnam is a rapidly aging country facing challenges in maintaining the well-being of older people at risk of multimorbidity, polypharmacy, frailty, functional impairment, and mental health problems.16 Moreover, approximately 75% of the older Vietnamese population resides in rural areas, where they may have a high risk of malnutrition.17 A previous hospital-based study18 reported that 71.6% of older inpatients were malnourished or at risk of being malnourished, whereas another study found that the prevalence of malnourishment among outpatients with diabetes was 31%.19 However, to our knowledge, there are no previous studies elucidating the nutritional status of community-dwelling older people in rural areas; the problem of malnutrition in this population is often overlooked. This study aimed to address the prevalence of malnutrition and its association with frailty and health-related quality of life among older adults living in a rural province in Vietnam. The findings can inform preventive and interventional strategies for older individuals with malnutrition or at risk of malnutrition, preventing frailty, and improving their quality of life.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Participants

We conducted a cross-sectional study in Tra Vinh province, including seven districts and 106 sub-districts with a high proportion of the Khmer people (a minority ethnic group in Vietnam) in Southern Vietnam.20 Tra Vinh is a coastal province in the Mekong Delta with an economy based on agriculture and aquaculture.20 According to the population statistics in 2019, the total population of Tra Vinh was around one million. People aged ≥ 60 years accounted for 12.3% of the total population, 68.2% were people aged 20–59 years, and the remainder were aged < 20 years (30.3%).20 In particular, approximately 90% of Tra Vinh’s population resides in rural areas and most older adults live in the community, where there is no care service or nursing home.20,21

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (Approval number: 26/HĐĐĐ-ĐHYD), complying with the Declarations of Helsinki.

We used Open Epi version 3.01 to calculate the sample size, with a prevalence of malnutrition in older people of 27%, as specified in a previous study.22 We applied an absolute precision of 5% and a confidence interval of 95%. The primary sample size was 310. Thereafter, a cluster sampling scheme was used; thus, we regarded the effect of intra-cluster correlation (the correlation within the clusters).23 This is called the design effect, a factor used to adjust the required sample size.24 Therefore, the primary sample size was multiplied by two (the design effect) to get the sample size of 620 participants.23 Probability proportional to size sampling with 30 clusters was applied, with 21 individuals in each cluster, and one cluster being equivalent to one sub-district.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 60 years, residence in the community in Tra Vinh province for ≥ 1 year, existence of medical records with a primary care practice, ability to communicate, and the capacity to provide consent for participation in the study. We excluded participants with severe auditory impairment or severe dementia (based on medical records and confirmation by an internal medicine doctor). We did not assess cognition as routine.

Data Collection

The study protocol was explained to eligible participants. Written informed consent was obtained from those who were willing to participate in the study. Trained investigators conducted face-to-face interviews with the participants. Data were collected during a period of 10 months, from December 1st, 2021, to September 30th, 2022. Public health doctors evaluated the eligible participants.

Malnutrition Measurement

We used the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF), a widely used and validated tool, for evaluating nutrition (www.mna-elderly.com).25–27 It includes six items: food intake, weight loss over the past 3 months, mobility, psychological stress or acute disease in the past 3 months, neuropsychological problems; and body mass index or calf circumference,25 with a total score ranging from 0 to 14 points. A total score of 0–7 is classified as malnutrition, 8–11 as at risk of malnutrition, and 12–14 as no malnutrition.25,28

Frailty Measurement

Frailty was evaluated using the FRAIL scale,29 including five components: (1) fatigue (tiredness during the previous 4 weeks), (2) resistance (difficulty in walking up 10 steps), (3) ambulation (difficulty in walking 300 m unaided), (4) illness (having ≥ 5 illnesses) and (5) loss of weight (≥ 5% of weight within 12 months), with the total score of 5. A score ≥ 3 indicates frailty, 1–2 indicates pre-frailty, and 0 indicates robustness. This scale was translated and validated in Vietnamese and has been reported elsewhere.30

Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement

Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), which includes 36 items covering eight health domains.31 Physical functioning (10 items), social functioning (two items), role limitations due to physical problems (four items), role limitations due to emotional problems (three items), mental health (five items), energy and vitality (four items), bodily pain (two items), and general perception of health (five items). The total score ranges from 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates a more favorable health status.31 This questionnaire was translated into Vietnamese and validated in a previous study.32

Other Covariates

Data on other variables were also collected, including demographic information (age, sex, educational level, weight, height, body mass index, and perceived income status), functional status (instrumental activities of daily living and activities of daily living), and chronic diseases. Data on chronic diseases were collected from primary care medical records. Musculoskeletal diseases included osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and gout. Chronic pulmonary diseases included asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or bronchiectasis.

Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were evaluated using the Lawton-Brody scale, which includes eight activities: the ability to use the telephone, ability to go shopping, ability to prepare food, ability to engage in housekeeping, ability to do the laundry, mode of transportation, responsibility for own medications, and ability to handle finances,33 with a total score ranging from 0 to 8, and a higher score indicating a higher level of independence.33 Scores below 8 indicated IADL impairment.33 Activities of daily living (ADL) were evaluated using the Katz Index, including six activities: dressing, bathing, toileting, transferring, feeding, and incontinence.34 Similarly, the total ADL score ranges from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence. ADL impairment was defined as a total score of < 6.34

Data Analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as the number of participants (percentage), and quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). We used chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests to compare categorical variables and one-way analysis of variance or t-test to compare continuous variables with normal distribution. The correlation between the SF-36, including eight scales and two summary measures, and the MNA-SF was determined using Pearson’s coefficient.

The association between nutritional status and frailty, adjusting for age, sex, ADL, and IADL, was examined by the multinomial logistic regression analysis and expressed as odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI). All statistical analyses were performed using the Stata version 14.0 software (STATA Corp, College Station, Texas). Statistical significance was set at p <0.05.

Results

We approached 635 eligible older adults for participation in the study; however, five of them refused to participate and three were excluded due to missing data (Figure 1). Finally, the study included 627 participants with a mean age of 69 ± 7 years; and 63.6% were female. Kinh and Khmer were the two most popular ethnicities (67.4% and 31.9%, respectively). Buddhism was the most popular religion (64.8%). In particular, most of the participants had low educational attainment (preschool and primary school-educated participants accounted for 78.4%), and one-fourth were former farmers (25.4%). Most of the older adults (89.5%) lived with their family members.

Prevalence of Malnutrition

The prevalence of malnutrition was 7.3% (n = 46); however, 50.2% of the study participants (n = 315) were at risk of malnutrition. In particular, the number of malnourished individuals increased with age, with more than 30% (30.4%) aged ≥ 80 years. As shown in Table 1, participants with malnutrition had a lower mean body mass index than those without malnutrition (18.9 ± 3.0 vs 25.6 ± 2.7, p <0.001). In particular, ADL and IADL impairment rates in the malnourished group were significantly higher than those in the non-malnourished group (26.1% vs 8.7% and 47.8% vs 27.4%, respectively).

Table 1 Characteristics of Rural Older Adults in Vietnam Classified by Nutritional Status (N = 627)

Association of Malnutrition and Frailty

Table 2 shows the relationship between nutritional status according to the MNA-SF and frailty status. Based on the FRAIL scale, 13.6% (n = 85) of participants were classified as frail, 53.4% (n = 335) as pre-frail, and 33% (n = 207) as non-frail. The frail group’s malnutrition rate was twice as high as that of the non-frail group (17% vs 6.3%, p <0.001). Moreover, the proportions of participants whose food intake had declined over the past 3 months and who experienced involuntary weight loss were also significantly greater in the frail group than in the non-frail group (45.9% vs 24.7% and 36.5% vs 20.8%, respectively). In particular, 20 participants who met the criteria of weight loss belonged to both the groups of malnutrition (20/46, 43.5%) and frailty (20/85, 23.5%). The results also showed that the rate of psychological stress or acute disease in the past 3 months was three times higher in frail individuals than in non-frail individuals (52.9% vs 17.9%, p <0.001).

