Back to Journals » Journal of Inflammation Research » Volume 16

Insights into the Role of Inflammation in the Management of Atherosclerosis

Authors Rocha VZ, Rached FH, Miname MH

Received 24 April 2022

Accepted for publication 28 March 2023

Published 24 May 2023 Volume 2023:16 Pages 2223—2239

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S276982

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Ning Quan



Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha,1,2,* Fabiana Hanna Rached,1,3,* Marcio Hiroshi Miname1,*

1Cardiopneumology Department at the Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School Hospital (FMUSP), Sao Paulo, Brazil; 2Fleury Medicina e Saúde, Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; 3Department of Cardiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha, Fleury Medicina e Saúde, Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Atherosclerosis is the biological basis of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke, the leading causes of death in the world. After decades of studies, the understanding of atherosclerosis has evolved dramatically, and inflammation has been recognized as one of the most relevant pillars in all phases of atherosclerotic disease. Nevertheless, only recently, the trial CANTOS, and subsequent outcome studies with colchicine, finally provided proof-of-concept evidence that anti-inflammatory therapies were able to reduce cardiovascular events with no influence on lipid levels. These landmark studies inaugurated an era of clinical and pre-clinical studies of immunomodulatory strategies focused on reduction of cardiovascular risk. Although there are promising results in the field, selection of the most appropriate immunomodulatory therapy and identification of patients who could benefit the most, are still enormous challenges. Further research is imperative before we can finally advance towards regular use of anti-inflammatory agents to reduce atherosclerotic events in our clinical practice.

Keywords: inflammation, atherosclerosis, anti-inflammatory therapies, cardiovascular risk

Introduction

Atherosclerosis is the biologic substrate of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke, the two leading causes of death in the world. According to data from the World Health Organization (WHO), cardiovascular diseases were responsible for approximately 32% of all global deaths in 2019, with an estimation of 17.9 million deaths. Coronary heart disease and stroke accounted for 85% of those deaths.1

Atherosclerotic disease refers to formation of plaques within the arterial intima derived from the accumulation of lipidic and/or fibrous material.2 Upon entry and accumulation of circulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles in the arterial intima, followed by biochemical modification that can turn them into more pro-inflammatory particles, a sequence of various events culminates in the formation of an atheroma. Despite the clear importance of lipids in the genesis of this phenomenon, there is undeniable evidence that inflammation participates in the entire atherosclerotic process, from the development of incipient fatty streaks to the occurrence of ischemic outcomes. In the early phase of atherogenesis, inflammatory responses represent an important interface between the presence of risk factors and initiation of plaque formation.2 Once an atheroma is formed, inflammation may continue playing a role in its progression, with participation of elements of both innate and adaptive immunity, including factors with pro- and anti-inflammatory properties. Finally, inflammatory mediators can also operate critically in plaque rupture and plaque erosion, the most important triggers of thrombotic complications of atherosclerosis.

In addition to the evidence linking inflammation to the biology of atherosclerosis, population studies also demonstrate an association between concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers, such as high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and risk of ischemic events.3 Post hoc analyses of outcome studies testing statins and other lipid-lowering therapies have also suggested that lowering inflammation, in addition to LDL-C control, may also contribute to reduce the risk of atherosclerotic events.4,5 Despite all the previous suggestive evidence, the Canakinumab Antiinflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS) was the first trial that successfully demonstrated a causal relationship between inflammation and atherothrombotic events.6 By showing that use of Canakinumab, an anti-inflammatory therapy targeting the interleukin-1β (IL-1β) immunity pathway, resulted in a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular events compared to placebo, CANTOS provided solid proof on the role of inflammation in the management of atherosclerotic disease6 and paved the way for subsequent clinical studies with other anti-inflammatory agents, such as colchicine.7,8 This review intends to recapitulate the evidence suggesting an important role of inflammation in the management of atherosclerosis, and the most promising anti-inflammatory therapies in the field of cardiovascular prevention.

The Role of Inflammation in the Pathophysiology of Atherothrombosis

Atherosclerosis refers to the presence of atheroma within the arterial wall. Inflammation consists in a fundamental pillar of the entire process of atherosclerosis, through numerous inflammatory cells and mediators, participating in its inception, progression and in thrombotic complications.

Initiation of Atherosclerosis

In the early stage of atherosclerosis, traditional and non-traditional risk factors can activate inflammatory pathways that can alter the behavior of cells of the artery wall towards a proatherogenic milieu.2 LDL particles can accumulate in the subendothelial space, particularly in the presence of a dysfunctional endothelium, and can be retained by extracellular matrix macromolecules. While trapped in the intima, the LDL particles can undergo biochemical modification, such as oxidation. The retained and now modified lipoproteins can elicit an innate inflammatory response. Endothelial cells express adhesion molecules that in conjunction with locally secreted chemokines, lead to leukocyte recruitment.9 Circulating monocytes that infiltrated the intima can differentiate into macrophages in response to macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), derived from endothelial cells and other cell types.9 In addition to persistent recruitment and differentiation, monocyte-derived macrophages can also proliferate locally, representing a major cell subset in the atheroma.10,11 Accumulated macrophages in the subendothelial space can engulf the retained lipoproteins through the so-called scavenger receptors. Distinctly from the LDL receptors, the scavenger receptors are not downregulated by the intracellular cholesterol content, allowing macrophage lipid overloading, and thus formation of foam cells.12 According to recent data, smooth muscle cells may also generate macrophage-like foam cells and contribute to lesion progression.13

Progression of Atherosclerosis

Activated macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques are critical determinants of the local inflammatory milieu, by secreting proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and producing reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.14 Macrophages can also amplify inflammation through crosstalks with smooth muscle cells and T cells. Due to a deficient capacity to migrate, macrophages in the atheroma undergo apoptosis, with consequent accumulation of cell debris, and formation of a necrotic core in the plaque.15 Despite the known role of macrophages in the maintenance of plaque inflammation, these cells are notorious for their plasticity, and can assume distinct functions and phenotypes depending on several factors.16,17 Experimental studies suggested the concept of a subclassification of macrophages into a more inflammatory M1 subset, activated by interferon-γ (IFNγ) and lipopolysaccharide, and a less inflammatory M2 subset, activated by IL-4 or IL-13.16 Although both M1 and M2 macrophages have been found in humans and mice plaques,18,19 recent data suggest that the M1/M2 classification may be an oversimplification of macrophage heterogeneity.20,21

The activation of the NACHT, LRR and PYD domains containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in macrophages has received particular visibility in the context of atherosclerosis. Cholesterol crystals formed in foam cells can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, which unleashes caspase-1 to cleave the pro-form IL-1β to its active form.22,23 The functional IL-1β stimulates smooth muscle cells to secrete IL-6, a messenger cytokine that induces an acute phase response through CRP production.24 After CANTOS demonstrated the clinical relevance of IL-1β inhibition in the reduction of atherosclerotic events, the inflammatory pathway from NLRP3 to IL-1 to IL-6 to CRP turned into a central target for atheroprotection.25

