In Vitro Intraductal MRI and T2 Mapping of Cholangiocarcinoma Using Catheter Coils
Received 9 June 2020
Accepted for publication 9 July 2020
Published 27 July 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 107—114
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Gerry Lake-Bakaar
Narong Khuntikeo,1 Attapol Titapun,1 Nittaya Chamadol,2 Wuttisak Boonphongsathien,2 Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool,3 Simon D Taylor-Robinson,4 Christopher A Wadsworth,4 Shuo Zhang,5 Evdokia M Kardoulaki,6 Richard RA Syms6
1Department. of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand; 2Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand; 3Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand; 4Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Paddington, London W2 1NY, UK; 5Philips Healthcare Germany, Health Systems, Clinical Science, Hamburg, Germany; 6EEE Department, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Correspondence: Simon D Taylor-Robinson
Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Liver Unit, St. Mary’s Hospital, South Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1NY, UK
Tel +44 20 3312 6199
Email [email protected]
Aim: Diagnostic imaging of early-stage cholangiocarcinoma is challenging. A previous in vitro study of fixed-tissue liver resection specimens investigated T2 mapping as a method of exploiting the locally increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of duodenoscope coils for improved quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), despite their non-uniform sensitivity. This work applies similar methods to unfixed liver specimens using catheter-based receivers.
Methods: Ex vivo intraductal MRI and T2 mapping were carried out at 3T on unfixed resection specimens obtained from cholangiocarcinoma patients immediately after surgery using a catheter coil based on a thin-film magneto-inductive waveguide, inserted directly into an intrahepatic duct.
Results: Polypoid intraductal cholangiocarcinoma was imaged using fast spin-echo sequences. High-resolution T2 maps were extracted by fitting of data obtained at different echo times to mono-exponential models, and disease-induced changes were correlated with histopathology. An increase in T2 was found compared with fixed specimens and differences in T2 allowed the resolution of tumour tissue and malignant features such as polypoid morphology.
Conclusion: Despite their limited field of view, useful data can be obtained using catheter coils, and T2 mapping offers an effective method of exploiting their local SNR advantage without the need for image correction.
Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma, T2 mapping, catheter coil
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an adenocarcinoma of the biliary tree and the second most common primary malignancy of the liver.1 It is rare in the West but widely prevalent in Thailand and other South-East Asian countries due to local dietary habits. The predominant cause is infestation with the liver fluke O. viverrini, widespread in Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Cambodia, central Vietnam and Myanmar;2 the similarly carcinogenic trematode, C. sinensis, occurs in South-West China, North Vietnam and Korea.
Local dishes often involve uncooked or pickled river fish. Following consumption, metacercariae excyst in the duodenum, pass through the ampulla of Vater into the bile ducts, where they attach to mucosa and develop. Their toxic excretions induce chronic irritation and hyperplasia of the ductal epithelium, oxidative DNA damage and possible malignant transformation.3 Tumours may be intra- or extra-hepatic and are classified into mass-forming, periductal-infiltrating and intraductal types.4 However, cholangiocytes are highly diverse5 and more precise classifications are emerging.6 Despite education programs, an estimated 9.4% of the Thai population (6 million people) is affected with liver fluke. The most strongly affected region is North-East Thailand, where CCA is responsible for over 25,000 deaths per year.7
The symptoms of early-stage CCA are minor (lethargy, weight loss, abdominal pain and itching.) However, obstructive jaundice may occur as intraductal tumours develop. Biomarkers are still relatively ineffective,8 but mass-forming lesions are now being detected in ultrasound screening clinics.9 Periductal and intraductal tumours are more difficult to detect. Patients therefore typically present in their early 60s, when surgery offers the only cure.10
Confirmatory diagnosis is performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP),11 computed tomography (CT)12 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),13 with endoscopic and intraductal ultrasound or cholangioscopy in selected cases. CT and MRI are non-invasive, with a field of view (FOV) encompassing the entire torso. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) provides high soft-tissue contrast that may be manipulated using excitation sequences and contrast agents.14 Obstructive cholestasis can be highlighted using T2-weighted imaging, while neovascularisation causes preferential enhancement of inflammatory lesions and tumours in dynamic contrast imaging. Periductal CCA is harder to detect; characteristic signs include hyper-enhancement relative to liver parenchyma, and thick, irregular duct walls with indistinct margins.15–17
All MRI suffers from motion artifacts18 and body noise.19 Motion effects are mitigated using breath-holding.20 Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be improved using internal coils, which have a limited FOV for body noise.21 Unfortunately, non-uniform sensitivity also introduces image brightness variations that require time-consuming correction.22 Specialized designs are also needed to minimize radio frequency heating.23 As a result, application of internal coils to CCA diagnosis has received limited attention.24
In vitro work with fixed specimens25 explored the possible use of a duodenoscope receiver26 to increase SNR in MRI and showed that T2 mapping27 can provide results without correction. The increase in SNR reduces the variation in T2 caused by thermal noise, increasing the clarity of genuine features.28 Time constants are altered by magnetic field strength and homogeneity,29 diffusion,30 partial volume effects and multi-exponential relaxation.31 In vitro, additional factors include time after resection and fixation.32 The significance of exact T2 values is therefore debatable.33 Despite this, the ability to visualize tissue boundaries through T2 maps may assist in staging. This work aimed to perform in vitro T2 mapping of intraductal CCA with a small-diameter catheter receiver, using recently resected specimens to allow insertion into ducts.
