Efficacy and safety of intraperitoneally administered resveratrol against rat orthotopic ovarian cancers

Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most common malignancies in females^1,2 with a very poor prognosis because of its subtle symptoms at the early stages of carcinogenesis,³ metastasis through blood dissemination,⁴ and peritoneal implantation.⁵ Because of the difficulty to remove advanced ovarian cancers radically, adjuvant chemotherapy has been commonly employed.⁶ Intraperitoneal chemotherapy permits the anticancer drug to directly affect abdominal malignancies and is therefore used in the management of colorectal, liver, gastric and ovarian cancers.⁷ Nevertheless, this therapeutic approach also leads to toxic effects.^7,8 For example, paclitaxel and cisplatin are usually administered intraperitoneally to treat ovarian cancers, but they cause severe side effects including thrombocytopenia and neutrophilia.^9,10 It would therefore be of clinical significance to explore safer anti-OC agent(s) for intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

A body of evidence has demonstrated that resveratrol exerts the inhibitory effects on in vitro growth of various cancers.¹¹ Moreover, the anticancer dose of resveratrol has little adverse effects on normal cells and tissues that possess an efficient metabolic biotransformation system for resveratrol.^12,13 However, this well-operated resveratrol metabolic system leads to extremely low bioavailability if resveratrol is administered systemically.^13,14 Therefore, data concerning in vivo anticancer effects of resveratrol are quite limited.^11,15 It is necessary to overcome this therapeutic bottleneck by organ-targeting drug delivery. In our previous studies, resveratrol was delivered by bladder instillation and lumbar puncture respectively to treated mouse orthotopic bladder cancers ¹² and glioblastomas,^16,17 which achieved promising results. In view of the extensive application of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the clinic, the possibilities of intraperitoneal injection to improve the bioavailability of resveratrol in rat ovaries and the therapeutic outcomes of ovarian tumors were elucidated in the current study.

Resveratrol is usually dissolved in 10% ethanol and administered to the rat abdominal cavity to alleviate doxorubicin-caused hemogram toxicity¹⁸ and prevent retinal detachment via its neuroprotective effect on light-sensitive cells.¹⁹ On the other hand, resveratrol dissolved in 0.2% DMSO is adopted for in vitro studies,^14,20 but is rarely used in vivo because of the lack of knowledge about the effects of DMSO on normal tissues and organs. Because resveratrol in 0.2% DMSO is harmless to cultured normal cells,^12,16 the absorption, distribution, and safety of intraperitoneally administered resveratrol in 10% ethanol and 0.2% DMSO were analyzed and compared using a rat orthotopic ovarian cancer model.

Materials and methods

Ethic statement

Prior to the animal experiments, the research protocols had been reviewed and approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine to guarantee that all studies involving experimental animals were performed in full compliance with National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 25 female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (289 g±17 g) used in this study were provided by University Experimental Animal Centre and raised under specific pathogen free conditions.

Rat orthotopic ovarian cancer model and intravesical treatment

NUTU-19 rat poorly differentiated ovarian cancer cell line is derived from the spontaneously transformed Fischer 344 rat ovarian surface epithelial cells.²¹ This cell line was purchased from Shanghai Meixuan Biol Sci Technol Ltd, China and employed for establishing rat orthotopic ovarian cancer model. 21 rats were anesthetized intraperitoneally with 3.5% chloral hydrate (0.1 ml/10 mg/body weight). The state of anaesthesia was evaluated by loss of righting reflex (LORR), and time to induce LORR was usually between 5–10 mins. In the germ-free isolator, the rat abdominal cavity was opened to expose the ovarian glands; 10 µl (5×10⁶) NUTU-19 cell suspension²¹ was injected into the sub-epithelial layer of the left gland, and the right side one was cited as normal control. The appearance of “semitransparent bubbles” indicated successful inoculation. Three days later, the rats were randomly divided into three groups (7 rats/group) as Group-1, without treatment; Group-2, treated by 20 mg/kg Res-in-ethanol; Group-3, treated by 20 mg/kg Res-in-DMSO. The four tumor-free rats received 20 mg/kg Res-in-DMSO treatment were used for safety evaluation. The treatments were daily conducted for two weeks.

