Back to Journals » Journal of Blood Medicine » Volume 9

Evaluation of thrombosis-related biomarkers before and after therapy in patients with multiple myeloma

Authors Nomura S , Ito T , Yoshimura H, Hotta M, Nakanishi T, Fujita S, Nakaya A , Satake A , Ishii K

Received 30 July 2017

Accepted for publication 27 November 2017

Published 19 January 2018 Volume 2018:9 Pages 1—7

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S147743

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Martin Bluth



 

Shosaku Nomura, Tomoki Ito, Hideaki Yoshimura, Masaaki Hotta, Takahisa Nakanishi, Shinya Fujita, Aya Nakaya, Atsushi Satake, Kazuyoshi Ishii

First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan

Background: Thrombosis is one of the complications in the clinical course of multiple myeloma (MM). Vascular endothelial cells and/or the hemostatic-coagulatory system are thought to play an important role in thrombosis of MM. In addition to melphalan-prednisone (Mel-P) therapy, several new therapeutic drugs such as lenalidomide or bortezomib have been developed and show effectiveness against MM. However, these new drugs also have risk of therapy-related thrombosis.
Methods: We assessed 103 MM patients and 30 healthy controls, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to evaluate five biomarkers: platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), high mobility group box protein-1 (HMGB1), endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR), and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1). The effects of Mel-P, bortezomib, and lenalidomide on the plasma concentrations of these biomarkers were investigated.
Results: The plasma concentrations of PDMP, PAI-1, HMGB1, EPCR, and sVCAM-1 were higher in MM patients than in healthy controls. Mel-P, bortezomib, and lenalidomide therapies all reduced biomarker levels after treatment. However, when only patients with higher levels of EPCR were compared, differences were seen between the three therapies in the elevation of PDMP, HMGB1, and PAI-1.
Conclusion: These results suggest that both MM and therapies for MM can induce a hypercoagulable state. The elevated risk of thrombosis conferred by hypercoagulability increases patient morbidity and mortality. Attention should be paid to therapy-related thrombosis when new therapeutic regimens are selected for MM patients.

Keywords: multiple myeloma, bortezomib, lenaridomide, thrombosis, biomarker

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignancy of the plasma cells.1 The majority of MM patients relapse, regardless of their initial treatment.1 Melphalan-prednisone (Mel-P) has long been the treatment of choice for MM patients over 65 years of age.2 Recently, several new therapeutic drugs, such as lenalidomide and bortezomib, have been developed and show effectiveness against MM.3,4 However, the pathologic characteristics of individual MM patients differ, depending on the products secreted by MM cells. In addition, vascular endothelial cells and/or the hemostatic-coagulatory system are thought to play an important role in the clinical course of MM.5,6

Many individuals with cancer are in a hypercoagulable state, and the elevated risk of thrombosis conferred by hypercoagulability increases patients morbidity and mortality.79 Cancer patients frequently develop venous thromboembolism (VTE), and various potentially predictive biomarkers have been evaluated for association with VTE in cancer progression.1012 For example, analysis of cell-derived microparticles (MP), high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1(PAI-1), and soluble endothelial protein C receptor (sEPCR) can effectively predict the risk of VTE development.1316 Previous studies have further demonstrated a significant relationship between these markers and thrombosis with MM.1720 In addition, although new drugs such as bortezomib, lenalidomide, or monoclonal antibodies can improve the prognosis of MM, these drugs can also be accompanied by side effects such as VTE.2226 Therefore, here we measured various thrombosis-related biomarkers in patients with MM to study the clinical significance of these biomarkers in MM and their relationship with MM therapy.

Patients and methods

Patients

The study group consisted of 103 patients newly diagnosed with symptomatic, measurable MM,21 defined in accordance with the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of MM in Adults,27 presenting at our hospital between May 2010 and August 2016. As a control group, 30 healthy volunteers were recruited from the hospital staff and other sources. All study participants provided signed informed consent, and this study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan (no 110788).