An ex vivo intraductal imaging study was performed on resection specimens from Thai patients with CCA at Khon Kaen University Hospital (KKUH). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, following the grant of ethics approval by the local Ethics Committee and informed patient consent. Careful synchronization between surgery, radiology and pathology in a busy hospital was needed to ensure fresh specimens. The patients selected were therefore three individuals adjacent on the surgery list in a 1-week period, with no exclusions. Specimens were made available after resection, imaged for around 2 hrs, and transferred to pathology. Pre-operative MRI was used to develop an imaging protocol. Due to the lack of perfusion, contrast agents could not be used.
Imaging was carried out with a 3T clinical whole-body system (AchievaTM, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands) at KKUH, using fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences. The quadrature body coil (QBC) was used for excitation. Signal reception was carried out using i) the QBC and ii) an experimental biliary catheter coil. Axial images obtained using the internal coil (which has radially varying sensitivity) were compensated using a self-developed Matlab algorithm. T2 maps were also generated using Matlab, which fitted mono-exponential relaxation models to image data obtained at different echo times; similar results were obtained by least-squares fitting to log-domain data.
The catheter coil was based on an array of magnetically coupled L-C resonators known as a magneto-inductive waveguide34 (Figure 1A). The circuit was fabricated by double-sided patterning of copper-clad Kapton to form inductors and parallel plate capacitors. Segmentation and the use of figure-of-eight loops provide passive decoupling from external E fields and B1 fields. Experiments using phantoms have shown that such coils generate limited artifacts, can operate while flexed, and show little RF heating.35
Figure 1 Thin-film receiver: a) circuit, catheter, and ultimate use with a non-magnetic duodenoscope; b) coronal FSE image of cuboid phantoms at 3T, showing the segmented FOV of the catheter receiver.
Catheter receivers were constructed with an overall length of 1 m, based on nineteen 100 mm long loops formed in 35 μm thick copper on a 25 μm thick Kapton substrate. Each loop overlapped with neighbouring elements, and the tip overlap was adjusted to achieve resonance. The circuits were mounted on a polymer tube using heat-shrink tubing to yield a catheter with an outer diameter of 2r0 = 3 mm. The hollow scaffold provided guide-wire compatibility, while flexibility and lack of protrusions allowed passage through the biopsy channel of a duodenoscope. Figure 1A shows the circuit, catheter integration, and proposed use. Impedance matching was carried out using an adjustable inductive tap, connected to an auxiliary coil input via a custom interface. Tissue specimens were mounted on a cuboid phantom to increase localizer signals and arranged with the catheter roughly parallel to the magnet bore to assist with image correction.
Within each loop, the receiver acted as a parallel-wire coil, so sensitivity fell off as r−2, where r is the radial distance. However, the segmented design also resulted in subdivision of the FOV into 50 mm long sections. Figure 1B shows a coronal image obtained with the catheter between two cuboid phantoms, which highlights both effects. The useful image, which extended axially over 200 mm, was constrained to a small radial distance on either side of the catheter and segmented axially into lobes. A peak SNR advantage over a torso coil has been demonstrated to at least 3r0, implying a transverse field of view of 9 mm and at least a nine-fold advantage near the coil. Provided the correction centre can be located, the effect of radially varying sensitivity can be corrected for axial images obtained in a similar arrangement. However, it is unlikely that this can be achieved in practice, since the catheter must follow anatomical tracts.