Table 2 MNA-SF Item Results Classified by Frailty Status Among Rural Older People in Vietnam (N = 627)® Société des Produits Nestlé SA, Trademark Owners.

In the multinomial logistic regression model assessing the association between nutritional status and frailty, malnutrition, and risk of malnutrition status were independently associated with frailty (Table 3). Individuals at risk of malnutrition had a 2.14 higher odds of frailty (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.16–3.93), which increased to 4.78 (OR = 4.78, 95% CI: 1.86–12.32) in those with malnutrition after adjusting for age, sex, ADL, and IADL. In particular, those with psychological stress or acute disease in the past 3 months had a significantly higher odds ratio of frailty (OR = 5.45, 95% CI: 3.05–9.72) than their counterparts.

Table 3 Multinomial Logistic Regression Analysis of the Nutritional Status and MNA-SF Items Associated with Pre-Frailty/Frailty Among Rural Older Adults in Vietnam (N=627)

Association of Nutritional Status and Health-Related Quality of Life

Table 4 presents the correlation between the MNA-SF and SF-36 scores. Eight domains of the health-related quality of life were positively correlated with the MNA-SF score; two domains, including physical functioning and general health, had a slightly higher correlation with the MNA-SF score than the other domains.

Table 4 Correlation Between MNA-SF Score and Health-Related Quality of Life Measured by SF-36 Among Rural Older Adults in Vietnam (N = 627)

Discussion

Prevalence of Malnutrition

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of malnutrition and its association with frailty and health-related quality of life among older rural adults in Vietnam. Although 7.3% of rural older adults were malnourished, approximately half (50.2%) were at risk of malnutrition. In particular, the prevalence of malnutrition increased with age, with approximately 30% of individuals aged ≥ 80 years experiencing malnutrition. These results indicate that poor nutrition is an alarming issue for older rural Vietnamese adults. Further, the prevalence of malnutrition in our study was similar to that in a Malaysian study6 (7.3% vs 7.5%). However, the prevalence of risk of malnutrition was significantly higher in our study than in the Malaysian study (50.5% vs 23.5%). The prevalence of malnutrition in our study was seven times higher than that reported in a Korean study (7.3% vs 0.8%), whereas the prevalence of risk of malnutrition was nearly four times higher (50.2% vs 13.5%).36 The differences in the prevalence rates may be due to the differences in the socioeconomic status among the countries. First, Vietnamese people, particularly those living in rural areas, have lower incomes than Malaysians and Koreans.37 Meanwhile, income level has been proven to be a strong determinant of nutritional status in older adults. Participants with low income are more likely to be malnourished or at risk of malnutrition.38 Indeed, in our study, approximately 25% of malnourished individuals perceived their financial status as “poverty” or “pro-poverty”. Second, the majority of participants in our study (78.9%) had low educational attainment (preschool/primary school), which was much higher than that in the Korean study (50.9%). Previous studies revealed that older adults with low educational attainment tended to have worse nutritional status due to insufficient knowledge of healthy food selection and a lack of cooking skills.39,40 Furthermore, our study participants lived in a rural community, which is also a determinant of malnutrition or risk of malnutrition status. Several reports have shown that the prevalence of malnutrition in rural communities is approximately double that in urban communities because rural older adults have less access to healthcare services, family support, and diverse food options.41,42 Therefore, our results indicate the need for screening and early interventions for malnutrition and the risk of malnutrition among rural older Vietnamese adults.

