Back to Journals » Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare » Volume 3

Hourly-block and standard patient scheduling systems at two private hospitals in Alexandria

Authors Ashraf Ahmad Zaher Zaghloul, Nagwa Younes Abou El Enein

Published 7 December 2010 Volume 2010:3 Pages 225—232

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S15068

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Ashraf Ahmad Zaher Zaghloul1, Nagwa Younes Abou El Enein2

1Health Services Administration Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; 2Department of Health Administration and Behavioural Sciences, High Institute of Public Health, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt

Introduction: Patient appointment systems are of great importance for efficiently managing outpatient clinics as well as patient satisfaction as an indirect indicator for quality care rendered.
Purpose: To describe the hourly block and standard sequential scheduling appointment systems at two different hospitals, as well as to assess the patients' opinions regarding their waiting time in both systems.
Study settings: The study was conducted at ENT (Ear, Nose, and Throat) clinics in two of the biggest and reputable private hospitals in Alexandria. Hospital A follows the standard appointment system and Hospital B follows the hourly block appointment system.
Study design: A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed to compare the two settings.
Results: For new cases, the mean time was longer for the standard system with regards to access time (12.2 ± 5.9) days, while the mean time was longer in the hourly block system with regards to punctuality, waiting time, and consultation time (28.5 ± 12.3, 27.5 ± 17.1, and 14.5 ± 9.0 minutes, respectively). For return cases, the mean time was longer for the standard system with regards to access and punctuality times (14.5 ± 6.1 days and 48.9 ± 27.0 minutes, respectively), while the highest mean times in the hourly block system were for waiting and consultation (19.4 ± 6.9 and 12.3 ± 3.9 minutes, respectively). Most of the patients in both systems preferred the standard appointment system to the hourly block system (73.3% for Hospital A and 55.0% for Hospital B).
Conclusion: Every health care organization should know how to choose the most appropriate method of appointment system and how best to organize it to meet the needs of its patients. Patient scheduling is an important tool for efficient outpatient department management as well as rationally operating outpatient resources and critical areas like physician productivity, patient satisfaction, and practice profits.

Keywords: appointment, schedule, waiting time

A Letter to the Editor has been received and published for this article.

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other articles by this author:

Nurse stress at two different organizational settings in Alexandria

Ashraf AZ Zaghloul, Nagwa Y Abou El Enein

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2009, 2:45-51

Published Date: 15 April 2009

Intention to stay and nurses' satisfaction dimensions

Ashraf A Zaghloul, Mashael F Al-Hussaini, Nora K Al-Bassam

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2008, 1:51-58

Published Date: 11 August 2008

Readers of this article also read:

In vitro and in vivo effects of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide on glioblastoma

Jaworski S, Sawosz E, Kutwin M, Wierzbicki M, Hinzmann M, Grodzik M, Winnicka A, Lipińska L, Włodyga K, Chwalibog A

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:1585-1596

Published Date: 25 February 2015

Toxicity of pristine graphene in experiments in a chicken embryo model

Sawosz E, Jaworski S, Kutwin M, Hotowy A, Wierzbicki M, Grodzik M, Kurantowicz N, Strojny B, Lipińska L, Chwalibog A

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:3913-3922

Published Date: 14 August 2014

Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles

Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889

Published Date: 16 April 2014

Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon

Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779

Published Date: 15 November 2012

Drug use and self-medication among children with respiratory illness or diarrhea in a rural district in Vietnam: a qualitative study

Le TH, Ottosson E, Nguyen TKC, Kim BG, Allebeck P

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2011, 4:329-336

Published Date: 13 September 2011

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010