Despite advance arrangements, it was difficult to synchronize surgery with imaging. For example, the first patient recruited to the study was found to be unresectable during surgery. The second patient (with periductal CCA) was operable, but the resection specimen could not be cannulated due to common bile duct obstruction. The best results were obtained from the third patient, a 70-year-old male. Dilation of the left lobe intrahepatic ducts was identified using ultrasound, and the cause was confirmed as intraductal tumour using MRCP.
Figure 2A shows a pre-operative image obtained using a single-shot T2-weighted turbo spin-echo multiple breath-hold sequence. The intraductal tumour (T) and peripheral dilated ducts with thickened walls and/or stationary bile and mucin in segments 2 and 3 can both be seen. Further imaging using a T1-weighted sequence with contrast agent was used to enhance the tumour and plan the resection. Intraoperative ultrasound was used to verify tumour extent. Left hepatectomy of segments 1–4 followed the resection line R and involved dissection of the left hepatic artery, left portal vein, short hepatic veins and left hepatic vein. Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspiration (CUSA) was used to reduce intraoperative bleeding.
The upper photograph in Figure 2B shows the unfixed specimen at imaging. Residual falciform ligament and ligamentum venosum can be seen adjacent to a raised region corresponding to the tumour. Cannulation was carried out using a guidewire and the catheter receiver was inserted over the wire into the left hepatic duct. Only 6 cm of catheter could be inserted, sufficient to encompass the distal lobe in the FOV in Figure 1B. Pathology confirmed that an R0 margin of 1 cm was achieved, and the patient was in good health after 4 years.
The lower photograph in Figure 2B shows a slice through the specimen after fixing, confirming a polypoid-type intraductal CCA16 measuring around 5 cm x 2 cm x 2 cm invading the bile ducts in Segments 2 and 3. The insets are microscope views of stained tissue from two positions along the left hepatic duct. The left-hand inset shows (A) liver parenchyma, (B) duct wall and (C) intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB), with complex papillary structures in the dilated duct; the right-hand inset shows ductal tissue with no malignancy. Literature studies6 propose four sub-types of IPNB, namely pancreatobiliary, intestinal, gastric, and oncocytic. However, these are not distinct, and the specimen here displayed pancreatobiliary and intestinal-type IPNB.
The specimen was located at the magnet isocentre with the catheter approximately axial, and localizers were acquired to establish the imaging volume. Five sets of axial images were acquired, each in a stack of 21 slices in the locations marked in Figure 2B. Each was acquired using an FSE sequence with a different echo time, namely TE = 9 ms, 20 ms, 40 ms, 70 ms and 95 ms, but a common repetition time of 800 ms, FOV of 160 mm, slice thickness of 3 mm, slice separation of 4 mm and a 560 x 560 matrix. Figure 3 compares axial images obtained at a) TE = 9 ms and b) TE = 95 ms. The images have been cropped to ¼ of their original size, corrected for radial sensitivity variation, and adjusted to similar brightness. The dark region above the specimen is air. The small size scale should be noted; however, due to the lack of contrast agent, little detail is apparent in the image at TE = 9 ms apart from bright regions corresponding to extrahepatic ligament. The image at TE = 95 ms does show an extended feature to the left of the catheter, but, despite the improved contrast, the radial range of useful SNR is diminished.
Figure 3 Corrected axial images of intraductal CCA obtained from the same slice using FSE sequences with echo times of (A) TE = 9 ms and (B) TE = 95 ms. The inner and outer circles define the limits of image correction.
Figure 4A shows a T2 map obtained by fitting mono-exponential relaxation models to all five sets of data for the slice in Figure 3. No radial image correction was necessary, but a threshold was applied to exclude regions with low signal. The map is considerably more informative than the earlier images. Two main regions of different colour may be seen: a blue-green region extending to the lower right (parenchyma), and a brown-orange region surrounding the bile duct and extending to the left (intraductal tumour). Small white regions of interest (ROI) numbered 1 and 2 are indicated in each case; model fitting here yielded means and standard deviations of <T2>= 32.2 ms, σ = 4.6 ms and <T2>= 63.2 ms, σ = 5.2 ms, respectively. The T2 values were longer than those reported for fixed tissue,25 in agreement with other observations;32 however, their distinct values potentially allow the separation of tissue types. The spread in values arises from a combination of tissue inhomogeneity and thermal noise.
