Back to Journals » Risk Management and Healthcare Policy » Volume 15

Health Care Workers’ Perceived Self-Efficacy to Manage COVID-19 Patients in Central Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors Najjuka SM , Ngabirano TD, Balizzakiwa T, Nabadda R, Kaggwa MM , Kateete DP, Kalungi S, Beyeza-Kashesya J, Kiguli S

Received 30 December 2021

Accepted for publication 10 June 2022

Published 22 June 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 1253—1270

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S356410

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Kyriakos Souliotis



Sarah Maria Najjuka,1 Tom Denis Ngabirano,2 Thomas Balizzakiwa,1 Rebecca Nabadda,1 Mark Mohan Kaggwa,3 David Patrick Kateete,4 Samuel Kalungi,5 Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya,6 Sarah Kiguli7

1College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; 2Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; 3Department of Psychiatry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda; 4Department of Immunology and Molecular Biology, College of Health Sciences Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; 5Department of Pathology, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda; 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda; 7Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

Correspondence: Sarah Maria Najjuka, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda, Email [email protected]

Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic placed health workers at the frontline of the emergency task force response; a duty that requires professional expertise and confidence to rapidly identify and treat patients with COVID-19. This study explored perceived self-efficacy (PSE) of health care workers (HCWs) in the management of patients with COVID-19 and associated factors in central Uganda.
Methods: We recruited 418 HCWs from four national referral hospitals in Uganda. Multivariate linear regression analysis was utilized to determine factors associated with PSE. A p-value > 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Majority of the participants were female, about half were nurses/midwives, and had 10 years of work experience on average. Overall, HCWs reported moderate PSE in managing COVID-19 patients which reduced with increasing severity of the COVID-19 illness. Having a PhD, being a medical doctor, agreeing or completely agreeing that one has knowledge about COVID-19 management, and having COVID-19 management training were significantly associated with increase in one’s level of PSE.
Conclusion: This study highlights an unsatisfactory, moderate level of PSE among HCWs in the management of patients with COVID-19 in central Uganda. The health sector should focus on improving HCWs’ self-efficacy through continuous training of all HCWs in the clinical management of especially the severe and critically ill cases of COVID-19. Non-doctor HCWs should be given priority as they scored lower levels of PSE; yet they are the corner stone of the primary health care system and make majority of the health human resource in low- and middle-income countries. Interventions towards creating a safe working environment for HCWs through provision of adequate infection prevention and control strategies are essential in boosting HCWs confidence to manage COVID-19 patients.

Keywords: perceived self-efficacy, COVID-19, Uganda, health care workers, COVID-19 knowledge, COVID-19 management, COVID-19 training

Introduction

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, declared a public health emergency of international concern and later a pandemic in March 2020,1 placed health care workers (HCWs) at the frontline of the emergency response to ensure rapid identification, testing, isolation and management of suspected and confirmed cases of COVID-19.2 Due to the complex nature of transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-the etiological agent for COVID-19,3 over 152,000 frontline HCWs were infected with 1413 succumbing to the disease by May 2020.4 Uganda registered its first COVID-19 case on March 21, 2020, and by then, many African countries had reported increasing cases of COVID-19 infection.5 Based on a one month report between September and October 2020, a cumulative total of 1,201,111 COVID-19 cases were recorded in the African region, of these, 43,868 infections were among HCWs, and Uganda registered the highest number of HCW infections in the region.6 During one of Uganda’s first peaks of COVID-19 (November 2020 to February 2021),7 more HCWs got infected with some getting severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization and others dying. This could have led to increased fear, anxiety, low confidence in the health system and self, leading to lower perceived self-efficacy (PSE) to manage COVID-19 patients.

Fighting the COVID-19 pandemic requires HCWs with high levels of self-efficacy to effectively work in stressful situations created by the pandemic.8 Unfortunately, patients with COVID-19 symptoms tend to present in large numbers and deteriorate rapidly.9 This exerts tremendous pressure on the health care system as well as the frontline HCWs including nurses, doctors, paramedics, laboratory staff, radiologists, microbiologists, physiotherapists, among others, who must be rapidly mobilized to work effectively to manage the infected patients.10 However, the high transmission rate of the virus,11 lack of a curative antiviral drug for COVID-19,12 and emergence of new variants of SARS-Cov-2 that are likely to persist,13 may affect HCWs confidence to manage patients with COVID-19.

Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s belief in his or her ability to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments, and it reflects confidence in the ability to exert control over one’s own motivation, behavior, and social environment.14 The self-efficacy construct founded by the psychologist, Albert Bandura, following his 20 years of research, has been widely applied to diverse behaviors such as self-management of chronic disease, smoking cessation, alcohol use, eating and exercise control among others over the years 15,16. It is believed that one’s expectations of self-efficacy (PSE) have influence on whether copying behavior will be initiated, how much effort will be expended, and how long it will be sustained in the face obstacles and aversive experiences.14 Differences in personality, motivation, and the task itself; determined by mastery experiences, social modeling, social persuasion, and states of physiology (emotions, mood, and physical states), significantly influence self-efficacy.17 In the context of COVID-19 management, self-efficacy may depend on acquisition of skills and technical mastery within the scope of work of a particular category of HCW.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the level of HCWs’ self-efficacy to manage COVID-19 patients reported in different studies; among physicians and nurses working in the emergence, respiratory and infectious disease departments and intensive care units in Libya, those providing hospice care to dying COVID-19 patients in China, and a variety of HCWs from a district hospital in Poland ranged from low to high.18–20 Training of HCWs through simulation has shown to enhance their assertiveness, mental preparedness and self-efficacy hence improving patient care outcomes.21 Conversely, HCWs are experiencing significant stressors, burdens and mental health difficulties resulting from their work during the pandemic,22 factors that could decrease their self-efficacy to manage COVID-19 patients. Despite the importance of HCWs’ self-efficacy in managing patients with COVID-19, little is known regarding this concept in low resource settings. Nevertheless, the gravity of the pandemic is gradually shifting to African countries,23 hence the need to explore this important phenomenon. We explored the HCWs’ perceived self-efficacy to manage COVID-19 patients and associated factors; to provide insight for interventions aimed at reinforcing the task force response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we explored the role of socio-demographic characteristics and COVID-19-related variables in shaping HCWs’ perceived self-efficacy to manage patients with COVID-19 infection in central Uganda.

Methods

Study Design, Setting and Participants

We conducted a 2-months multicenter cross-sectional survey at four national referral hospitals in Kampala, the capital city of Uganda during the months of December 2020 and January 2021, at the climax of one of the first peaks of COVID-19 cases in Uganda.7 These hospitals included Mulago National Referral Hospital, Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kawempe National Referral Hospital, and Kiruddu National Referral Hospital. These facilities also serve as Makerere University teaching hospitals, the leading University in the county and provide specialized and super-specialized health services to Uganda and its neighboring countries. The total bed capacities of these hospitals were approximated at 1800 as of April 2020 with about 1300 to 1500 HCWs.24 The study was conducted after nine months following Uganda’s first case of COVID-19 and all study sites were involved in screening and management of patients with COVID-19 from Kampala and other regions of the country since the beginning of the pandemic, hence their selection for the study. At the time of the study, majority of Uganda’s COVID-19 cases came from Kampala. This study adopts the World Health Organization definition of Health care workers (HCWs) as all people engaged in actions whose primary intent is to enhance health.25 All HCWs employed in these four facilities were eligible to participate in this study, and these included: specialists, residents, general practitioners, interns, nurses, midwives among others. Of these, we recruited 418 HCWs aged 18 years and above who provided informed consent to participate in the study. We excluded HCWs with no formal registration and those who were too ill to participate in the study.

Sample Size Estimation

We estimated sample size based on the rule of thumb of at least 10 observations per variable included in regression analysis.26 Our study included 17 variables in regression analysis hence a minimum sample size of 170 participants was considered appropriate.

Study Procedure and Data Collection

We utilized a convenient sampling strategy to recruit HCWs. Trained research assistants approached the HCWs at their working stations and requested them to participate in the study. Those who voluntarily accepted to participate and provided written informed consent were given a self-administered questionnaire that took a maximum of 10 minutes to be completed. Eligible HCWs were recruited from all departments in the four facilities for a period two weeks per facility.

The data collection tool obtained information on: (i) socio-demographic characteristics including age, sex, marital status, level of education, occupation, type of employment, and duration of work-experience among others; (ii) COVID-19 related knowledge and experiences, such as ever working in a COVID-19 treatment unit, ever been involved in management of suspected and confirmed cases of COVID-19, attending a formal training about COVID-19 management, having knowledge about COVID-19 management and COVID-19 test status; (iii) level of satisfaction with available supplies for prevention of COVID-19 from the workplace; (iv) Likelihood of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2 from the workplace; and (v) perceived self-efficacy to manage patients with COVID-19.

