Back to Journals » Psychology Research and Behavior Management » Volume 16

Linkages Between Parenting Practices and Adolescents’ Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Resilience

Authors Bi X , Wang S 

Received 30 September 2022

Accepted for publication 10 December 2022

Published 5 January 2023 Volume 2023:16 Pages 19—27

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S391867

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Igor Elman



Xinwen Bi, Shuqiong Wang

Department of Education, Shandong Women’s University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Shuqiong Wang, Department of Education, Shandong Women’s University, No. 2399, Daxue Road, Changqing University Science Park, Jinan, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18653143970, Email [email protected]

Background: Life satisfaction is a critical antecedent of adolescents’ positive development in many domains. To promote adolescents to feel more satisfied with their lives, it is important to identify the factors influencing life satisfaction and to further investigate the inner mechanisms. The purpose of this research was to examine whether parenting practices were closely associated with life satisfaction among Chinese adolescents and whether these associations were mediated by adolescents’ resilience.
Methods: In this one-year interval longitudinal study, 353 students (50.7% girls) in Grade 7 and Grade 10 were recruited as participants. At the first wave of assessment, they reported parenting practices and resilience; at the second wave of assessment, they rated the level of life satisfaction.
Results: The results of this study revealed that parental responsiveness, demandingness, and autonomy granting promoted adolescents’ life satisfaction. Additionally, parental responsiveness and demandingness positively predicted adolescents’ life satisfaction through the mediating effect of adolescents’ resilience; however, resilience did not significantly mediate the relation between autonomy granting and adolescents’ life satisfaction.
Conclusion: Adolescents’ resilience plays a mediating role in the relations between parental responsiveness and demandingness and adolescents’ life satisfaction. The present study highlights the significance of providing adolescents with positive parenting practices and promoting adolescents’ development of resilience to elevate their life satisfaction.

Keywords: adolescent, parenting practice, resilience, life satisfaction

Introduction

Life satisfaction is defined as one’s cognitive judgement of life quality.1 As a significant domain of positive psychology, it has received much attention. In this domain, given that adolescents are experiencing many challenges (eg, educational pressure) as well as opportunities (eg, cognitive development) for constructing life satisfaction,2,3 particular attention should be paid to this special developmental stage of adolescence. Recently, an increasing body of research found that adolescents’ life satisfaction is the antecedent of many critical developmental outcomes, such as achieving academic success and decreasing problem behaviors.4–6 Therefore, it’s necessary to focus on the stage of adolescence and identify factors contributing to life satisfaction. Among the influential factors, parenting practices may be vital determinants of life satisfaction.5,7,8 This study focused on investigating the relations between parenting practices and adolescents’ life satisfaction in the Chinese cultural context. To advance previous research, we also examined whether adolescents’ resilience was the underlying mechanism of these relations.

Parenting Practices and Life Satisfaction

The family system is a critical environment that influences individuals’ development. Although individuals spend more time with peers during the period of adolescence, parents still are important providers of valuable advice and resources and supporters of their development.9 Within the family system, parenting practices play a critical part in influencing adolescents’ well-being in multiple domains, including life satisfaction.5,10 Parenting practices are “behaviors defined by specific content and socialization goals”.11 Researchers have divided parenting practices into three central dimensions: responsiveness, demandingness, and autonomy granting.12 Responsiveness refers to expressing emotional warmth to children and responding to children’s needs.13 Demandingness refers to monitoring children’s behaviors and regulating them through mature demands.14 This dimension is consistent with behavioral control and strictness/supervision but is distinct from psychological control where parents impose intrusiveness and domination on children that hinder their psychological and emotional development.15 Autonomy granting reflects encouraging children’s expression, acknowledging their perspectives, and allowing them to make decisions independently.16

Empirical research has generally found that responsiveness and autonomy granting parenting practices are positively associated with adolescents’ life satisfaction.5,7,8,17–20 Since responsive parents often provide emotional support for adolescents and promptly respond to their needs and demands, adolescents are more likely to achieve their psychological need for connectedness, and they would have a greater propensity to perceive life satisfaction.21 As for autonomy granting parenting practice, it can fulfill adolescents’ psychological need for autonomy and promote the development of positive capacities and beliefs (eg, self-efficacy, self-reliance, and self-esteem), which would contribute to their perceptions of life satisfaction.13,22 For the relationship between demandingness and life satisfaction, the existing research found inconclusive results. For instance, some researchers found that parental demandingness promoted adolescents’ life satisfaction in the Spanish, Peruvian, Mexican, and Chilean samples,23 whereas this relationship was insignificant among late adolescents in Greece, Norway, Poland, and Switzerland.19 The inconsistent results may be explained by various cultural values which determine adolescents’ appraisal of parental demandingness and influence the effects of this parenting practice on life satisfaction.

Although most previous studies have found close associations between parenting practices and adolescents’ life satisfaction, they have mainly been conducted in Western cultural contexts. Few studies have examined these associations under the background of Chinese culture. Furthermore, only a few prior studies have explored the underlying mechanisms and examined the mediating factors of these relationships, such as psychology connectedness,19 reciprocal filial piety,20 and self-efficacy.22 At present, we are still far from getting a comprehensive insight into the inner mechanism of how parenting practices are correlated with adolescents’ life satisfaction. This study attempts to investigate the links between parenting practices and adolescents’ life satisfaction in the Chinese cultural background and examine the mechanism of these links by focusing on the mediating effects of adolescents’ resilience.

Mediating Effect of Resilience

Resilience is defined as “the capacity of a system to adapt successfully to significant challenges that threaten its function, viability, or development”.24 In a highly competitive society, it is inevitable to encounter setbacks, and it is important to recover mental balance and adapt to the changing environments after suffering setbacks. In the period of adolescence, resilience may be particularly important. Because adolescents face many challenges from various sources, such as adapting to educational transition, renegotiating their relationships with parents, or even experiencing violence in some conditions.25,26 Resilience can protect them from negative influences and help them deal with stressful events. Understanding the crucial role of resilience in family systems and adolescents’ adaptation would facilitate adopting targeted strategies to promote adolescents’ resilience, which in turn may contribute to their positive development in multiple domains.27–30

Both theoretical and empirical evidence supports the idea of adolescents’ resilience as a mediating factor in the relations between parenting practices and adolescents’ life satisfaction.31–35 For the relations between parenting practices and adolescents’ resilience, the Positive Youth Development theory provides a framework for understanding these relations. This theory proposes that adolescents’ adaptive developmental outcomes can be promoted by harnessing individual and contextual resources.32 As an important family contextual resource, parenting practice may contribute to adolescents’ development of resilience.36 Most research supported this theory and demonstrated that responsiveness, demandingness, and autonomy granting were positively correlated with adolescents’ resilience.31,34,35 Responsive parents show understanding of adolescents’ perspectives and provide emotional support for them, which facilitates them to develop resilience to effectively deal with challenges.34 Parental demandingness can help adolescents understand rules, limits, and consequences, thus making them more likely to develop self-regulation and adapt to challenges or stresses.37 And autonomy granting can provide adolescents with more opportunities to consider and attempt different solutions and learn from the outcomes when faced with problems.37 Adolescents’ resilience may derive from the experience of independently planning and making decisions.31

For the link between resilience and adolescents’ life satisfaction, empirical evidence consistently suggests that adolescents’ resilience is positively linked to life satisfaction, and the positive link has been found both in the Western and Eastern cultural contexts.29,33,38–40 Resilience can help adolescents develop psychological resources, such as affect balance,41 self-esteem,33 and hope.42 Then, these psychological resources facilitate adolescents to resist or recover from negative influences of crises and to actively respond to challenges. As a result, adolescents possessing higher levels of resilience tend to feel more satisfied with their lives.