Sample collection and treatments

One hour after the final administration, tumor-bearing animals were painlessly sacrificed by an authorized expert at the DMU Animal Center through cervical dislocation. Ascites, whenever present, was extracted from the bottom of pelvic cavity and their volume and cancer cell concentration were measured. Both sides of the ovarian glands were harvested and weighed. Portions of the tumor-containing tissues were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for frozen sectioning and protein preparation, and the remaining tissues were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned for morphological and immunohistochemical examinations using standard methods.²² After the treatment, four resveratrol -treated tumor-free female rats were bred normally with healthy male rats to evaluate their fertility.

Sample preparation for HPLC analysis

Samples for HPLC analysis were prepared from frozen tumor specimens and pooled ovarian tissues by a method described elsewhere.¹³ Briefly, a frozen tissue sample was sectioned into 7 mm slices using a freezing microtome, collected in a centrifuge tube, and extracted with 416 μl methanol and 84 μl internal standard [IS, 1, 8-dihydroxyanthraquinone, 200 μg/ml; (Sigma-Aldrich)]. The tissue homogenates were vortexed for 5 min and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was then transferred to a clean tube. The residue was extracted twice with 1 ml methanol by 5 min of vigorous agitation, followed by centrifugation. The combined organic solvent of the supernatants was evaporated to a final volume of 400 μl and subsequently placed in a sealed amber vial for HPLC analysis.²³ To improve the sensitivity and precision of quantification, 1, 8-dihydroxyanthraquinone was used as the internal standard and trans-resveratrol (Sigma-Aldrich) as the standard to construct a standard curve using previously described methods.¹³

Histological and immunohistochemical staining

Paraffin-embedded xenografts were sliced into 7 μm sections and subjected to HE morphological staining and immunohistochemical staining by the methods described elsewhere.¹² Because ARHI has been known as OC suppressor²⁴ and STAT3 signaling as the main resveratrol molecular target,²⁵ their statuses in the orthotopic tumor tissues with and without resveratrol treatment were analyzed. The antibodies used were mouse anti-ARHI (1:100; Santa Cruz, CA, USA), PIAS3 (1:120; Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and phosphorylated STAT3/p-STAT3 (1:300; ProteinTech, Chicago, IL, USA), respectively. Binding of the primary antibody was detected by a peroxidase reaction using 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) as the substrate (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). According to the labeling intensity, the staining results were evaluated by two independent researchers and scored as negative (-) if no immunolabeling was observed in target cells, weakly positive (+) if the labeling was faint, moderately positive (++), and strongly positive (+++) when the labeling was stronger or distinctly stronger than (++). Tissue sections without primary antibody incubation were used as background controls for IHC staining and β-actin was used as a quantitative control for Western blotting.

Tunel-based identification of apoptotic cells

Cells apoptosis in the tumor tissues was tested by terminal deoxynucleotide transferase(TdT)–mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and the apoptotic cells were visualized by DAB colorization and immunofluorescent labeling according to manufacturers’ instructions (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany; Promega, Madison, WI, USA).¹⁷ The immunofluorescent intensities of tumor tissues of the three experimental groups were quantified using ImageJx2 Launcher (Broken Symmetry Software Inc. USA).

Protein extraction and Western blotting

The frozen tissue samples were sectioned to 7 μm slices for protein preparation by the method described elsewhere.²² The sample proteins (50 µg/well) were separated in 10% sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK). The membrane was blocked with 5% skimmed milk in TBS-T (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 0.5% Tween 20) at 4°C, rinsed 10 mins for three times with TBS-T, followed by 3 h incubation at room temperature with the first antibody and then 1 h incubation with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (Zymed Lab, Inc, USA). The bound antibody was detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Roche GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). After removing the labeling signal by incubation with stripping buffer, the membrane was re-incubated with other antibodies one by one until all of the parameters (ARHI, PIAS3 and p-STAT3) were examined with the same antibodies used in immunohistochemical staining. β-actin was cited as the quantitative control.