Study Measure

Perceived Self-Efficacy to Manage COVID-19 Patients

In this study, we define perceived self-efficacy as HCWs’ confidence in his/her ability to manage patients with COVID-19. HCWs were asked to rate their level of perceived self-efficacy with respect to their scope of work in the management of COIVID-19 patients for the different categories of HCWs as per Uganda health service commission guidelines.27 This was described to study participants in the context of COVID-19 by research assistants prior to filling the questionnaire. Perceived self-efficacy was assessed using an adapted practice rating scale from Bandura’s guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.28 The scale is based on a standard methodology where individuals are presented with items portraying different levels of task demands, as they rate the strength of their belief in the ability to execute the requisite activities on a scale, ranging from 0 (“Cannot do at all”) through intermediate levels of assurance, 5 (“Moderately certain can do”) to complete assurance, 10 (“Highly certain can do”). We used a 5-item scale (Supplementary Table S1) consisting of questions about the management of COVID-19 cases in order of increasing severity according to national guidelines for management of COVID-19.29 These included: (i) suspected case, (ii) mild case, (iii) moderate case, (iv) severe case, and (v) critically ill case; each requiring specific management ranging from simple home-based remedies to advanced intensive care depending on severity.29 Descriptions of case definitions from suspected to critically ill COVID-19 were provided to HCWs by research assistants before they answered the questionnaire. A sample question was, “If you were asked to manage a patient with mild COVID-19 right now, how confident are you that you can manage him/her appropriately?” HCWs rated the strength of their ability to manage each case as described above. An overall mean score for participants on all items was computed, with a higher score indicating higher levels of perceived self-efficacy to manage patients with COVID-19. The reliability (Cronbach`s alpha) of the scale was 0.88 in a pilot study among 24 medical students in clinical years and 0.94 in this study. Various researchers have used a similar method to formulate scales for assessing self-efficacy for different health behaviors such as regulation of exercise,30 and adherence to medication among HIV-infected adults.31

Data Analysis

Data was entered in to Microsoft excel 2010, cleaned and exported to STATA version 16.0 for final analysis. Descriptive characteristics such as frequencies, means, and standard deviations were used to describe the distribution of the different variables. Student’s t-test and One-way Analysis of Variances (ANOVAs) were used to determine significant difference between perceived self-efficacy mean score of categorical variables. For continuous variables, Pearson correlations were computed to determine their relationship with the outcome variable. Association between independent variables (age, gender, marital status, level of education, occupation, employment status, duration of work experience in the health sector, duration of work experience at current facility, knowledge about COVID-19, training about COVID-19, ever working in COVID-19 treatment unit, ever managing a suspected or confirmed case of COVID-19, ever testing for COVID-19, level of satisfaction with availability of supplies for prevention of COVID-19 at the workplace, and likelihood of getting infected with COVID-19 from the workplace) and the dependent variable (perceived self-efficacy to manage COVID-19 patients) were assessed by conducting bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. Three separate sensitivity regression analyses were conducted for subgroups of HCWs; nurses/midwives, doctors, and HCWs who had ever managed suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical Consideration

This study complies with the declaration of Helsinki. The study was reviewed and approved by the Mulago Hospital Research and Ethics Committee (MHREC) under reference number (MHREC 1908), administrative clearance was also provided by all the four hospitals in involved in the research. All study participants provided written informed consent prior to participation in the study.

Results

Participant Characteristics

Details of the participant characteristics are presented in Table 1. A total of 418 health care workers (HCWs) with mean age of 36.3 years (SD=10) participated in the study. The majority were female (61.7%, n = 258), married 52.6% (n = 220), and had a Bachelor’s level of education 47.13% (n = 197). About half of the participants (50.96%, n = 213) were nurses/midwives and 10 years of work experience on average (SD= 9.3). Almost 90% of the participants agreed or completely that they had knowledge on COVID-19 management, and half (50.7%, n = 212) had received a formal training about COVID-19 management. 0nly 28 (6.7%) of the ever worked in a COVID-19 treatment unit, 51.9% (n = 217) ever been involved in management of a suspected case of COVID-19, and only 23.4% (n = 98) had ever been involved in management of a confirmed case of COVID-19. The vast majority (78.46%, n = 328) of the participants were either somewhat, mostly or completely dissatisfied with availability of supplies for prevention of COVID-19 at their facility, and 43.5% (n = 182) reported that they were extremely likely to get infected with SARS-CoV-2 from the work place (Table 1)

Table 1 Participant Characteristics

Perceived Self-Efficacy to Manage COVID-19 Patients

HCWs reported overall moderate perceived self-efficacy (PSE) in managing COVID-19 patients (mean score 5.4 [SD = 2.3]). The level of PSE gradually decreased with increase in disease severity. Figure 1. There was no significant age difference in the level of PSE for participants (p= 0.181). Males reported a significantly higher level of PSE compared to females (6.2, [SD = 2.4] vs 4.9 [SD = 0.1]; p<0.001). Similarly, doctors reported a significantly higher levels of PSE compared to nurses and other HCWs (6.7 [SD = 2.1], 4.7 [SD = 2.0], 3.6 [SD = .2.2] respectively; p<0.001). The higher the level of education, the higher was one’s level PSE p<0.001. In relation to COVID-19 variables, the degree of agreement with one’s knowledge about COVID-19 management (p<0.001), ever receiving a training about COVID-19 management (p<0.001), history of working in a COVID-19 unit (p= 0.005), ever been involved in management of suspected (p<0.001), or confirmed (p<0.001), cases of COVID-19 and the degree of likelihood of getting infected with COVID-19 from one’s work place (p= 0.009) were statistically increased one’s level of PSE. There was no statistical difference in the level of satisfaction with the availability of supplies for prevention of COVID-19 at the facility with the level of PSE. Table 1

Figure 1 Health care workers’ perceived self-efficacy to manage COVID-19 patients in Central Uganda. Mean perceived self-efficacy scores in the management of COVID-19 cases. The overall mean score was 5.4, SD = 2.3. Mean scores decreased gradually with increase in disease severity.

