Back to Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 7

Impact of nanotechnology in cancer: emphasis on nanochemoprevention

Authors Siddiqui IA, Adhami VM, Chamcheu JC, Mukhtar H

Received 9 September 2011

Accepted for publication 27 October 2011

Published 2 February 2012 Volume 2012:7 Pages 591—605


Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Imtiaz A Siddiqui, Vaqar M Adhami, Jean Christopher Chamcheu, Hasan Mukhtar
Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

Abstract: Since its advent in the field of cancer, nanotechnology has provided researchers with expertise to explore new avenues for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of the disease. Utilization of nanotechnology has enabled the development of devices in nanometer (nm) sizes which could be designed to encapsulate useful agents that have shown excellent results but otherwise are generally toxic due to the doses intended for extended use. In addition, examples are also available where these devices are easily conjugated with several purposeful moieties for better localization and targeted delivery. We introduced a novel concept in which nanotechnology was utilized for enhancing the outcome of chemoprevention. This idea, which we termed as "nanochemoprevention," was subsequently exploited by several laboratories worldwide and has now become an advancing field in chemoprevention research. This review examines some of the up and coming applications of nanotechnology for cancer detection, imaging, treatment, and prevention. Further, we detail the current and future utilization of nanochemoprevention for prevention and treatment of cancer.

Keywords: nanochemoprevention, cancer, nanotechnology

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]


Readers of this article also read:

Optimal delivery of male breast cancer follow-up care: improving outcomes

Ferzoco RM, Ruddy KJ

Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy 2015, 7:371-379

Published Date: 23 November 2015

Advances in cancer pain from bone metastasis

Zhu XC, Zhang JL, Ge CT, Yu YY, Wang P, Yuan TF, Fu CY

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015, 9:4239-4245

Published Date: 18 August 2015

The role of regulatory T cells in cancer immunology

Whiteside TL

ImmunoTargets and Therapy 2015, 4:159-171

Published Date: 5 August 2015

Public attitudes about lung cancer: stigma, support, and predictors of support

Weiss J, Stephenson BJ, Edwards LJ, Rigney M, Copeland A

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2014, 7:293-300

Published Date: 16 July 2014

Clinical epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer in the UK

Doufekas K, Olaitan A

International Journal of Women's Health 2014, 6:537-545

Published Date: 23 May 2014

Ulcerative colitis six years after colon cancer: only a coincidence?

Sakellakis M, Makatsoris T, Gkermpesi M, Peroukidis S, Kalofonos H

International Medical Case Reports Journal 2014, 7:85-88

Published Date: 29 April 2014

How to reduce your cancer risk: mechanisms and myths

Nahleh Z, Bhatti NS, Mal M

International Journal of General Medicine 2011, 4:277-287

Published Date: 8 April 2011

Capecitabine in the management of colorectal cancer

Hirsch BR, Zafar SY

Cancer Management and Research 2011, 3:79-89

Published Date: 24 March 2011