Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 15

Investigation of Virulence Genes of the Predominant Bacteria Associated with Renal Stones and their Correlation with Postoperative Septic Complications

Authors Ahmed AE, Abol-Enein H, Awadalla A, El degla H, El-Shehaby OA

Received 5 April 2022

Accepted for publication 30 June 2022

Published 9 July 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 3643—3655

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S368852

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Suresh Antony



Asmaa E Ahmed,1 Hassan Abol-Enein,2 Amira Awadalla,2 Heba El degla,3 Omar A El-Shehaby1

1Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt; 2Center of Excellence for Genome and Cancer Research, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt; 3Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Correspondence: Amira Awadalla, Center of Excellence for Genome and Cancer Research, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, PO Box 35516, Mansoura, Egypt, Tel +20 502202222, Email [email protected]

Abstract:
Purpose: Nephrolithiasis is a worldwide disease, and 4.7% of the patients may develop postoperative sepsis. Characterization of virulence genes of bacteria associated with renal stones is still lacking in the literature. The study aimed to investigate the virulence genes of the predominant stone bacterial isolate and their association with postoperative septic complications in patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Methods: Stone and midstream urine samples were collected from 200 nephrolithiasis patients who underwent PCNL. Microbiological examination and virulence profile were studied for the common bacteria isolated from the stones.
Results: Microbiological analysis revealed that Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant organism in stone samples (42.8%), while Escherichia coli (56.6%) was the dominant pathogen in midstream urine. Eight patients (4%) developed septic complications; stone culture was positive for S. aureus in seven and E. coli in one patient, while all but one had negative midstream urine. The patient with positive midstream urine culture had also S. aureus infection. Detection of virulence genes in S. aureus isolated from stones showed a high positivity of the hemolysine gene hla (93.3%) and adhesion gene fnbA (73.3%), whereas enterotoxin genes (sec and sea) were negative in all S. aureus stone cultures. Moreover, the adhesion genes (fnbB and can), hemolysine gene (hlb), panton-valentine leukocidin (pvl) gene and the enterotoxin gene (seb) were significantly higher in septic patients compared to the non-septic ones (p< 0.05). Interestingly, there was a significant relation between the existence of virulence genes and the resistance of antibiotics (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: There has been a notable shift toward gram-positive organisms (S. aureus) in the stone culture. Moreover, S. aureus virulence genes were significantly attributed to the resistance of some antibiotics and postoperative septic complications, suggesting that the stone culture could be more informative than urine culture, especially in predicting the risk of postoperative sepsis.

Keywords: S. aureus, nephrolithiasis, antibiotic resistance, percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Introduction

Urolithiasis is a common worldwide disease. The prevalence depends on the geographical location and ranged between 5% and 20%. Moreover, during the last 20 years, the prevalence of urolithiasis has interestingly increased, especially in developing countries. The rate of stone recurrence is quite high; it can be up to 50–70% over 10 years of follow-up.

Urolithiasis is considered as a significant health problem with high socioeconomic costs. Several models might expect dramatic rises in urolithiasis in the future.1

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for large renal stones beyond the scope of indications of shock wave lithotripsy. Numerous studies have concluded that about 30% of the patients undergoing PCNL developed perioperative complications, and 10% to 30% of the patients had postoperative complications.2 Although fever is usually related to an immunological reaction to the operation, 4.7% of the patients may develop a postoperative septic complications.3

Historically, the association between bacteria and kidney stones was traditionally restricted to the relationship between urease-splitting bacterial species and magnesium-ammonium-phosphate calculi (struvite stones). However, infection stones represented just 4% of the stones, the majority of stones are calcium-based (calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate) and uric acid stones.4 Kidney stones have been found to be commonly associated with bacteria. Frequently, kidney stone patients have concomitant urinary tract infections (UTI), regardless its chemical composition. Following stone removal, resolution of bacteriuria is highly expected.5