Abbreviations: M, mean self-efficacy score; SD, standard deviation.

Factors Associated with Perceived Self-Efficacy to Manage COVID-19 Patients

At bivariate analysis (Table 2), being male (β = 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83 – 1.72; p <0.001), a medical doctor (β = 2.03; CI: 1.62 – 2.45; p <0.001), having a master’s degree (β = 3.15; CI: 2.29 – 4.01; p <0.001), or PhD (β = 4.81; CI: 2.87 – 6.74; p <0.001) and ever testing for COVID-19 (β = 0.57; CI: 0.12 – 1.03; p = 0.014) were significantly associated with one’s PSE to manage COVID-19 patients. In addition, participants who either agreed (β = 1.65; CI: 0.91 – 2.39; p <0.001) or completely agreed (β = 3.18; CI: 2.40 – 3.96; p <0.001) that they had knowledge about COVID-19 management, and those who had received a training about COVID-19 management (β = 1.10; CI: 0.66 – 1.53; p <0.001) showed an increase in the level PSE. Furthermore, ever being involved in management of a suspected (β = 1.39; CI: 0.96 – 1.82; p <0.001 or confirmed cases (β = 1.44 (0.93 – 1.95); p <0.001) cases of COVI-19 also increased one’s level of PSE. The variables had good collinearity with mean variance inflation factor (VIF) of 1.32, none of the individual VIF were above 3, thus, included in the multivariate analysis. At multivariate analysis, having a PhD (β = 2.80; CI: 0.99 – 4.60; p = 0.002), being a medical doctor (β = 0.88; CI: 0.31 – 1.45; p = 0.003), agreeing (β = 0.95; CI: 0.27 – 1.63; p = 0.006) or completely agreeing that one has knowledge about COVID-19 management (β = 1.85; CI: 1.11 – 2.57; p <0.001) and having COVID-19 management training (β = 0.80; CI: 0.42 – 1.19; p <0.001) were significantly associated with increase in the level of PSE. Being a HCW other than a doctor or nurse was associated with a decrease in one’s level of PSE (β = −1.06; CI: −1.79 - −0.33; p = 0.005). The final model had an adjusted R square of 0.38, and a p-value of <0.001.

Table 2 Bi-Variate and Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis of Participant Characteristics and Self-Efficacy to Manage COVID-19 Patients

Table 3 presents factors associated with PSE among subgroups of HCWs; nurses/midwives, medical doctors, and HCWs who had ever managed suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19. For nurses/midwives, having had a training about management of COVID-19, agreeing and completely agreeing with one’s knowledge about COVID-19, and being somehow satisfied with availability of supplies of prevention of COVID-19 at the facility was associated with increase in one’s level of PSE. For medical doctors, having a PhD and completely agreeing with one’s knowledge about COVID-19 increased one’s PSE and among HCWs who had ever been involved in management of suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19, having a PhD and being a doctor increased one’s PSE.

Table 3 Bi-Variate and Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis of Participant Characteristics and Self-Efficacy to Manage COVID-19 Patients, Among Subgroups of Health Care Workers; Nurses/Midwives, Medical Doctors and Health Care Workers Who Had Ever Managed Suspected/Confirmed Cases of COVID-19

Discussion

This study explored health care workers’ (HCWs) perceived self-efficacy (PSE) to manage COVID-19 patients. Our study findings provide valuable insights and suggestions for improving HCWs confidence in managing patients with COVID-19 as one of the ways to contribute to the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Besides, PSE and respective behavior may be a relevant factor for HCWs’ performance in the face of pandemic surges. In this study, overall, HCWs reported moderate PSE to manage COVID-19 patients which gradually decreased with increasing severity of the COVID-19 clinical illness. Among nurses, having had a training about management of COVID-19, agreeing or completely agreeing with one’s knowledge about COVID-19, and being somehow satisfied with availability of supplies of prevention of COVID-19 at the facility was associated with increase in one’s level of PSE. For doctors, having a PhD and completely agreeing with one’s knowledge about COVID-19 increased one’s level of PSE. Overall, having knowledge about COVID-19 management, having attended a training about COVID-19 management, having a PhD and being a medical doctor were significantly associated increase in the level of PSE to manage COVID-19.