Figure 4 (A) T2 map from the slice in Figure 3, showing ROIs of interest; (B) subsections of T2 maps from four adjacent slices, in ROI 3 of Figure 4a; rings highlight modulation of the bile duct wall.
To highlight the structure of the duct, Figure 4B shows sub-sections of the T2 maps from the large ROI numbered 3 in Figure 4A, for slices 14–17. In each case, the catheter was located in the upper right-hand corner. The yellow and green regions may indicate the duct wall and periductal fibrosis, respectively. The tumour tissue is inhomogeneous, and the duct wall is irregular and internally lined by papillary structures, ringed in slices 16 and 17. Irregular duct walls in polypoid IPNB have been described by others,16 and the presence of similar processes in adjacent slices confirms these are genuine features. Their existence may be responsible for the indistinct appearance of duct walls in lower-resolution MRI.
Figure 5A shows volumetric T2 data as a stack of maps, at the frame numbers indicated. With the slice separation used (4 mm), and the number of slices shown, the x-, y- and z-axis spans are all approximately 40 mm, so the presentation is quasi-isometric. The red line shows the catheter track. The image volume corresponds only to a single lobe of the catheter’s FOV, but this is sufficient to visualize the intraductal tumour as the brown-orange feature infiltrating from the left. Darker red at the catheter tip (very long T2) may originate from trapped bile. Figure 5B shows similar data with short T2 values corresponding to parenchyma excluded; this presentation may be useful to highlight ductal tracts.
Figure 5 3D images obtained as a stack of T2 maps, including (A) all T2 values, and (B) only T2 values > 45, to exclude parenchyma. In each case, the red line shows the catheter track, and the tumour may be seen encroaching from the left.
The ex vivo data presented here suggest that there may be a role for catheter coils in improving diagnostic MRI of CCA using a modified ERCP procedure, since the need for particular coil orientations and slice planes may be obviated using T2 mapping. This modality seems most appropriate for early-stage intraductal and periductal tumours. Provided the duct may be cannulated, its tract may be deduced from the catheter track and the extent of the tumour from differences in T2 with respect to parenchyma. Despite these encouraging results, further steps must be taken before in vivo study.
First, the local SNR advantage of internal receivers must be shown to be retained with the longer sequences used for relaxometry, even in the presence of respiratory motion.18 Intrinsic safety must also be proven for MR-compatible duodenoscopes and catheters. MRI endoscopes were first demonstrated over 25 years ago36 but are still not widely available. However, materials compatibility,37 safety issues,38 tracking39 and duodenoscope functionality40 have all been investigated. Thin-film receivers have not been manufactured, but the process used here allows low-cost production.
Second, clinical advantages must be demonstrated. Of particular interest would be the ability to distinguish the involvement of arteries and veins in the hilar region, since this often determines operability.10 Modified ERCP procedures must be developed for the insertion of catheter receivers, almost certainly requiring careful patient management, including general anesthesia.36 Prior evaluation of MRCP data must also be made to predict the viability of internal imaging, since even partly blocked ducts will require guidewire cannulation. Support from the radiology community would also be required to build collective experience of map interpretation. Although these steps each present a significant challenge, further efforts are justified by the severity of the disease problem in South-East Asia and the current poor patient prognosis.
Magnetic resonance images and T2 maps of intraductal CCA have been obtained in vitro following left hepatectomy, using a catheter-mounted thin-film receiver inserted directly into an intrahepatic duct in an unfixed resection specimen. The results confirm that T2 maps can provide useful visualization from images acquired using internal coils without the need for radial image correction. Due to the large difference in their T2 values, ducts and tumour boundaries can be separated from parenchyma without contrast agent, and details of duct walls are apparent. However, new forms of image presentation may be required for effective visualization. The method appears most appropriate for imaging of single ducts with early-stage disease, but work is needed to establish the viability and potential advantages of in vivo use.