The Chinese Cultural Background

The interactions of parents and adolescents are embedded in a broad cultural background, and the effects of parenting practices are influenced by the match between parenting and cultural norms.43,44 Since there are some unique characteristics of the Chinese cultural background, we would like to consider the effects of parenting practices in this specific cultural context. Unlike Western cultural values which place more importance on autonomy, traditional Chinese culture places particular emphasis on hierarchy and conformity to authority.45 Additionally, traditional Chinese culture emphasizes parents’ responsibility for disciplining and training their children to meet social requirements.46 In this cultural context, adolescents tend to interpret parental demandingness with positive meaning, such as a highly involved concern and care rather than domination and control.46,47 With the social change, traditional Chinese cultural values are constantly interacting with Western cultural values, and some cultural values are changing towards individualism (eg, encouraging autonomy).48 Under the current Chinese cultural background, autonomy granting may meet adolescents’ needs, thus promoting their positive development. This study aims to explore the effects of parenting practices on adolescents’ resilience and life satisfaction in this unique cultural background. And the exploration of this research question would enrich the literature.

The Present Study

In this study, our purpose is to investigate the relations between parenting practices (ie, responsiveness, demandingness, and autonomy granting) and adolescents’ life satisfaction and examine the mediating role of adolescents’ resilience in these relations under the current Chinese cultural background. Considering the theoretical and empirical evidence and the contemporary Chinese cultural context, we assume that responsiveness, demandingness, and autonomy granting would positively correlate with adolescents’ life satisfaction, and adolescents’ resilience would mediate these relations.

Method

Participants

A longitudinal design was utilized to collect data in this study. Using cluster sampling, we recruited 448 Chinese adolescents in Grade 7 and Grade 10 from 4 secondary schools (47.8% girls; age range: 11.06–17.11 years; Mage = 13.83 ± 1.64 years). One year later, ninety-five students were excluded because of their incomplete questionnaires or withdrawn from this study. The final data set contained 353 students (50.7% girls) who accomplished two-wave assessments. The result of the missing data analysis showed that except for demandingness, none of the study variables at the first assessment significantly differed between the missing and retained individuals (see Table S1 in Supplemental Material). For parents’ educational level, 57.22% of mothers and 66.00% of fathers got senior high school or higher degrees. For the parents’ occupational statuses, 90.93% of mothers and 86.40% of fathers had semiprofessional or professional occupations.

Procedure

This study involved assessment at two time points. Before collecting data, we got written informed consent from all participants. We also informed the participants’ parents about this study and obtained their informed consent. At each assessment, we instructed the participants to complete self-reported questionnaires. At Time 1, they rated parenting practices and resilience; and at Time 2, they rated life satisfaction. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received ethical approval from the institutional review board of Shandong Women’s University.

Measures

Parenting Practices

The Chinese version of the Parenting Styles Inventory II (PSI-II) was used to assess parenting practices.49 This measure consists of three subscales: responsiveness (eg, “My father/mother and I do things that are fun together”), demandingness (eg, “My father/mother points out ways I could do better”), and autonomy granting (eg, “My father/mother believes I have a right to my own point of view”). Adolescents reported parenting practices on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. The Chinese version of PSI-II had good reliability in this study (responsiveness: α = 0.80; demandingness: α = 0.76; autonomy granting: α = 0.81). The result of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the data fitted well with the three-factor model (RMSEA = 0.056, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.91).

Resilience

The Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents was employed to assess resilience.50 In this study, three dimensions of this scale were used: goal planning (eg, “When faced with difficulties, I usually make a plan and find a solution”), affect control (eg, “I can adjust my emotions very well in a short time”), and positive thinking (eg, “I think compared to the results, the process can help people grow”). Participants rated each item using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 = totally untrue to 5 = totally true. The internal consistency of this scale was satisfactory (α = 0.80). CFA showed that the three-factor model was acceptable (RMSEA = 0.055, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.91).

Life Satisfaction

The Chinese version of the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale was utilized to measure adolescents’ life satisfaction.51,52 Participants reported their satisfaction with life in specific domains on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = completely false to 7 = completely true. The internal consistency of this scale was excellent (α = 0.95). As indicated by the result of CFA, the construct validity of this scale was acceptable (RMSEA = 0.060, CFI = 0.91, TLI = 0.90).

