Back to Journals » Drug Design, Development and Therapy » Volume 12

Effect of butorphanol on opioid-induced cough: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors Zhang J, Miao S , Tu Q, Shi M , Zou L , Liu S, Wang G

Received 17 July 2018

Accepted for publication 27 August 2018

Published 2 October 2018 Volume 2018:12 Pages 3263—3268

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S180533

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Anastasios Lymperopoulos



Jian Zhang,1,* Shuai Miao,2,* Qing Tu,3 Mengzhu Shi,2 Lan Zou,2 Su Liu,2 Guanglei Wang2

1Department of Anesthesiology, The Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; 2Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China; 3Department of Anesthesiology, Tangshan People’s Hospital, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei, China

*These authors contributed equally to this study

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of butorphanol on the prevention of opioid-induced cough by a meta-analysis.
Materials and methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to demonstrate the efficacy of butorphanol on the prevention of opioid-induced cough. We used RevMan 5.3 to conduct a meta-analysis on each outcome.
Results: Eight RCTs comparing 942 patients were included in this study. The pooled meta-analysis showed that the incidence of opioid-induced cough in the butorphanol group was significantly decreased compared with that of the control group (risk ratio [RR]=0.17, 95% CI [0.09, 0.33], P<0.00001). Incidences of opioid-induced cough in the butorphanol group resulting in mild cough (RR=0.30, 95% CI [0.11, 0.78], P=0.01), moderate cough (RR=0.08, 95% CI [0.03, 0.22], P<0.00001), or severe cough (RR=0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.30], P=0.0001) were significantly lower than those of the control group.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggested that butorphanol can effectively prevent the incidence of opioid-induced cough and reduce the severity of opioid-induced cough.

Keywords: butorphanol, opioid, cough, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Opioids are commonly used intravenous anesthetic drugs during the induction of anesthesia for their analgesic effect, inhibition of metabolism, and reduction in the cardiovascular response. However, during the induction of anesthesia, opioids can cause cough, and the incidence of opioid-induced cough can be as high as 65%.1 Cough can lead to increased intracranial, intraocular, and intra-abdominal pressures.2 Meanwhile, opioid-induced cough is a risk factor for postoperative nausea and vomiting.3 Although opioid-induced cough is light and self-limiting, it is extremely harmful to patients undergoing neurosurgery, ophthalmology, or thoracic surgery. The mechanism of opioid-induced cough is still unclear, and many interventions for preventing opioid-induced cough have been demonstrated, for example, changing opioid administration, such as priming with fentanyl.4,5 Additionally, lidocaine, as well as dezocine and dexmedetomidine, has been proven to be efficacious in preventing opioid-induced cough, as well as dezocine and dexmedetomidine.3,6,7

Butorphanol, an agonist–antagonist opioid, has an in vitro affinity for opioid receptors of 25:4:1 (κ:δ:μ) and is extensively used in clinical practice due to a potent analgesic effect and a desirable pharmaceutical formulation. To date, there have been several studies regarding the prevention of opioid-induced cough by butorphanol. Therefore, we reviewed available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of butorphanol on preventing opioid-induced cough.

Materials and methods

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies were included if they were RCTs using butorphanol for the prevention of opioid-induced cough while the control group received an equal volume of saline. Studies were excluded for the following reasons: 1) non-RCTs, 2) retrospective studies, 3) review and case reports, and 4) no target outcomes. The primary outcome was the incidence of opioid-induced cough, and the secondary outcomes were incidence of cough at various degrees.

Search strategy

We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database for relevant RCTs from inception to June 2018, without language restriction. The references of the identified studies were also searched to identify any further relevant studies. The search terms included butorphanol, fentanyl, sufentanil, remifentanil, and cough.

Quality assessment

Two authors independently assessed the quality of the included studies according to the Jadad scale. The following items were evaluated for each study: 1) whether randomization was performed and whether the method was correct, 2) whether allocation concealment was used and whether the method was correct, 3) whether blinding was performed and in whom the method was used, and 4) whether there were withdrawals or dropouts. Articles with 1–3 points were classified as low quality, and those with 4–7 points were classified as high quality.

Data extraction

Two authors independently extracted the following data using standard data tables: 1) first author and year of publication, 2) country, 3) sample size, 4) outcomes, and 5) intervention details.

Statistical analyses

We used RevMan 5.3 to conduct all statistical analyses. The incidence of opioid-induced cough and its degrees were reported by the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI. Heterogeneity of those included studies was assessed with the I2 statistic, and I2>50% was regarded as significant. A fixed effects model was used to conduct the meta-analysis if significant heterogeneity had been found, and a random effects model was adopted to perform the meta-analysis when I2 was ≧50%.