COVID-19 is associated with a sudden emergence and persistence of large numbers of patients in a short time,32 which presents challenges to the health system including shortages in medical supplies and health professionals resulting heavy workloads, fatigue and stress among HCWs that negatively affect their PSE to manage COVID-19 patients.33,34 Few studies worldwide have investigated HCWS’ self-efficacy to manage patients with COVID-19 infection with varying results. A cross-sectional study among clinical nurses and physicians providing hospice care to dying COVID-19 patients in China reported moderate hospice care self-efficacy, results consistent with the current study.19 Another study conducted in Jordan also agrees with our study findings as it reported moderate levels of self-efficacy among HCWs during caring for COVID-19 patients.35 However, a study investigating the general self-efficacy of Chinese nurses in the face of COVID-19 during February 2020, reported lower self-efficacy compared to this study.36 In addition, a study conducted in first three months of the pandemic by Muhammed et al involving 21 healthcare centers in Libya found that over 80% of the physicians and nurses working the emergence, respiratory and infectious disease departments and intensive care units had little or no confidence to manage COVID-19 patients.18 This variation could be explained by the fact that the current study was conducted later in the pandemic when more information had been discovered about COVID-19 and with the development of COVID-19 treatment protocols,29 introduction and high acceptance rate of vaccination in low and middle income countries that could boost HCWs confidence,37 which were short of the earlier studies. On the contrary, one study in Poland reported higher levels of health workers’ self-efficacy to manage COVID-19 patients than that reported in this study.20 The difference could be due to the fact that Poland is a high-income country with advanced technology to provide complex care to patient like those suffering from severe and critical COVID-19 illness.

In this study, PSE to manage COVID-19 patients significantly increased when an individual agreed that they had knowledge about COVID-19 management. Individuals’ knowledge has a positive effect on self-efficacy.38 Moreover, HCWs’ knowledge is one of the factors that are paramount in personal protection and the containment of COVID-19.39 A study by Wang et al also supports the positive mediating effect of COVID-19 related knowledge on self-efficacy.40 This could be attributed to the fact that HCWs with high levels of knowledge may have trust in the health system and its capacity to manage COVID-19 patients including themselves in the event that they become infected. HCWs who had attended a training about COVID-19 management had a significantly higher self-efficacy to manage such patients compared to their untrained counterparts. Continuous education of medical personnel especially through scenario simulations may equip HCWs with skills of facing difficult situations in real time.41,42 A study assessing PSE among operating room (OR) staff in OR-specific procedures for patients with COVID-19 also affirms increase in self-efficacy post-training.43 Surprisingly, having had a training about COVID-19 management did not show any influence on the level of PSE among HCWs who had ever managed suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19. This may suggest confounding factors; perhaps the nature of training, methods used in training, level of satisfaction with the training, and provision of reinforcement trainings may influence HCWs PSE. However, these important aspects were not explored in the current study hence a need for further studies to deeply explore the interaction between PSE and training.

It was not surprising that HCWs with a PhD had a higher level of PSE in comparison with those with lower levels of education in this study. Senior HCWs with more years of experience and postgraduate degrees show higher levels of self-efficacy while caring for patients with COVID-19.35 In addition, highly educated HCWs are more competent in integrating evidence-based practice in the clinical environment, taking up responsibility and control and coping with challenging situations, are efficient while working in teams, executing leadership roles and balancing patients’ health care demands with those of HCWs.44 Furthermore, in the face of difficult cases in the hospital, senior HCWs could be the first to be called on to take charge of the situation, hence most likely to gain experience and confidence in the management of a new disease like COVID-19 before lower carder HCWs. This makes lower carder HCWs less confident in the management of these cases as it was found in our study that HCWs who had ever managed COVID-19 cases scored higher PSE compared to those with no experience, also, lower carder HCWs, such as nurses and midwives scored less on the PSE scale than senior HCWs.

In this study, being a medical doctor also increased HCWs’ PSE level to manage patients with COVID-19 compared to nurses and other HCWs. This study agrees with findings by Kadoya et al, indicating low self-confidence among non-doctor HCWs in offering COVID-19 care.45 Another study from Uganda and Zambia also reported higher self-efficacy among medical doctors providing obstetric care compared to other HCWs.46 This could be because medical doctors are usually trained in the management of more complex cases that may present similar to COVID-19. Despite the fact that medical doctors had higher PSE to manage patients with COVID-19 in this study, nurses and other lower carder HCWs have a major role in the COVID-19 management especially in providing critical care to COVID-19 patients.44,47,48 Thus, the need to empower non-doctor HCWs to be more self-efficacious in treating COVID-19 patients through structured training tailored to their knowledge needs about COVID-19 management as they make the majority of the health care work force. This could be reinforced by creating a safe working environment through provision of supplies for prevention of COVID-19 at their facilities as these have shown to increase nurses’ PSE in the current study. Moreover, most of the participants in this study reported likely or extremely likely to get infected with SARS CoV-2 from their workplace. This could have reduced their PSE levels as HCWs who view themselves at high risk of getting infected with a life-threatening illness like COVID-19 may be less confident to manage such cases due to fear of infection and its complications.