Analysis Plan

In the current study, Structural Equation Modeling along with Mplus 7.4 was used to analyze the relations between parenting practices, adolescents’ resilience, and life satisfaction. Specifically, we examined the relations between parenting practices and adolescents’ life satisfaction in the total effect model. Furthermore, we examined the mediating effects of adolescents’ resilience on these relations in the mediation model. Resilience and life satisfaction were constructed as latent variables based on the subscales in these models. We used 95% bias-corrected bootstrap to test the significance of the total effects and the mediating effects. The effect was significant when a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) did not include zero. To evaluate the overall model fit, the following statistical criteria were used: root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI). Overall model fit was acceptable when RMSEA was lower than 0.08, and CFI and TLI were higher than 0.90.

Results

Descriptive Statistics

Table 1 shows the values of mean, standard deviation, and correlation among parenting practices, resilience, and life satisfaction. Three dimensions of parenting practices (ie, responsiveness, demandingness, and autonomy granting) were positively correlated with adolescents’ resilience and life satisfaction. And adolescents’ resilience and life satisfaction also were correlated with each other.

Table 1 Descriptive Statistics of the Variables

Mediating Effect of Resilience

The fitting indexes met the statistical criteria, which indicated that the total effect model was acceptable (RMSEA = 0.080, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.94). The total effects of the three dimensions of parenting practices on adolescents’ life satisfaction were positive (responsiveness: β = 0.26, 95% CI [0.14, 0.38]; demandingness: β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.08, 0.34]; autonomy granting: β = 0.21, 95% CI [0.10, 0.31]). Then we examined the mediating effects of resilience on the relations between parenting practices and adolescents’ life satisfaction. The fitting indexes showed that the data fitted well to the mediation model (RMSEA = 0.072, CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.92). As displayed in Table 2, resilience mediated the relations between parental responsiveness and demandingness and adolescents’ life satisfaction. However, resilience did not significantly mediate the relation between autonomy granting and adolescents’ life satisfaction.

Table 2 Standardized Estimates and 95% CIs for Direct and Indirect Effects

As shown in Figure 1, responsiveness and demandingness were positively associated with adolescents’ resilience (responsiveness: β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.06, 0.39]; demandingness: β = 0.24, 95% CI [0.09, 0.38]); however, autonomy granting was insignificantly associated with adolescents’ resilience (β = 0.16, 95% CI [−.004, 0.30]). In turn, adolescents’ resilience positively predicted life satisfaction (β = 0.41, 95% CI [0.27, 0.54]).

Figure 1 Mediation analysis of parenting practices on life satisfaction via resilience.

Notes: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Although the direction of the relation between parenting practices and adolescents’ resilience was supported by Positive Youth Development theory,32 these variables were concurrently measured. Therefore, we examined the alternative model in which adolescents’ resilience predicted life satisfaction through parenting practices. The result found that the fitness indexes of the alternative model were worse than the original model (RMSEA = 0.129, CFI = 0.81, TLI = 0.75). And the mediating paths were insignificant or marginally significant in the alternative model (see Table S2 in Supplemental Material). Considering the theoretical background and the result of statistical analysis, the original model was preferred.

Discussion

This study sought to examine the relations between parenting practices and Chinese adolescents’ life satisfaction. Furthermore, this study investigated the underlying mechanism of these relations by focusing on the mediating role of adolescents’ resilience.

