Inhibitory Effect of Lygodium Root on the Cytochrome P450 3A Enzyme in vitro and in vivo

Introduction

Lygodiumjaponicum (Thunb.) Sw., also named Hai Jia Sha, belongs to the Lygodiaceae family 1, which is endemic to southern and southwestern China. This species is a perennial plant, and roots of several species of this genus are commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat hepatitis and dysentery.¹ According to the medication habits of SHE nationality, Lygodium root has the functions of heat-clearing, detoxifying, dispersing swelling and detumescence. To date, a number of monomers have been extracted from Lygodium, including flavonoids, triterpenes, unsaturated hydrocarbons, organic acids, ketones, and non-terpene alcohols. Apigenin, found in many plants, is a natural product belonging to the flavone class and is the aglycone of several naturally occurring glycosides.^2,3 Apart from its traditional anti-inflammatory effect, acacetin has a variety of biological activities, such as antioxidant and anti-tumor activities.^4–6 The main active component of Lygodium root is p-coumaric acid, which exhibits multiple antioxidant activities by regulating the expression of cardioprotective antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), and catalase (CAT).⁷ In addition, it also possesses anti-inflammatory,^8,9 antineoplastic,¹⁰ antimicrobial¹¹ and neuroprotective properties.¹²

Cytochrome P450 is the most important drug-metabolizing enzyme in the human body, and it can metabolize more than 70% of drugs commonly used in clinic.^13–15 The human CYP enzyme includes 18 families and 44 subfamily members, of which CYP3A4 is the most abundantly expressed drug metabolism enzyme in the human liver, comprising, on average, approximately 30% of the microsomal P450 pool. CYP3A4 is also the most important drug-metabolizing enzyme in adult humans owing to its extraordinarily broad substrate spectrum. The CYP3A4 enzyme plays a major role in the oxidative metabolism of approximately 30–40% of clinically used drugs.¹⁶ The enzyme activity of CYP3A4 shows wide inter-individual variability, up to 60-fold,¹⁷ and this enormous variation in drug metabolism is mainly due to a combination of several factors, such as genetic polymorphisms, regulation of gene expression and interactions with drugs or environmental chemicals.¹⁸

The incidence of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) and herb–drug interactions (HDIs) can lead to beneficial or severe and sometimes lethal clinical outcomes.^19,20 In contrast to DDIs, the study of HDIs remains challenging due to the inherent physicochemical complexity of herbs and their multi-target modulatory potential.²¹ Moreover, patients with chronic diseases are likely to be treated with multiple drugs, including herbal medicines, thereby increasing the risk of drug–drug interactions.²² For example, Lygodium root was widely used to treat hepatitis in some ethnic minorities in China. Midazolam was a medication used for anesthesia, procedural sedation,^23,24 insomnia, and severe agitation,²⁵ which could induce drowsiness, decrease anxiety, and cause a loss of ability to create new memories.²⁶ Therefore, when Lygodium root and midazolam are taken together, clinical herb–drug interactions may appear.

In this paper, a sensitive and reliable method with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple-quadrupole electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was developed to simultaneously quantify five bio-active components (ie, p-coumaric acid, acacetin, apigenin, buddleoside, and Diosmetin-7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside) in one analysis. A DDI study of midazolam with acacetin or apigenin in vitro and in vivo was successfully described in this paper. Our data indicated that two main components of Lygodium root, AC and AP, had a strong influence on midazolam metabolism. Therefore, more attentions might be paid when taking Lygodium root and midazolam synchronously in clinic and our developed methods could be applied for the safety and toxicity evaluation of Lygodium root in clinic.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Reagents

Lygodium (L. microstachyum Desv. species) root was provided by SHE Nationality Medical Research Institute of The People’s Hospital of Lishui. P-coumaric acid (PCA), acacetin (AC), apigenin (AP), buddleoside (BU) and Diosmetin-7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (DDG) (Figure 1) were purchased from MUST Biotech (Chengdu, China). Midazolam (MDZ) and hydroxy-midazolam (OHMDZ) were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Canada). HPLC grade methanol and acetonitrile were purchased from Fisher Scientific Co. (Fair Lawn, New Jersey, USA). Deionized water was produced by the Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The remaining conventional chemical reagents were all purchased from Beijing Chemical Reagents Company (Beijing, China). BCA Protein Assay Kit was supplied by Pierce (Thermo Scientific, USA). Coenzymes NADPH was purchased from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, Germany).