Study design

A total of 91 patients were assigned to receive Mel-P (n=23), bortezomib (n=31), or lenalidomide (n=37) (Figure 1). The Mel-P regimen consisted of six 28-day cycles of melphalan (0.18 mg/kg body weight on days 1 through 4) and prednisone (2 mg/kg body weight on days 1 through 4). The bortezomib regimen consisted of subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11), oral cyclophosphamide (500 mg on days 1, 8, and 15), and oral dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, and 15). The cycle was repeated every 21 days.28,29 The lenalidomide regimen consisted of either oral lenalidomide at 25 mg daily on days 1–21 plus oral dexamethasone at 40 mg daily on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 of each 28-day cycle, or the same schedule of lenalidomide plus oral 40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of the cycle.30,31 Treatment was continued until disease progression stopped or unacceptable adverse effects developed. The primary study end point was an improvement in various biomarkers; secondary end points included response rate, response quality, and adverse events.

Figure 1 Randomization and follow-up of patients included in the trial.

Notes: A total of 91 patients underwent randomization: 23 were assigned to treatment with Mel-P, 31 with bortezomib, and 37 with lenalidomide.

Abbreviation: Mel-P, melphalan and prednisone.

Plasma levels of platelet-derived microparticle (PDMP), cytokines, soluble factors, and PAI-1

Fasting blood samples were obtained from the peripheral veins of patients and controls, using 21-gauge needles to minimize platelet activation, and were transferred into vacutainers containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-citrate dextrose (NIPRO Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The samples were gently mixed by inverting the tubes once or twice and kept at room temperature for a maximum of 2–3 hours. Samples were centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 5 minutes, and 200 μL at the top of each 2 mL upper layer was withdrawn to avoid contamination by platelets. These plasma samples were stored at –40°C until analysis. PDMP was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; JIMRO Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).32,33 Plasma concentrations of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), and PAI-1 were measured using monoclonal antibody-based ELISA kits (Invitrogen International Inc., Camarillo, CA, USA). HMGB1 was measured using the HMGB1 ELISA kit (Shino-test Corp., Kanagawa, Japan). Plasma sEPCR levels were measured by ELISA (R&D Syetems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The recombinant products and standard solutions provided with the commercial kits were used as positive controls in each assay. All kits were used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed using multiple regression (stepwise method), as appropriate. Between-group comparisons were made using the Newman–Keuls test and Scheffe’s test. All statistical analyses were performed using Stat Flex (version 6; Artech Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) software, with p-values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

The plasma concentrations of biomarkers in patients newly diagnosed with MM and in healthy controls are shown in Table 1. HMGB1, PDMP, sVCAM-1, PAI-1, and sEPCR concentrations were higher in patients than in controls.

Table 1 Plasma levels of cytokines, PDMP, and soluble factors

Notes: Data are shown as mean ± SD. p-value, patients versus controls.

Abbreviations: TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α; HMGB1, high mobility group box protein 1; PDMP, platelet-derived microparticles; sVCAM-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; sEPCR, soluble endothelial protein C receptor; NS, not significant.

The demographic and baseline characteristics of the treated patients were similar among the three groups (data nor shown). Treatment with Mel-P for 6 months significantly reduced the plasma concentrations of PDMP, relative to baseline, but did not significantly alter the plasma concentrations of TNFα, HMGB1, sVCAM-1, PAI-1, or sEPCR (Figures 2 and 3). In contrast, treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide alone improved the levels of all tested biomarkers other than TNFα (Figures 2 and 3).

Figure 2 Changes in the plasma levels of TNFα, HMGB1, and PDMP before and after treatments.

Notes: Data are shown as mean ± SD. p-value, patients versus controls.

Abbreviations: Mel-P, melphalan and prednisone; Bor, bortezomib; Len, lenalidomide; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α; HMGB1, high mobility group box protein 1; PDMP, platelet-derived microparticle; NS, not significant.

Figure 3 Changes in the plasma levels of sVCAM-1, PAI-1, and sEPCR before and after treatments.