Parenting Practices and Life Satisfaction

Consistent with previous studies,7,8,17 the current study found that responsiveness, demandingness, and autonomy granting positively predicted adolescents’ life satisfaction. This may be because responsive parents can fulfill adolescents’ basic psychological needs for connectedness by providing them with emotional warmth and responding to their needs.21 Adolescents are more likely to derive satisfaction with life from perceiving emotional connectedness with their parents.21 Regarding the beneficial role of demandingness on adolescents’ life satisfaction, the unique Chinese cultural context may explain this result. Western cultural values place more importance on individualism and promote individual freedom and self-expression.53 In this cultural orientation, western parents are encouraged to exert control, directive, and discipline with caution, and western adolescents may treat parental demandingness as less acceptable and desirable.53 In contrast, traditional Chinese culture emphasizes collectivism and encourages the parenting practice of disciplining and training children to meet social requirements.46 When parents set limitations on their children’s behaviors and propose demands for them, Chinese adolescents tend to regard parental demandingness as normative, interpret this parenting practice as a highly involved concern, and perceive parents’ good intention of promoting children’s development.47 Therefore, Chinese adolescents exposed to high levels of demandingness also feel satisfied with life. As for the promotion effect of autonomy granting on adolescents’ life satisfaction, it may be that adolescents are inclined to endorse the cultural values of autonomy and individuality in the process of experiencing interaction between Western and Chinese cultural values.48 When provided with adequate autonomy, their desire for autonomy would be fulfilled, leading to satisfaction with life.22

Mediation of Resilience

According to our findings, adolescents’ resilience mediated the relations between parental responsiveness and demandingness and adolescents’ life satisfaction. Responsive parents provide emotional support for their children and show more understanding and response to their needs. Adolescents’ development of resilience may be rooted in this positive parenting practice which helps adolescents buffer the consequences of stressful events.31,34,35 Demandingness also plays an important role in promoting adolescents’ resilience because this parenting practice serves the functions of inhibiting adolescents’ problematic behaviors and fostering adaptive outcomes.37 Raised in this parenting practice, adolescents can acquire the skills of regulating themselves, develop the strategies of flexibly adapting to challenges, and actively deal with the stressors in their lives.37 In turn, the development of resilience may increase the opportunities to perceive life satisfaction.31

However, adolescents’ resilience did not significantly mediate the relation between autonomy granting and adolescents’ life satisfaction. This may be explained by that the participants in this study were in a period of educational transition. During this critical period, adolescents would face increasing educational pressure and adaptive problems and need more guidance and advice from parents. Those receiving much autonomy and freedom may lack adequate strategies or supports to tackle the challenges in their lives. Therefore, adolescents may be more likely to experience severe difficulties which hinder them from developing resilience.32

Implications for Practice

Our study suggests that positive parenting practices are important elements in promoting adolescents’ resilience and life satisfaction. Therefore, programs should be implemented to guide parents to adopt positive parenting practices, for example, how to express responsiveness to children’s needs, which family rules should be set to discipline children’s behavior and direct them to pursue excellence, and when is appropriate to grant adolescents autonomy. These programs are particularly useful for parents who are facing obstacles in the process of parenting children and those who need more information and support to improve their parenting practices. In addition, it is also necessary to develop programs aiming at promoting adolescents’ development of resilience, such as teaching adolescents problem-solving coping strategies,54 encouraging them to participate in prosocial activities,55 and providing them with mindfulness training.56 By developing and implementing targeted programs, adolescents would have more opportunities to get support from family environments and build psychological resources, which may further enhance their life satisfaction.

Contributions and Limitations

The present study has some contributions in the following aspects. First, this study enriches the literature by examining the relations between parenting practices and adolescents’ life satisfaction in a non-Western cultural context. Second, this study extends our understanding of the inner mechanism by demonstrating that adolescents’ resilience is an important mediator of the relations between these variables. Additionally, the mediating roles of adolescents’ resilience varied for the relations between different parenting practices and adolescents’ life satisfaction. Third, there are some practical implications suggested by the results of this study. For instance, parents should provide their children with emotional support, appropriate discipline, and adequate autonomy to enhance their life satisfaction. Furthermore, parents also should use responsiveness and demandingness to promote adolescents’ development of resilience which contributes to their life satisfaction.

Despite these contributions, there are several limitations of this study. First, we recruited Chinese adolescents as participants in this study. Caution should be exercised when generalizing the conclusions of this study to other cultural contexts or other developmental stages. Second, we found that individuals retained in the study reported a higher level of parental demandingness than those excluded from this study. Therefore, it should be prudent when interpreting the effects of parental demandingness. Third, the research design of this study was not optimal. In this study, parenting practices and adolescents’ resilience were measured concurrently. Future research should conduct a 3-wave longitudinal research design to examine the associations between these variables. Finally, this study only examined the mediation of adolescents’ resilience. Future research should explore other possible mediators and compare the effects of different mediators.