Results

Characteristics of the included studies

Initially, 114 articles were found, and 8 of them815 were eventually included in the meta-analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Figure 1 shows the screening process and results. The basic characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart of the included studies.

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis

Incidence of opioid-induced cough

All RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was found among the studies (I2=72%). Therefore, a random effects model was applied to conduct this meta-analysis. The results showed that butorphanol could significantly prevent opioid-induced cough compared with placebo (RR=0.17, 95% CI [0.09, 0.33], P<0.00001; Figure 2).

Figure 2 Butorphanol reduced the incidence of opioid-induced cough.
Abbreviation: M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.

Severity of opioid-induced cough

Mild cough

Five RCTs including 592 patients reported the degree of mild cough that was induced by opioids. Statistical heterogeneity (I2=57%) was found, and a random effects model was employed for the meta-analysis. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the butorphanol group and the control group in the incidence of opioid-induced mild cough (RR=0.30, 95% CI [0.11, 0.78], P=0.01) (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Butorphanol reduced the intensity of opioid-induced cough: mild cough.
Abbreviation: M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.

Moderate cough

Five RCTs including 592 patients reported the degree of opioid-induced moderate cough. No statistical heterogeneity was found among the study results (I2=0%); thus, a fixed effects model was used to perform the meta-analysis. There was a significant difference between the butorphanol group and the control group in the incidence of opioid-induced moderate cough (RR=0.08, 95% CI [0.03, 0.22], P<0.00001) (Figure 4).

Figure 4 Butorphanol reduced the intensity of opioid-induced cough: moderate cough.
Abbreviation: M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.

Severe cough

Five RCTs including 592 patients reported the degree of opioid-induced severe cough. No statistical heterogeneity (I2=0%) was found, and a fixed effects model was adopted for meta-analysis. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the butorphanol group and the control group in the incidence of opioid-induced severe cough (RR=0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.30], P=0.0001) (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Butorphanol reduced the intensity of opioid-induced cough: severe cough.
Abbreviation: M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.

Sensitivity analysis

Significant heterogeneity was found in the incidence of opioid-induced cough and mild cough; therefore, sensitivity analysis was performed. By removing one study at a time, the sensitivity analysis had no effect on the results.

Discussion

The present meta-analysis aimed to estimate the efficacy of butorphanol in preventing opioid-induced cough. The meta-analysis indicated that butorphanol can effectively prevent the incidence of opioid-induced cough and decrease the incidence of opioid-induced mild, moderate, and severe cough.

Numerous studies have been conducted to estimate the mechanisms of opioid-induced cough; however, the exact mechanism remains unclear. The following mechanisms may be some of the reasons for the occurrence of opioid-induced cough. Opioids could activate the vagus nerve by inhibiting central sympathetic outflow, which is a possible reason for cough and bronchoconstriction.16 Another possible mechanism is the pulmonary chemoreflex, which is mediated by rapidly adapting receptors (irritant receptors) or vagal C-fiber receptors close to pulmonary vessels.17 Opioid-induced tracheal smooth muscle constriction may contribute to cough by simulating opioid receptors in the upper pulmonary mucosa. Substances such as histamine released from lung mast cells and the sudden adduction of the vocal cords or supraglottic obstruction caused by opioid-induced muscle rigidity also play important roles in the occurrence of opioid-induced cough.18 Among the different interventions used to prevent opioid-induced cough,1921 agonist–antagonist opioid analgesic agents, such as dezocine and pentazocine, could reduce the incidence of opioid-induced cough, and there were no obvious adverse effects.7,22,23 Butorphanol, an agonist–antagonist opioid, can antagonize the μ receptor to prevent the cough reflex while acting on the C-fiber receptor to inhibit the afferent pathway of the cough reflex. This meta-analysis found that the incidence of opioid-induced cough was significantly lower in the butorphanol group than in the control group. Similar results were found with severe cough. Our findings were consistent with the previous studies. However, significant heterogeneity was found in the results, which may have affected the rigor of those findings. The heterogeneity may be explained by the different doses of butorphanol administered to prevent opioid-induced cough, such as 10, 20, and 25 μg/kg.

Several limitations may affect the objectivity of the meta-analysis. First, the overall sample size was small. Second, the patients included in this meta-analysis were all from China. Third, significant heterogeneity was found in the results. Therefore, high-quality, large-sample studies involving different races are still needed to confirm the results. In summary, this study showed that butorphanol can reduce the incidence of opioid-induced cough and can mitigate the severity of cough.