Notes: Data are shown as mean ± SD. p-value, patients versus controls.

Abbreviations: Mel-P, melphalan and prednisone; Bor, bortezomib; Len, lenalidomide; sVCAM-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; sEPCR, soluble endothelial protein C receptor; NS, not significant.

Nineteen of 91 patients showed remarkable elevation of sEPCR (sEPCR >248 ng/mL) (including four patients treated with Mel-P, seven with bortezomib, and eight with lenalidomide). Four biomarkers (HMGB1, sVCAM-1, PAI-1, and PDMP) showed no significant concentration changes before and after treatment (Table 2). However, when only patients with higher levels of sEPCR were compared, differences were seen between the three therapies in the elevation of HMGB1, sVCAM-1, PAI-1, and PDMP (Figure 4). Specifically, only lenalidomide treatment was associated with the significant elevation of these four biomarkers after 6 months (Figure 4). However, these patients did not suffer from clinical thrombosis, because they received aspirin treatment.

Figure 4 Changes in HMGB1 (A), sVCAM-1 (B), PAI-1 (C), and PDMP (D) before and after treatment of patients with higher levels of sEPCR.

Notes: Data are shown as mean ± SD. p-value, before versus 3 or 6 months after treatment began.

Abbreviations: HMGB1, high mobility group box protein 1; sVCAM-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; PDMP, platelet-derived microparticles; Mel-P, melphalan and prednisone; Bor, bortezomib; Len, lenalidomide; NS, not significant; M, months.

Table 2 Changes in the plasma levels of PDMP, soluble factors, and cytokines/chemokines before and after all treatments of patients with elevated sEPCR

Notes: Data are shown as mean ± SD. p-value, before versus 3 or 6 months after treatment began.

Abbreviations: sEPCR, soluble endothelial protein C receptor; HMGB1, high mobility group box protein 1; sVCAM-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; PDMP, platelet-derived microparticle; NS, not significant.

Discussion

Bleeding and thrombosis are complications in patients with hematologic malignancies, with epidemiological, clinical, and pathophysiologic significance.22,23,34 In patients with MM, several disease- and treatment-related factors have been found to affect the coagulation system, as well as increase the risks of bleeding and thrombotic complications.3436 Similar to findings in other cancers, malignant clones in patients with MM induce a cytokine environment responsible for a hypercoagulable state.22 Circulating monoclonal proteins increase blood viscosity and impair platelet and coagulation function, which are considered key mechanisms in the hemostatic abnormalities frequently detected in patients with MM.6 This study assessed the plasma concentrations of several biomarkers of hemostasis, coagulation, and endothelial dysfunction in patients newly diagnosed with MM. We found that the concentrations of HMGB1, PDMP, sVCAM-1, PAI-1, and sEPCR were higher in MM patients than in healthy controls. These results suggest that patients with MM likely have coagulation- and/or endothelial cell activation-related risk factors for coagulation abnormalities.6,1719,2325

Recently, the treatment strategy for MM has undergone a complete change.3739 In particular, Mel-P plus bortezomib has been reported to improve progression-free survival and overall survival when compared with Mel-P alone.3,4,30,31,40 Furthermore, lenalidomide also provides good therapeutic effects.30,31 Along with these treatments, new strategies using monoclonal antibodies can be anticipated.41 However, an accurate understanding of therapeutic effects and/or side effects is necessary for the development of new MM treatments. This study therefore examined the response of various biomarkers to alternative treatments for MM. Treatment with Mel-P for 6 months significantly reduced the plasma concentrations of PDMP, relative to baseline, but did not significantly alter the plasma concentrations of TNFα, HMGB1, sVCAM-1, PAI-1, and sEPCR. In contrast, treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide alone had a beneficial effect on all tested biomarkers other than TNFα. These results suggest the possibility that bortezomib and lenalidomide could improve the abnormality of thrombosis-related biomarkers that accompanies MM.