Figure 1 Structures of five typical compounds: PCA (A), AC (B), AP (C), BU (D) and DDG (E).

Animals

Male Sprague Dawley rats (200–250 g) were supplied by the Experimental Animal Center of Wenzhou Medical University. They were placed in rooms with lights in the 12–12 day and night cycle. All rats were fed a standard rodent diet and consumed tap water ad libitum, except during the 12-hrs fasting period prior to the pharmacokinetic study. All experimental procedures and protocols were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Wenzhou Medical University (NO. wydw2017-0010) and were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Preparation and Fermentation of Lygodium Root

Lygodium root was provided by the SHE Nationality Medical Research Institute of The People’s Hospital of Lishui. A quantity of 50 g dried Lygodium root powder was first soaked in a twice volume of water for 1 hr and then heated to decoct for 1 hr, followed by filtering with filter paper. A second decocting was performed for one additional hour by adding a volume of water twofold larger than the filter residue. Finally, two decocted filtrates were combined to obtain the final crude drug solution with a concentration of 2 g/mL. A volume of 1 mL decoction and 50 mL methanol-water mixed solution (1:1) was mixed together in a triangular flask and treated with ultrasound (200 W, 40 kHz) for 30 mins. Then, the methanol-water mixed solution (1:1) was filled up to a specific volume, followed by filtration with a 0.22 μm membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).

Simultaneous Quantification of the Main Compounds in Lygodium Root

Five quantifications of the main compounds, PCA, AC, AP, BU and DDG, were dissolved in the methanol-water mixed solution (1:1). A UPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of PCA, AC, AP, BU and DDG in Lygodium root was successfully developed. An ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) column was used for the separation of the five compounds with a gradient elution system consisting of acetonitrile and water with 0.1% formic acid.

The triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer was operated in the positive electrospray ionization mode with an ESI interface. Capillary voltage was set at 1 kV, and cone voltages were 25, 55, 60, 40 and 35 V for PCA, AC, AP, BU and DDG, respectively. Collision energy was set at 11, 35, 30, 31 and 20 V for PCA, AC, AP, BU and DDG, respectively. Source and desolvation temperatures were both 150°C. The desolvation gas flow was 1000 L/h, and the cone gas (nitrogen) flow was 50 L/h. The multiple reaction monitoring modes of 164.96–146.99 m/z for PCA, 285.09–242.06 m/z for AC, 271.09–153.01 m/z for AP, 593.23–285.09 m/z for BU and 463.12–301.02 m/z for DDG were used for quantitative analysis, with a scan time of 0.063 s per transition. Masslynx 4.1 software (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA) was used for data processing.

Standard Sample Preparation

A quantity of 10 mg of the standard midazolam and hydroxy-midazolam was accurately weighed and dissolved in methanol in a 10 mL volumetric flask at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The midazolam and hydroxy-midazolam stock solutions were stored at 4°C until use. A quantity of 5 mg diazepam (as the internal standard, IS) was accurately weighed in a 10 mL volumetric flask and prepared with a methanol-water solution at a concentration of 500 μg·mL⁻¹ as a stock solution. The working solution (500 ng·mL⁻¹) was diluted with methanol.

Separate 5 mg quantities of PCA, AC, AP, BU and DDG were accurately weighed. Those samples were set in a 10 mL volumetric flask and were dissolved in a methanol-water solution. The stock solutions of PCA, AC, AP, BU and DDG were 500 μg·mL⁻¹.

Plasma Sample Preparation

Plasma samples were treated with precipitation. After thawing, 20 μL diazepam was added to 100 µL samples and vortex-mixed for 10 s. Afterward, 100 μL acetonitrile was added and was vortex-mixed for 30 s. Samples were centrifuged at 13,000 r/min for 1 min. The supernatant was then injected into a vial.

