Back to Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 10

Electronic health–literacy skills among nursing students

Authors Sharma S , Oli N , Thapa B 

Received 2 March 2019

Accepted for publication 15 June 2019

Published 18 July 2019 Volume 2019:10 Pages 527—532

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S207353

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Md Anwarul Azim Majumder



S Sharma,1 N Oli,2 B Thapa3

1Department of Nursing, Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2Department of Community Medicine, Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal; 3Department of Nursing, Nepalgunj Nursing Campus, Nepalgunj, Nepal

Background: The Internet has become a major source of health-related information. In order to provide better health services and health-care education to society, nurses should have acceptable electronic health (eHealth) literacy.
Objective: The main aim was to measure eHealth-literacy skills among nursing students of Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, Nepal.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 152 Bachelor of Science nursing students at the hospital. Data were collected using the self-administered eHealth Literacy Scale. This is an eight-item tool that is assessed on 5-point likert scale to measure consumers’ perceived skills at finding, evaluating, and applying eHealth information to health problems. Demographical and personal variables were collected to explore their relationship with eHealth literacy.
Results: A total of 152 nursing students with mean age of 19.84±1.62 years participated in the study. While 44.7% perceived that they had average Internet skills, 65.1% found the Internet useful in helping them make decisions about their health. Nursing students had a moderate self-perceived level of eHealth literacy (median 3.69, IQR 0.87). Related factors included students’ Internet skills, frequency of using the Internet for health related purposes, and self-perception of the usefulness and importance of the Internet.
Conclusion: This study represents a baseline reference for eHealth literacy among nursing students. Students have some basic necessary skills, while other skills still need to be improved. There is a need to pay attention to eHealth-literacy needs of nursing students.

Keywords: digitization, health literacy, Internet, nursing students, technology

Introduction

Health literacy, a relatively new concept in health promotion, is recognized as one of the public health goals for the new century.1 The level of health literacy signifies whether the public is able to access and process basic health information and services and thereby participate in health-related decisions.2,3 Electronic resources are effective for providing health-related information.4 Electronic health (eHealth) offers a medium of electronic tools by which people can navigate personal health-care information easily. Being aware of electronic resources in getting relevant health information is eHealth literacy.5,6 In broader terms, eHealth literacy enables people to seek, find, understand, and appraise health information from electronic sources and apply this knowledge in addressing or solving health problems.7

With the rapid growth of information technology, the use of electronic resources in health is increasing. The benefits of using the Internet — low cost, high-speed searching, and the ability to access information anonymously — have made the Internet a preferable choice in searching for health information.8 There is enough evidence that a large number of Internet users search for health information online.911 With this in mind, the government of Nepal has also developed a digital framework in which the primary focus is digital health-care programs and mobile health.12 In these scenario of increasing demand of digital health-care programs, it is necessary to be aware of and orient eHealth. In addition, eHealth literacy also has high significance in the self-management of patients with chronic diseases. It is estimated that 80% of people with chronic diseases manage their diseases themselves at home or with the help of friends, family members, or relatives.13 However, for the self-management of diseases, it is very important to get the right information from reliable sources. Nurses are usually the primary contact for health information in the community, with whom people feel more comfortable in communicating regarding their health problems.14,15 Therefore, in the present context of advanced communication and technology, nurses should have an acceptable level of eHealth literacy, in order to provide better health services and health-care education to the community. Nurses should be aware of the medium from which health information is accessible to majority of the population. Nurses should have skills that help their patients utilize eHealth information, and correct any misunderstanding of their diseases that could result from misinterpretation of information gathered from the Internet.16