Association of Malnutrition and Frailty

Consistent with previous studies, our study confirms that nutrition is significantly associated with frailty.10,36 We found that older adults with malnutrition and risk of malnutrition had 4.78 and 2.14 higher odds of frailty, respectively, than those without malnutrition. Similarly, previous studies in Korea and China reported that older individuals with poor nutritional status had 3.3 and 3.38 higher odds of frailty, respectively, than those with good nutritional status.10,36 This result may be explained by the fact that long-term malnutrition may result in fatigue, weight loss, and reduced activity which are components of frailty.29 One interesting finding in our study is that older adults with psychological stress or acute disease in the past 3 months had 5.45 higher odds of frailty than those without psychological stress and acute disease. These two conditions directly impact mental health and frailty, leading to decreased food intake, reduced mobility and physical activity, and a lack of engagement in social relationships.43 Therefore, older people with acute disease or psychological stress should be recognized as high-risk individuals for frailty.

Association of Nutritional Status and Health-Related Quality of Life

Health-related quality of life is an essential measure of health outcomes in older adults.44 In our study, the MNA-SF score was positively correlated with eight domains of health-related quality of life measured by SF-36, particularly physical functioning and general health. Older individuals with good nutritional status had a higher quality of life. These results align with those of previous studies, which suggested that malnutrition predicted declining quality of life among older adults.45,46 A possible explanation for this is that food intake and nutrition are related to cultural and social aspects of eating and life satisfaction, a part of the quality of life.45 Therefore, older adults with good nutritional status are expected to experience a better quality of life than those with poor nutrition. This result emphasizes the need to improve the nutritional status of older rural adults to improve their quality of life.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing nutritional status among rural older adults living in a community in Vietnam. It provides a clear understanding of malnutrition and risk of malnutrition status and their association with frailty and quality of life among older people in a lower-middle-income country. However, our study has some limitations. First, this was a cross-sectional study; hence, it could not identify the causal relationship between malnutrition and frailty and health-related quality of life. Second, the data may not be nationally representative because our study was limited to a rural province in Vietnam and we may have a selection bias because we did not recruit participants who did not register to primary care. These would be fruitful areas for future research with larger sample sizes and diverse populations in Vietnam. Moreover, our study used overlapping diagnostic criteria for malnutrition (based on MNA-SF) and frailty (based on the FRAIL scale). Approximately 45% of the malnourished individuals had weight loss, accounting for 25% of the frail group. Therefore, our study may have overestimated the association between malnutrition and frailty.

Conclusion

Malnutrition and the risk of malnutrition were significantly higher among older adults living in the community, particularly in those aged ≥ 80 years in an agricultural province in Vietnam. Older individuals with malnutrition had approximately five-fold higher odds of frailty than those without malnutrition. Those with psychological stress or acute disease in the past 3 months had a greater risk of frailty than those without. Furthermore, nutritional status was positively correlated with the health-related quality of life among older rural Vietnamese adults. Therefore, there is a need for screening older rural adults for malnutrition and risk of malnutrition since they lack access to health services, and as nutrition may receive little attention from healthcare providers. In particular, further interventional studies are needed to explore whether early nutritional interventions may reduce the risk of frailty and increase the quality of life among older adults in rural areas.

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (Approval number: 26/HĐĐĐ-ĐHYD). Written informed consent was obtained from the participants in the study.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Rasheed S, Woods RT. Malnutrition and quality of life in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(2):561–566. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2012.11.003

2. Jung SE, Kim S, Bishop A, et al. Poor nutritional status among low-income older adults: examining the interconnection between self-care capacity, food insecurity, and depression. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(10):1687–1694. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2018.04.009

3. Damayanthi H, Prabani KIP. Nutritional determinants and COVID-19 outcomes of older patients with COVID-19: a systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021;95:104411. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104411

4. World Health Organization. Evidence profile: malnutrition. Integrated care for older people (ICOPE); 2017:1–31. Available from: https://www.who.int/ageing/health-systems/icope/evidence-centre/ICOPE-evidence-profile-malnutrition.pdf?ua=1#:~:text=Undernutrition%20is%20common%20among%20older,%2Dincome%20countries%20(6). Accessed February 22, 2022.