Conclusions

This study investigated the relations between parenting practices and adolescents’ life satisfaction in the contemporary Chinese cultural background. Furthermore, this study also explored the mediating role of adolescents’ resilience in these relations. The findings suggested that responsiveness, demandingness, and autonomy granting can promote adolescents’ life satisfaction. Additionally, parental responsiveness and demandingness can help adolescents build resilience, which in turn contributes to life satisfaction. This study may be useful for directing professionals and practitioners to adopt targeted efforts to enhance adolescents’ life satisfaction, such as guiding parents to use positive parenting practices and developing projects to strengthen adolescents’ resilience.

Funding

This study was funded by the Scientific Research Fund for High-level Talents in Shandong Women’s University (2019RCYJ05) and the Science and Technology Support Plan for Youth Innovation in Shandong Province (2021RW022).

Disclosure

The authors declared no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Huebner ES, Hills KJ, Jiang X. Assessment and promotion of life satisfaction in youth. In: Proctor C, Linley PA, editors. Research, Applications, and Interventions for Children and Adolescents. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013:23–42. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6398-2_3

2. Moksnes UK, Løhre A, Lillefjell M, Byrne DG, Haugan G. The association between school stress, life satisfaction and depressive symptoms in adolescents: life satisfaction as a potential mediator. Soc Indic Res. 2016;125(1):339–357. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0842-0

3. Cikrikci Ö, Odaci H. The determinants of life satisfaction among adolescents: the role of metacognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Soc Indic Res. 2016;125(3):977–990. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0861-5

4. Heffner AL, Antaramian SP. The role of life satisfaction in predicting student engagement and achievement. J Happiness Stud. 2016;17(4):1681–1701. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9665-1

5. Suldo SM, Huebner ES. The role of life satisfaction in the relationship between authoritative parenting dimensions and adolescent problem behavior. Soc Indic Res. 2004;66(1):165–195. doi:10.1023/B:SOCI.0000007498.62080.1e

6. Sun RCF, Shek DTL. Positive youth development, life satisfaction and problem behaviour among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: a replication. Soc Indic Res. 2012;105(3):541–559. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9786-9

7. Beiswenger KL, Grolnick WS. Interpersonal and intrapersonal factors associated with autonomous motivation in adolescents’ after-school activities. J Early Adolesc. 2010;30(3):369–394. doi:10.1177/0272431609333298

8. Vasquez AC, Patall EA, Fong CJ, Corrigan AS, Pine L. Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning: a meta-analysis of research. Educ Psychol Rev. 2016;28(3):605–644. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9329-z

9. Steinberg L, Silk JS. Parenting adolescents. In: Bornstein MH, editor. Handbook of Parenting: Volume 1. Children and Parenting. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2002:103–133.

10. Çiçek İ, Tanriverdi S, Şanli ME, Bulus M. Parental attitudes and socio-demographic factors as predictors of smartphone addiction in university students. Int J Psychol Educ Stud. 2021;8(2):158–169. doi:10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.2.430

11. Darling N, Steinberg L. Parenting style as context: an integrative model. Psychol Bull. 1993;13(3):487–496. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.48

12. Skinner E, Johnson S, Snyder T. Six dimensions of parenting: a motivational model. Parenting. 2005;5(2):175–235. doi:10.1207/s15327922par0502_3

13. Gray MR, Steinberg L. Unpacking authoritative parenting: reassessing a multidimensional construct. J Marriage Fam. 1999;61(3):574–587. doi:10.2307/353561

14. Baumrind D. The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. J Early Adolesc. 1991;11(1):56–95. doi:10.1177/0272431691111004

15. Liew J, Kwok O, Chang Y, Chang BW, Yeh YC. Parental autonomy support predicts academic achievement through emotion-related self-regulation and adaptive skills in Chinese American adolescents. Asian Am J Psychol. 2014;5(3):214–222. doi:10.1037/a0034787

16. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: an overview of self-determination theory. In: Ryan RM, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. Oxford University Press; 2012:85–107.