ELISA analysis of ascetic and serum CA125

Ascetic and serum CA125 levels in individual samples were determined at the end of treatments using an ELISA kit (Lengton Bioscience Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Briefly, ascetic samples were incubated in a mouse anti-CA125 antibody-coated 96-well microplate and then developed with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. After adding the substrate and then the stop solution, the plates were read on a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a wavelength of 450 nm. The results were calculated based on the absorbance of cytokine-antibody complexes. CA125 concentrations were calculated using a standard curve with a 0.1 mg/mL detection limit.

Statistical analysis

The experimental data were analyzed by SPSS13.0 statistical software and expressed by mean ± standard deviation ( ±s). The differences in continuous variables were assessed by Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.

Results

Improved general states of resveratrol-treated tumor-bearing rats

The therapeutic outcomes of the two resveratrol groups (Res-in-ethanol and Res-in-DMSO) administered via the intraperitoneal route were elucidated by average body weights, orthotopic tumor weights, ascetic volumes, and ascetic cancer cell numbers. Although no animal died during the experiments, significant loss of average body weight (205.3±14 g/rat) was found in the control group (tumor-bearing animals without treatment) in comparison with normal rats (289.2±17.4 g/rat; P<0.01) and Res-in-ethanol (241.2±15.2 g/rat; P<0.05) and Res-in-DMSO (262.9±13.2 g/rat; P<0.05) rats, respectively (Figure 1A). The average tumor weight was 0.426±0.091 g in the control group, 0.238±0.073 g in the Res-in-ethanol group, and 0.187±0.065 g in the Res-in-DMSO group (Figure 1B). The average volume and cancer cell numbers of abdominal ascites were 5.65±0.27 ml and 2.8×10⁴/ml in the control group, 2.75±0.14 ml and 1.4×10⁴/ml in the Res-in-ethanol group, and 2.09±0.11 ml and 0.95×10⁴/ml in the Res-in-DMSO group, respectively (Figure 1C and D).

Figure 1 Resveratrol improves general states of tumor-bearing rats. General states of tumor-bearing rats without treatment (Untreated) and treated with resveratrol in 10% ethanol (Res-in-Ethanol) or resveratrol in 0.2% DMSO (Res-in-DMSO) by evaluating average body weights (A), orthotopic tumor weights (B), ascetic volumes (C), and ascetic cancer cell numbers (D). The data obtained was validated by Student's t-test. *P<0.05 and #P<0.01 in comparison with the untreated group. Abbreviation: Res, resveratrol.

Resveratrol availability in tumor tissues

HPLC analysis revealed that the amounts of resveratrol in orthotopic ovarian cancer tissue and its tumor-free ovarian counterpart of individual rats were determined one hour after final trans-resveratrol i.p. administration. As shown in Figure 2A, only one peak corresponding to trans-resveratrol could be detected in the tumor tissue extracts. The average resveratrol concentration was 1.237±0.203 nmol/g in Res-in-ethanol treated tumor tissues and 2.154±0.287 nmol/g in Res-in-DMSO treated ones (P<0.01; Figure 2B).

Figure 2 Sufficient resveratrol in orthotopic tumor tissues. (A and B) HPLC/DAD demonstration of retention times and absorbance of i.p. administered Res-in-ethanol and Res-in-DMSO in orthotopic ovarian cancer tissues. Peak-1, trans-resveratrol; Peak-2: 1,8–2 hydroxy anthraquinone as internal standard. (a) without treatment as the negative control; (b) Res-in-ethanol; (c) Res-in-DMSO. Student's t-test was used to validate the obtained data. *P<0.01 in comparison with b. Abbreviations: AU, absorbance retention time; Res, resveratrol; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; DAD, diode array detector.

Resveratrol plaques on abdominal mucosa of Res-in-ethanol rats

Animals were painlessly sacrificed at 1 hr after the last resveratrol injection. White plaques were widely distributed in the abdominal mucosa of Res-in-ethanol rats, but not in that of Res-in-DMSO rats (Figure 3A). HPLC analysis of the collected white plaques revealed a single peak corresponding to trans-resveratrol (Figure 3B), confirming that the plaques were deposits of precipitated resveratrol.