Techniques for precluding postoperative infectious complications are nowadays based on the data provided by midstream urine culture. However, there are many reports of septic complications in patients who received a dose of antibiotic based on urine culture.6 The American Urological Association (AUA) advises antibiotic prophylaxis after PCNL. Nevertheless, several reports have noted that even with using a prophylaxic dose of antibiotics, septic complications occur in around 8–10% of the patients.6,7 Some authors’ data reported that the bacterial agents isolated from midstream urine samples were entirely different from the agents isolated from the stones of patients who suffered from infectious complications after PCNL6,8. Moreover, recent studies tried to change the old belief that gram-negative species commonly represent the kidney stone’s micro-flora rather than gram-positive species.4,9

The pathogenicity of bacterial agents and their ability to cause infectious complications is basically determined by the acquisition of virulence characteristics encoded by certain genes, which enable pathogens to colonize over host mucosal surfaces and invade the typically sterile urinary tract.10

Virulence factors such as adhesion and biofilm have been extensively studied by scientists on bacteria isolated from UTI.11 Few investigations have been performed to study the prevalence of virulence genes of bacteria associated with stones. Studies of the virulence genes of bacteria isolated from stone samples are scanty and are commonly restricted to gram-negative bacteria.12,13

Therefore, the present study is proposed to investigate the precision of midstream urine culture and stone culture in predicting patients at high risk for postoperative septic complications. Moreover, we aim to study the virulence features of the most common stone bacterial isolates and investigate their significance in developing septic complications.

Patients and Methods

Patients

This prospective study included 200 consecutive patients with kidney stones scheduled for PCNL in a tertiary referral center, admitted to the hospital between December 2019 and October 2021. Midstream urine culture was obtained from all patients prior to PCNL. Those who showed positive culture received a full course of antibiotics based on culture sensitivity. All patients who underwent PCNL had negative urine culture and received a perioperative prophylactic single dose of broad spectrum antibiotics. Stones were managed by mechanical fragmentation using ultrasound or pneumatic lithoclast. Stone fragments were collected under complete aseptic condition. Post-operative follow-up was carried out, and the primary endpoint was the development of septic complications; in terms of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). SIRS was defined as tachypnea (>20 breaths per min) or PCO2 < 32 mmHg, fever or hypothermia, leukopenia (<4000 cells/mm3), leukocytosis (>12,000 cells/mm3), tachycardia (>90 beats per min) or more than 10% of immature neutrophils.14 Sepsis was considered SIRS with the suspicion or confirmation of a microorganism-caused infection.15 Patients with indwelling urinary catheters and urinary stents were excluded from the study.

Methods

Stone fragments were obtained under complete aseptic condition and subjected to microbiological analysis including bacterial identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and virulence profile of the most common bacterial isolates. Moreover, the stone fragments were subjected to chemical analysis using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).

Analysis of Chemical Composition

A portion of the removed stone was utilized for chemical composition analysis using Perkin Elmer FTIR (FTIR 2000, Perkin-Elmer Co., USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Briefly, the stone fragments were washed with distilled water to remove any residuals of blood and tissue and allowed to be dry. Then, the stones were ground manually by mortar, and the FT-IR spectral analysis was performed with the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) technique.16

Microbiological Processing of the Samples and Bacterial Identification

The remaining part of the stones was subjected to bacteriological examination according to Tavichakorntrakool et al17 method. The stone fragments were immediately washed in sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and then crushed with a sterile grinding mortar. The crushed fragments of the stones were cultured in a brain heart infusion broth medium and then incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h aerobically, and then the stone homogenate and urine samples were cultured on cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar and blood agar using a standard loop technique and then incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h. As previously described, sterile PBS was used as a negative control for assessing the quality assurance and testing for the contamination.18 Bacterial colonies were identified by Gram stain and a standard biochemical reaction for full identification of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. VITEK2 system version 08.01 (BioMérieux, France) was used to confirm the bacterial identification. Bacterial isolates were then preserved for additional molecular testing in nutrient broth media, supplemented with glycerol (30%) at −80°C.19

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was tested by the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method using Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA). The following antibiotic discs (Oxoid, UK) were used: vancomycin (VA, 30 µg), cefoxitin (Fox, 30 µg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC,20/10 µg), nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg), norfloxacin (NOR, 10 µg), cefaclor (CEC, 30 µg), gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), cephalothin (CE, 30 µg), ampicillin–sulbactam (SAM, 20 µg) and levofloxacin (LEV, 5 µg). Disc diffusion procedure was conducted based on the guidelines of the clinical and laboratory standard institute (CLSI 2018).