Activated protein C, combined with its cofactor protein S, acts as an anticoagulant, inactivating factor Va and factor VIIIa.42 EPCR, which is a transmembrane glycoprotein found in the endothelium, enables activation of PC.43 EPCR is also found in a soluble form, sEPCR, which binds activated protein C in competition with cell-surface EPCR.44 Therefore, sEPCR can be considered to be a biomarker of cancer-related hypercoagulability in human malignancies.16,17,45 In the present study, 19 of 91 patients showed remarkable elevation of sEPCR (sEPCR >248 ng/mL).

Four other biomarkers, HMGB1, sVCAM-1, PAI-1, and PDMP, showed no significant changes before and after treatment. However, when only patients with higher levels of sEPCR were compared, differences were seen in the elevation of these biomarkers between the three therapies described in this study. Only lenalidomide produced a significant elevation of the four biomarkers after 6 months of treatment. These results suggest the possibility that lenalidomide could cause the elevation of thrombosis-related biomarkers regardless of its effects on MM.24,25

The risk of venous thrombosis is increased not only in MM but also by chemotherapy, and is dependent on the combination of drugs administered.46 In particular, VTE incidence greatly increases when thalidomide or lenalidomide is used in combination with dexamethasone or multiagent therapy.47,48 The hazard ratio for a specific VTE risk should be taken into account when choosing an appropriate anticoagulant prophylaxis, because the relative risk of VTE is quite heterogeneous.47 Our patients received aspirin treatment. Although these patients did not exhibit clinical thrombosis, their thrombosis-related biomarkers were elevated. Therefore, when a new multiagent therapy in addition to lenalidomide is chosen, it may mandate the delivery of more aggressive prophylaxis, such as low-molecular-weight heparin, full-dose warfarin, or the new oral factor Xa anticoagulants.

The exact mechanism by which lenalidomide treatment leads to an increase in sEPCR levels remains unclear. However, at least one possibility can be inferred: the participation of TNFα-converting enzyme (TACE or ADMM17).49 TACE is a metalloproteinase that plays a pivotal role in the shedding of many cellular receptors.50 During MM treatment, lenalidomide has critical immunomodulatory activity, and increases inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and IL-8.51,52 TNFα is closely linked to the production of TACE, and TACE ultimately causes the elevation of sEPCR.49 A previous report demonstrated that the anti-inflammatory effect of lenalidomide may relate to its ability to block the production of TNFα in peripheral blood cells.53 However, the effect of lenalidomide on TNFα is paradoxical, because an increasing level of TNFα after lenalidomide treatment has already been reported in chronic lymphoblastic leukemia patients.51,52 Our results support these findings. However, we could not confirm a direct correlation between the TNFα and sEPCR. Therefore, further examination is required to elucidate the mechanism of sEPCR elevation caused by lenalidomide.

Conclusion

These results suggest that a hypercoagulable state can be induced by both MM and the therapies used to treat it. Hypercoagulability elevates the risk of thrombosis and hence increases patient morbidity and mortality. The risk of therapy-related thrombosis should be considered when new therapeutic regimens are selected for patients with MM.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Akiko Konishi, Dr Yukie Tsubokura, and Dr Yoshiko Azuma for technical assistance and for data collection. This study was supported in part by a grant from the Japan Foundation of Neuropsychiatry and Hematology Research, the Research Grant for Advanced Medical Care from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan, and a grant (13670760 to SN) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.

The abstract of this paper was presented as a poster presentation with interim findings at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, 4–6 May 2017, Honolulu, HI, USA, and was published in the International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, Volume 39, Issue S2 May 2017. The poster’s abstract was published in “Poster Abstracts” in the International Journal of Laboratory Hematology: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.2017.39.issue-S2/issuetoc.

Author contributions

All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and critically revising the paper, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1.

Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):564–569.

2.

Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):1046–1060.

3.

San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):906–917.

4.

Fayers PM, Palumbo A, Hulin C, et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. Blood. 2011;118(5):1239–1247.

5.

Sanz-Rodríguez F, Ruiz-Velasco N, Pascual-Salcedo D, et al. Characterization of VLA-4-dependent myeloma cell adhesion to fibronectin and VCAM-1. Br J Haematol. 1999;107:825–834.