Figure 3 HPLC identification of trans-resveratrol in abdominal white plaques of Res-in-ethanol-treated rats. (A) Arrow indicates widely distributed white plaques on the surface of the peritoneal serosa of Res-in-ethanol treated rats (left), but not in Res-in-DMSO-treated rats (right). Inset, circled region at higher magnification (×80). (B) HPLC analysis of collected white plaques revealed a single peak that corresponded to trans-resveratrol. a, Control; b. Res-in-ethanol. Abbreviations: AU, absorbance retention time; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; Res, resveratrol.

Resveratrol induced apoptosis in cancer but not noncancerous tissues

H&E staining revealed distinct morphological changes of the tumor tissues of Res-in-ethanol and, especially, Res-in-DMSO group in terms of abundant distribution of tumor cells with shrinkage and chromatin condensation (Figure 4A). TUNEL apoptosis assay by DAB and immunofluorescent coloration demonstrated the abundant TUNEL-positive cells (Figure 4A and B) and remarkably increased IF pixel values (Figure 4C) in resveratrol-treated tumor tissues particularly that in the Res-in-DMSO group. Neither cell death nor morphological alteration was found in both the noncancerous ovarian tissues or the tissues of the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys and intestine (Figure 5).

Figure 4 Resveratrol induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer tissues. (A) H&E morphological staining revealed more aggressive tumor growth of the untreated group. Extensive cell death was found in tumor tissues of both Res-in-ethanol and Res-in-DMSO groups. Arrows indicate regions with higher magnification in insets (×40). (B) DAB colorization and IF labeling of apoptotic cells in resveratrol-treated orthotopic tumor tissues by a TUNEL apoptosis assay (×20). Arrows indicate regions with higher magnification in insets (×40). (C) ImageJ x2-based evaluation of TUNEL immunofluorescent pixel values of untreated tumor tissues and the tumor tissues treated by Res-in-ethanol and Res-in-DMSO. ANOVA was used to validate these data. *P<0.01 in comparison with untreated tumor tissues.Abbreviations: DAB, 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride ; IF, immunofluorescence; Res, resveratrol.

Figure 5 H & E staining showed neither cell death nor morphological alteration in the noncancerous ovarian tissues and the tissues of the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys and intestine of the tumor-bearing rats without drug treatment (Untreated), treated by Res-in-DMSO or Res-in-Ethanol.Abbreviation: Res, resveratrol.

Resveratrol suppressed STAT3 transcription and activation

The effects of resveratrol on STAT3 signaling in the orthotopic tumor tissues of the experimental groups were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining and Western blotting. The results revealed that STAT3 was expressed in the untreated tumor tissues with remarkable nuclear translocation (Figure 6A). In contrast, phosphoralated-STAT3 (p-STAT3) nuclear translocation became infrequent after resveratrol treament (Figure 6A). Down-regulated (24.5%) STAT3 expression with the reduced phosphoralated-STAT3 generation (48.5%) were evidenced in the tumor tissues of Res-in-ethanol group and became more distinct (83.1% and 81.6%) in that of Res-in-DMSO group (Figure 6B).

Figure 6 Resveratrol suppresses STAT3 activation in orthotopic ovarian cancer tissues. STAT3 transcription and nuclear translocation in ovarian cancer tissues were elucidated by immunohistochemical staining (A) and Western blotting. (B) Tumor samples were collected from untreated rats (Untreated) and rats treated with resveratrol in 10% ethanol (Res-in-ethanol) or 0.2% DMSO (Res-in-DMSO). Insets, ×40 magnification.Abbreviation: Res, resveratrol.

ARHI and PIAS3 upregulation in resveratrol-treated tumors

ARHI and PIAS3 are known as the suppressors of STAT3 signaling.^24,25 Immunocytochemical staining demonstrated that the levels of these two proteins were very low in the untreated orthotopic tumor tissues, which were distinctly increased by resveratrol dissolved in 10% ethanol and especially in 0.2% DMSO (Figure 7A). The results of Western blotting were in accordance with the ICC findings by showing 4.2 fold and 7.6 fold increases of ARHI and PIAS3 levels in the tumor samples of the Res-in-ethanol group and 6.5 fold and 9.1 fold increases of the two proteins in Res-in-DMSO group (Figure 7B).