Acknowledgment

This work was financially supported by grants from the Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province, the Nature Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20161175), the “Six One” Project of Jiangsu Province (LGY2016039), Jiangsu Provincial Medical Youth Talent (QNRC2016796), and Xuzhou medical university innovation team.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.


References

1.

Lin CS, Sun WZ, Chan WH, Lin CJ, Yeh HM, Mok MS. Intravenous lidocaine and ephedrine, but not propofol, suppress fentanyl-induced cough. Can J Anaesth. 2004;51(7):654–659.

2.

Sun S, Huang SQ. Effects of pretreatment with a small dose of dexmedetomidine on sufentanil-induced cough during anesthetic induction. J Anesth. 2013;27(1):25–28.

3.

Peringathara B, Robinson S. Fentanyl-induced cough is a risk factor for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(2):269.

4.

Yu H, Yang XY, Zhang X, et al. The effect of dilution and prolonged injection time on fentanyl-induced coughing. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(9):919–922.

5.

Min SK, Kim DH, Cho HB, Moon BK, Kim JY. Limited maximal flow rate of target-controlled remifentanil infusion and induced cough. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(2):145–148.

6.

Pandey CK, Raza M, Ranjan R, et al. Intravenous lidocaine 0.5 mg·kg−1 effectively suppresses fentanyl-induced cough. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52(2):172–175.

7.

Xu Y, Zhu Y, Wang S, Ren Y, Miao C. Dezocine attenuates fentanyl-induced cough in a dose-dependent manner – a randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(4):6091–6096.

8.

Zhang J, Xu F, Wang YJ. Effect of butorphanol to depress the bucking which was induced by fentanyl. ChongQ Med J. 2010;39(04):432–433.

9.

Wan L, Jia J, Liu Y. [Effects of butorphanol pretreatment on fentany l-induced cough during general aneasthesia induction]. Progr Modern Biomed. 2013;(1):119–121. Chinese.

10.

Wang Y, Xia XQ, Zhang QM. [Effects of different dose of butorphanol on cough induced by sufentanil]. J Clin Anesthesiol. 2015;11:1124–1125. Chinese.

11.

Li G, Hb Y, Wang LP. [Effects of intravenous butorphanol premedication on sufentanil-induced cough]. Chin Arch Gen Surg. 2015;9(5):389–390. Chinese.

12.

Cheng XY, Lun XQ, Li HB, Zhang ZJ. Butorphanol suppresses fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(26):e3911.

13.

Dong SL, Tian Y, Zhu SF. [Effects of different doses of butorphanol preconditioning on sufentanil induced cough]. Guangxi Med J. 2016;38(02):288–290. Chinese.

14.

Xu Q, Zhang W. [Effects of different dose of butorphanol on cough induced by fentanyl]. Zhej Clin Med J. 2016;11:2013–2014. Chinese.

15.

Yang K, Liu BL, Tong BF. [Clinical observation of the effect of butorphanol on the prevention of cough reaction induced by sulfentanyl]. China Foreign Med Treat. 2016;35(06):36–37. Chinese.

16.

Agarwal A, Azim A, Ambesh S, et al. Salbutamol, beclomethasone or sodium chromoglycate suppress coughing induced by iv fentanyl. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50(3):297–300.

17.

Böhrer H, Fleischer F, Werning P. Tussive effect of a fentanyl bolus administered through a central venous catheter. Anaesthesia. 1990;45(1):18–21.

18.

Yasuda I, Hirano T, Yusa T, Satoh M. Tracheal constriction by morphine and by fentanyl in man. Anesthesiology. 1978;49(2):117–119.

19.

Sedighinejad A, Naderi Nabi B, Haghighi M, et al. Propofol is effective to depress fentanyl-induced cough during induction of anesthesia. Anesth Pain Med. 2013;2(4):170–173.

20.

Firouzian A, Emadi SA, Baradari AG, Mousavi R, Kiasari AZ. Can low dose of propofol effectively suppress fentanyl-induced cough during induction of anaesthesia? A double blind randomized controlled trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31(4):522–525.

21.

Pandey CK, Raza M, Ranjan R, et al. Intravenous lidocaine suppresses fentanyl-induced coughing: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(6):1696–1698.

22.

Liu XS, Xu GH, Shen QY, et al. Dezocine prevents sufentanil-induced cough during general anesthesia induction: a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacol Rep. 2015;67(1):52–55.

23.

Ai Q, Hu Y, Wang Y, et al. Pentazocine pretreatment suppresses fentanyl-induced cough. Pharmacol Rep. 2010;62(4):747–750.

Creative Commons License © 2018 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.