DNA Extraction

Bacterial isolates were cultured in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth at 37 °C for 18 h prior to the DNA extraction. Bacterial cells were collected from 1.5 ml LB broth, then suspended in 100 µl PrepMan™ Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (Applied Biosystems®) and incubated at 100 °C for 10 min. The cell debris was collected into a pellet by centrifugation, and the supernatant was collected into a fresh tube. The DNA extraction was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, DNA was checked using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for Detection Virulence Genes

Multiple PCR assays were carried out to detect the following 9 S. aureus virulence genes, including the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl) gene, the enterotoxin a (sea), b (seb), and c (sec) genes, the hemolysin alpha (hla) and beta (hlb) genes, and the adhesion factor genes including collagen-binding protein (can), fibronectin-binding proteins A (fnbA) and B (fnbB) genes. The primers are listed in Table S1. The PCR mixture with a final volume of 25 µL contained 1 µL of DNA template, 2 µL of a reverse and forward primers (10 µM), 12.5 µL of Maxima Hot Start PCR master mix (2X) (Thermo Scientific®), and nuclease-free water (9.5 µL). A negative control sample for each gene was prepared by replacing the DNA sample with nuclease-free water. The conditions of PCR were performed as follows: the step of initial denaturation (95°C for 10 min), followed by 35 cycles of denaturation stage for 30s at 94°C, 45s for annealing stage; the corresponding annealing temperatures are listed in Table S1, extension stage for 45s at 72°C, and final extension stage at 72°C for 10 min. And, 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis was used to visualize all PCR products.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) when normally distributed and use median and range when non-normally distributed, whereas categorical data were presented as frequency (number and percentage). Comparison between the two types of samples was carried out by Fisher’s exact test. When the P value was <0.05, the results were considered statistically significant. The SPSS 19 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used.

Results

Patients’ Demographics

Table 1 provides demographic characteristics of patients enrolled in the study. Of all patients, bacterial culture was positive for 70 (35%) and 60 (30%) for stone and midstream urine samples, respectively. Eight patients (4%) developed postoperative septic complications. For all patients, the mean operative time was 88.43±24.34 minutes. For septic patients, it was 98.12±14.03 minutes, and for non-septic was 87.93±24.62 minutes. Bleeding occurred in 11 (5.5%) patients; 3 of them had postoperative septic complications. The tracts were single for 180 (90%) patients and multiple for 20 (10%) patients. Three septic patients had multiple tracts, and five had a single tract. Stone disintegration was performed using the ultrasound disintegration for 152 patients, of whom 7 were septic. Pneumatic disintegration was used for 27 patients; 1 was septic, and combined disintegration was utilized for 21 patients.

Table 1 Patient Demographics

Stone Chemical Composition

Calcium-based stones were found in 77 (38.5%), while the remaining 110 (55%) had non-calcium-based stones and only 13 (6.5%) had combined ones. Calcium oxalate and uric acid stones were the most common types of calcium-based and non-calcium-based stones, respectively. Table 1 shows the frequency of positive stone culture in all types of stones.

Microbiological Study

The bacterial spectra of samples collected from the stone and midstream urine are shown in Table 2. The highest percentage of bacterial isolates detected in the stone samples was Staphylococcus aureus (42.8%), and for midstream urine was Escherichia coli (56.6%). The similarities between the type of organism detected in stone samples and those from the midstream urine are shown in Table 2. Compared to 70 positive stone cultures, midstream urine samples showed positive culture with the same organism in 26 (37.1%), positive culture with different organism in 12 (17.1%) and sterile culture in the remaining 32 (45.7%) samples. It was observed that there was no statistical significance between the type of bacterial stone culture and their chemical composition (Table 3).

