False negative results in glaucoma detection with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II
Authors Deghislage C, Van Malderen L, Zeyen TG
Published 7 March 2008 Volume 2008:2(1) Pages 153—157
Catherine Deghislage, Lidwine Van Malderen, Thierry G Zeyen
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
Purpose: To evaluate the rate of false negative results with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II) in a glaucoma practice.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Methods: We analyzed the HRTs taken between October 2002 and October 2003 in our glaucoma clinic, and selected the patients who had a good quality image (SD < 40 µ) with a normal Moorfield’s Regression Analysis (MRA). A masked independent observer classified those patients as normal, glaucoma suspect, or glaucomatous on the basis of optic disc stereo photos (ODP) and at least 2 consecutive reliable automated perimetries. The diagnosis of glaucoma was based on a glaucomatous optic disc with a congruent, reproducible visual field defect.
Results: Four hundred and fifty patients who had undergone an HRT examination were analyzed. One hundred and nine patients had an HRT classified as normal on the MRA, and a good quality image. Fifteen of those 109 patients (13.7%) were classified as glaucomatous on the basis of an abnormal ODP with corresponding visual field defect. Seven (6.4%) patients were classified as glaucoma suspect.
Conclusion: Fourteen percent of glaucoma patients with glaucoma remained undetected with the HRT II Moorfield’s regression analysis as a sole means to detect glaucoma.
Keywords: glaucoma detection, false negative results, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF]