From drug-delivery device to disease management tool: a study of preferences for enhanced features in next-generation self-injection devices
Authors Boeri M, Szegvari B, Hauber B, Mange B, Mountian I, Schiff M, Maniadakis N
Received 31 January 2019
Accepted for publication 8 June 2019
Published 11 July 2019 Volume 2019:13 Pages 1093—1110
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen
Marco Boeri,1 Boglarka Szegvari,2 Brett Hauber,3 Brennan Mange,3 Irina Mountian,2 Michael Schiff,4 Nikolaos Maniadakis5
1RTI Health Solutions, Belfast, UK; 2UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium; 3RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 4Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA; 5Health Services Management, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece
Purpose: To quantify rheumatology patient preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for features differentiating enhanced from standard self-injection devices and to investigate differences among subgroups.
Patients and methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) were recruited in the UK. A discrete-choice experiment was used to elicit preferences; respondents were presented with 10 choices between 3 different devices: a free standard disposable device, and 2 hypothetical reusable devices characterized by presence/absence of skin sensor, injection speed control, on-screen instructions, injection reminders, electronic log, and large grip. Every hypothetical device included a cost component to assess WTP for each enhanced feature. A random-parameters logit model was used to estimate preference weights and WTP.
Results: Data were collected from 323 respondents by electronic survey (15/11/2017–15/02/2018; RA: 108; PsA: 103; axSpA: 112). On average, the skin sensor was the most preferred feature (£30), followed by injection speed control, injection reminders, electronic log (∼£20 each), on-screen instructions (∼£12), and a device with a small, rather than large grip (∼£7). Similar preferences for attributes were observed across condition subgroups except for grip size: axSpA patients preferred small grip (∼£27); PsA patients preferred large grip (∼£19). Overall, respondents preferred reusable devices with all enhanced features (WTP value: £85) over the standard device. RA patients exhibited a higher WTP (£145) than PsA (£102) or axSpA (£62) for the same enhanced device.
Conclusion: Patients positively valued reusable self-injection devices with enhanced features, which may improve patient experience, potentially improving treatment adherence, clinical, and economic outcomes.
Keywords: rheumatology, subcutaneous injection, self-administration, patient preference, discrete-choice experiment
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]