Estimation of radiotherapy modalities for patients with stage I-II nasal natural killer T-Cell lymphoma
Authors Liu X, Wu F, Guo Q, Wang Y, He Y, Luo H, Li Q, Zhong M, Li C, Yang H, Zhou J, Jin F
Received 14 January 2019
Accepted for publication 29 June 2019
Published 30 July 2019 Volume 2019:11 Pages 7219—7229
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Nakshatri
Xianfeng Liu,1 Furong Wu,1 Qishuai Guo,1 Ying Wang,1 Yanan He,1 Huanli Luo,1 Qicheng Li,1 Mingsong Zhong,1 Chao Li,1 Han Yang,1 Juan Zhou,2 Fu Jin1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China; 2Forensic Identification Center, College of Criminal Investigation, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China
Purpose: The objective of this study is to estimate radiotherapy (RT) modalities for patients with stage I-II nasal natural killer T-Cell lymphoma (NNKTCL), including plan quality, radiation delivery efficiency, cost of RT and excess absolute risk (EAR).
Materials and methods: Twenty-four representative patients with stage I-II NNKTCL treated with fix-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FF-IMRT) were re-planned for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), TomoDirect (TD) and TomoHelical (TH) on the TomoHDA system, respectively. Plan characteristics, cost of RT and EAR were compared.
Results: Compared with IMRT, TD and TH showed significant improvement in terms of D98%, D2%, cold spot volume and homogeneity index (HI) of planning target volume (PTV), while achieving worse Dmean and conformity index (CI). The mean dose of oropharynx, thyroid and left salivary, and the maximum dose of right salivary by TD (249.20%, p=0.000; 52.94%, p=0.000; 160.23%, p=0.022; 122.67%, p=0.027), VMAT (15.76%, p=0.000; 23.53%, p=0.000; 34.09%, p=0.000; 31.33%, p=0.000) and TH (250.32%, p=0.000; 58.82%, p=0.000; 120.45%, p=0.020; 117.33%, p=0.032) increased significantly compared to IMRT. VMAT reduced treatment time (p=0.000; 0.000; 0.000) and monitor units (MUs) (p=0.000; 0.000; 0.000) obviously compared with IMRT, TD and TH. The cost of RT for TD and TH increased 150% compared with IMRT and VMAT. IMRT obtained the lowest EAR to oropharynx, thyroid, left and right salivary gland in the four treatment modalities.
Conclusion: The results show that both TD and TH can achieve higher conformal target quality while getting worse organs at risk (OARs) sparing and EAR to some organs than IMRT for patients with stage I-II NNKTCL. IMRT delivers the lowest dose to most OARs, VMAT requires the lower cost of RT and shortest delivery time, and TH obtained the optimal target coverage. The results could provide direction for selecting proper RT modalities for different cases.
Keywords: nasal natural killer T-Cell lymphoma, excess absolute risk, IMRT, VMAT, TomoHelical
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]