Table 2 Comparison Between Positive Bacterial Stone Culture and Midstream Urine Culture

Table 3 The Distribution of the Types of Bacterial Stone Culture in Relation to Its Chemical Composition

Of the eight patients who developed septic complication, all had positive stone culture and only one had positive midstream urine culture. Stone culture was positive for S. aureus in 7 and E. coli in one patient. The only patient who had positive midstream urine culture had also S. aureus.

Because of the findings that S. aureus was the most predominant isolate detected in all stone samples and also associated with postoperative infectious complications, its virulence genes and antibiotic sensitivity were investigated.

Virulence Genes Profile

The distribution of the virulence genes was studied among the 30 S. aureus samples, as shown in Table 4. For hemolysin genes, hla was positive in 28 (93.3%), while hlb was positive in 17 (56.7%). pvl, a Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene, was positive in 17 (56.7%) specimens. Regarding adhesion genes, fnbA was positive in 22 (73.3%), fnbB in 7 (23.3%) and can in 7 (23.7%). On the other hand, among enterotoxin genes, only seb gene was positive in 5 (16.7%). An example of PCR results is shown in Figures S1S4 for detection of the adhesion genes (fnbA, fnbB and can), hemolysine genes (hla and hlb), pvl gene, and enterotoxin gene (seb), respectively.

Table 4 Distribution of Virulence Genes Among S. aureus Strains and Among Septic and Non-Septic Patients

Virulence Genes Among Septic and Non-Septic Patients

Comparison of the distribution of the virulence genes among septic (n=7) and non-septic (n= 23) patients with positive S. aureus showed that hla gene and fnbA gene had no statistical significance, while fnbB, can, seb, pvl and hlb genes showed high statistical significance (Table 4).

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

S. aureus strains were resistant for cephalotin (66.6%), norfloxacin (56.6%), cefoxitin (36.6%), amoxicillin/clavulanic and cefaclor (30%), and levofloxacin and gentamicin (26.6%). On the other hand, they showed high sensitivity for both nitrofurantoin and ampicillin–sulbactam (83.3%) and vancomycin (76.6%) (Figure S5).

The presence of hlb gene was associated with resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, norfloxacin, cefaclor and ampicillin–sulbactam (P = 0.002, 0.02, 0.001 and ≤0.001, respectively). pvl existence was associated with the resistance of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefaclor, cephalotin and ampicillin–sulbactam (P= ≤0.001, 0.002, ≤0.001 and ≤0.001, respectively). A part of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefaclor resistance showed a significant increase with the existence of fnbA (P = 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). The seb gene showed a significant association with the resistance to cefoxitin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefaclor and ampicillin–sulbactam (P= 0.008, 0.001, 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). On the other hand, fnbB and can show a significant association with the resistance to cefoxitin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, norfloxacin, cefaclor, ampicillin–sulbactam and levofloxacin (P = 0.004, ≤0.001, 0.01, 0.003, ≤0.001 and 0.04, respectively) (Table 5).

Table 5 Relation of Antibiotic Resistance to Virulence Genes of S. aureus

Discussion

Postoperative complications are observed in patients with renal stones treated by PCNL in up to 4.7% due to bacterial infection.3 Some studies reported that midstream urine culture is not helpful for the prediction of septic complications, therefore, suggested the use of stone culture.3,6,20 Recent studies showed a trend towards a change in stone micro-flora from gram-negative to gram-positive bacteria.4,9 Nevertheless, characterization of bacterial stone species and analysis of their virulence nature is still lacking in the literature, especially for cases who developed bacterial septic complications.

Previous studies reported that the prevalence of bacterial infection in urine and stone cultures are not always similar.3,21 This fact was confirmed by the present study that showed that the urinary cultures were different from that of stone culture. This study indicated a 35% and 30% prevalence of stone and midstream urine infections, respectively. These results are nearly similar to the studies of Mariappan and Loong22 and Shah et al,23 who showed a prevalence of stone infection in 34.3% and 36.4%, respectively. Nevertheless, different frequencies of infection from midstream urine (22%) were reported by Wang et al.24

