Early symptom non-improvement and aggravation are associated with the treatment response to SSRIs in MDD: a real-world study
Received 30 November 2018
Accepted for publication 20 February 2019
Published 16 April 2019 Volume 2019:15 Pages 957—966
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Jun Chen
Hsinsung Yuan,1,2 Xiao Zhu,1 Qiang Luo,3,4 Alice Halim,5 Michael Halim,5 Hao Yao,5 Yiyun Cai,1,6 Shenxun Shi1,6
1Psychiatry Department of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Psychiatry Department of Nanjing Brain Hospital, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China; 3Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 4Key Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 5Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 6Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
Purpose: Early improvement in major depressive disorder is defined as a reduction of ≥20% in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) score at the second week after initiation of treatment, predicting long-term treatment response. However, there remains no effective strategy for switching medications when a patient fails to reach early improvement at the second week. This study focused on the predictive value of early symptom changes in each item of the HAM-D-17 scale for treatment response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) monotherapy and to provide a reference for switching antidepressants to enhance early treatment efficacy.
Patients and methods: Our study was an observational, real-world study that enrolled 90 treatment-naïve patients experiencing their first episode of major depressive disorder in the outpatient department of Huashan Hospital. Patients who did not achieve the threshold of early improvement in the second week after starting treatment were switched to alternative SSRI monotherapy. Patient follow-up occurred at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment. We analyzed the relationship between the change in each symptom on the HAM-D-17 scale and treatment efficacy.
Results: Early improvement predicted the treatment response at 12 weeks (χ2=19.249, P<0.001), whereas early non-improvement in insomnia and anxiety was associated with a poor response (OR =9.487, 95% CI: 1.312–68.588 and OR =12.947, 95% CI: 1.99–82.246, respectively). At week 2, general somatic symptom aggravation was associated with a poorer response (OR =73.337, 95% CI: 2.232->999.999); treatment-emergent headache and tremor were associated with treatment efficacy (t=-9.521, P<0.001 and t=3.660, P=0.001, respectively). In addition, the increase in suicidal thoughts, once treatment began, had no relationship with the treatment response (OR =0.821, P=0.872).
Conclusion: This study suggested that patients with early non-improvement in insomnia and anxiety were not suitable for switches in SSRI monotherapy. Patients with treatment-emergent symptoms, especially headaches and tremors, were not suitable for switching from monotherapy to another SSRI.
Keywords: early improvement, major depressive disorder, antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]