Smooth muscle cells also have critical functions in atherosclerosis. These cells migrate from the media to the intima, where they can proliferate and secrete extracellular matrix macromolecules, contributing to the elaboration of an atheroma fibrous cap. In addition to the known beneficial role in fibrous cap strength and stabilization, smooth muscle cells can actually have a broad participation in atherosclerosis, by secreting chemokines that induce leukocyte recruitment, by transitioning to macrophage-like cells, and by contributing to necrotic core formation upon death.25

Adaptive immunity has also a pivotal role in atherothrombosis. MHC class II-expressing cells and T cells are the most representative elements of adaptive immunity in the atherosclerotic plaque.9 CD4+ T cells are often identified in atherosclerotic plaques. Whereas T helper 1 (Th1) cells have a pro-atherogenic role, producing IFNγ, a cytokine that can promote macrophage activation, and counteract cap formation, regulatory T cells (Treg) present anti-atherogenic functions, by controlling the proinflammatory effects of other cells. Considerable evidence supports the idea that atherosclerosis-specific antigens, such as LDL and its apolipoprotein B (ApoB) drive an immune response, probably started in the lymph nodes.26 The roles of other Th cell subsets in atherosclerosis, such as Th2 and Th17 among others, are still less understood.26

Complications of Atherosclerosis

During a great course of atheroma expansion, the vessel lumen is preserved, and so the blood flow through the affected artery. Flow-limiting lesions leading to tissue ischemia, particularly in the context of higher oxygen demands, result from the incapacity of these lesions to further centrifugal expansion.

Acute vascular events, such as myocardial infarctions and ischemic strokes are, in general, complications of atherosclerosis that result from acute thrombosis. The rupture of a plaque´s fibrous cap allows the interaction between components of the blood and thrombogenic material inside the atheroma, leading to a thrombus formation. Much of the strength of a fibrous cap derives from interstitial collagen, and its thinning, strongly implicated in plaque fracture, likely results from inflammation-related processes.27 Indeed, inflammatory elements in the atheroma can interfere in both production and degradation of interstitial collagen contributing to the weakening of fibrous cap: cytokines can attenuate smooth muscle cells’ collagen production, and inflammatory cells-derived enzymes can break important matrix components.

While plaque rupture accounts for most of the fatal acute coronary syndrome cases, another mechanism, plaque erosion, has been on the rise.27,28 Widespread use of lipid-lowering therapy may have attenuated the classical vulnerable plaque phenotype, more commonly associated with plaque fissure. Instead, the superficial plaque erosion involves endothelial cell injury and desquamation on the plaque surface, due to activation of toll-like receptor 2, likely linked to local flow disturbance. Circulating granulocytes get trapped, resulting in neutrophils extracellular traps (NETs), which can contribute to thrombus formation.29

The critical involvement of inflammatory elements and processes in all phases of atherosclerosis immediately raised the question on the benefit of anti-inflammatory strategies to prevent cardiovascular risk.

Anti-Inflammatory Strategies

Lifestyle Interventions and Clinical Trials

The control and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors result in risk reduction and prevention of future cardiovascular events. Statins have been recognized as a major weapon in the battle against atherosclerosis after the demonstration of a significant reduction of cardiovascular events in several clinical trials.30 Interestingly, besides reducing LDL-C levels, statins can also reduce inflammation, an effect represented by the fall of CRP levels. In Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), a clinical study that tested whether primary prevention individuals with LDL-C <130 mg/dL and high hs-CRP levels would benefit from a statin, the most favorable clinical outcomes were observed in participants who achieved a reduction in both LDL-C and hs-CRP.31 Subjects allocated to rosuvastatin group who achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL but with hs-CRP > 2 mg/L had 45% reduction in cardiovascular events, while those that achieved both LDL-C < 70 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L had 65% reduction in cardiovascular events.31 Similar findings were demonstrated in Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy Trial (PROVE-IT/TIMI-22) and The Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT), which included patients with acute coronary syndrome: individuals that achieved both targets of LDL-C and hs-CRP after statin therapy had better clinical outcomes.4,5 These data clearly show that a residual inflammatory risk can persist after statin therapy and may represent an important therapeutic target. Both lifestyle intervention and pharmacologic therapies that reduce inflammation could translate in reduction of cardiovascular events as discussed in the following topics.

Lifestyle Interventions

A healthy lifestyle is the primordial intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk, but its practical application is not easy for patients to adhere. Several of lifestyle modifications are known to improve inflammatory processes.32

Regular practice of physical exercise of moderate intensity promotes an anti-inflammatory status, and therefore, in long term, prevents the development of chronic diseases.33 Cumulative evidence suggests that a pro-inflammatory phenotype is favored by physical inactivity, while the regular practice of moderate intensity physical exercise directs the immune response towards a less proinflammatory state.33,34

Obesity is also characterized by a low-grade chronic inflammatory status and inflammation likely plays a causative role in the development of insulin resistance.35 In fact, pro-inflammatory cytokines seem to interfere with insulin signaling in peripheral tissues or induce β-cell dysfunction and subsequent insulin deficiency, increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes.36 For example, IL-6 inhibits the expression of insulin receptors and reduces adiponectin expression.37 Increased production of TNF-α in adipose tissue is positively correlated with the degree of obesity, insulin level and insulin resistance.37 Lifestyle interventions focused on weight reduction are associated with improvement in inflammatory status mainly in obese subjects. A previous randomized study in patients with normal or overweight body mass index (BMI) submitted to 25% caloric restriction for 2 years showed a mean weight reduction of 7.5 kg and a significant reduction in CRP compared to the control group.38 Another randomized study in obese women compared weight loss intervention with a Mediterranean-style diet versus control, showing a significant reduction in BMI (−4.2 Kg/m2, p<0.001) and CRP (−1.6 mg/L, p=0.008) in the intervention group.39

Smoking increases inflammation and oxidative stress. Previous studies showed that in middle age (about 30 to 69 years of age), mortality among cigarette smokers was two to three times the mortality among otherwise similar persons who had never smoked, leading to a reduction in life span by an average of about 10 years.40 Moreover, smoking cessation prolongs life expectancy: those who have smoked cigarettes since early adulthood but stop at 30, 40, or 50 years of age gain about 10, 9, and 6 years of life expectancy, respectively, as compared with those who continue smoking.40 Smoking cessation reduces systemic inflammation. A previous study has showed that only 14 days of smoking cessation returned inflammatory markers like IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12p70 towards levels seen in non-smokers (p<0.05).41

A healthy diet is part of all guidelines for prevention of cardiovascular disease. There are many aspects related to the benefits of a healthy diet, of which we can highlight the improvement in the inflammatory profile. A previous study included 180 patients meeting criteria for metabolic syndrome, who were randomized to a Mediterranean or a control prudent diet.42 After 2 years, patients on the Mediterranean diet had significantly reduced serum concentrations of hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-7, and IL-18 compared to patients on the control diet.42 Nonetheless, this finding is not an unanimity in the literature. A small study with 90 subjects with abdominal obesity were placed on a Mediterranean diet for 2 months and compared to a control group.43 CRP concentrations did not differ between the 2 groups, but there was an improvement on endothelial function in the Mediterranean group.43 Additionally, consumption of specific elements or nutrients, such as Mg, fiber, ω-3 PUFAs, MUFAs, flavonoids and carotenoids, also seems associated with decreased levels of inflammatory markers in serum.44

Taking all the evidence together, one can conclude that a healthy lifestyle including exercise, a healthy diet (Mediterranean pattern, for example), weight reduction in overweight or obese subjects and smoking cessation consist in non-pharmacological anti-inflammatory interventions that can translate in better cardiovascular outcomes and should be strongly emphasized for all patients.