In the past, it was known that gram-negative pathogens were the most common organism associated with renal stone infection. However, many recent reports stated that change of the offending bacteria associated with stones become with more gram-positive organism. Recent reports documented that Staphylococcus spp., either epidermidis and/or aureus, are incriminated in stone infection. One of these reports stated that gram-positive organisms (Staphylococcus spp.) were the dominant pathogen in preoperative urine and stone cultures.9 Other studies that used microbiome analysis revealed that the Staphylococcus spp. was the dominant genera in the stone and urine of kidney stone patients.4,25 Also, recent studies concluded that renal stones were significantly associated with S. aureus infection as it can colonize the stones.6,26,27 These findings again were confirmed in this study, as S. aureus was found to be the most predominant organism in stone isolates (30/70). On the other hand, E. coli was the predominant organism isolated from the midstream urine samples in our study. These findings also are proved by Eswara et a20 and Zeng et al.3

Several studies reported that the emergence of S. aureus is attributed to the presence of foreign bodies like stones. This information clarifies the high rate of S. aureus infection in stone samples.26,28,29 Moreover, recent in vitro studies demonstrated that Staphylococcus spp. has crystal aggregation potential.30 Furthermore, it is clear that the stone disease microbiology has significantly changed over the last decade, with gram-negative organisms giving way to gram-positive organisms.9

Shoshany et al31 and Zeng et al 3 found that the incidence of postoperative septic complication was highly associated with positive stone culture. Similar to the previous studies, our results showed that 4% (8/200) of patients developed postoperative septic complications, seven patients their stones were associated with S. aureus infection, and one with E. coli. One of these samples was associated with positive S. aureus stone and midstream urine culture. Walton-Diaz et al6 recorded that 5.7% (7/122) of percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients had fever or sepsis, in one patient S. aureus was the causative agent, as S. aureus was present in the renal stone culture and not detected in the midstream urine or urine sample from pelvis.

The ability of S. aureus to cause infection is probably due to the expression of a wide range of virulence factors, including adhesions and toxins. Several studies highlighted the role of Staphylococcal toxins and adhesion genes that could be critical in the physiopathology of UTI.32,33 So, the present study focused on detecting the main S. aureus virulence genes previously described in the case of UTIs, which included hemolysin (hla and hlb), Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl), adhesion (can, fnbA, and fnbB), and enterotoxin (seb, sec and sea) genes.32,33 Based on this, we studied the pathogenic potentiality of S. aureus isolated from stones concerning those genes.

Hemolysin genes produced by S. aureus are a crucial virulent factor. They have cytotoxic action responsible for lysing red blood cells and culminating in worsening of clinical conditions34. S. aureus has been shown to produce alpha, beta, gamma, and delta toxins, although different strains may vary in level of their expression. Among these toxins, alpha and beta toxin were detected by the most pathogenic S. aureus strains and considered a significant virulence factor. In the present study, hla- and hlb-positive isolates represented 93.3% and 56.7%, respectively; these results are more or less similar to results obtained by Li et al35 as they reported that 99% and 52% of S. aureus isolated from blood samples harboring hla and hlb genes, respectively. On the other hand, Ando et al36 stated that hla and hlb were detected in 81% and 76% of S. aureus isolated from UTI, respectively.

The pvl is a leukotoxin-forming pore produced by pvl gene. It can attack and destroy host leukocytes via plasma membrane perforation along with intracellular organelle membranes.19 In the last decades, in vitro studies pointed the potential role of pvl in inducing cell lysis and programmed cells death.37 In the current study, we observed that the pvl gene was detected in 56.7% of isolated S. aureus. Sultan and Nabiel19 reported that the pvl gene was detected in 23% of S. aureus isolated from urine samples.

The first stage in the occurring of S. aureus infection is adherence to host tissues. There are many types of adhesions, the so-called “microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules” or MSCRAMM. Attachment of S. aureus to the human body occurs by the use of microbial surface components such as can, fnbA, and fnbB. The reported observation in this issue is variable. In the present study 73.3% of the strains harboring the fnbA gene, can and fnbB genes were detected in 23.3% of the isolates. These results are inconsistent with the results obtained for S. aureus isolated from urine samples.36 While, in the study performed by Baba-Moussa et al,33 the fnbA represents 17% in S. aureus isolated from UTI. Shahmoradi et al11 reported that fnbA present in 70% of S. aureus isolated from different clinical samples (blood, tracheal, aspirate, and urine).

