Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 7

Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction

Authors Krueger N, Mai SV, Luebberding S, Sadick N

Received 31 December 2013

Accepted for publication 16 May 2014

Published 26 June 2014 Volume 2014:7 Pages 201—205

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S44371

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 5


Nils Krueger,1 Sophia V Mai,2 Stefanie Luebberding,1 Neil S Sadick3

1Rosenpark Research, Darmstadt, Germany; 2Department of Dermatology, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA, 3Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA

Abstract: In recent years, a number of modalities have become available for the noninvasive reduction of adipose tissue, including cryolipolysis, radiofrequency, low-level laser, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. Each technology employs a different mechanism of action to cause apoptosis or necrosis of the targeted adipocytes. Among these technologies, cryolipolysis has not only been commercially available for the longest time, but has also been best researched including in vitro and animal models and randomized controlled clinical trials in humans. The principle behind cryolipolysis exploits the premise that adipocytes are more susceptible to cooling than other skin cells. The precise application of cold temperatures triggers apoptosis of the adipocytes, which invokes an inflammatory response and leads to slow digestion by surrounding macrophages. In clinical studies, cryolipolysis was shown to reduce subcutaneous fat at the treatment site by up to 25% after one treatment. Improvements were seen in 86% of treated subjects. At 73%, the patient satisfaction rate is higher than with other technologies used for noninvasive lipolysis. Cryolipolysis has been proven to be a very safe method for body contouring, and is accomplished with only minimal discomfort. Expected side effects are temporary erythema, bruising, and transient numbness that usually resolve within 14 days after treatment. With a prevalence of 0.1%, the most common complaint is late-onset pain, occurring 2 weeks post-procedure, which resolves without intervention. Although no procedure has been accepted as the gold standard for noninvasive body contouring as yet, cryolipolysis is considered to be both safe and efficient with a high patient satisfaction rate.

Keywords: cryolipolysis, nonsurgical fat reduction, body contouring, patient satisfaction, patient safety


Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]