Clinical Trials

In the last decade, several clinical trials testing therapies that modulate inflammation, focusing on the reduction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, were published. We will discuss the main findings of the principal studies (Table 1).

Table 1 Summary of Clinical Trials of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Events

Canakinumab

As previously stated, CANTOS was a landmark trial that showed unequivocally that targeting inflammation should be the next step in treating atherosclerosis.6 CANTOS assessed whether canakinumab could reduce atherosclerotic risk through reduction of inflammation. Canakinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting IL-1β, a cytokine that drives the IL-6 signaling pathway.45 A previous study has showed that IL-1β inhibition with canakinumab markedly reduced plasma levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP.46 Canakinumab is approved for rare autoinflammatory syndromes and as a second-line biologic agent for rheumatoid disease.47

CANTOS enrolled 10,061 individuals with an acute myocardial infarction at least thirty days before enrollment and evidence of persistent inflammation defined as hs-CRP ≥ 2 mg/L despite medical therapy including high-intensity statin.6 The trial compared three doses of canakinumab (50 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg, administered subcutaneously every 3 months) with placebo.6 The median follow-up was 3.7 years. In the 50 mg group there was no significant effect regarding the primary end point.6 However, a significant effect was observed in the 150 mg group [hazard ratio (HR) vs placebo, 0.85; p = 0.02075].6 In the 300 mg group, the HR was similar to that in the 150 mg group, but the P value did not meet the prespecified threshold for significance.6 The 150 mg dose of canakinumab also reduced the secondary cardiovascular end point (HR: 0.83, p= 0.00525).6 Those individuals who achieved hs-CRP concentrations < 2 mg/L derived the most substantial benefit. Concerning adverse events, more deaths attributed to infection or sepsis occurred in the pooled canakinumab groups.6 Interestingly, cancer mortality was significantly lower with canakinumab than with placebo. In fact, canakinumab was associated with lower incidence and mortality due to lung cancer.48 CANTOS trial showed strong evidence that an anti-inflammatory intervention with no change in lipids could result in significant reduction in cardiovascular outcomes. Maybe the most important contribution of CANTOS trial was bringing the concept that treatment of inflammatory residual risk could be the next step in the fight against atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, since generalized use of canakinumab seems unlikely due to its high cost and increase in fatal infections.

Colchicine

Colchicine acts by impairing leukocyte locomotion and interfering with the assembly of multiple components that comprise inflammasomes.49 There are studies also suggesting that colchicine may prevent NLRP3 inflammasome activation.50

The effect of colchicine on cardiovascular events was first investigated in a randomized, open-label study, the Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (LoDoCo) trial, that tested whether colchicine 0.5 mg/day prevented recurrent cardiovascular events.51 This trial included 532 patients with angiographically proven coronary disease, age 35 to 85 years and clinically stable for at least 6 months. In a median follow-up of 36 months, colchicine reduced the composite endpoint (acute coronary syndrome, fatal or nonfatal out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke): 5.3% (colchicine) vs 16% (no colchicine); HR: 0.33; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.59; p= 0.001.51 More recently, the LoDoCo 2 trial confirmed the benefit of colchicine in chronic coronary heart disease, in a larger placebo-controlled study, showing a reduction of 31% in the composite cardiovascular endpoint.7

Colchicine was also studied in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT) tested whether colchicine 0.5 mg/day could prevent the composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, urgent hospitalization for angina leading to unplanned coronary revascularization, or death from cardiovascular causes in 4745 participants recruited within 30 days of MI.8 Colchicine led to a 23% reduction in the primary endpoint (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67–0.96) during a median of follow-up of 23 months.8

The Colchicine in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (COPS) trial evaluated the clinical usefulness of colchicine among acute coronary syndrome patients, including ST elevation MI, non-ST elevation MI and unstable angina.52 A total of 795 patients were included. This trial did not show a benefit from colchicine: during 12-month follow-up, there were 24 events in the colchicine group compared with 38 events in the placebo group (p=0.09, log-rank).52 One of the main limitations of this trial was failure to include the target sample size (1009 patients), which may have resulted in lack of power to demonstrate the true benefit of colchicine.52

Methotrexate

Methotrexate is commonly used as first-line treatment in auto-immune, inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Methotrexate modulates inflammation via inhibition of aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide, which leads to elevated adenosine levels. This effect diminishes inflammation by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-12, IL-6, TNF-α) and upregulating anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonists).53

The Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial (CIRT) tested whether use of the anti-inflammatory methotrexate would result in lower cardiovascular event rates among patients with a history of MI or multivessel coronary artery disease who additionally had either type 2 diabetes or the metabolic syndrome.54 The primary end point was a composite of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Near the conclusion of the trial, hospitalization for unstable angina that led to urgent revascularization was added to the primary end point.54 The trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 2.3 years. Methotrexate did not result in lower IL-1β, IL-6, or CRP levels than placebo, and also failed to show reduction in cardiovascular events.54 There was no difference in the primary end point comparing methotrexate versus placebo, occurring in 201 patients in the methotrexate group and in 207 in the placebo group (incidence rate, 4.13 vs 4.31 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.16).54 Concerning adverse events, modest leukopenia and elevations of ALT and AST levels were more common in the methotrexate group.54 There was a larger number of patients with non-basal-cell skin cancer in the methotrexate group (31 vs 10; rate ratio, 3.08; P = 0.002).54

At this point comes the question: why is CIRT neutral, while CANTOS showed a positive result? Both trials enrolled patients in stable secondary prevention, however CANTOS included patients with residual inflammatory risk (hs-CRP of 2 mg/L or more), while CIRT did not include a high inflammatory marker as one of the inclusion criteria. As a result, CANTOS patients had higher median baseline hs-CRP: 4.2 mg/L versus 1.6 mg/L in CIRT. In addition, in CANTOS there was a significant reduction in inflammatory biomarkers in the canakinumab group, which was not observed in the methotrexate group of CIRT.

Preclinical Studies and Perspectives

Despite the enormous relevance of CANTOS and the recent colchicine trials in the process of clinical translation of immunomodulatory therapeutics in CVD reduction, these studies have not changed yet the cardiovascular risk management in clinical practice. Besides, as previously mentioned, not all tested anti-inflammatory therapies have demonstrated a cardiovascular benefit in clinical trials. The use of methotrexate in CIRT and several other anti-inflammatory therapies, such as the p38 inhibitor, have failed to reduce cardiovascular events or mortality in patients with CVD.54 Therefore, a lot of work remains to be done, finding the “right” patients and the “right” inflammatory target to address.