Some S. aureus strains express pyrogenic exotoxins, such as staphylococcal enterotoxins.1 Regarding the findings of PCR in this study, it was clear that 16.7% of the isolates had seb gene; this result is near to the result obtained by Sabouni et al,38 as they reported that 11.5% of S. aureus isolated from urine were positive for seb gene. The sec and sea genes were not detected among S. aureus isolates these results are in agreement with the results obtained by Sabouni et al.38

In the current study, all S. aureus associated with septic patients developed most of the studied virulence genes and showed significance with the hlb, pvl, fnbB, can and seb genes. These results could explain the occurring of postoperative sepsis. The expression of these virulence genes could help in the persistence of infection. So, monitoring these strains and their virulence genes is of great importance.

S. aureus isolates had demonstrated higher resistance rates to norfloxacin and cephalothin. On the other hand, they showed a high sensitivity rate for nitrofurantoin, vancomycin, and ampicillin–sulbactam. The previous result is in agreement with Shah et al,23 as they concluded that S. aureus isolated from stones was sensitive for nitrofurantoin and vancomycin.

Bacterial infection and antimicrobial susceptibility are related to the local antibacterial spectrum. The most prevalent uro-pathogens’ resistance rate considerably differed across nations. Higher resistance rates to fluoroquinolones, amoxicillin/clavulanate, fosfomycin, and aminoglycosides were observed in North Macedonia. The cephalosporins, piperacillin/tazobactam, carbapenems, and nitrofurantoin recorded a high resistance rate in Spain, while Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole showed high resistance in Turkey.39 A Chinese study reported that Staphylococcus spp. showed resistance to cephalosporins, penicillins, fluoroquinolones, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.40 In a Russian study, Staphylococcus spp. were resistant to bacitracin, ampicillin, cefepime, cephalexin, nitrofural, levofloxacin, streptomycin, ofloxacin, sulfanilamide, and tetracycline.27

The antibiotic resistance was compared with virulence genes, and the study showed that the resistance of some antibiotics was associated with the existence of virulence genes. This could be because virulence genes help bacteria to establish chronic infection and enhance their antibiotic resistance.

Conclusions

Our data confirmed that the microorganism profile of the stone had been changed from gram-negative pathogen to gram-positive (S. aureus), which showed a high prevalence of virulence genes, especially in patients who developed postoperative septic complications. Furthermore, the existence of these genes was significantly related to antibiotic resistance. Therefore, the stone culture could be more reliable than the urine culture in predicting patients at high risk for postoperative infectious complications.

We recommend taking a small piece of the stone for culture during PCNL. This simple procedure may save the lives of a considerable number of patients at risk of developing septic complications through tailoring of postoperative antibiotic therapy.

Nevertheless, our study is not free of limitations, of these: the small number of studied patients with S. aureus and the small number of investigated septic patients. Still, the incidence of sepsis due to infection does not excessed 4.7%. So, to consolidate this data, we encourage to perform multi-center studies. Moreover, the use of antibiotics prior to PCNL may have an impact on changing the type of stone bacterial flora.

In this study, we used PCR technology to detect virulence genes, the most popular and well-established method for identifying pathogenic bacteria. It is considered a powerful technology for the detection of virulence genes, it is not only sensitive and specific but it also allows quick screening for bacterial toxins. Nevertheless, it does not reflect the actual behaviour of virulence factors. Meanwhile, based on the PCR results, further research is warranted to assess the role of these virulence factors by analyzing their corresponding proteins and judging their actual biological behaviour. Therefore, we recommend further research to avoid such shortcomings to consolidate our initial observations.

Data Availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article and Supplementary Materials.

Ethical Consideration

Prior to specimen collection, the research was accepted by the Faculty of Medicine – Mansoura University institutional review board and the local ethical committee (ID: RP.20.12.90). Informed consent was taken from all patients, and all of them were treated according to the principles of declaration of Helsinki.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This work was supported by Science, Technology and Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in Egypt for the financial support of this study [Grant No 43356].