Figure 7 ARHI and PIAS3 upregulation in resveratrol-treated tumors. Immunocytochemical staining (A) and Western blotting (B) were conducted to analyze ARHI and PIAS3 expression in tumor tissues of untreated, resveratrol in 10% ethanol (Res-in-ethanol), and resveratrol in 0.2% DMSO (Res-in-DMSO) groups. Insets, ×40 magnification.Abbreviation: Res, resveratrol.

Resveratrol reduces ascetic and serum CA125 levels

A increased serum CA125 level is an unfavorable prognostic indicator of ovarian cancer patients.²⁶ As shown in Figure 8A, the average serum CA125 level of the untreated group was 8.606±0.819 ng/mL, which was significantly decreased to 4.132±0.311 ng/mL (p<0.01) and 3.769±0.285 ng/mL (P<0.01) in Res-in-ethanol and Res-in-DMSO groups, respectively. The average CA125 concentration was 6.125 ng/mL ±0.402 in the ascetic samples of the untreated group in comparison with 5.177 ng/mL ±0.371 in the Res-in-ethanol group and 4.245 ng/mL ±0.287 in the Res-in-DMSO group(P<0.05). As shown in Figure 8B, the CA125 content in total ascites of the untreated group was 19.624 ng ±0.743/3.12 mL, which was higher (P<0.05) than that of Res-in-ethanol group (14.237 ng ±0.612/2.75 mL) and significantly higher (P<0.01) than that of the Res-in-DMSO group (8.872 ng ±0.7369/2.09 mL).

Figure 8 Decreased serum and ascetic CA125 levels in resveratrol-treated tumor-bearing rats. A CA125 ELISA was performed using the serum (A) and ascetic samples (B) of tumor-bearing rats without treatment (Untreated) and treated by intraperitoneal administration of resveratrol dissolved in 10% ethanol (Res-in-ethanol) or 0.2% DMSO (Res-in-DMSO). Student’s t-test was used to validate the obtained data. *, P<0.05 in comparison with the untreated group; #, P>0.05 in comparison with the Res-in-ethanol group.Abbreviation: Res, resveratrol.

Maintained fertility after 2 weeks of resveratrol treatment

Four tumor-free female rats were bred normally with healthy male rats at a 1:1 ratio after the same dose (20 mg/kg/day) of intraperitoneal Res-in-DMSO treatment for 2 weeks. After 34–37 days, the four female animals successfully produced 12–14 pups, and all juvenile rats grew normally without any visible abnormalities (data not shown).

Discussion

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal genital malignancy. The survival rate of ovarian cancer patients has been improved somewhat, but it is largely attributed to early detection by advanced diagnostic techniques rather than the revolutionary progress of adjuvant treatments.²⁷ Consequently, the prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer remains poor because of the lack of effective postoperative therapies.²⁸ It is therefore of great clinical value to explore new drugs for ovarian cancer treatment. Resveratrol effectively inhibits the growth of ovarian cancer cells in vitro without affecting normal tissues and cells,^29–31 indicating its natural propensity as an ideal anticancer drug. However, this polyphenol compound has not yet been applied to clinical practice, because it can be easily metabolized in vivo and quickly expelled from the body.¹³ Intraperitoneal injection is one of the conventional therapeutic approaches for ovarian cancer, by which the administered drug directly affects the tumor to inhibit its growth, metastasis, and recurrence.³² We therefore consider that such administration is suitable for resveratrol in OC treatment. Ethanol and DMSO are frequently used solvents for resveratrol, but there is a lack of comparative analysis of the absorption rates, anticancer efficacy and safety of the two resveratrol preparations in vivo. To assess the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal resveratrol administration for ovarian cancer treatment, a rat orthotopic ovarian cancer model was established using the rat NUTU-19 OC cell line²¹ and applying resveratrol-based experimental treatments by imitating clinical intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