In this section, we will summarize the promising Phase II studies, the ongoing trials targeting the immune system in atherosclerosis and identify important challenges that need to be addressed to advance the translation of novel immunotherapeutics into the clinic. We will also highlight the new therapeutic targets emerging from preclinical studies with the biggest potential for translational results in the medium and long term.

Promising Phase II Clinical Trials and Ongoing Clinical Trials of Anti-Inflammatory Therapies for Atherosclerosis

Cytokine blockers are the first line of biologics for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis.55–57 Several cytokine blockers have shown promising results in phase II trials for cardiovascular disease.

IL-1 Blockade (Figure 1)

IL-1 is a well-recognized pro-inflammatory cytokine that drives inflammation in atherosclerosis.58 It is a family of cytokines, including 11 members, among them IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-18. Studies in mice have shown that IL-1α has a role in the remodeling of arteries during early stages of atherogenesis and also connects the immune system and coagulation through its activation by thrombin, highlighting the importance of this isoform in the pathogenesis of adverse cardiovascular events.59 The IL-1β isoform stimulates vascular inflammation in later stages of atherosclerosis60 and had a protective role in advanced atherosclerosis in mice through the promotion and maintenance of a fibrous cap rich in VSMCs and collagen.60 The levels of IL-1β in human coronary arteries are higher in patients with CAD than in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.61 Several options are available for IL-1 blockade, including canakinumab (selective IL-1β targeting) as described above, anakinra (a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-Ra) that blocks signaling by both IL-1β and −1α) and xilonix (a monoclonal antibody specifically targeting IL-1α).

Figure 1 Therapies targeting inflammation and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention. This figure summarizes some of the main inflammatory targets for CVD prevention and their directed therapies: NLRP3 and microtubule polymerisation inhibitors, IL-1 and IL-6 blockade and TNF targeting.

Anakinra

In two separate studies, therapy with anakinra significantly reduced hs-CRP levels in the acute setting in patients with ACS compared with placebo.62,63 Anakinra has also been evaluated in a Phase 2 trial involving 182 patients with NSTEMI.63 Results have showed that during the 14-day treatment period, CRP and IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the anakinra group. However, by day 30, the hs-CRP levels in patients treated with anakinra were significantly higher than in the placebo group, and an unexpected increase of late recurrent ischemic events was observed. Interestingly, a recent study carried out by the Interleukin-1 Genetics Consortium supports the hypothesis that long-term IL-1 inhibition may be associated with an increase in cardiovascular events. In this study, individuals who carried four IL-1Ra raising alleles were found to have an increased odds ratio for coronary heart disease (1.15) compared to those carrying no IL-1Ra raising alleles.64 Whether anakinra will be taken into a Phase 3 study to assess for clinical outcome is still unclear. In summary, the relationship between IL-1 targeting and clinical outcomes seems more complex than originally thought. Further understanding of the distinct roles of the different IL-1 isoforms would enhance our understanding of clinical trial data and improve future trial design.

Xilonix

Xilonix is an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody specific for human IL-1α. Therapy with xilonix plus standard of care showed a non-significant trend towards a reduction in restenosis and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with standard of care only in patients undergoing percutaneous femoral artery revascularization.65 Xilonix did not have a significant impact on hs-CRP levels; however, the cohort of patients had unusually high CRP levels at baseline with important intragroup and intergroup differences. Given the substantial body of evidence implicating IL-1α in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, xilonix may be worthy of further consideration in phase 2 trials in patients with CAD.

IL-6 Blockade (Figure 1)

Interleukin-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in different pathways of the immune system. It can result in both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses that can be explained by the different signaling arms engaged. Although IL-6 has traditionally been viewed as an inflammatory cytokine, in fact, it has become clear that most of IL-6–dependent inflammation may be related to IL-6 binding to its soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R). This is termed IL-6 trans-signaling and activates a pro-inflammatory pathway. On the other hand, IL-6 binding of transmembrane IL-6 receptor (mIL-6R) does not always lead to inflammatory cell activation. Prolonged activation of STAT3 downstream of mIL6R signaling is involved in several physiological processes and is indeed anti-inflammatory.66 Thus, although IL-6 injection into mice exacerbates atherosclerosis,67 lifetime total IL-6 deficiency is not protective; it accelerates atherosclerosis, and may lead to increased serum cholesterol levels.68 In contrast, selective targeted modulation of IL-6 trans-signaling reduces atherosclerosis.69 Data from humans show that elevated IL-6 levels in the plasma are associated with an increased risk of MI, and genetic studies have provided evidence of a causal role for IL-6 receptor signaling in CVD.70,71 Targeting the IL-6 axis may be crucial to reduce the residual inflammation responsible for the increased risk of cardiovascular events.

Several clinical trials have tested the therapeutic benefit of targeting the IL-6 axis using Tocilizumab. Tocilizumab is a humanized anti-IL-6R antibody that blocks IL-6R signaling through both the membrane and trans-signaling routes. Tocilizumab was tested in a phase 2 trial in 117 patients with NSTEMI and led to a decrease in hs-CRP levels in patients with NSTEMI72 compared with placebo. In the ASSAIL-MI Trial, tocilizumab therapy also significantly increased the myocardial salvage index in patients with STEMI;73 however, the absolute difference between the tocilizumab and placebo groups was only 5.6%, meaning that this increase might be of limited clinical relevance.

It is important to keep in mind that although tocilizumab treatment mirrors the impact of the IL6R genetic variant on downstream inflammatory biomarkers, it is also associated with increased circulating levels of cholesterol and triglycerides, unlike the IL6R genetic variant, which does not alter lipid parameters.71 Therefore, there is a risk that the potential anti-inflammatory and atheroprotective effects of tocilizumab may become compromised in the long-term.

In a phase II trial published in 2021 (RESCUE), IL-6 blocking with the monoclonal antibody ziltivekimab dramatically reduced hs-CRP levels in patients with chronic kidney disease, individuals who are at high atherosclerotic risk,74 with no relevant toxicity or adverse changes in lipid markers. Follow-up studies, including the ZEUS trial,75 a large-scale study with ziltivekimab versus placebo in individuals with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and systemic inflammation, will provide a more complete picture of the clinical relevance of IL-6-targeted therapies in CVD.

Despite the promising results, higher-powered studies are required to better evaluate the safety and efficacy of current IL-6 targeting agents in atherosclerosis prevention. Besides, detailed understanding of the distinct roles of membrane and trans-signaling pathways of IL-6 should lead to development of more specific and safer therapies in the future.

