Back to Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 8

Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia

Authors Gomez F, Curcio C, Suriyaarachchi P, Demontiero O, Duque G

Received 12 November 2012

Accepted for publication 6 December 2012

Published 20 January 2013 Volume 2013:8 Pages 61—67

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S40221

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Fernando Gomez,1,2 Carmen Lucia Curcio,1 Pushpa Suriyaarachchi,2 Oddom Demontiero,2 Gustavo Duque2

1Research Group on Geriatrics and Gerontology, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics Collaborative Center, University of Caldas, Manizales, Colombia; 2Ageing Bone Research Program, Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, Penrith, Australia

Abstract: Falls and fractures are major causes of morbidity and mortality in older people. More importantly, previous falls and/or fractures are the most important predictors of further events. Therefore, secondary prevention programs for falls and fractures are highly needed. However, the question is whether a secondary prevention model should focus on falls prevention alone or should be implemented in combination with fracture prevention. By comparing a falls prevention clinic in Manizales (Colombia) versus a falls and fracture prevention clinic in Sydney (Australia), the objective was to identify similarities and differences between these two programs and to propose an integrated model of care for secondary prevention of fall and fractures. A comparative study of services was performed using an internationally agreed taxonomy. Service provision was compared against benchmarks set by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and previous reports in the literature. Comparison included organization, administration, client characteristics, and interventions. Several similarities and a number of differences that could be easily unified into a single model are reported here. Similarities included population, a multidisciplinary team, and a multifactorial assessment and intervention. Differences were eligibility criteria, a bone health assessment component, and the therapeutic interventions most commonly used at each site. In Australia, bone health assessment is reinforced whereas in Colombia dizziness assessment and management is pivotal. The authors propose that falls clinic services should be operationally linked to osteoporosis services such as a "falls and fracture prevention clinic," which would facilitate a comprehensive intervention to prevent falls and fractures in older persons.

Keywords:
outpatient clinics, falls and fracture services, geriatric health services, secondary prevention

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]