According to Albert Bandura, individuals with high levels of self-efficacy approach threatening situations like the COVID-19 pandemic with a strong belief that they can control them.49 He suggested four ways of improving self-efficacy that could be adopted by HCWs: (i) staying in the stretch zone, (ii) setting simple goals, (iii) looking at the big picture and (iv) reframing obstacles.50 Given the significant association between HCWs’ knowledge, education attainment and training on HCWs self-efficacy to manage COVID-19 patients, we recommend training more HCWs about clinical management of COVID-19 irrespective of their carder as a strategy to increase self-efficacy to manage patients with COVID-19. Employers should take on the responsibility of training their staff in COVID-19 treatment. However, HCWs should also have the responsibility of updating themselves with current COVID-19 guidelines and participating in trainings about COVID-19.45 This will reduce the burden of patient care on the highly trained but few HCWs in LMICs. In addition, training should specifically focus on lower carder HCWs and clinical management aspects of the severe and critically ill patients with COVID-19. Another strategy to increase HCWs’ self-efficacy to manage COVID-19 patients could be through improving the mental health of HCWs by interventions aimed at combating psychological distress (anxiety, stress, and depression), that decreases HCWs’ self-efficacy by several researchers.36,51 This could be done by providing social support to HCWs especially those directly involved in treating COVID-19 patients.52,53

Limitations of the Study

Our findings should be interpreted with caution due its several limitations: First, since majority of the study participants did not have actual experience in taking care of patients with COVID-19, we report perceived self-efficacy (PSE) which is an assumption of actual self-efficacy among HCWs, which may not reflect the actual experience of health workers actively managing COVID-19 patients. Therefore, we suggest future researchers to conduct a similar study among HCWs who are actively caring for COVID-19 patients. Secondly, this was a cross-sectional study that based on self-report which could have introduced respondent bias, for instance, confidence is a virtue of a good HCW, one would intuitively think they are confident due to the fact that they are HCWs. Third, due to the study design, we could not ascertain causality for the levels of PSE among HCWs. We recommend future researchers to conduct large prospective studies to understand the causes of the different levels of PSE among the various groups of HCWs. Fourth, we adopted a convenience sampling technique making generalizability of the study findings limited. Fifth, the perceived self-efficacy scale adapted in the study had not been previously validated for use in our setting. Sixth, the use of trained research assistants in data collection could have introduced selection bias since a research assistant will most likely approach the less busy HCW and invite them to participate, in contrast, the busiest one may be avoided, and probably those may have more experience in dealing with COVID-19. This could have led to underestimation of the level of PSE among HCWs. Seventh, over 90% of the study participants were nurses/midwives and doctors, this limits generalization of study findings to other categories of health workers. However, we conducted sensitivity analysis to explore this limitation. Lastly, we also did not assess for symptoms of psychological distress, which have been previously found to be associated with self-efficacy.36,51

Conclusion

This study highlights an unsatisfactory moderate overall perceived self-efficacy among HCWs in the management of patients with COVID-19 in central Uganda. The health sector should focus on improving HCWs’ self-efficacy through continuous training of all HCWs in the clinical management of the severe and critically ill cases of COVID-19. Non-doctor HCWs should be given priority as scored lower levels of PSE in management of COVID-19; yet they are the cornerstone of the primary health care system and make majority of the health human resource in low- and middle-income countries. Interventions towards creating a safe working environment for HCWs through provision of adequate infection prevention and control strategies are essential in boosting HCWs confidence to manage COVID-19 patients.

Patient and Public Involvement

Patients and the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting or dissemination plans of our research.

Data Sharing Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this study will be made available by the corresponding author, without undue reservations on reasonable request.

Ethical Consideration

This study complies with the declaration of Helsinki. The study was reviewed and approved by the Mulago Hospital Research and Ethics Committee (MHREC) under reference number (MHREC 1908), administrative clearance was also provided by all the four hospitals in involved in the research. All study participants provided written informed consent prior to participation in the study.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely acknowledge Ms Evelyn Bakngesa, Ms Rhoda Namubiru and Ms Regina Namirembe who helped with the funding acquisition process. We also thank the research assistants namely, Moureen Namusoke, Stuart Sekisaka, Maria Assumpta Nansubuga and Ambrose Lugona for their diligent contribution during data collection. We are finally grateful to all the health workers who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health, US Department of State’s Office of the US Global AIDS Coordinator and Health Diplomacy (S/GAC), and President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) under Award Number 1R25TW011213. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Disclosure

All authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this work.