TNF Targeting (Figure 1)

Alternatives to IL-1 and IL-6 blockade include TNF blockers since preclinical and clinical research has demonstrated a pro-atherogenic role for this cytokine.76

TNF is a pro-inflammatory cytokine mainly produced by macrophages, T cells, endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells (SMCs).77 In humans, TNF is highly expressed in human atherosclerotic plaques and its levels in peripheral blood predict future coronary events in patients with MI.78

In observational studies in patients with arthritis, inflammation was a strong risk factor for cardiovascular events, and TNF blockade resulted in reduced atherogenesis and lower incidence of cardiovascular events compared with patients not receiving TNF-blocking therapy.79 Two meta-analyses also confirmed that RA patients treated with anti-TNF therapy had a lower risk of cardiovascular events in comparison with patients treated with antirheumatic drugs.80,81

Currently, five different anti-TNF drugs are approved for clinical use, including the soluble TNF-receptor (etanercept) and TNF monoclonal antibodies (adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol). Among them, adalimumab and golimumab have shown promising results.

Three small studies (two in RA patients and one in psoriatic patients) showed that treatment with adalimumab improves endothelial-dependent vasodilatation.82,83 However, a larger study84 including 107 psoriatic patients randomized to receive either adalimumab for 52 weeks or placebo for 16 weeks followed by adalimumab for 36 weeks (per-protocol setting), showed no difference in vascular inflammation at 16 weeks. At the 52-week time point, there was no difference observed in the ascending aorta with adalimumab, but a modest increase in vascular inflammation in carotids was described.84 Thus, the effect of adalimumab in ASCVD remains unclear.

Golimumab is a fully humanized monoclonal anti-TNF antibody approved for the treatment of RA, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis, and ulcerative colitis. It has been studied in patients with ASCVD with encouraging results85 in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy of golimumab in preventing atherosclerosis progression and arterial stiffness in AS patients. A total of 20 patients received 50 mg of golimumab monthly, with 21 receiving placebo treatment, for 1 year. After one year, no significant change in vascular parameters (ie aortic stiffness, carotid intima/media thickness) was observed between the two groups. However, a significant progression of the mean intima-media thickness (IMT) was only seen in the placebo group and not in the golimumab group. Further large-scale studies are needed to fully validate the potential effects seen in this study.

Interestingly, a recent meta-analysis including 7697 coronary artery disease (CAD) patients and 9655 controls has investigated the association of TNF gene polymorphisms and CAD susceptibility.86 The authors concluded that the TNF-α 238G/A genotype showed a significant association with higher CAD susceptibility in the subgroup of Europeans and North Asians, suggesting a direct role of TNF in CAD. On the other hand, several studies described an adverse effect of TNF inhibitors on lipid profiles with increase of total cholesterol and triglycerides levels.87 In summary, further large-scale studies are required to evaluate the potential benefits of anti-TNF agents.

Hydroxychloroquine

Other alternative therapeutic target currently being tested in trials is hydroxychloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine is an antimalarial and a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug largely used for the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, especially systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and RA. The most important mechanisms to explain the immunomodulatory actions are its ability to reduce inflammatory pathways and Toll-like receptors activation, reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including type I interferons.88 In observational studies, hydroxychloroquine therapy was associated with a 72% decrease in the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with RA and a 68% reduction in thromboembolic events in patients with SLE.89 Hydroxychloroquine is currently being tested in clinical trials in patients with coronary artery disease.90

NLRP3 Inhibitors (Figure 1)

Despite the importance of the NLRP3 inflammasome in several inflammatory diseases, there is currently no approved inflammasome inhibitor for the treatment or prevention of atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, many small molecule compounds targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome have been developed, with promising results. Importantly, both canonical and non-canonical NLRP3 activation pathways can be targeted.

MCC950

MCC950 is a small molecule inhibitor of the NLRP3 pathway, with a mechanism which is yet to be fully understood.91 Nevertheless, it was found to reduce atherosclerotic lesion formation in ApoE -/- mice, which was associated with decreased expression of the adhesion molecules ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, as well as reduced macrophage infiltration within plaques and no change in necrotic core size.92 This early data suggests that MCC950 represents an interesting candidate to target NLRP3-induced inflammation in atherosclerosis.

Tranilast

Tranilast, which was originally used to treat allergy, was shown to inhibit NLRP3 by facilitating its ubiquitination and impairing ASC oligomerization.93 Tranilast decreased the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis in mice.94 Thus, pharmacologic manipulation of NLRP3 ubiquitination offers a potential strategy of atheroprotection. Despite encouraging results in animal models, many questions remain to be answered concerning the safety of NLRP3 inhibitors. It will be critical to further examine how these compounds affect the activity of other inflammasomes and how the host immune response is affected in the long run. The initiation of new clinical trials evaluating the benefit of NLRP3 inhibitors in the context of cardiovascular diseases will also depend on these factors.

Low Doses of IL-2 Therapy

Interleukin-2 is a cytokine that plays a key role in the regulation of T cell activity and survival. Although IL-2 has the ability to regulate all T cells, it appears to be particularly important in the development and survival of Tregs,95 which have a role in the control of inflammation.

Low-dose IL-2 therapy has been studied in patients with SLE, RA and psoriasis. The principle of using low doses of IL-2 for the treatment of inflammatory diseases is based on the differential sensitivity of distinct immune cell subsets to IL-2. The activation threshold for Tregs is lower than for other effector T cells,96 owing to elevated surface expression of the IL-2 receptor subunit-α (also known as CD25) and the high-affinity of IL-2 receptor complex in this cell subset, which may explain the somewhat paradoxical effect of IL-2 therapy. While high-dose IL-2 therapy is thought to promote effector immunity, low-dose IL-2 stimulates immunosuppressive Tregs97 and the expression of functional markers, such as CD25, in patients with other inflammatory diseases. Preclinical studies have shown that administration of recombinant IL-2 complexed with monoclonal antibodies against IL-2 increases the levels of Tregs and reduces atherosclerotic plaque burden in mice.98 The ongoing phase II LILACS clinical trial is testing low-dose IL-2 therapy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndromes and aims to assess the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of recombinant IL-2, as well as its ability to alter Treg, effector T cell and other immune cell populations. Preliminary results indicate the treatment is well tolerated and induces robust increases in Tregs without affecting effector T cells. Interestingly, a dose-dependent reduction in B cells was also seen, which may have further beneficial effects on atherosclerosis.99 The subsequent phase II IVORY trial will assess changes in vascular inflammation in patients with acute coronary syndromes with low-dose IL-2 (NCT04241601- Low-dose Interleukin-2 for the Reduction of Vascular Inflammation in Acute Coronary Syndromes (IVORY)). One limitation of low-dose IL-2 therapy is potential off-target effects, which include mild increases in NK cells and eosinophils.99 Furthermore, initially protective Tregs may undergo a phenotypic switch toward a proinflammatory TH1-like phenotype with progressing disease in mice.100 It remains to be addressed whether this switch can occur in humans.

Potential Future Therapies in Preclinical Development

There are currently several promising cellular and molecular therapeutic targets that have not yet made to the clinical trial phase but are in active development. These include strategies that interfere with immunometabolic processes and trained immunity, focusing on transcriptomic, epigenetic and metabolic rewiring of innate immune cells;101 strategies that interfere with the pro-inflammatory signaling pathways CD40-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) signaling in macrophages,102 strategies that inhibit CD47 signaling to reduce atherosclerosis by enhancing efferocytosis103 and strategies as anti-CD20 mediated B cell depletion that could ameliorate the development of several cardiovascular pathologies including atherosclerosis.

One of the potential and hopeful approaches is the favorable modulation of atherosclerosis by vaccination by using antigens relevant to atherosclerosis. This would involve the development of antigen-specific antibodies or induction of antigen-specific Treg cells or other athero-protective immune responses. However, some obstacles that we must overcome are the identification of relevant antigenic epitopes in human atherosclerotic disease and some difficulties in vaccine design (for example, choice of the adjuvant, safety, and stability).

Finally, multiple experimental studies have also demonstrated that smooth muscle cell and endothelial cell phenotypic modulation can modify atherosclerosis, opening a new avenue for therapeutic possibilities.104,105 For instance, whereas transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) can transform endothelial cells into pro-inflammatory cells, inhibition of TGF-β-receptor signalling in endothelial cells can reverse atherosclerosis in mice.105

Use of Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Clinical Practice

Despite the strong evidence that targeted immunomodulation can reduce atherothrombotic events, further studies, particularly on safety, are still lacking for a consensual recommendation of anti-inflammatory therapies. Nevertheless, the 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice suggest low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg o.d.) as a class IIb recommendation in selected high-risk individuals, such as those in secondary prevention of CVD with other insufficiently controlled risk factors of if recurrent CVD events occur under optimal therapy.106

Conclusion

Our understanding of the relevance of inflammation in atherosclerosis has dramatically improved over the past decades and the immune system plays a major role in the onset, progression, and complications of atherosclerosis. Recent clinical trials finally answered an important question, demonstrating that modulation of inflammation can reduce cardiovascular events. Still, the inflammatory network operating in atherosclerosis includes several branches, and selecting the best target is very challenging. As previously mentioned, not all the anti-inflammatory agents tested provided a cardiovascular benefit and/or have led to unwanted side effects, such as increased infections. Indeed, anti-inflammatory therapies can depress host defense mechanisms, and thus identifying the most appropriate agent, and the patients who could benefit the most, will be mandatory to increase the net clinical benefit. Therefore, further research remains to be done until the proper balance between favorable and harmful effects on selected patients is found. More targeted approaches using biologics, vaccination and cell-targeted delivery approaches might allow specific destination of atherosclerotic anti-inflammatory agents and thus minimizing off-target effects. It is important to emphasize that not all patients should receive anti-inflammatory therapy, pointing toward the era of personalized and precision medicine.

Disclosure

Dr Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha reports personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from NovoNordisk, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Aché, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from BIOLAB outside the submitted work. Dr Marcio Hiroshi Miname reports personal fees from NovoNordisk, personal fees from Aché, personal fees from Amgen, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Fact Sheet. World Health Organ. 2021;42:207–216.

2. Libby P, Buring JE, Badimon L, et al. Atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):56. doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z

3. Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Lowe G, et al.; Emerging Risk Factors C. C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9709):132–140.

4. Bohula EA, Giugliano RP, Cannon CP, et al. Achievement of dual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein targets more frequent with the addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin and associated with better outcomes in IMPROVE-IT. Circulation. 2015;132(13):1224–1233. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018381

5. Ridker PM, Cannon CP, Morrow D, et al. C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(1):20–28. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042378

6. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–1131. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1707914

7. Nidorf SM, Fiolet ATL, Mosterd A, et al. Colchicine in patients with chronic coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(19):1838–1847. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021372

8. Tardif JC, Kouz S, Waters DD, et al. Efficacy and safety of low-dose colchicine after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2497–2505. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1912388

9. Gistera A, Hansson GK. The immunology of atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(6):368–380. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2017.51

10. Haley NJ, Shio H, Fowler S. Characterization of lipid-laden aortic cells from cholesterol-fed rabbits. I. Resolution of aortic cell populations by metrizamide density gradient centrifugation. Lab Invest. 1977;37(3):287–296.

11. Robbins CS, Hilgendorf I, Weber GF, et al. Local proliferation dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19(9):1166–1172. doi:10.1038/nm.3258

12. Goldstein JL, Ho YK, Basu SK, Brown MS. Binding site on macrophages that mediates uptake and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein, producing massive cholesterol deposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76(1):333–337. doi:10.1073/pnas.76.1.333

13. Bennett MR, Sinha S, Owens GK. Vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2016;118(4):692–702. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306361

14. Barrett TJ. Macrophages in atherosclerosis regression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40(1):20–33. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312802

15. Back M, Yurdagul A Jr, Tabas I, Oorni K, Kovanen PT. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(7):389–406. doi:10.1038/s41569-019-0169-2

16. Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(3):787–795. doi:10.1172/JCI59643

17. Murray PJ, Allen JE, Biswas SK, et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 2014;41(1):14–20. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008

18. Chistiakov DA, Bobryshev YV, Nikiforov NG, Elizova NV, Sobenin IA, Orekhov AN. Macrophage phenotypic plasticity in atherosclerosis: the associated features and the peculiarities of the expression of inflammatory genes. Int J Cardiol. 2015;184:436–445. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.055

19. de Gaetano M, Crean D, Barry M, Belton O. M1- and M2-type macrophage responses are predictive of adverse outcomes in human atherosclerosis. Front Immunol. 2016;7:275. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00275

20. Stoger JL, Gijbels MJ, van der Velden S, et al. Distribution of macrophage polarization markers in human atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2012;225(2):461–468. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.013

21. Williams JW, Giannarelli C, Rahman A, Randolph GJ, Kovacic JC. Macrophage biology, classification, and phenotype in cardiovascular disease: JACC macrophage in CVD series (part 1). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2166–2180. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2148

22. Duewell P, Kono H, Rayner KJ, et al. NLRP3 inflammasomes are required for atherogenesis and activated by cholesterol crystals. Nature. 2010;464(7293):1357–1361. doi:10.1038/nature08938

23. Rajamaki K, Lappalainen J, Oorni K, et al. Cholesterol crystals activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in human macrophages: a novel link between cholesterol metabolism and inflammation. PLoS One. 2010;5(7):e11765. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011765

24. Loppnow H, Libby P. Proliferating or interleukin 1-activated human vascular smooth muscle cells secrete copious interleukin 6. J Clin Invest. 1990;85(3):731–738. doi:10.1172/JCI114498

25. Ridker PM. From CANTOS to CIRT to COLCOT to clinic: will all atherosclerosis patients soon be treated with combination lipid-lowering and inflammation-inhibiting agents? Circulation. 2020;141(10):787–789. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045256

26. Saigusa R, Winkels H, Ley K. T cell subsets and functions in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(7):387–401. doi:10.1038/s41569-020-0352-5

27. Libby P. The changing landscape of atherosclerosis. Nature. 2021;592(7855):524–533. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03392-8

28. Partida RA, Libby P, Crea F, Jang IK. Plaque erosion: a new in vivo diagnosis and a potential major shift in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(22):2070–2076. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx786

29. Kolte D, Libby P, Jang IK. New insights into plaque erosion as a mechanism of acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2021;325(11):1043–1044. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.0069

30. Fulcher J, O’Connell R, Voysey M, et al.; Cholesterol Treatment Trialists C. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385(9976):1397–1405.

31. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. Reduction in C-reactive protein and LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular event rates after initiation of rosuvastatin: a prospective study of the Jupiter trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9670):1175–1182. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60447-5

32. Soehnlein O, Libby P. Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis - from experimental insights to the clinic. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(8):589–610. doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00198-1

33. Scheffer DDL, Latini A. Exercise-induced immune system response: anti-inflammatory status on peripheral and central organs. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(10):165823. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165823

34. Noz MP, Hartman YAW, Hopman MTE, et al. Sixteen-week physical activity intervention in subjects with increased cardiometabolic risk shifts innate immune function towards a less proinflammatory state. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(21):e013764. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.013764

35. Saltiel AR, Olefsky JM. Inflammatory mechanisms linking obesity and metabolic disease. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(1):1–4. doi:10.1172/JCI92035

36. Esser N, Legrand-Poels S, Piette J, Scheen AJ, Paquot N. Inflammation as a link between obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;105(2):141–150. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2014.04.006

37. Kojta I, Chacinska M, Blachnio-Zabielska A. Obesity, bioactive lipids, and adipose tissue inflammation in insulin resistance. Nutrients. 2020;12(5):1305. doi:10.3390/nu12051305

38. Kraus WE, Bhapkar M, Huffman KM, et al. 2 years of calorie restriction and cardiometabolic risk (CALERIE): exploratory outcomes of a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(9):673–683. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30151-2

39. Esposito K, Pontillo A, Di Palo C, et al. Effect of weight loss and lifestyle changes on vascular inflammatory markers in obese women: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1799–1804. doi:10.1001/jama.289.14.1799

40. Jha P, Peto R. Global effects of smoking, of quitting, and of taxing tobacco. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(1):60–68. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1308383

41. Darabseh MZ, Maden-Wilkinson TM, Welbourne G, et al. Fourteen days of smoking cessation improves muscle fatigue resistance and reverses markers of systemic inflammation. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12286. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91510-x

42. Esposito K, Marfella R, Ciotola M, et al. Effect of a Mediterranean-style diet on endothelial dysfunction and markers of vascular inflammation in the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292(12):1440–1446. doi:10.1001/jama.292.12.1440

43. Rallidis LS, Lekakis J, Kolomvotsou A, et al. Close adherence to a Mediterranean diet improves endothelial function in subjects with abdominal obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(2):263–268. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27290

44. Galland L. Diet and inflammation. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25(6):634–640. doi:10.1177/0884533610385703

45. Ortega-Paz L, Capodanno D, Angiolillo DJ. Canakinumab for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. Future Cardiol. 2021;17(3):427–442. doi:10.2217/fca-2020-0211

46. Ridker PM, Howard CP, Walter V, et al. Effects of interleukin-1beta inhibition with canakinumab on hemoglobin A1c, lipids, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and fibrinogen: a phase IIb randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation. 2012;126(23):2739–2748. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.122556

47. Nguyen MT, Fernando S, Schwarz N, Tan JT, Bursill CA, Psaltis PJ. Inflammation as a Therapeutic Target in Atherosclerosis. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1109. doi:10.3390/jcm8081109

48. Ridker PM, MacFadyen JG, Thuren T, et al. Effect of interleukin-1 beta inhibition with canakinumab on incident lung cancer in patients with atherosclerosis: exploratory results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10105):1833–1842. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32247-X

49. Libby P. Targeting inflammatory pathways in cardiovascular disease: the inflammasome, interleukin-1, interleukin-6 and beyond. Cells. 2021;10(4):951. doi:10.3390/cells10040951

50. Hemenway G, Frishman WH. Therapeutic implications of NLRP3-mediated inflammation in coronary artery disease. Cardiol Rev. 2022;30(2):90–99. doi:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000391

51. Nidorf SM, Eikelboom JW, Budgeon CA, Thompson PL. Low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):404–410. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.027

52. Tong DC, Quinn S, Nasis A, et al. Colchicine in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the Australian COPS randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2020;142(20):1890–1900. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050771

53. Cutolo M, Sulli A, Pizzorni C, Seriolo B, Straub RH. Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60(8):729–735. doi:10.1136/ard.60.8.729

54. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Pradhan A, et al. Low-dose methotrexate for the prevention of atherosclerotic events. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(8):752–762. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1809798

55. Yamamoto-Furusho JK. Inflammatory bowel disease therapy: blockade of cytokines and cytokine signaling pathways. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018;34(4):187–193. doi:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000444

56. Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Tildrakizumab versus placebo or etanercept for chronic plaque psoriasis (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): results from two randomised controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):276–288. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31279-5

57. Aaltonen KJ, Virkki LM, Malmivaara A, Konttinen YT, Nordstrom DC, Blom M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of existing TNF blocking agents in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30275. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030275

58. Grebe A, Hoss F, Latz E. NLRP3 inflammasome and the IL-1 pathway in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2018;122(12):1722–1740. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.311362

59. Burzynski LC, Humphry M, Pyrillou K, et al. The coagulation and immune systems are directly linked through the activation of interleukin-1 alpha by thrombin. Immunity. 2019;50(4):1033–42 e6. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.003

60. Vromman A, Ruvkun V, Shvartz E, et al. Stage-dependent differential effects of interleukin-1 isoforms on experimental atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(30):2482–2491. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz008

61. Galea J, Armstrong J, Gadsdon P, Holden H, Francis SE, Holt CM. Interleukin-1 beta in coronary arteries of patients with ischemic heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16(8):1000–1006. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.16.8.1000

62. Abbate A, Trankle CR, Buckley LF, et al. Interleukin-1 blockade inhibits the acute inflammatory response in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5):e014941. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.014941

63. Morton AC, Rothman AM, Greenwood JP, et al. The effect of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist therapy on markers of inflammation in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: the MRC-ILA Heart Study. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(6):377–384. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu272

64. Interleukin 1 Genetics C. Cardiometabolic effects of genetic upregulation of the interleukin 1 receptor antagonist: a Mendelian randomisation analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(4):243–253. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00034-0

65. El Sayed H, Kerensky R, Stecher M, Mohanty P, Davies M. A randomized phase II study of Xilonix, a targeted therapy against interleukin 1 alpha, for the prevention of superficial femoral artery restenosis after percutaneous revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(1):133–41 e1. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.069

66. Yasukawa H, Ohishi M, Mori H, et al. IL-6 induces an anti-inflammatory response in the absence of SOCS3 in macrophages. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(6):551–556. doi:10.1038/ni938

67. Huber SA, Sakkinen P, Conze D, Hardin N, Tracy R. Interleukin-6 exacerbates early atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19(10):2364–2367. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.19.10.2364

68. Schieffer B, Selle T, Hilfiker A, et al. Impact of interleukin-6 on plaque development and morphology in experimental atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004;110(22):3493–3500. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000148135.08582.97

69. Schuett H, Oestreich R, Waetzig GH, et al. Transsignaling of interleukin-6 crucially contributes to atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(2):281–290. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.229435

70. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH. Plasma concentration of interleukin-6 and the risk of future myocardial infarction among apparently healthy men. Circulation. 2000;101(15):1767–1772. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.101.15.1767

71. Swerdlow DI, Holmes MV, Kuchenbaecker KB, et al.; Interleukin-6 Receptor Mendelian Randomisation Analysis C. The interleukin-6 receptor as a target for prevention of coronary heart disease: a Mendelian randomisation analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9822):1214–1224.