Preparation and Protein Concentration Determination of RLMs

The RLMs were prepared in our laboratory according to a standing protocol. Rat livers were removed after perfusion with normal saline (0.9%) after the rats were anesthetized with 0.6% Amytal sodium (0.65 mL/100 g). A quantity of 3 g liver was accurately weighed and homogenized in an ice bath. The liver homogenate was prepared and centrifuged in 9000 g for 30 mins at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and centrifuged again at 4°C and 105,000 g for 60 mins. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded to obtain a pink precipitate, which was resuspended in 0.15 mol KCl-PBS solution (containing 0.25 mol·L⁻¹ sucrose). Protein concentrations were determined by the Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit.

Optimization of the Incubation Conditions and Sample Preparation

To simplify the process of incubation optimization, the concentrations of RLMs and midazolam were fixed. The reaction was terminated with different buffer solutions, different volumes of microsomes and different time points to determine the amount of metabolites and to guarantee the linear formation of midazolam metabolites. The optimized incubation conditions (ie, buffer, microsome volume and time) were chosen for the subsequent enzyme kinetic assay and inhibition study. First, 100 mM PBS (pH=7.4) and 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH=7.4) was selected in the parallel incubation system with comparable amounts of hydroxy-midazolam. Second, incubation time points of 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 mins were selected in the parallel incubation system. The number of microsomes should have a linear relationship with the amount of metabolite that reacted, and the appropriate line segment should be chosen to select the number of microsomes. Finally, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 μL of RLMs were used in the parallel incubation system. Incubations were initiated following a 5-mins pre-incubation in a shaking water bath at 37°C. Then, NADPH was added to start the reaction. The reaction was terminated by cooling to −80°C immediately after 20 min of incubation. Then, 400 µL acetonitrile and 20 µL diazepam (the IS, 50 ng/mL) were added. After vortex mixing for 30 s, the tubes were centrifuged at 13,000 r/min for 5 mins, and the supernatant was collected. Each incubation sample study was performed in separate EP tubes, performed in triplicate and analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS. All the experimental data were expressed in mean ± SD.

In vitro CYP3A1 Inhibitor Screening and Inhibition Parameters

CYP3A1 inhibitor screening experiments were carried out in a 200 μL incubation system containing midazolam solution with a final concentration of 10 μM RLMs, 100 μM PCA, AP, BU, and DDG or 35.2 μM AC solution separately (ie, 3 tubes in parallel for each drug solution). Data were processed by using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software, and the percentage of remaining activity was plotted. The average residual activity of PCA, AP, BU, DDG, and AC was determined.

The inhibition assay was carried out with a 200 μL incubation system containing 4 μL of rat microsomes, 100 mM PBS (PH=7.4), 10 μM midazolam (approximately the Km of RLMs), AC or AP (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100 μM) and 1 mM NADPH. All the experiments were carried out according to the sample preparation (ie, each drug concentration in parallel with three tubes). Data were processed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software, and an IC50 plot was drawn.

In vivo Pharmacokinetic Studies

Eighteen Sprague Dawley rats, weighing 250 ± 20 g, were divided into three groups with six mice in each group. Group A, as the control group, was given midazolam alone; group B (AC group) and group C (AP group) rats were consecutively administered AC or AP for 7 days at the dosage of 5 mg/kg. Midazolam was administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected via tail vein into a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube at 0.083, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min, plasma samples were immediately separated from whole blood and frozen at −80°C until analysis. Rats were allowed to drink water at 2 h after administration to ensure adequate blood volume. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the study were as follows: maximum plasma concentration (C_max), maximum plasma time (T_max), area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC), plasma clearance (CL), and half-life (t_1/2). These parameters were processed by DAS software (Version 3.2.8, The People’s Hospital of Lishui, China).

Analytical Method

An ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) column was used for the separation of midazolam and its metabolite. The mobile phase pumped with a gradient elution program consisting of (A) acetonitrile and (B) 0.1% formic acid was delivered at a flow rate of 0.4 mL·min⁻¹. The column heater was adjusted to 40°C. The internal standard was diazepam. Elution had a linear gradient, with the acetonitrile content changing from 20% to 40% between 0 and 2.8 min and increasing to 95% over 0.2 min. The acetonitrile content was maintained at 95% for 0.5 min and then decreased to 20% within 0.1 min and maintained at 30% for 0.4 min.

