Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar
Received 15 March 2018
Accepted for publication 8 June 2018
Published 3 September 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 493—500
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Amy Norman
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo
Lee S Schwartzberg,1,2 Lincy S Lal,3 Sanjeev Balu,4 Kim Campbell,4 Lee Brekke,3 Caitlin Elliott,3 Stephanie Korrer3
1West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, USA; 2Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA; 3Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA; 4US Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Sandoz Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
Background: Filgrastim and other granulocyte colony-stimulating factors are recommended to decrease febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence among patients with nonmyeloid cancers undergoing chemotherapy. Data comparing biosimilar filgrastim-sndz with reference filgrastim (filgrastim-ref) are limited outside of clinical trials in the US.
Objective: To compare the incidence of FN across chemotherapy cycles 1–6 between patients treated with filgrastim-sndz vs filgrastim-ref.
Materials and methods: This was a retrospective claims analysis of patients with nonmyeloid cancer enrolled in commercial or Medicare Advantage plans from March 2015 to June 2016 and receiving filgrastim-sndz or filgrastim-ref during ≥1 completed chemotherapy cycle. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, pregnant patients, and those with missing data were excluded. FN was identified using the diagnosis codes for neutropenia + fever, neutropenia + bacterial/fungal infection, and neutropenia + infection + fever. Equivalence testing for FN incidence at the cycle level across chemotherapy cycles 1–6 was conducted for filgrastim-sndz vs filgrastim-ref after adjusting for baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results were considered equivalent if the 90% CIs for between-cohort differences were within ±6.0%.
Results: The analysis included 3,459 patients (162 filgrastim-sndz and 3,297 filgrastim-ref). Before weighting, the filgrastim-sndz cohort was younger than filgrastim-ref and had a higher proportion of men, a higher proportion with commercial insurance, and lower proportions with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis or metastatic cancer. After weighting, baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts. Adjusted FN incidence was equivalent for filgrastim-sndz vs filgrastim-ref, respectively: neutropenia + fever, 0.81% vs 0.61% (difference [90% CI]=0.20 [−0.57 to 1.56]); neutropenia + infection, 1.21% vs 1.33% (difference [90% CI]=−0.12 [−1.17 to 2.28]); neutropenia + infection + fever, 0.0% vs 0.14% (difference=–0.14; CI not calculated because filgrastim-sndz had 0 events).
Conclusion: Filgrastim-sndz and filgrastim-ref are statistically equivalent for preventing FN across chemotherapy cycles 1–6 among patients with nonmyeloid cancer.
Keywords: biosimilar pharmaceuticals, febrile neutropenia, filgrastim, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, retrospective studies
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]