Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Additional Risk Minimization Measure to Reduce the Risk of Prescribing Mirabegron to Patients with Severe Uncontrolled Hypertension in Four European Countries
Received 19 December 2019
Accepted for publication 11 March 2020
Published 1 May 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 423—433
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Vera Ehrenstein
Edith M Heintjes,1 Irene D Bezemer,1 Daniel Prieto-Alhambra,2,3 Elisabeth Smits,1 Helen P Booth,4 Daniel Dedman,4 Ying He,3 Fabian Hoti,5 Minna Vehkala,5 Stefan de Vogel,6 Noah Jamie Robinson,6 Kwame Appenteng,7 Fernie JA Penning-van Beest1
1PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 2Idiap Jordi Gol Primary Care Research Institute and CIBERFes, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; 3Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK; 4Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), London, UK; 5Statfinn - EPID Research, Espoo, Finland; 6Astellas Pharma Europe B.V., Leiden, Netherlands; 7Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA
Correspondence: Edith M Heintjes
PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, Utrecht, AE 3528, the Netherlands
Tel +31 30 7440 800
Background: Mirabegron, indicated for the treatment of overactive bladder, is contraindicated in patients with severe uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mm Hg). In September 2015, a Direct Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC) letter was disseminated as an additional risk minimisation measure.
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of the DHPC in reducing the proportions of patients with severe or non-severe uncontrolled hypertension at mirabegron initiation.
Methods: An observational multi-database cohort study was undertaken using routinely collected healthcare data (December 2012–December 2016) from the PHARMO Database Network (Netherlands), SIDIAP database (Spain), CPRD (United Kingdom, UK) and national healthcare registers and electronic medical records from Finland. DHPC effectiveness was evaluated using interrupted time series analyses comparing trends and changes in monthly proportions of severe or non-severe uncontrolled hypertensive mirabegron initiations relative to the timing of the DHPC dissemination.
Results: The study population comprised 52,078 patients. Prior to DHPC dissemination, across the four databases, 0.3– 1.3% had severe uncontrolled hypertension. Estimated absolute changes (EAC) in proportions of severe uncontrolled hypertension post-DHPC indicated a tendency towards a lower proportion in the Netherlands (EAC − 0.36%, p=0.053), unchanged proportions in Spain and the UK and a higher proportion in Finland (EAC +0.73%, p=0.016). For non-severe uncontrolled hypertension (13– 16% pre-DHPC), post-DHPC proportions tended to be lower in the Netherlands (EAC − 2.02%, p=0.038) and Spain (EAC − 1.04%, p=0.071), and unchanged in the UK and Finland.
Conclusion: Severe uncontrolled hypertension prior to mirabegron initiation was uncommon in these four European countries even before DHPC dissemination. This suggests that other risk minimisation communications (prior to the DHPC dissemination) had worked adequately with respect to minimising mirabegron use among patients with severe uncontrolled hypertension. No strong and consistent evidence of further risk minimisation after the DHPC dissemination was observed in this study.
Keywords: drug utilisation study, direct healthcare professional communication, risk minimization, interrupted time series analysis
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]