6.

Coppola A, Tufano A, Di Capua M, Franchini M. Bleeding and thrombosis in multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders. Semin Thromb Hemostas. 2011;37(8):929–945.

7.

Sallah S, Wan JY, Nguyen NP. Venous thrombosis in patients with solid tumors: determination of frequency and characteristics. Thromb Haemost. 2002;87(4):575–579.

8.

Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S, et al. Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2005;293(6):715–722.

9.

Khorana AA, Connolly GC. Assessing risk of venous thromboembolism in the patient with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(29):4839–4847.

10.

Blom JW, Vanderschoot JP, Oostindiër MJ, et al. Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66,329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(3):529–535.

11.

Simanek R, Vormittag R, Ay C, et al. High platelet count associated with venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS). J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(1):114–120.

12.

Mackman N. New insights into the mechanisms of venous thrombosis. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(7):2331–2336.

13.

Fleitas T, Martínez-Sales V, Vila V, et al. Circulating endothelial cells and microparticles as prognostic markers in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47365.

14.

Naumnik W, Nilklińska W, Ossolińska M, Chyczewska E. Serum levels of HMGB1, survivin, and VEGF in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer during chemotherapy. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2009;47(4):703–709.

15.

Su CY, Liu YP, Yang CJ, et al. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 plays a leading prognostic role among protease families in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133411.

16.

Ducros E, Mirshahi SS, Faussat AM, et al. Soluble endothelial protein C receptor (sEPCR) is likely a biomarker of cancer-associated hypercoagulability in human hematologic malignancies. Cancer Med. 2012;1(2):261–267.

17.

Dri AP, Politou M, Gialeraki A, et al. Decreased incidence of EPCR 4678G/C SNP in multiple myeloma patients with thrombosis. Thromb Res. 2013;132(3):400–401.

18.

Auwerda JJ, Yuana Y, Osanto S, et al. Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity and venous thrombosis in multiple myeloma. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105(1):14–20.

19.

Benameur T, Chappard D, Fioleau E, et al. Plasma cells release membrane microparticles in a mouse model of multiple myeloma. Micron. 2013;54–55:75–81.

20.

Krishnan SR, Luk F, Brown RD, et al. Isolation of Human CD138(+) microparticles from the plasma of patients with multiple myeloma. Neoplasia. 2016;18(1):25–32.

21.

Roy M, Liang L, Xiao X, et al. Lycorine downregulates HMGB1 to inhibit autophagy and enhances Bortezomib activity in multiple myeloma. Theronostics. 2016;6(12):2209–2224.

22.

Chong BH, Lee SH. Management of thromboembolism in hematologic malignancies. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007;33(4):435–448.

23.

Franchini M, Dario Di Minno MH, Coppola A. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in hematologic malignancies. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2010;36(4):388–403.

24.

Valsami S, Ruf W, Leikauf MS, et al. Immunomodulatory drugs increase endothelial tissue factor expression in vitro. Thromb Res. 2011;127(3):264–271.

25.

Rosovsky R, Hong F, Tocco D, et al. Endothelial stress products and coagulation markers in patients with multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone: an observational study. Br J Haematol. 2013;160(3):351–358.

26.

Gao Y, Ma G, Liu S, et al. Thalidomide and multiple myeloma serum synergistically induce a hemostatic imbalance in endothelial cells in vitro. Thromb Res. 2015;135(6):1154–1159.

27.

Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, et al. Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2005;106(3): 812–817.

28.

Davies FE, Wu P, Jenner M, Srikanth M, Saso R, Morgan GJ. The combination of cyclophosphamide, velcade and dexamethasone induces high response rates with comparable toxicity to velcade alone and velcade plus dexamethasone. Haematologica. 2007;92(8):1149–1150.

29.