The electrospray ionization (ESI) was operated in a positive ion detection mode. The capillary voltage was 2.0 kV; ion source temperature, 150°C; desolvation gas temperature, 500°C; cone gas flow, 50 L/h; desolvation gas flow, 1000 L/h; argon flow, 0.15 mL·min⁻¹. The ionic reactions used for quantitative analysis were 326.02–290.99 m/z for midazolam; 342.03–324.02 m/z for hydroxy-midazolam; and 285.1–193.1 m/z for the internal standard, diazepam. MassLynx (Version 4.1) software was used for data calculation and processing for the UPLC-MS/MS system.

Rigorous tests for selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, and stability were conducted according to the guidelines set by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) to thoroughly validate the proposed bioanalytical method.^27–33 All the QC plasma samples were prepared on three consecutive days with six replicates.

Data Analysis

This experiment used GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA) to calculate the enzyme kinetic parameters of midazolam, including the K_m value, the maximum reaction rate (V_max), and the intrinsic clearance (IC50). A one-way analysis of variance was used for comparisons between groups. The main pharmacokinetic parameters, such as t_1/2, C_max, AUC, and C_L/F, were statistically analyzed by using SPSS 17.0 software. P-values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Quantification of the Main Compounds in Lygodium Root

Representative MRM chromatogram of five compounds in Lygodium root decoction: BU, DDG, AC, AP and PCA is shown in Figure 2A. Calibration curves of standard components showed a strong linear relationship (R²>0.9964). The limit of quantification (LOQ) ranged from 0.1 to 0.2 ng/mL (Table 1). The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the intraday and inter-day experiments ranged from 4.1% to 9.2% and 5.8% to 9.5%, respectively. The measured results of the recovery test varied from 96.19% to 101.99% with RSD values <9.21%. A comparison of the amounts of the five compounds is listed in Table 2.

Table 1 Five Compounds Linear Regression Equation and Lower Limit of Quantification

Table 2 Comparison of the Relative Amounts of Five Typical Compounds in Lygodium Root

Figure 2 (A) Representative MRM chromatograms of five compounds in Lygodium root decoction: BU (1), DDG (2), AC (3), AP (4), PCA (5) and total ion chromatogram (6). (B) Representative MRM chromatograms of midazolam and hydroxyl-midazolam in rat plasma: hydroxyl-midazolam (7), midazolam (8), diazepam (9) and total ion chromatogram (10).

Optimization of the Detection Method for Hydroxy-Midazolam and Midazolam by UPLC-MS/MS

A UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of midazolam, which is one of the typical probe drugs for CYP3A enzymes was developed in this study. As shown in Figure 2B, the retention times of hydroxy-midazolam, midazolam and the internal standard were 2.07 mins, 2.17 mins and 3.61 mins, respectively, with no detectable interference component in blank plasma.

Standard samples with serial concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 ng·mL⁻¹ hydroxy-midazolam and serial concentrations of 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250 and 500 ng·mL⁻¹ midazolam were prepared as the calibration curve. Results showed that the regression equation of hydroxy-midazolam was Y=0.00166842*X+0.00850074, with r=0.9991, and its lowest limit of quantification was 0.1 ng·mL⁻¹. For midazolam, the regression equation was Y= 0.00438818*X+0.0193277, with r=0.9995 and with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.5 ng·mL⁻¹.

Plasma concentrations of 0.5, 8, and 80 ng·mL⁻¹ of hydroxy-midazolam and 4, 45, and 400 ng·mL⁻¹ of midazolam were set as low, medium, and high-quality control points, respectively, in accuracy, precision, and recovery method validation. As shown in Table 3, the intraday and inter-day precision RSDs of hydroxy-midazolam and midazolam were both <11.8%, and the matrix effect of the internal standard, diazepam, was 95.37±6.84%, which indicated that the matrix does not substantially interfere with the detection.

