Back to Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 7

Kaempferol nanoparticles achieve strong and selective inhibition of ovarian cancer cell viability

Authors Luo H, Jiang B, Li B, Li Z, Jiang BH, Chen YC

Received 7 May 2012

Accepted for publication 24 May 2012

Published 24 July 2012 Volume 2012:7 Pages 3951—3959

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S33670

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 4

Haitao Luo,1 Bingbing Jiang,2 Bingyun Li,2–4 Zhaoliang Li,1 Bing-Hua Jiang,5 Yi Charlie Chen1

1Department of Biology, Natural Science Division, Alderson-Broaddus College, Philippi, 2Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, 3WVNano Initiative, 4Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, WV, USA; 5Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract: Ovarian cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death for women throughout the Western world. Kaempferol, a natural flavonoid, has shown promise in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer. A common concern about using dietary supplements for chemoprevention is their bioavailability. Nanoparticles have shown promise in increasing the bioavailability of some chemicals. Here we developed five different types of nanoparticles incorporating kaempferol and tested their efficacy in the inhibition of viability of cancerous and normal ovarian cells. We found that positively charged nanoparticle formulations did not lead to a significant reduction in cancer cell viability, whereas nonionic polymeric nanoparticles resulted in enhanced reduction of cancer cell viability. Among the nonionic polymeric nanoparticles, poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO) nanoparticles incorporating kaempferol led to significant reduction in cell viability of both cancerous and normal cells. Poly(DL-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles incorporating kaempferol resulted in enhanced reduction of cancer cell viability together with no significant reduction in cell viability of normal cells compared with kaempferol alone. Therefore, both PEO-PPO-PEO and PLGA nanoparticle formulations were effective in reducing cancer cell viability, while PLGA nanoparticles incorporating kaempferol had selective toxicity against cancer cells and normal cells. A PLGA nanoparticle formulation could be advantageous in the prevention and treatment of ovarian cancers. On the other hand, PEO-PPO-PEO nanoparticles incorporating kaempferol were more effective inhibitors of cancer cells, but they also significantly reduced the viability of normal cells. PEO-PPO-PEO nanoparticles incorporating kaempferol may be suitable as a cancer-targeting strategy, which could limit the effects of the nanoparticles on normal cells while retaining their potency against cancer cells. We have identified two nanoparticle formulations incorporating kaempferol that may lead to breakthroughs in cancer treatment. Both PEO-PPO-PEO and PLGA nanoparticle formulations had superior effects compared with kaempferol alone in reducing cancer cell viability.

Keywords: nanochemoprevention, kaempferol, ovarian cancer, nanoparticles, viability, natural compound

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other articles by this author:

Readers of this article also read:

Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study

Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan MS, Habib SS, Memic A

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:6003-6009

Published Date: 5 December 2012

Application of magnetically induced hyperthermia in the model protozoan Crithidia fasciculata as a potential therapy against parasitic infections

Grazú V, Silber AM, Moros M, Asín L, Torres TE, Marquina C, Ibarra MR, Goya GF

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5351-5360

Published Date: 8 October 2012

A MSLN-targeted multifunctional nanoimmunoliposome for MRI and targeting therapy in pancreatic cancer

Deng L, Ke X, He Z, Yang D, Gong H, Zhang Y, Jing X, Yao J, Chen J

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5053-5065

Published Date: 19 September 2012

Biofunctionalization of a titanium surface with a nano-sawtooth structure regulates the behavior of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

Zhang WJ, Li ZH, Liu Y, Ye DX, Li JH, Xu LY, Wei B, Zhang XL, Liu XY, Jiang XQ

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4459-4472

Published Date: 13 August 2012

Nimodipine-loaded mixed micelles: formulation, compatibility, pharmacokinetics, and vascular irritability study

Song X, Jiang Y, Ren CJ, Sun X, Zhang Q, Gong T, Zhang ZR

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:3689-3699

Published Date: 13 July 2012

Multifactorial determinants that govern nanoparticle uptake by human endothelial cells under flow

Samuel SP, Jain N, O'Dowd F, Paul T, Kashanin D, Gerard VA, Gun'ko YK, Prina-Mello A, Volkov Y

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:2943-2956

Published Date: 14 June 2012

Nanomedicine as an emerging approach against intracellular pathogens

Armstead AL, Li B

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:3281-3293

Published Date: 9 December 2011

Zinc oxide nanoparticles as selective killers of proliferating cells

Taccola L, Raffa V, Riggio C, Vittorio O, Iorio MC, Vanacore R, Pietrabissa A, Cuschieri A

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:1129-1140

Published Date: 30 May 2011