5. Krishnamoorthy Y, Vijayageetha M, Kumar SG, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition and its associated factors among elderly population in rural Puducherry using mini-nutritional assessment questionnaire. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7(6):1429–1433. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_22_18

6. Ahmad MH, Salleh R, Siew Man C, et al. Malnutrition among the elderly in Malaysia and its associated factors: findings from the national health and morbidity survey 2018. J Nutr Metab. 2021;2021:6639935. doi:10.1155/2021/6639935

7. Evans C. Malnutrition in the elderly: a multifactorial failure to thrive. Perm J. 2005;9(3):38–41. doi:10.7812/TPP/05-056

8. Laur CV, McNicholl T, Valaitis R, et al. Malnutrition or frailty? Overlap and evidence gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of frailty and malnutrition. Appl Physiol Nutr Metabol. 2017;42(5):449–458. doi:10.1139/apnm-2016-0652

9. Verlaan S, Ligthart-Melis GC, Wijers SLJ, et al. High prevalence of physical frailty among community-dwelling malnourished older adults-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(5):374–382. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.074

10. Liang H, Li X, Lin X, et al. The correlation between nutrition and frailty and the receiver operating characteristic curve of different nutritional indexes for frailty. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):619. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02580-5

11. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–156. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146

12. Fried LP, Cohen AA, Xue Q-L, et al. The physical frailty syndrome as a transition from homeostatic symphony to cacophony. Nat Aging. 2021;1(1):36–46. doi:10.1038/s43587-020-00017-z

13. Wei K, Nyunt MS, Gao Q, et al. Association of frailty and malnutrition with long-term functional and mortality outcomes among community-dwelling older adults: results from the Singapore longitudinal aging study 1. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(3):e180650. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0650

14. Holmes S. The effects of undernutrition in hospitalised patients. Nurs Standard. 2007;22(12):35–38. doi:10.7748/ns2007.11.22.12.35.c6242

15. Volkert D, Beck AM, Cederholm T, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):10–47. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.024

16. World Health Organization. Ageing and health in viet nam. aging and health; 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/vietnam/health-topics/ageing-and-health. Accessed February 23, 2022.

17. Help Age Global Network. Vietnam age watch report card ageing population in Vietnam; 2019. Available from: https://ageingasia.org/ageing-population-vietnam/#:~:text=The%20number%20of%20older%20people%3A%20Vietnam%20is%20one%20of%20the,third%20of%20the%20total%20population.&text=The%20majority%20of%20older%20people,in%20rural%20and%20mountainous%20areas. Accessed February 23, 2022.

18. Tran TP, Nguyen LT, Hirose K, et al. Malnutrition is associated with dysphagia in Vietnamese older adult inpatients. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2021;30(4):588–594. doi:10.6133/apjcn.202112_30(4).0005

19. Nguyen TTH, Vu HTT, Nguyen TN, et al. Assessment of nutritional status in older diabetic outpatients and related factors in Hanoi, Vietnam. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:601–606. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S194155

20. City Population. Trà Vinh province in Vietnam. Provincial division; 2019. Available from: http://citypopulation.de/en/vietnam/prov/admin/84__tr%C3%A0_vinh/. Accessed February 23, 2022.

21. Bank TW. Population, total - Vietnam. Population; 2022. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=VN. Accessed March 10, 2023.

