Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties Adaption of Chinese Version of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10)
Authors Wang F, Huang L, Zhang H, Jiang H, Chang X, Chu Y, Wang Z, Zhang X
Received 9 June 2020
Accepted for publication 2 September 2020
Published 22 October 2020 Volume 2020:14 Pages 2027—2034
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Naifeng Liu
Feijie Wang,1,* Lijie Huang,1,* Hongmei Zhang,2 Hongxia Jiang,1 Xiaoxia Chang,1 Yinping Chu,1 Zhixia Wang,3 Xiaoli Zhang1
1Department of Urinary Surgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou University Peoples Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, People’s Republic of China; 2Nursing Department, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, People’s Republic of China; 3Gastrointestinal Surgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Hongmei Zhang Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Objective: To translate and validate the DES-10 into Chinese and adapt the DES-10 among Chinese prostate cancer patients. To explore the impact of demographic data on the SDM of Chinese prostate cancer patients.
Methods: Data were collected from December 2019 to January 2020 from four hospitals among prostatic cancer patients in Henan Province, by convenience sampling method. A demographic questionnaire, DES-10, and 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) were administered. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to test the content, construct, reliability, and concurrent validity of the translated DES-10. Then, Pearson’s correlation, t-test, and analysis of variance were used to test the demographic difference of DES-10.
Results: A total of 380 prostatic cancer patients completed the survey (96% response rate). The total score of DES-10 was 71.16± 17.14. The Cronbach’s ɑ coefficient was 0.87. Single factor structure was confirmed by exploratory factor analysis (explaining 50.14% of the variance). Model fitting indexes (RMSEA=0.07, CMIN/DF=2.92) were acceptable. The DES-10 scale showed good validity with the SDM-Q-9 as the criterion. Age, marital status, homeplace, and household monthly income could affect the shared decision-making of prostatic cancer patients.
Conclusion: The DES-10 was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable scale to assess the prostatic cancer patient’s engagement in health care decision-making. And it is culturally appropriate for use in China. The influence of age, marital status, homeplace, and household monthly income should be considered in promoting patients’ participation in shared decision-making.
Keywords: reliability, decisional engagement scale, prostatic cancer patients
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]