Image-Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Versus Cryoablation For Hepatocellular Carcinoma In High-Risk Locations: Intermediate-Term Results
Authors Hu J, Chen S, Wang X, Lin N, Yang J, Wu S
Received 20 August 2019
Accepted for publication 25 October 2019
Published 18 November 2019 Volume 2019:11 Pages 9801—9811
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Yong Teng
Jiahui Hu,1 Sheng Chen,2 Xin Wang,3 Ning Lin,2 Jianchuan Yang,2 Songsong Wu2
1Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Ultrasonography, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Oncology, Fuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350001, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Songsong Wu
Department of Ultrasonography, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, People’s Republic of China
Objective: The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes between image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation (CRA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations and to identify the prognostic factors associated with the two treatment methods.
Methods: This retrospective study was institutional review board approved. A total of 120 patients (88 men and 32 women) with one hundred and thirty-four HCC lesions in high-risk locations from April 2014 to March 2018 were reviewed. Sixty-four patients underwent MWA and 56 patients underwent CRA. Survival, recurrence and complications were compared between the two groups. Effect of changes in key outcomes (i.e., overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and local tumor progression (LTP)) was statistically analyzed with the log rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed on clinicopathological variables to identify factors affecting intermediate-term outcomes.
Results: The OS and RFS after MWA were comparable to those of CRA (P =0.141, and P=0.469, respectively). The LTP and major complication in MWA group was higher than those in CRA group (P=0.003, and P=0.039). Univariate analysis showed that age (P=0.007), tumor size (P=0.001), and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) grade (P=0.003) were risk factors for OS, and multivariate analysis results showed that older age (≥65 years) (P=0.002, HR:3.338, 95% CI:1.928–5.281), 3.0–5.0 cm in size (P<0.001, HR: 3.312, 95% CI: 1.872–4.489) and CTP grade B (P=0.001, HR:3.382, 95% CI: 1.882–5.902) were independently associated with poor OS.
Conclusion: CRA had comparable oncologic outcomes with MWA and could be a safe and effective treatment for HCC in high-risk locations.
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, microwave ablation, cryoablation, outcome, high-risk
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]