References

1. World Health Organisation. COVID 19 Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) - Global research and innovation forum: towards a research roadmap. World Health Organisation; 2020.

2. Mehta S, Machado F, Kwizera A, et al. COVID-19: a heavy toll on health-care workers. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(3):226–228. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00068-0

3. Khan S, Siddique R, Bai Q, et al. Coronaviruses disease 2019 (COVID-19): causative agent, mental health concerns, and potential management options. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(12):1840–1844. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.07.010

4. Bandyopadhyay S, Baticulon RE, Kadhum M, et al. Infection and mortality of healthcare workers worldwide from COVID-19: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(12):e003097. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003097

5. Migisha R, Kwesiga B, Mirembe BB, et al. Early cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Uganda: epidemiology and lessons learned from risk-based testing approaches. Global Health. 2020;16(1):114. doi:10.1186/s12992-020-00643-7

6. World Health Organisation. Situation reports on COVID-19 outbreak - Sitrep 32; 2020. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/publications/situation-reports-covid-19-outbreak-sitrep-32-07-october-2020. Accessed March 25, 2022.

7. Hannah Ritchie EM, Rodés-Guirao L, Appel C, et al. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19), Uganda: coronavirus pandemic country profile. Our World Data; 2020.

8. Vagni M, Maiorano T, Giostra V, Pajardi D. Coping with COVID-19: emergency stress, secondary trauma and self-efficacy in healthcare and emergency workers in Italy. Front Psychol. 2020;11:566912. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566912

9. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061–1069. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1585

10. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):470–473. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9

11. Shereen MA, Khan S, Kazmi A, Bashir N, Siddique R. COVID-19 infection: origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. J Adv Res. 2020;24:91–98. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.005

12. Liu X, Liu C, Liu G, Luo W, Xia N. COVID-19 progress in diagnostics, therapy and vaccination. Theranostics. 2020;10(17):7821–7835. doi:10.7150/thno.47987

13. World Health Organisation. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/. Accessed August 1, 2021.

14. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

15. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co; 1997.

16. Michael P, Carey ADF. Teaching tip sheet: self-efficacy; 2009. Available from: https://www.apa.org/pi/aids/resources/education/self-efficacy#:~:text=Self%2Defficacy%20refers%20to%20an,%2C%20behavior%2C%20and%20social%20environment.

17. Tugsbaatar U. Albert Bandura: self-efficacy for agentic positive psychology; 2021. Available from: https://positivepsychology.com/bandura-self-efficacy/. Accessed 31 August 2021, 2021.

18. Elhadi M, Msherghi A, Alkeelani M, et al. Assessment of healthcare workers’ levels of preparedness and awareness regarding COVID-19 infection in low-resource settings. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(2):828–833. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-0330

19. Zheng Z-H, Luo Z-C, Zhang Y, et al. Hospice care self-efficacy among clinical medical staff working in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) isolation wards of designated hospitals: a cross–sectional study. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19(1):188. doi:10.1186/s12904-020-00692-0

20. Bidzan M, Bidzan-Bluma I, Szulman-Wardal A, Stueck M, Bidzan M. Does self-efficacy and emotional control protect hospital staff from covid-19 anxiety and PTSD symptoms? Psychological functioning of hospital staff after the announcement of COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Front Psychol. 2020;11:552583. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552583

21. Cheung VK-L, So EH-K, Ng GW-Y, So -S-S, Hung JL-K, Chia N-H. Investigating effects of healthcare simulation on personal strengths and organizational impacts for healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Integr Med Res. 2020;9(3):100476. doi:10.1016/j.imr.2020.100476

22. Søvold LE, Naslund JA, Kousoulis AA, et al. Prioritizing the mental health and well-being of healthcare workers: an urgent global public health priority. Front Public Health. 2021;9:679397. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.679397

23. World Health Organisation. Africa faces steepest COVID-19 surge yet; 2021. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/news/africa-faces-steepest-covid-19-surge-yet. Accessed July 31, 2021.

24. Olum R, Chekwech G, Wekha G, Nassozi DR, Bongomin F. Coronavirus disease-2019: knowledge, attitude, and practices of health care workers at makerere university teaching hospitals, Uganda. Frontiers in Public Health. 2020;8(181). doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00181

25. World Health Organisation. Health workers, a global profile; 2006.

26. Statistics Solutions. Sample size formula; 2022. Available from: https://www.statisticssolutions.com/dissertation-resources/sample-size-calculation-and-sample-size-justification/sample-size-formula/.

27. Uganda Health Service Commission. Guidelines for the Recruitment of Health Workers in Local Governments; 2020.

28. Bandura AJS. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy Beliefs Adolescents. 2006;5(1):307–337.

29. Uganda Ministry of Health. National guidelines for management of COVID-19; 2021. Available from: https://www.health.go.ug/download-attachment/72Hhhq3qozmz17LW6Mew0oKfee9kk7IUd_Hg6hQKlJ0. Accessed July 31, 2021.