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust Institutional Support Fund (ISSF) at Imperial College London through a Networks of Excellence Award and a Value in People Award (for EK), and technical support from Harry Friel, Dr Christian Stehning, Dr Marc Van Cauteren and Philips Healthcare Thailand. ST-R and CW thank the UK NIHR Biomedical Facility at Imperial for infrastructural support. The contribution of our collaborator Prof. Ian Young, who died in 2019, is gratefully acknowledged.
Shuo Zhang reports personal fees from Philips, during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work and is an employee of Philips Healthcare Germany. The authors report no other possible conflicts of interest in this work.
1. Khan S, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Robinson SD. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 2005;366:1303–1315. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67530-7
2. Sripa B, Bethony JM, Sithithaworn P, et al. Opisthorchiasis and Opisthorchis-associated cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand and Laos. Acta Trop. 2011;120(Suppl 1):S15868. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.07.006
3. Sripa B, Brindley PJ, Mulvenna J, et al. The tumorigenic liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini – multiple pathways to cancer. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28(10):395–407. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2012.07.006
4. Lim JH. Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(3):819–827. doi:10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810819
5. Komuta M, Govaere O, Vandecaveye V, et al. Histological diversity in cholangiocellular carcinoma reflects the different cholangiocyte phenotypes. Hepatology. 2012;55(6):1876–1888. doi:10.1002/hep.25595
6. Nakanuma Y, Kakuda Y, Lee JW. Pathologic classification of cholangiocarcinoma: new concepts. Best practice & research. Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;175(2):721–725. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2015.02.006
7. Khuntikeo N, Loilome W, Thinkhamrop B, Chamadol N, Yongvanit P, Gasser RB. A Comprehensive Public Health Conceptual framework and strategy to effectively combat Cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(1):e0004293. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004293
8. Wongkham S, Silsirivanit A. State of serum markers for detection of cholangiocarcinoma. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(Suppl):17–27.
9. Chamadol N, Pairojkul C, Khuntikeo N. Histological confirmation of periductal fibrosis from ultrasound diagnosis in cholangiocarcinoma patients. J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci. 2014;21(5):316–322. doi:10.1002/jhbp.64
10. Khuntikeo N, Titapun PA, Bhudhisawasdi V. Surgical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a Khon Kaen experience. J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:521–524. doi:10.1002/jhbp.74
11. Kozarek R. Biliary ERCP. Endoscopy. 2007;39:11–16. doi:10.1055/s-2006-945101
12. Lee JW, Han JK, Kim TK, et al. CT features of intraductal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:721–725. doi:10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750721
13. Laubenberger J, Büchert M, Schneider B, Blum U, Hennig J, Langer M. Breath-hold projection magnetic Resonance-Cholangio-Pancreaticography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts.Magnetic Reson Medicine. 1995;33(1):18–23. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330104
14. Kim JY, Lee JM, Han JK, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures: differentiation of malignant from benign bile duct strictures.J Magnetic Reson Imaging. 2007;26(2):304–312. doi:10.1002/jmri.20973
15. Lee DH, Lee JM, Kim KW, et al. MR imaging findings of early bile duct cancer. J Magnetic Reson Imag. 2008;28(6):1466–1475. doi:10.1002/jmri.21597
16. Kim H, Lim JH, Jang KT, et al. Morphology of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Abdom Imag. 2011;36(4):438–446. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9636-2
17. Joo I, Lee JM. Imaging bile duct tumors: pathologic concepts, classification, and early tumor detection.Abdom Imag. 2013;38(6):1334–1350. doi:10.1007/s00261-013-0027-3
18. Schultz CL, Alfidi RJ, Nelson AD, Kopiwoda SY, Clampitt ME. The effect of motion on two-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance images. Radiology. 1984;152(1):117–121. doi:10.1148/radiology.152.1.6729101
19. Hoult DI, Lauterbur PC. The sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples. J Magn Reson. 1979;34:425–433.