Table 3 Accuracy, Precision and Extraction Recovery of Hydroxy-Midazolam and Midazolam in Rat Plasma (n=6)

Stability analysis revealed that no significant loss of hydroxy-midazolam or midazolam in rat plasma was observed at either low, medium or high concentrations (ie, 0.5, 8, 80 ng·mL⁻¹ for hydroxy-midazolam and 4, 45, 400 ng·mL⁻¹ for midazolam). Long-term, benchtop, room temperature storage, and freeze-thaw cycle conditions were also evaluated. All stability tests of hydroxy-midazolam and midazolam in rat plasma indicated that the RSDs of the responses were less than 15%.

Optimization of Incubation Conditions

The optimization of incubation conditions was carried out for three main aspects: reaction buffer, incubation time and microsome volume. The results revealed that the amount of hydroxy-midazolam in PBS was significantly higher than that in the Tris-HCl buffer. Within 5 to 30 min, the incubation time had a strong correlation (R² = 0.9941) with the production rate of hydroxy-midazolam. The RLMs were well correlated with the production rate of midazolam (R² = 0.9976) between 1 and 5 μL. Based on these data, we selected 2 μL of RLMs with a concentration of 0.665 mg/mL in PBS for 20 mins as the best condition for CYP3A enzyme kinetic studies. With this condition, we determined the kinetic parameters of midazolam for RLMs by adding 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 μmol of midazolam to the 200 μL incubation system. The Vmax and Km values for the rat liver microsome were 83.24 ng (min·mg)⁻¹ and 10.11 μM, respectively.

In vitro CYP3A1 Inhibitor Screening

When a Lygodium root extract solution was added to the optimized reaction system, the average residual activity of PCA, AC AP, BU, and DDG were 101.86%, 39.27%, 29.64%, 90.01% and 99.89%, respectively (Figure 3A). These data indicated that only AP and AC had inhibitory effects on the CYP3A1 probe midazolam. As shown in Figure 3B and C, the IC50 values for AP and AC inhibition of midazolam were 58.46 μM and 8.20 μM, respectively.

Figure 3 (A) The inhibition ratios of five main components of Lygodium root on the metabolic activity of midazolam. (B) Inhibitory potential of AP on midazolam metabolism in RLMs. Results were presented at mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Inhibitory potential of AC on midazolam metabolism in RLMs. Results were presented at mean ± SD (n = 3).

Effect of AC on the Metabolism of Midazolam and Hydroxy-Midazolam in vivo

The pharmacokinetic parameters results revealed a significant difference between Group A and Group B (P < 0.05) regarding the data of AUC_(0−t), AUC_(0−∞), T_max, V_z/F, and CL_z/F (Tables 4 and 5). Compared with Group A, Group B showed an increased Tmax for midazolam (130%) and decreased V_z/F (43%), AUC (34%), CL_z/F (62%), and C_max (20%) (Tables 4 and 5 and Figure 4).

Table 4 Primary Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Midazolam After Oral Administration of Midazolam (10 mg/kg), AC and AP (5 mg/kg) in Rats (n = 6, Mean±SD)

Table 5 Primary Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Hydroxy-Midazolam After Oral Administration of Midazolam (10 mg/kg), AC and AP (5 mg/kg) in Rats (n = 6, Mean±SD)

Figure 4 (A) Mean plasma concentration-time profile of midazolam after oral administration of midazolam (10 mg/kg) in rats. Group A, Group B and Group C (n = 6, mean± SD). (B) Mean plasma concentration-time profile of hydroxy-midazolam after oral administration of midazolam (10 mg/kg) in rats. Group A, Group B and Group C (n = 6, mean± SD).

Effect of AP on the Metabolism of Midazolam and Hydroxy-Midazolam in vivo

Similar Group B, Group C exhibited a large difference from Group A in AUC_(0−t), AUC_(0−∞), T_max, V_z/F, and CL_z/F. In detail, when AP was combined with midazolam, the AUC of midazolam increased by 55%, T_max increased by 217%, V_z/F decreased by 42%, CL_z/F decreased by 39%, C_max increased by 153%, and for hydroxy-midazolam, the AUC decreased by 41%, T_max increased by 116%, V_z/F decreased by 43%, CL_z/F increased by 76%, and C_max decreased by 40%. The specific data were shown in Tables 4 and 5 and Figure 4.

Discussion

In this study, a rapid, accurate and highly sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method was developed to detect PCA, AC, AP, BU and DDG in Lygodium root simultaneously. The established quantitative method is simple, time-saving, accurate and easy to handle and, thus, can be used for quality assessment and safety and toxicity evaluation of Lygodium root. In addition, a UPLC-MS/MS method for the detection of the CYP3A1 probe drug, midazolam, was also constructed and evaluated. Then, we established an in vitro analysis system by incubating rat microsomes with midazolam and a Lygodium root extract solution to evaluate whether PCA, AC, AP, BU and DDG could inhibit midazolam metabolism in vitro. As a result, we found that only AC and AP exhibited inhibitory effects on the metabolism of midazolam. In addition, we also evaluated these inhibitory effects in rats by orally administering midazolam with AC or AP. As expected, the in vivo experiment corresponded well with previously observed in vitro data.

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A subfamily plays a very important role in the metabolism of xenobiotics, with a very broad substrate specificity. In humans, CYP3A is divided into four subtypes: CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7 and CYP3A43. These enzymes are mainly distributed throughout the liver and intestine.³⁴ In rats, six subtypes have been reported to date, which include CYP3A1, CYP3A2, CYP3A9, CYP3A18, CYP3A23 and CYP3A62.^34–39 Although the rat is not a good model for humans to study CYP3A4 induction, it is still reasonable to perform experiments using mice or male rats for CYP3A activity for comparison with humans, as the anti-rat CYP3A2 inhibition profile obtained in mice and male rats is most similar to the inhibition profile of human liver microsomes.^40,41

Midazolam is a well-known drug that is used to treat acute seizures and status epilepticus, including neurologically induced seizures and is mainly metabolized by the CYP3A/5 subtype (human) or CYP3A1/2 subtype (rat) in the liver.⁴² In this study, we used midazolam as the probe drug for the inhibitory effect assessment in vitro and in vivo. As reported, the in vitro incubation method with RLMs is a reasonable biochemical reaction method for simulating the physiological environment.^43–45 Compared with other methods, for example, cell culture, this method exhibits many advantages, such as easy operation, less interfering factors, better reproducibility, intuitiveness and easy handling of multiple samples. In the pre-screening experiment of Lygodium root extraction, including 50 μM midazolam, we found that only AC and AP had a strong influence on midazolam metabolism, especially AC. This result corresponded well with previously published reports that AP has an inhibitory effect on imatinib metabolized by CYP3A.⁴⁶ Additionally, in vivo data showed that the inhibitory effect of AC was stronger than that of AP.

Although RLMs incubation can reflect metabolism to a certain extent, it is still difficult to illustrate real metabolism in the human or animal body. In this study, we developed a UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of the main components of Lygodium root in rat plasma and successfully applied it for the pharmacokinetic study of midazolam after oral administration. Compared with HPLC and UPLC,^47,48 the UPLC-MS/MS system showed several unique advantages: simple sample processing, high sensitivity, time-saving and so on. As shown in Tables 4 and 5, AP and AC significantly increased the AUC and reduced the CL of administered midazolam, which suggests that the metabolism of midazolam was inhibited in vivo when combined with AP or AC. These results corresponded well with the incubation results in vitro. Specifically, in vivo data revealed that T_max, C_max and MRT_0–t were significantly increased compared with the control group after combined medication. These data indicate that during long-term administration, it is necessary to appropriately adjust the dosage and frequency of administration of CYP3A4 drugs to prevent possible adverse reactions caused by inhibition of Lygodium root.

Conclusion

In this study, a sensitive, time-saving UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the simultaneous detection of midazolam and the main components of Lygodium root. Using this method, we found that AP and AC could inhibit the catalytic activities of midazolam in vitro and in vivo, indicating that much more attention should be paid when taking Lygodium root and midazolam synchronously in clinic.