22. Abate T, Mengistu B, Atnafu A, et al. Malnutrition and its determinants among older adults people in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):498. doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01917-w

23. Carlin JB, Hocking J. Design of cross-sectional surveys using cluster sampling: an overview with Australian case studies. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23(5):546–551. doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.1999.tb01317.x

24. Alimohamadi Y, Sepandi M. Considering the design effect in cluster sampling. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2019;11:78. doi:10.15171/jcvtr.2019.14

25. Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, et al. Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(9):782–788. doi:10.1007/s12603-009-0214-7

26. Vellas B, Villars H, Abellan G, et al. Overview of the MNA--its history and challenges. J Nutr Health Aging. 2006;10(6):456–463;discussion 463–455.

27. Rubenstein LZ, Harker JO, Salvà A, et al. Screening for undernutrition in geriatric practice: developing the short-form mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF). J Gerontol a Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(6):M366–372. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.6.M366

28. Guigoz Y. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) review of the literature--what does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging. 2006;10(6):466–485;discussion 485–467.

29. Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(7):601–608. doi:10.1007/s12603-012-0084-2

30. Anh D, Nguyen T, Nguyen T, Nguyen TV. The validity of the FRAIL scale in frailty screening among Vietnamese older people. Aging Med Healthc. 2022;13:87–92. doi:10.33879/AMH.132.2021.07060

31. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483. doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002

32. Khoa VT, Khue NT. Translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary validity of the Vietnamese Short Form 36 (SF-36). Hội Nội Tiết và Đái Tháo Đường miền Trung. 2016;19:154.

33. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186. doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179

34. Katz S. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983;31(12):721–727. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb03391.x

35. Nestlé Nutrition Institute. Mini Nutritional Assessment MNA®. www.mna-elderly.com: https://www.mna-elderly.com/sites/default/files/2021-10/mna-mini-english.pdf. www.mna-elderly.com. Available from:

36. Kim J, Lee Y, Won CW, et al. Nutritional status and frailty in community-dwelling older Korean adults: the Korean frailty and aging cohort study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(7):774–778. doi:10.1007/s12603-018-1005-9

37. CEIC. Vietnam household income per capita. Vietnam; 2021; Available from: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/vietnam/annual-household-income-per-capita#:~:text=Vietnam%20Annual%20Household%20Income%20per,averaged%20value%20of%20813.323%20USD. Accessed January 11, 2023.

38. Maseda A, Diego-Diez C, Lorenzo-López L, et al. Quality of life, functional impairment and social factors as determinants of nutritional status in older adults: the VERISAÚDE study. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(3):993–999. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.04.009

39. Donini LM, Scardella P, Piombo L, et al. Malnutrition in elderly: social and economic determinants. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013;17(1):9–15. doi:10.1007/s12603-012-0374-8

40. Hoogendijk EO, Flores Ruano T, Martínez-Reig M, et al. Socioeconomic position and malnutrition among older adults: results from the FRADEA study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(9):1086–1091. doi:10.1007/s12603-018-1061-1

41. Crichton M, Craven D, Mackay H, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition: associations with geographical region and sex. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):38–48. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy144

42. Ferede YM, Derso T, Sisay M. Prevalence of malnutrition and associated factors among older adults from urban and rural residences of Metu district, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Nutr. 2022;8(1):52. doi:10.1186/s40795-022-00532-9

43. Navarro-Pardo E, Facal D, Campos-Magdaleno M, et al. Prevalence of cognitive frailty, do psychosocial-related factors matter? Brain Sci. 2020;10(12):968. doi:10.3390/brainsci10120968

44. MacLeod S, Schwebke K, Hawkins K, et al. Need for comprehensive health care quality measures for older adults. Popul Health Manag. 2017;21(4):296–302. doi:10.1089/pop.2017.0109

45. Keller HH, Østbye T, Goy R. Nutritional risk predicts quality of life in elderly community-living Canadians. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(1):68–74. doi:10.1093/gerona/59.1.M68

46. Keshavarzi S, Ahmadi SM, Lankarani KB. The impact of depression and malnutrition on health-related quality of life among the elderly Iranians. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;7(3):161–170. doi:10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p161

Creative Commons License © 2023 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.