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this work.

References

1. Bauza J, Pieras E, Grases F, et al. Urinary tract infection’s etiopathogenic role in nephrolithiasis formation. Med Hypotheses. 2018;118:34–35. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2018.06.002

2. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):899–906. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.020

3. Zeng T, Chen D, Wu W, et al. Optimal perioperative antibiotic strategy for kidney stone patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;97:162–166. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.095

4. Dornbier RA, Bajic P, Van Kuiken M, et al. The microbiome of calcium-based urinary stones. Urolithiasis. 2020;48(3):191–199. doi:10.1007/s00240-019-01146-w

5. Omar M, Abdulwahab-Ahmed A, Chaparala H, Monga M. Does stone removal help patients with recurrent urinary tract infections? J Urol. 2015;194(4):997–1001. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.096

6. Walton-Diaz A, Vinay JI, Barahona J, et al. Concordance of renal stone culture: PMUC, RPUC, RSC and post-PCNL sepsis—a non-randomized prospective observation cohort study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017;49(1):31–35. doi:10.1007/s11255-016-1457-y

7. Koras O, Bozkurt IH, Yonguc T, et al. Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(1):55–60. doi:10.1007/s00240-014-0730-8

8. Mariappan P, Smith G, Bariol SV, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1610–1614. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000154350.78826.96

9. Paonessa JE, Gnessin E, Bhojani N, Williams JJC, Lingeman JE. Preoperative bladder urine culture as a predictor of intraoperative stone culture results: clinical implications and relationship to stone composition. J Urol. 2016;196(3):769–774. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.148

10. Ribet D, Cossart P. How bacterial pathogens colonize their hosts and invade deeper tissues. Microbes Infect. 2015;17(3):173–183. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2015.01.004

11. Shahmoradi M, Faridifar P, Shapouri R, Mousavi SF, Ezzedin M, Mirzaei B. Determining the biofilm forming gene profile of staphylococcus aureus clinical Isolates via multiplex colony PCR method. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;7(2):181.

12. Maheswari UB, Palvai S, Anuradha PR, Kammili N. Hemagglutination and biofilm formation as virulence markers of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in acute urinary tract infections and urolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2013;29(4):277. doi:10.4103/0970-1591.120093

13. Zhong F, Wu W, Chen D, et al. The characteristic and relationship of Escherichia coli isolated from urine and stones in patients with calcium oxalate stones. Urolithiasis. 2021;49:1–8.

14. Ratzinger F, Haslacher H, Perkmann T, et al. Sepsis biomarkers in neutropaenic systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients on standard care wards. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45(8):815–823. doi:10.1111/eci.12476

15. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 sccm/esicm/accp/ats/sis international sepsis definitions conference. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(4):530–538. doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1662-x

16. Yalçın MS, Tek M. Analysis of Urinary stones collected from some patients with X-Ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Appl Spectrosc. 2019;85(6):1050–1057. doi:10.1007/s10812-019-00758-9

17. Tavichakorntrakool R, Prasongwattana V, Sungkeeree S, et al. Extensive characterizations of bacteria isolated from catheterized urine and stone matrices in patients with nephrolithiasis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(11):4125–4130. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs057

18. Barr-Beare E, Saxena V, Hilt EE, et al. The interaction between Enterobacteriaceae and calcium oxalate deposits. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139575. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139575

19. Sultan AM, Nabiel Y. Association of TSST-1 and pvl with mecA genes among clinical staphylococcus aureus Isolates from a tertiary care hospital. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2019;13(2):855–864. doi:10.22207/JPAM.13.2.21

20. Eswara JR, Sharif-Tabrizi A, Sacco D. Positive stone culture is associated with a higher rate of sepsis after endourological procedures. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(5):411–414. doi:10.1007/s00240-013-0581-8

21. Margel D, Ehrlich Y, Brown N, Lask D, Livne P, Lifshitz D. Clinical implication of routine stone culture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy—a prospective study. Urology. 2006;67(1):26–29. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.008

22. Mariappan P, Loong CW. Midstream urine culture and sensitivity test is a poor predictor of infected urine proximal to the obstructing ureteral stone or infected stones: a prospective clinical study. J Urol. 2004;171(6 Part 1):2142–2145. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000125116.62631.d2