Brown S, Hinsley S, Ballesteros M, et al. The MUK five protocol: a phase II randomised, controlled, parallel group, multi-centre trial of carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CCD) vs. cyclophosphamide, bortezomib (Velcade) and dexamethasone (CVD) for first relapse and primary refractory multiple myeloma. BMC Hematol. 2016;16:14.

30.

Rajkumar SV, Jacobus S, Callander NS, et al. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(1):29–37.

31.

Reece DE, Masih-Khan E, Atenafu EG, et al. Phase I-II trial of oral cyclophosphamide, prednisone and lenalidomide for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2015;168(1):46–54.

32.

Osumi K, Ozeki Y, Saito S, et al. Development and assessment of enzyme immunoassay for platelet-derived microparticles. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85(2):326–330.

33.

Nomura S, Uehata S, Saito S, Osumi K, Ozeki Y, Kimura Y. Enzyme immunoassay detection of platelet-derived microparticles and RANTES in acute coronary syndrome. Thromb Haemost. 2003;89(3):506–512.

34.

Eby C. Pathogenesis and management of bleeding and thrombosis in plasma cell dyscrasias. Br J Haematol. 2009;145(2):151–163.

35.

Leebeek FW, Kruip MJ, Sonnevels P. Risk and management of thrombosis in multiple myeloma. Thromb Res. 2012;129(Suppl 1):S88–S92.

36.

Wang X, Li Y, Yan X. Efficacy and safety of novel agent-based therapies for multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:6848902.

37.

Martinez-Lopez J, Blade J, Mateos MV, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of response in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2011;118(3):529–534.

38.

Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M, et al. Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1759–1769.

39.

Mateos MV, Hernández MT, Giraldo P, et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):438–447.

40.

Petrucci MT, Levi A, Bringhen S, et al. Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a multicenter, open label phase 1/2 study. Cancer. 2013;119(5):971–977.

41.

Touzeau C, Moreau P, Dumontet C. Monoclonal antibody therapy in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2017;31:1–9.

42.

Castellino FJ, Ploplis VA. The protein C pathway and pathologic processes. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(Suppl 1):140–145.

43.

Van Hylckama Vlieg A, Montes R, Rosendaal FR, Hermida J. Autoantibodies against endothelial protein C receptor and the risk of a first deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(7):1449–1454.

44.

Fukudome K, Kurosawa S, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, He X, Rezaie AR, Esmon CT. The endothelial cell protein C receptor. Cell surface expression and direct ligand binding by the soluble receptor. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(29):17491–17498.

45.

Althawadi H, Alfarsi H, Besbes S, et al. The endothelial cell protein C receptor. Cell surface expression and direct ligand binding by the soluble receptor. Oncol Lep. 2015;34(2):603–609.

46.

Cesarman-Maus G, Braggio E, Fonseca R. Thrombosis in multiple myeloma (MM). Hematology. 2012;17(1):S177–S180.

47.

Palumbo A, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma. Leukemia. 2008;22(2):414–423.

48.

Carrier M, Le Gal G, Tay J, Wu C, Lee AY. Rates of venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma patients undergoing immunomodulatory therapy with thalidomide or lenalidomide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(4):653–666.

49.

Qu D, Wang Y, Esmon NL, Esmon CT. Regulated endothelial protein C receptor shedding is mediated by tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme/ADAM17. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(2):395–402.

50.

Moss ML, Lambert MH. Shedding of membrane proteins by ADAM family proteases. Essays Biochem. 2002;38:141–153.

51.

Chanan-Khan AA, Chitta K, Ersing N, et al. Biological effects and clinical significance of lenalidomide-induced tumour flare reaction in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: in vivo evidence of immune activation and antitumour response. Br J Haematol. 2011;155(4):457–467.

52.

Maiga S, Gomez-Bougie P, Bonnaud S, et al. Paradoxical effect of lenalidomide on cytokine/growth factor profiles in multiple myeloma. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(9):1801–1806.

53.

Muller GW, Chen R, Huang SY, et al. Amino-substituted thalidomide analogs: potent inhibitors of TNF-alpha production. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1999;9(11):1625–1630.

Creative Commons License © 2018 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.