30. McAuley E, Mullen SP, Szabo AN, et al. Self-regulatory processes and exercise adherence in older adults: executive function and self-efficacy effects. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(3):284–290. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.014

31. Johnson MO, Chesney MA, Goldstein RB, et al. Positive provider interactions, adherence self-efficacy, and adherence to antiretroviral medications among HIV-infected adults: a mediation model. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006;20(4):258–268. doi:10.1089/apc.2006.20.258

32. World Health Organisation. COVID-19 weekly epidemiological update; 2021.

33. Huang JZ, Han MF, Luo TD, Ren AK, Zhou XP. Mental health survey of 230 medical staff in a tertiary infectious disease hospital for COVID-19. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2020;38:E001.

34. Mo Y, Deng L, Zhang L, et al. Work stress among Chinese nurses to support Wuhan in fighting against COVID-19 epidemic. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(5):1002–1009. doi:10.1111/jonm.13014

35. Abu Sharour L, Bani Salameh A, Suleiman K, et al. Nurses’ self-efficacy, confidence and interaction with patients with COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021;7:1–5.

36. Xiong H, Yi S, Lin Y. The psychological status and self-efficacy of nurses during COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional survey. Inquiry. 2020;57:46958020957114. doi:10.1177/0046958020957114

37. Solís Arce JS, Warren SS, Meriggi NF, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries. Nat Med. 2021;27:1385–1394. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01454-y

38. Boswell SS. Undergraduates’ perceived knowledge, self-efficacy, and interest in social science research. J Eff Teach. 2013;13(2):48–57.

39. Alao MA, Durodola AO, Ibrahim OR, Asinobi OA. Assessment of health workers’ knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and use of personal protective equipment for prevention of COVID-19 infection in low-resource settings. Adv Public Health. 2020;2020:4619214. doi:10.1155/2020/4619214

40. Wang S, Feng K, Zhang Y, Liu J, Wang W, Li Y. Antecedents of public mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: mediation of pandemic-related knowledge and self-efficacy and moderation of risk level. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:567119. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.567119

41. Tramontt CR, Jaime PC. Improving knowledge, self-efficacy and collective efficacy regarding the Brazilian dietary guidelines in primary health care professionals: a community controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):214. doi:10.1186/s12875-020-01245-3

42. Atak N, Gurkan T, Kose K. The effect of education on knowledge, self management behaviours and self efficacy of patients with type 2 diabetes. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2008;26(2):66–74.

43. Lois F, Hallet C, Samalea Suarez N, Ghuysen A, Brichant JF. In situ simulation improves perceived self-efficacy of OR nurses and anaesthesiologists during COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021;7(6):555. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000840

44. Hope K, Massey PD, Osbourn M, Durrheim DN, Kewley CD, Turner C. Senior Clinical Nurses Effectively Contribute to the Pandemic Influenza Public Health Response. Vol. 28. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation; 2011.

45. Kadoya Y, Zen K, Wakana N, et al. Knowledge, perception, and level of confidence regarding COVID-19 care among healthcare workers involved in cardiovascular medicine: a web-based cross-sectional survey in Japan. J Cardiol. 2021;77(3):239–244. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.07.029

46. Kim MK, Arsenault C, Atuyambe LM, Macwan’gi M, Kruk ME. Determinants of healthcare providers’ confidence in their clinical skills to deliver quality obstetric and newborn care in Uganda and Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):539. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05410-3

47. Fawaz M, Anshasi H, Samaha A. Nurses at the front line of COVID-19: roles, responsibilities, risks, and rights. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(4):1341–1342. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-0650

48. Liu Q, Luo D, Haase JE, et al. The experiences of health-care providers during the COVID-19 crisis in China: a qualitative study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(6):e790–e798. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30204-7

49. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs Adolescents. 2006;5(1):307–337.

50. Madhuleena CR 4 ways to improve and increase self-efficacy; 2021. Availablr from: https://positivepsychology.com/3-ways-build-self-efficacy/. Accessed August 2, 2021.

51. Shacham M, Hamama-Raz Y, Kolerman R, Mijiritsky O, Ben-Ezra M, Mijiritsky E. COVID-19 factors and psychological factors associated with elevated psychological distress among dentists and dental hygienists in Israel. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2900. doi:10.3390/ijerph17082900

52. Hou T, Zhang T, Cai W, et al. Social support and mental health among health care workers during coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: a moderated mediation model. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233831. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233831

53. Lu YC, Shu BC, Chang YY, Lung FW. The mental health of hospital workers dealing with severe acute respiratory syndrome. psychother psychosom. 2006;75(6):370–375. doi:10.1159/000095443

Creative Commons License © 2022 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.