17. Chai WY, Kwok SYCL, Gu M. Autonomy-granting parenting and child depression: the moderating roles of hope and life satisfaction. J Child Fam Stud. 2018;27(8):2596–2607. doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1102-8

18. Chang L, Mcbride-Chang C, Stewart SM, Au E. Life satisfaction, self-concept, and family relations in Chinese adolescents and children. Int J Behav Dev. 2003;27(2):182–189. doi:10.1080/01650250244000182

19. Filus A, Schwarz B, Mylonas K, Sam DL, Boski P. Parenting and late adolescents’ well-being in Greece, Norway, Poland and Switzerland: associations with individuation from parents. J Child Fam Stud. 2019;28(2):560–576. doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1283-1

20. Tan SA, Nainee S, Tan CS. The mediating role of reciprocal filial piety in the relationship between parental autonomy support and life satisfaction among adolescents in Malaysia. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(2):804–812. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0004-7

21. Teubert D, Pinquart M. The link between coparenting, parenting, and adolescent life satisfaction. Fam Sci. 2011;2(4):221–229. doi:10.1080/19424620.2012.666655

22. Reed K, Duncan JM, Lucier-Greer M, Fixelle C, Ferraro AJ. Helicopter parenting and emerging adult self-efficacy: implications for mental and physical health. J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25(10):3136–3149. doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0466-x

23. Reparaz C, Rivas S, Osorio A, Garcia-Zavala G. A parental competence scale: dimensions and their association with adolescent outcomes. Front Psychol. 2021;12:652884. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652884

24. Masten AS. Resilience theory and research on children and families: past, present, and promise. J Fam Theory Rev. 2018;10(1):12–31. doi:10.1111/jftr.12255

25. Kuo C, LoVette A, Slingers N, Mathews C. Predictors of resilience among adolescent girls and young women who have experienced intimate partner violence and sexual violence in South Africa. J Interpers Violence. 2022;37(15–16):NP13425–NP13445. doi:10.1177/08862605211005158

26. Steinberg L. Adolescence. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013.

27. Dray J, Bowman J, Campbell E, et al. Systematic review of universal resilience-focused interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(10):813–824. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2017.07.780

28. Droppert K, Downey L, Lomas J, et al. Differentiating the contributions of emotional intelligence and resilience on adolescent male scholastic performance. Personal Individ Differ. 2019;145:75–81. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.023

29. Ramos-Díaz E, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Axpe I, Ferrara M. Perceived emotional intelligence and life satisfaction among adolescent students: the mediating role of resilience. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20(8):2489–2506. doi:10.1007/s10902-018-0058-0

30. Çiçek İ. Effect of hope on resilience in adolescents: social support and social connectedness as mediators. J Posit Sch Psychol. 2021;5(2):136–147. doi:10.47602/jpsp.v5i2.283

31. Dawson M, Pooley J. Resilience: the role of optimism, perceived parental autonomy support and perceived social support in first year university students. J Educ Train Stud. 2013;1(2):38–49. doi:10.11114/jets.v1i2.137

32. Lerner RM, Almerigi JB, Theokas C, Lerner JV. Positive youth development a view of the issues. J Early Adolesc. 2005;25(1):10–16. doi:10.1177/0272431604273211

33. Liu Y, Wang Z, Zhou C, Li T. Affect and self-esteem as mediators between trait resilience and psychological adjustment. Personal Individ Differ. 2014;66:92–97. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.023

34. Nair N, Taylor ZE, Evich CD, Jones BL. Relations of positive parenting, effortful control, and resilience in rural Midwestern Latinx early adolescents. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;113:105003. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105003

35. Zakeri H, Jowkar B, Razmjoee M. Parenting styles and resilience. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2010;5:1067–1070. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.236

36. Masten AS. Ordinary magic: resilience processes in development. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):227–238. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227

37. Brooks RB. The Power of Parenting. In: Goldstein S, Brooks RB, editors. Handbook of Resilience in Children. Boston: Springer; 2005:297–314. doi:10.1007/0-306-48572-9_18