20. Lewis CE, Prato FS, Drost DJ, Nicholson RL. Comparison of respiratory triggering and gating techniques for the removal of respiratory artifacts in MR imaging. Radiology. 1986;160(3):803–810. doi:10.1148/radiology.160.3.3737921
21. Atalar E, Bottomley PA, Ocali O, et al. High resolution intravascular MRI and MRS by using a catheter receiver coil. Mag Reson Med. 1996;36(4):596–605. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910360415
22. Eryaman Y, Oner Y, Atalar E. Design of internal MRI coils using ultimate intrinsic SNR.Magnetic Reson Mater Phy, Biol Med. 2009;22(4):221–228. doi:10.1007/s10334-009-0167-1
23. Ladd ME, Quick HH. Reduction of resonant RF heating in intravascular catheters using coaxial chokes. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43(4):615–619. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200004)43:4<615::AID-MRM19>3.0.CO;2-B
24. Weiss CR, Georgiades C, Hofmann LV, et al. Intrabiliary MR imaging: assessment of biliary obstruction with use of an intraluminal MR receiver coil.J Vasc Interventional Radiol. 2006;17(5):845–853. doi:10.1016/S1051-0443(07)60823-9
25. Khuntikeo N, Titapun A, Chamadol N, et al. Improving the detection of cholangiocarcinoma: in vitro MRI-based study using local coils and t2 mapping. Hepatic Med. 2005;366:29–39. doi:10.2147/HMER.S232392
26. Syms RRA, Kardoulaki E, Rea M, et al. Magneto-inductive magnetic resonance imaging duodenoscope. PIER. 2017;159:125–138. doi:10.2528/PIER17062104
27. Poon CS, Henkelman RM. Practical T2 quantitation for clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imag. 1992;2(5):541–553. doi:10.1002/jmri.1880020512
28. Sijbers J, den Dekker AJ, Raman E, van Dyck D. Parameter estimation from magnitude MR images. Int J Imag Syst Technol. 1999;10(2):109–114. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1098(1999)10:2<109::AID-IMA2>3.0.CO;2-R
29. Majumdar S, Orphanoudakis SC, Gmitro A, O’Donnell M, Gore JC. Errors in the measurements ofT2 using multiple-echo MRI techniques. II. effects of static field inhomogeneity. Magn Reson Med. 1986;3(4):562–574. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910030410
30. Deichmann R, Adolf H, Kuchenbrod E, Noth U, Schwarzbauer C, Haase A. Compensation of diffusion effects in T2 measurements.Magn Reson Med. 1995;33(1):113–115. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330117
31. Bernardino ME, Small W, Goldstein J, Sewell CW, Sones PJ, Gedgaudas-McClees K. Multiple NMR T2 relaxation values in human liver tissue.Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141(6):1203–1208. doi:10.2214/ajr.141.6.1203
32. Bottomley PA, Foster TH, Argersinger RE, Pfeifer LM. A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. Med Phy. 1984;11(4):425–448. doi:10.1118/1.595535
33. Bottomley PA, Hardy CJ, Argersinger RE, Allen-Moore G. A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? Med. Phys. 1987;14:1–37.
34. Shamonina E, Kalinin VA, Ringhofer KH, Solymar L. Magneto-inductive waveguide. Electron Lett. 2002;38(8):371–373. doi:10.1049/el:20020258
35. Syms RRA, Young IR, Ahmad MM, Taylor-Robinson SD, Rea M. Magneto-inductive catheter receiver for magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(9):2421–2431. doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2258020
36. Inui K, Nakazawa S, Yoshino J, et al. Endoscopic MRI: preliminary results of a new technique for visualization and staging of gastrointestinal tumors. Endoscopy. 1995;27(07):480–485. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1005752
37. Tse ZTH, Elhawary H, Fuentes Montesinos CAF, Rea M, Young IR, Lamperth M. Testing MR image artifacts generated by engineering materials. Concepts Magn Reson Part B. 2011;39B(2):109–117. doi:10.1002/cmr.b.20197
38. Gilderdale DJ, Williams AD, Dave U, deSouza NM. An inductively-coupled, detachable receiver coil system for use with magnetic resonance compatible endoscopes. J Magn Reson Imag. 2003;18(1):131–135. doi:10.1002/jmri.10321
39. Coutts GA, Gilderdale DJ, Williams AD, de Souza NM “A method for motion artefact control in MR endoscopy”.
40. Syms RRA, Young IR, Wadsworth CA, Taylor-Robinson SD, Rea M. Magnetic resonance imaging duodenoscope. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(12):3458–3467. doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2271045
This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.Download Article [PDF]