Back to Journals » Drug Design, Development and Therapy » Volume 9

Comment on a meta-analysis comparing hepatic resection or transarterial chemoembolization as initial treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma

Authors Zhong J, Xiang B, Li L

Received 17 September 2015

Accepted for publication 18 September 2015

Published 13 October 2015 Volume 2015:9 Pages 5623—5624


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Wei Duan

Jian-Hong Zhong,1,2 Bang-De Xiang,1,2 Le-Qun Li1,2

1Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People’s Republic of China; 2Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Center, Nanning, People’s Republic of China
We read with great interest the meta-analysis by Tian et al1 comparing the efficacy of initial hepatic resection (HR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The results from this analysis of eleven cohort studies involving 6,297 patients suggested similar overall survival (OS) and recurrence rate for the two techniques. We believe this conclusion should be treated with caution because it conflicts with much larger original studies2,3 and large systematic reviews.4,5 
View original article by Tian X, Dai Y, Wang DQ, et al.

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]