23. Shah P, Baral R, Agrawal C, Lamsal M, Baral D, Urinary Calculi: KB. A microbiological and biochemical analysis at a tertiary care hospital in Eastern Nepal. Int J Microbiol. 2020;2020:1–9. doi:10.1155/2020/8880403

24. Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Li J. An evaluation of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in patients with urinary stone disease: data from a high-volume stone management center. World J Urol. 2020;38(2):425–432. doi:10.1007/s00345-019-02772-0

25. Liu F, Zhang N, Jiang P, et al. Characteristics of the urinary microbiome in kidney stone patients with hypertension. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s12967-020-02282-3

26. Kitano H, Shigemoto N, Koba Y, et al. Indwelling catheterization, renal stones, and hydronephrosis are risk factors for symptomatic Staphylococcus aureus-related urinary tract infection. World J Urol. 2021;39(2):511–516. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03223-x

27. Ignatova N, Ivanova T, Antonyan A, et al. Efficacy of Photodynamic Inactivation Against the Major Human Antibiotic-Resistant Uropathogens. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2021:495.

28. Bichler K-H, Eipper E, Naber K, Braun V, Zimmermann R, Lahme S. Urinary infection stones. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002;19(6):488–498. doi:10.1016/S0924-8579(02)00088-2

29. Walker JN, Flores-Mireles AL, Pinkner CL, et al. Catheterization alters bladder ecology to potentiate Staphylococcus aureus infection of the urinary tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(41):E8721–E8730. doi:10.1073/pnas.1707572114

30. Chutipongtanate S, Sutthimethakorn S, Chiangjong W, Thongboonkerd V. Bacteria can promote calcium oxalate crystal growth and aggregation. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2013;18(3):299–308. doi:10.1007/s00775-012-0974-0

31. Shoshany O, Margel D, Finz C, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for infection stones: what is the risk for postoperative sepsis? A retrospective cohort study. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(3):237–242. doi:10.1007/s00240-014-0747-z

32. Rahimi F, Katouli M, Karimi S. Biofilm production among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from catheterized patients with urinary tract infection. Microb Pathog. 2016;98:69–76. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2016.06.031

33. Baba-Moussa L, Anani L, Scheftel J, et al. Virulence factors produced by strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from urinary tract infections. J Hosp Infect. 2008;68(1):32–38. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2007.10.010

34. Monteiro A, Pinto BL, Monteiro J, et al. Phylogenetic and molecular profile of staphylococcus aureus isolated from bloodstream infections in Northeast Brazil. Microorganisms. 2019;7(7):210. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7070210

35. Li X, Fang F, Zhao J, et al. Molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infection. Braz J Infect Dis. 2018;22:487–494. doi:10.1016/j.bjid.2018.12.001

36. Ando E, Monden K, Mitsuhata R, Kariyama R, Kumon H. Biofilm formation among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients with urinary tract infection. Acta Med Okayama. 2004;58(4):207–214. doi:10.18926/AMO/32090

37. Correa-Jiménez O, Pinzón-Redondo H, Reyes N. High frequency of panton-valentine leukocidin in staphylococcus aureus causing pediatric infections in the city of Cartagena-Colombia. J Infect Public Health. 2016;9(4):415–420. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2015.10.017

38. Sabouni F, Mahmoudi S, Bahador A, et al. Virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an Iranian referral children’s hospital. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2014;5(2):96–100. doi:10.1016/j.phrp.2014.03.002

39. De Lorenzis E, Alba AB, Cepeda M, et al. Bacterial spectrum and antibiotic resistance of urinary tract infections in patients treated for upper urinary tract calculi: a multicenter analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(10):1971–1981. doi:10.1007/s10096-020-03947-z

40. Chen D, Zhang Y, Huang J, et al. The analysis of microbial spectrum and antibiotic resistance of uropathogens isolated from patients with urinary stones. Int J Clin Pract. 2018;72(6):e13205. doi:10.1111/ijcp.13205

Creative Commons License © 2022 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.