However, many nurses lack the appropriate skills in using electronic resources for learning and decision-making regarding health-related issues. There is limited information on eHealth literacy among nurses in Asian regions and none in Nepal. The study aimed to measure eHealth literacy skills among nursing students of Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (KMCTH), Nepal and to determine factors that contribute to eHealth literacy.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted among undergraduate nursing students of KMCTH. KMCTH was chosen purposively, considering the convenience of researchers. KMCTH is a private medical college affiliated with Kathmandu University in Nepal. The study was conducted from July 2018 to September 2018. Inclusion criteria were being enrolled in the undergraduate nursing program at KMCTH at the time of data collection and agreeing to participate. Since the nursing program is 4 years, students from the first to fourth years were recruited, including the outgoing batch. The outgoing batch had already sat their final examinations, but were waiting on their results. The total number of students was 152. In the first round of data collection, information from 140 students was collected. We contacted those who were absent during the original data collection and arranged a second round of data collection with them, thus reaching the total.

A self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. We used the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) to measure eHealth skills. This is a globally validated tool to assess skills and comfort in using electronic resources in health.17 The eight-item eHEALS was used to assess combined knowledge and perceived skills to examine, evaluate, and apply health information from the Internet. Respondents needed to specify their opinions with eHEALS statements based on five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). This scale has been reported to have reliablility α- value 0.88 in a study on medical and dental interns in Nepal.18 In addition to the eight items, this tool has two questions that rate the importance and usefulness of eHealth resources. Personal and demographic factors and items related to purpose of Internet use were also used to assess factors associated with eHealth literacy. Ethical approval for conducting the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of KMCTH. Written informed consent was obtained from the nursing students after explaining the objectives of the study prior to administering the questionnaire. All responses were kept confidential and anonymity maintained.

Statistical analysis

The collected data were entered into SPSS 20.0 for Windows. Descriptive statistics were used to examine demographic and personal variables, including means and SD. One way ANOVA and independent t-tests were used to examine significant effects of reported personal and demographic variables on eHealth literacy. P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 152 nursing students completed the questionnaire (response rate 100%). The mean age of the participants was 19.84±1.62 years. All participants were female, and the mean aggregate of students’ past academic years’ achievement was 74.13±7.09. An equal proportion of students (19.7%) were from each of the second, third, and fourth year but 23.7% were first-years and 17.1% from the outgoing batch.

Most of the students (78.3%) reported smartphones as their primary means of Internet use. While 84.9% reported that they used the Internet several times a day, only 19.7% reported that for health purposes they used the internet this frequently. For health purposes, it was found that a quarter used the Internet fewer than three times a day, followed by 24.3% on alternate days, 17.8% for sometimes in a month, and 11.8% for once a week. Around 65.1% of the sample perceived that the Internet was useful for making health decisions. Similarly, 61.8% felt that it was important to be able to access health-related resources. However, 44.7% of the sample perceived that they had an average level of Internet skills (Table 1).

Table 1 Student characteristics regarding use of Internet

The overall median score for eHealth literacy was 3.69 (IQR =0.87), range 1–5 which indicates that nursing students in this study have a moderate perceived level of eHealth literacy. As shown in Table 2, most responses have similar moderate means scores.

Table 2 Self-reported eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS)

The findings indicated that there were statistically significant differences between participants’ self-perception of Internet skills, importance and usefulness of the Internet, and frequency of using the Internet for health purposes and eHEALS scores, as shown in Table 3. However, there were no statistically significant differences between eHealth literacy and average aggregate academic performance and frequency of Internet use for other purposes. Moreover, independent t-tests examining eHealth-literacy scores and devices for using the Internet showed no significant differences (P=0.8)

Table 3 Factors associated with eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS)

Discussion

In this era, health-care services have changed from provider-centered to patient-centered, whereby information is the foundation of change in health behavior. The Internet has so far been the most potent information resource globally.9,19 Nepal has achieved incredible success in digital adoption, with mobile penetration exceeding 100% and internet penetration reaching 60% in 2017, which is further expected to rise significantly in the next 5 years.12 However, even though the use of the Internet has grown extensively, skills in using the Internet for basic health purposes have not been explored. As such, this study was conducted to assess the perceived eHealth literacy of Nepalese nursing students and to explore influencing factors.

