Back to Journals » Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology » Volume 7

Efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors Miller LE, Tennila J, Ouwehand AC

Received 10 December 2013

Accepted for publication 25 February 2014

Published 12 July 2014 Volume 2014:7 Pages 241—248


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Larry E Miller,1 Julia Tennilä,2 Arthur C Ouwehand2

1Miller Scientific Consulting, Inc., Asheville, North Carolina, USA; 2Danisco Sweeteners Oy, Active Nutrition, Kantvik, Finland

Background: Constipation is a common complaint in adults. Lactitol is an osmotic disaccharide laxative that increases fecal volume and stimulates peristalsis. In this paper, we present the first meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerance of lactitol for adult constipation.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE® and Embase, with no date or language restrictions, for studies of lactitol supplementation on adult constipation. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on pre- to posttreatment changes in stool frequency and consistency with lactitol among all studies, as well as a comparison of efficacy and tolerance outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lactitol versus lactulose.
Results: A total of eleven studies representing 663 distinct patients were included in the final analysis, including five single-arm studies, four RCTs comparing lactitol with lactulose, one RCT comparing lactitol with placebo, and one nonrandomized controlled trial comparing lactitol with stimulant laxatives. Weekly stool frequency was significantly increased with lactitol compared with baseline (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.56, P<0.001). Stool consistency also improved over the supplementation period with lactitol (SMD: 1.04, P<0.001). Approximately one-third of patients experienced an adverse event; however, symptoms were generally mild and rarely (5%) resulted in study withdrawal. In RCTs of lactitol versus lactulose, lactitol was slightly more effective than lactulose in increasing weekly stool frequency (SMD: 0.19, P=0.06). No statistically significant differences between lactitol and lactulose were identified in any other efficacy or tolerance outcome. Lactitol demonstrated favorable efficacy and tolerance in individual studies when compared to stimulant laxatives and placebo.
Conclusion: Lactitol supplementation is well tolerated and improves symptoms of adult constipation. The efficacy and tolerance of lactitol and lactulose are similar, with a trend for more frequent stools with lactitol. Limited evidence suggests lactitol is superior to stimulant laxatives and placebo for relieving constipation symptoms.

Keywords: adult, bowel function, constipation, gastrointestinal, lactitol, laxative, osmotic, stool, sugar alcohol

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]


Other articles by this author:

Bone-anchored annular closure following lumbar discectomy reduces risk of complications and reoperations within 90 days of discharge [Corrigendum]

Klassen PD, Bernstein DT, Köhler HP, Arts MP, Weiner BK, Miller LE, Thomé C

Journal of Pain Research 2017, 10:2739-2740

Published Date: 6 December 2017

Bone-anchored annular closure following lumbar discectomy reduces risk of complications and reoperations within 90 days of discharge

Klassen PD, Bernstein DT, Köhler HP, Arts MP, Weiner B, Miller LE, Thomé C

Journal of Pain Research 2017, 10:2047-2055

Published Date: 26 August 2017

Multiexpandable cage for minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Coe JD, Zucherman JF, Kucharzyk DW, Poelstra KA, Miller LE, Kunwar S

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2016, 9:341-347

Published Date: 28 September 2016

Unraveling the confusion behind hyaluronic acid efficacy in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

Miller LE, Altman RD, McIntyre LF

Journal of Pain Research 2016, 9:421-423

Published Date: 17 June 2016

Clinical and radiographic outcomes with L4–S1 axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) and posterior instrumentation: a multicenter study

Tobler WD, Melgar MA, Raley TJ, Anand N, Miller LE, Nasca RJ

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2013, 6:155-161

Published Date: 18 September 2013

Readers of this article also read:

Emerging and future therapies for hemophilia

Carr ME, Tortella BJ

Journal of Blood Medicine 2015, 6:245-255

Published Date: 3 September 2015

Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles

Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889

Published Date: 16 April 2014

Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon

Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779

Published Date: 15 November 2012

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010