Difficult-to-heal wounds of mixed arterial/venous and venous etiology: a cost-effectiveness analysis of extracellular matrix
Received 12 January 2016
Accepted for publication 7 March 2016
Published 4 May 2016 Volume 2016:8 Pages 153—161
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Qian Ding
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo
Marco Romanelli,1 Adrienne M Gilligan,2,3 Curtis R Waycaster,3,4 Valentina Dini1
1Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 2Department of Life Sciences, Truven Health Analytics, Fort Worth, TX, USA; 3Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of North Texas Health Sciences Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; 4Department of Market Access, Smith and Nephew Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA
Importance: Difficult-to-heal wounds pose clinical and economic challenges, and cost-effective treatment options are needed.
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of extracellular matrix (ECM) relative to standard of care (SC) on wound closure for the treatment of mixed arterial/venous (A/V) or venous leg ulcers (VLUs).
Design, setting, and participants: A two-stage Markov model was used to predict the expected costs and outcomes of wound closure for ECM and SC. Outcome data used in the analysis were taken from an 8-week randomized clinical trial that directly compared ECM and SC. Patients were followed up for an additional 6 months to assess wound closure. Forty-eight patients completed the study; 25 for ECM and 23 for SC. SC was defined as a standard moist wound dressing. Transition probabilities for the Markov states were estimated from the clinical trial.
Main outcomes and measures: The economic outcome of interest was direct cost per closed-wound week. Resource utilization was based on the treatment regimen used in the clinical trial. Costs were derived from standard cost references. The payer’s perspective was taken.
Results: ECM-treated wounds closed, on average, after 5.4 weeks of treatment, compared with 8.3 weeks for SC wounds (P=0.02). Furthermore, complete wound closure was significantly higher in patients treated with ECM (P<0.05), with 20 wounds closed in the ECM group (80%) and 15 wounds closed in the SC group (65%). After 8 months, patients treated with ECM had substantially higher closed-wound weeks compared with SC (26.0 weeks versus 22.0 weeks, respectively). Expected direct costs per patient were $2,527 for ECM and $2,540 for SC (a cost savings of $13).
Conclusion and relevance: ECM yielded better clinical outcomes at a slightly lower cost in patients with mixed A/V and VLUs. ECM is an effective treatment for wound healing and should be considered for use in the management of mixed A/V and VLUs.
Keywords: extracellular matrix, adjunct therapy, venous leg ulcers, wound care, compression therapy, economic outcomes
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]