72. Kleveland O, Kunszt G, Bratlie M, et al. Effect of a single dose of the interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab on inflammation and troponin T release in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(30):2406–2413. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw171

73. Broch K, Anstensrud AK, Woxholt S, et al. Randomized trial of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(15):1845–1855. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.049

74. Ridker PM, Devalaraja M, Baeres FMM, et al. IL-6 inhibition with ziltivekimab in patients at high atherosclerotic risk (RESCUE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10289):2060–2069. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00520-1

75. Ridker PM. From RESCUE to ZEUS: will interleukin-6 inhibition with ziltivekimab prove effective for cardiovascular event reduction? Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(11):e138–e40. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvab231

76. Tousoulis D, Oikonomou E, Economou EK, Crea F, Kaski JC. Inflammatory cytokines in atherosclerosis: current therapeutic approaches. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(22):1723–1732. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv759

77. Barath P, Fishbein MC, Cao J, Berenson J, Helfant RH, Forrester JS. Detection and localization of tumor necrosis factor in human atheroma. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65(5):297–302. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(90)90291-8

78. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer M, Sacks F, Lepage S, Braunwald E. Elevation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and increased risk of recurrent coronary events after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000;101(18):2149–2153. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.101.18.2149

79. Full LE, Monaco C. Targeting inflammation as a therapeutic strategy in accelerated atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Cardiovasc Ther. 2011;29(4):231–242. doi:10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00159.x

80. Barnabe C, Martin BJ, Ghali WA. Systematic review and meta-analysis: anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy and cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(4):522–529. doi:10.1002/acr.20371

81. Roubille C, Richer V, Starnino T, et al. The effects of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids on cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(3):480–489. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206624

82. Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Llorca J, Sanchez-Andrade A, Garcia-Porrua C, Martin J, Gonzalez-Gay MA. Short-term Adalimumab therapy improves endo-thelial function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to infliximab. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006;24(3):309–312.

83. Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Vazquez-Rodriguez TR, Miranda-Filloy JA, et al. Anti-TNF-alpha-Adalimumab therapy is associated with persistent improvement of endothelial function without progression of carotid intima-media wall thickness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to conventional therapy. Mediators Inflamm. 2012;2012:674265. doi:10.1155/2012/674265

84. Bissonnette R, Harel F, Krueger JG, et al. TNF-alpha antagonist and vascular inflammation in patients with psoriasis vulgaris: a randomized placebo-controlled study. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(8):1638–1645. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.02.977

85. Tam LS, Shang Q, Kun EW, et al. The effects of golimumab on subclinical atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in ankylosing spondylitis-a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Rheumatology. 2014;53(6):1065–1074. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ket469

86. Huang R, Zhao SR, Li Y, et al. Association of tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene polymorphisms and coronary artery disease susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Genet. 2020;21(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12881-020-0952-2

87. Hassan S, Milman U, Feld J, et al. Effects of anti-TNF-alpha treatment on lipid profile in rheumatic diseases: an analytical cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):261. doi:10.1186/s13075-016-1148-1

88. Schrezenmeier E, Dorner T. Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(3):155–166. doi:10.1038/s41584-020-0372-x

89. Sharma TS, Wasko MC, Tang X, et al. Hydroxychloroquine use is associated with decreased incident cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(1). doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002867

90. Hartman O, Kovanen PT, Lehtonen J, Eklund KK, Sinisalo J. Hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events in myocardial infarction patients: rationale and design of the OXI trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2017;3(2):92–97. doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw035

91. Coll RC, Robertson AA, Chae JJ, et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Nat Med. 2015;21(3):248–255. doi:10.1038/nm.3806

92. van der Heijden T, Kritikou E, Venema W, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition by MCC950 reduces atherosclerotic lesion development in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice-brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(8):1457–1461. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309575

93. Zhuang T, Li S, Yi X, et al. Tranilast directly targets NLRP3 to protect melanocytes from keratinocyte-derived IL-1beta under oxidative stress. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:588. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00588

94. Chen S, Wang Y, Pan Y, et al. Novel role for tranilast in regulating NLRP3 ubiquitination, vascular inflammation, and atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(12):e015513. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.015513

95. Boyman O, Sprent J. The role of interleukin-2 during homeostasis and activation of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(3):180–190. doi:10.1038/nri3156

96. Lu LF, Rudensky A. Molecular orchestration of differentiation and function of regulatory T cells. Genes Dev. 2009;23(11):1270–1282. doi:10.1101/gad.1791009

97. Klatzmann D, Abbas AK. The promise of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(5):283–294. doi:10.1038/nri3823

98. Proto JD, Doran AC, Gusarova G, et al. Regulatory T cells promote macrophage efferocytosis during inflammation resolution. Immunity. 2018;49(4):666–77 e6. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.015

99. Zhao RSS TX, Lu Y, Hubsch A, et al. Low dose interleukin-2 in patients with stable ischaemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome (LILACS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41(Issue Supplement_2):e022452.

100. Wolf D, Gerhardt T, Winkels H, et al. Pathogenic autoimmunity in atherosclerosis evolves from initially protective apolipoprotein B100-reactive CD4(+) T-regulatory cells. Circulation. 2020;142(13):1279–1293. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042863

101. Netea MG, Joosten LA, Latz E, et al. Trained immunity: a program of innate immune memory in health and disease. Science. 2016;352(6284):aaf1098. doi:10.1126/science.aaf1098

102. Seijkens TTP, van Tiel CM, Kusters PJH, et al. Targeting CD40-induced TRAF6 signaling in macrophages reduces atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(5):527–542. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.055

103. Kojima Y, Volkmer JP, McKenna K, et al. CD47-blocking antibodies restore phagocytosis and prevent atherosclerosis. Nature. 2016;536(7614):86–90. doi:10.1038/nature18935

104. Wirka RC, Wagh D, Paik DT, et al. Atheroprotective roles of smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation and the TCF21 disease gene as revealed by single-cell analysis. Nat Med. 2019;25(8):1280–1289. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0512-5

105. Chen PY, Qin L, Li G, et al. Endothelial TGF-beta signalling drives vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. Nat Metab. 2019;1(9):912–926. doi:10.1038/s42255-019-0102-3

106. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227–3337. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

107. Deftereos SG, Beerkens FJ, Shah B, et al. Colchicine in cardiovascular disease: in-depth review. Circulation. 2022;145(1):61–78. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056171

Creative Commons License © 2023 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.