Most of the nursing students accessed the Internet frequently. For health-related queries almost a fifth used the internet several times a day. This corresponds with a study among interns at the BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, where almost all interns accessed the Internet daily and more than half used it for health purposes.18 Similarly, a study done in Jordan among undergraduate nursing students also revealed that they used the Internet frequently.16 Apart from nursing and medical students, the trend of using the Internet for health information by other college students is also increasing.20 These findings suggest the Internet's potential as a desired health-promotion channel for youth.

Smartphones were found to be the primary means of Internet use among nursing students. Almost 50% understood the usefulness and importance of the Internet to access health resources and make health decisions. With expanding use of the Internet, nursing students in different countries have responded that it is a useful tool in making health-related decisions and is equally important in being able to access health resources.16,21 However, in other study in Nepal, almost 40%–60% of interns were unsure of how to use the Internet and where to find useful health resources. They also explained that they were not taught about the importance of knowledge and skills to find useful health resources on the Internet.18 This shows that there is still a gap in knowledge of proper use of the Internet for health information, which must be explored. In addition, a little less than half our study participants perceived that they had average internet skills, which resembles other findings.22

Despite increased awareness of the usefulness and importance of the Internet in getting health information, the findings show that nursing students still have a moderate perceived level of eHealth literacy. This finding is consistent with a study among nursing students in Jordan in 201616 and medical and health-science students in Mashhad, Iran in 2017.8 However, a systematic review of college students that was done almost 9 years ago revealed low eHealth-literacy skills with poor ability in using, detecting, and evaluating health information on the internet.22 This may be because with time, the rate of Internet usage is increasing and so could be the rise in eHealth literacy.

Factors that can influence eHealth literacy were also investigated in the present study. Participants’ self-perception of Internet skills (<0.001), importance of the Internet (0.011), usefulness of the Internet (0.006), and frequency of using the Internet for health purposes (<0.001) were found to be significant. These findings are supported by a previous study among undergraduate nursing students in Jordan.16 However, in other related literature, only students' academic level was associated with eHealth literacy.22,23

This study has some limitations. It was conducted in only one setting chosen purposively, and may not represent the real scenario for all nursing students in Nepal. The tool used in this study, though reliable and valid assesses only students’ self-perceived level of comfort with and knowledge of eHealth literacy, not the skills associated with it. Furthermore, self-reporting of data might have been affected by the subjectivity of the students, who may have given socially acceptable responses and limited their estimations. Also, as there was limited variation in age, sex, education, and marital status in our sample, associations could not be assessed.

E-learning has been suggested to be integrated into medical education24 and continued nursing education.25 In the longer run, nurses need to be updated with the knowledge and skills to develop competence in using eHealth resources for patient care and health education. The outcome of this study gives baseline information on the level of eHealth literacy of nursing students, and be used as evidence for integrating eHealth education into academic curricula, as well as for academic experts to design e-learning in Nepal. In addition, nurses’ Internet skills and perception of its usefulness and importance should be considered when promoting eHealth literacy among them. Moreover, iterating the study among clinical nurses and comparing them with nursing students would be interesting.

Conclusion

This study represents a baseline reference for eHealth literacy among nursing students at Kathmandu Medical College, Nepal. Students have some basic necessary skills, while other skills still need to be improved. There is a need to pay attention to the eHealth-literacy needs of nursing students. Further research seems necessary to supply evidence on what interventions will be effective to meet the eHealth-literacy needs of nurses.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the nursing students of Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital for their active participation in the study. We are also very thankful to Ms Sushmita Mali from Dulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal for her proofreading for language.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000 [cited July 9, 2018];15(3):259–267. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/heapro/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.