As the first step of our study, the bioavailabilities of i.p. administered resveratrol dissolved in 10% ethanol (Res-in-Ethanol) or 0.2% DMSO (Res-in-DMSO) were elucidated by HPLC analysis. Only trans-resveratrol was detected in the samples. This finding suggests that, unlike the fate of systemically administered trans-resveratrol,^13,33 the chemical structure of this compound is well maintained in ovarian tissue when delivered via the i.p. route. Moreover, the average resveratrol concentration in orthotopic tumor tissues of the Res-in-DMSO group was 1.74 times higher than that of the Res-in-ethanol group, indicating a better absorption rate and anticancer effects of the 0.2% DMSO-dissolved resveratrol solution. The reason for the different bioavailabilities of the two resveratrol solutions can be explained by the widespread white plaques found on the abdominal mucosa of the Res-in-ethanol group, which were identified as trans-resveratrol precipitates. More importantly, no morphological alteration was observed in major organs of rats, and female rats maintained their reproductive ability after long-term Res-in-DMSO treatment. Therefore, the safety and absorptive efficiency of i.p. administration of this reagent were clarified, which may be more suitable for in vivo therapeutic study.

Because 2 weeks of intraperitoneal resveratrol treatment at a daily dose of 20 mg/kg had few adverse effects on rat health, this therapeutic strategy was applied to treat rat orthotopic ovarian cancers. Untreated tumor-bearing rats showed weight loss and a full abdomen in comparison with their healthy counterparts. There symptoms also occurred in rats of the two treatment groups but the degrees were less significant. Anatomical examination revealed that the average tumor weight, extracted ascites volume, ascitic cancer cell concentration, and CA125 level of untreated tumor-bearing rats were significantly higher than those of the Res-in-Ethanol group and, especially, the Res-in-DMSO group. These results demonstrated that the i.p. administered resveratrol efficiently inhibited the growth and progression of the tumors and therefore improved the general condition of the tumor-bearing rats. The suitability of DMSO-dissolved resveratrol was further confirmed because of the more effective inhibitory effects and higher resveratrol bioavailability in the Res-in-DMSO group. It should be pointed out that i.p. resveratrol chemotherapy by itself would still be insufficient to cure orthotopic tumors. Because chemotherapy is conventionally used postoperatively to prevent ovarian cancer relapse and metastasis,^34,35 it would be worthwhile to elucidate whether the therapeutic outcome can be further improved by the combination of surgery and i.p. resveratrol administration similarly to what has been shown in a rat orthotopic glioblastoma model.^13,16,17

A body of evidence has demonstrated that resveratrol exerts multifaceted biological effects on cultured OC cells, including apoptosis induction, ARH1 upregulation, and inactivation of STAT3 signaling [24, 30, 31]. In view of the importance of these events in determining the fate of OC cells, they were used as key parameters to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and anti-OC mechanism of i. p. resveratrol administration. In accordance with our previous in vitro findings,^30,31 the protein level and incidence of nuclear translocation of STAT3 were reduced in Res-in-Ethanol- and, more significantly, in Res-in-DMSO-treated tumor tissues with obvious apoptosis. STAT3 signaling is critical for the growth and survival of OC cells, because selective inhibition of its activation commits OC cells to apoptosis.²⁴ In this context, the inactivated STAT3 signaling in resveratrol-treated tumor tissues provides molecular evidence for the effectiveness of i. p. administered resveratrol. This notion is further supported by upregulation of ARHI and PIAS3, because ARHI is a suppressor of OC cell proliferation ^24,36 and STAT3 signaling,³⁷ and PIAS3 is an inhibitor of STAT3 transcriptional activity by blocking the STAT3 DNA-binding domain.³⁸

Conclusions

In this study, the bioavailability, safety, and tumor-suppressive effect of i. p. administered resveratrol dissolved in 10% ethanol or 0.2% DMSO were investigated in a rat orthotopic ovarian cancer model. The results revealed that resveratrol in DMSO had a better absorption rate and long-term safety in rat major organs, and preserved reproductive capacity. Resveratrol in DMSO more efficiently inhibited orthotopic tumor growth in terms of distinct reduction of tumor sizes, ascitic formation, ascitic cancer cell numbers, and CA125 levels. Abundant TUNEL-positive cells, downregulated STAT3 expression, decreased p-STAT3 nuclear translocation and ARHI upregulation were found in resveratrol-treated tumor tissues, providing cellular and molecular evidence for the anti-OC reliability of this therapeutic approach, especially when employing a resveratrol in DMSO solution.