38. Martínez-Martí ML, Ruch W. Character strengths predict resilience over and above positive affect, self-efficacy, optimism, social support, self-esteem, and life satisfaction. J Posit Psychol. 2017;12(2):110–119. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1163403

39. Bajaj B, Pande N. Mediating role of resilience in the impact of mindfulness on life satisfaction and affect as indices of subjective well-being. Personal Individ Differ. 2016;93:63–67. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.005

40. Wang K, Kong F. Linking trait mindfulness to life satisfaction in adolescents: the mediating role of resilience and self-esteem. Child Indic Res. 2020;13(1):321–335. doi:10.1007/s12187-019-09698-4

41. Liu Y, Wang Z, Lü W. Resilience and affect balance as mediators between trait emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Personal Individ Differ. 2013;54(7):850–855. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.010

42. Satici SA. Psychological vulnerability, resilience, and subjective well-being: the mediating role of hope. Personal Individ Differ. 2016;102:68–73. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.057

43. Bi X, Zhang L, Yang Y, Zhang W. Parenting practices, family obligation, and adolescents’ academic adjustment: cohort differences with social change in China. J Res Adolesc. 2020;30(3):721–734. doi:10.1111/jora.12555

44. Lansford JE, Godwin J, Al-Hassan SM, et al. Longitudinal associations between parenting and youth adjustment in twelve cultural groups: cultural normativeness of parenting as a moderator. Dev Psychol. 2018;54(2):362–377. doi:10.1037/dev0000416

45. Peterson GW, Steinmetz SK, Wilson SM. Parent-Youth Relations: Cultural and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Psychology Press; 2005.

46. Chao RK. Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Dev. 1994;65(4):1111–1119. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00806.x

47. Liu W, Guo S, Qiu G, Zhang SX. Corporal punishment and adolescent aggression: an examination of multiple intervening mechanisms and the moderating effects of parental responsiveness and demandingness. Child Abuse Negl. 2021;115:105027. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105027

48. Zeng R, Greenfield PM. Cultural evolution over the last 40 years in China: using the Google Ngram Viewer to study implications of social and political change for cultural values. Int J Psychol. 2015;50(1):47–55. doi:10.1002/ijop.12125

49. Darling N, Toyokawa T. Construction and Validation of the Parenting Style Inventory II (PSI-II); 1997. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.22528.87048

50. Hu YQ, Gan YQ. 青少年心理韧性量表的编制和效度验证[Development and psychometric validity of the Resilience Scale for Chinese adolescents]. Acta Psychol Sin. 2008;40(8):902–912. Chinese. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00902

51. Huebner ES. Conjoint analyses of the students’ life satisfaction scale and the Piers-Harris self-concept scale. Psychol Sch. 1994;31(4):273–277. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(199410)31:4<273::aid-pits2310310404>3.0.CO;2-A

52. Zhang XG, He LG, Zhang X. 青少年学生生活满意度的结构和量表编制[Adolescent students’ life satisfaction: its construct and scale development]. Psychol Sci. 2004;27(5):1257–1260. Chinese. doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2004.05.068.

53. Chen X, Fu R, Yiu WYV. Culture and parenting. In: Bornstein MH, editor. Handbook of Parenting Volume 2: Biology and Ecology of Parenting. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2019:448–473.

54. Dumont M, Provost MA. Resilience in adolescents: protective role of social support, coping strategies, self-esteem, and social activities on experience of stress and depression. J Youth Adolesc. 1999;28(3):343–363. doi:10.1023/A:1021637011732

55. Zimmerman MA, Stoddard SA, Eisman AB, Caldwell CH, Aiyer SM, Miller A. Adolescent resilience: promotive factors that inform prevention. Child Dev Perspect. 2013;7(4):215–220. doi:10.1111/cdep.12042

56. Yuan Y. Mindfulness training on the resilience of adolescents under the COVID-19 epidemic: a latent growth curve analysis. Personal Individ Differ. 2021;172:110560. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110560

Creative Commons License © 2023 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.