2. Lambert M, Luke J, Downey B, et al. Health literacy: health professionals’ understandings and their perceptions of barriers that indigenous patients encounter. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 [cited July 9, 2018];14:614. doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0614-1

3. Berkman ND, Davis TC, Mccormack L. Health literacy : what is it? J Health Commun. 2010;15:9–19. Available from. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.499985

4. Richtering SS, Hyun K, Neubeck L, et al. eHealth literacy: predictors in a population with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk. JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 [cited July 5, 2018];4(1). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28130203.

5. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8:2. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9

6. Norman C. eHealth literacy 2.0: problems and opportunities with an evolving concept. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4). doi:10.2196/jmir.1658

7. Robert Bautista J. From solving a health problem to achieving quality of life: redefining eHealth literacy. J Lit Technol. 2015 [cited July 9, 2018];16(2). Available from: http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/uploads/1/3/6/8/136889/jlt_v16_2_bautista.pdf.

8. Dashti S, Peyman N, Tajfard M, Esmaeeli H. E-Health literacy of medical and health sciences university students in Mashhad, Iran in 2016: a pilot study. Electron Physician. 2017 [cited July 9, 2018];9(3):3966–3973. doi:10.19082/3966

9. Mitsutake S, Shibata A, Ishii K, Oka K. Associations of eHealth literacy with health behavior among adult internet users. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:7. doi:10.2196/jmir.5413

10. Islam M, Touray M, Yang H, et al. E-health literacy and health information seeking behavior among university students in Bangladesh. Int Med Inf Assoc IOS Press. 2017;245:2–6.

11. Gray NJ, Klein JD, Noyce PR, Sesselberg TS, Cantrill JA. Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(7):1467–1478. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.010

12. Government of Nepal M of C and IT. Digital Nepal Framework: Unlocking Nepal’s Growth Potential. Frost & Sullivan; 2018.

13. Efthymiou A, Middleton N, Charalambous A, Papastavrou E. The association of health literacy and electronic health literacy with self-efficacy, coping, and caregiving perceptions among carers of people with dementia: research protocol for a descriptive correlational Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 [cited July 9, 2018];6(11). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133284.

14. Lundy KS, Janes S. Community Health Nursing: Caring for the Public’s Health. Second. USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2009.

15. Amieva S, Ferguson S. Moving forward: nurses are key to achieving the United Nations development program’s millennium development goals. Int Nurs Rev. 2011;59(1). doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00944.x

16. Tubaishat A, Habiballah L. eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;42(July):47–52. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.003

17. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS : the eHealth literacy scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(4):1–7. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27

18. Pokharel PK, Budhathoki SS, Pokharel HP. Electronic Health Literacy Skills among medical and dental interns at B P Koirala Institute of health sciences. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2016;14(3):159–164.

19. Neuhauser L, Kreps GL. eHealth communication and behavior change: promise and performance. Soc Semiot. 2010;20(1). doi:10.1080/10350330903438386

20. Escoffery C, Miner KR, Adame DD, Butler S, McCormick L, Mendell E. Internet use for health information among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2005;53(4):183–188. doi:10.3200/JACH.53.4.183-188

21. Park H, Lee E. Self-reported eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students in South Korea: a pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(2):408–413. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.022

22. Stellesfson M, Hanik B, Chaney B, Chaney D, Tennat B, Chavarria EA. eHealth literacy among college students: a systematic review with implications for eHealth education. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:4. doi:10.2196/jmir.1658

23. Tomas CC, Queiros P, Ferreira TDJR. Analysis of the psychometric properties of the portuguese version of an eHealth literacy assessment tool. Rev Enferm Ref. 2014;4(2). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267267830%0AAnalysis.

24. Masic I. E-learning as new method of medical education. REVIEW. 2008;16(2):102–117.

25. Dalhem WA, Saleh N. The impact of eLearning on nurses’ professional knowledge and practice in HMC. Can J Nurs Inf. 2014;9.

Creative Commons License © 2019 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.