Concordance between two methods in measuring treatment adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes
Authors Lopez-Simarro F, Brotons C, Moral I, Aguado-Jodar A, Cols-Sagarra C, Miravet-Jiménez S
Received 26 January 2016
Accepted for publication 23 February 2016
Published 4 May 2016 Volume 2016:10 Pages 743—750
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen
Flora López-Simarro,1 Carlos Brotons,2 Irene Moral,2 Alba Aguado-Jodar,3 Cèlia Cols-Sagarra,1 Sònia Miravet-Jiménez1
1Primary Health Care Center Martorell, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain; 2Research Unit, Sardenya Primary Health Care Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Teaching Unit of Family Medicine ACEBA, Barcelona, Spain; 3CAP Sagrada Família, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain
Objective: We analyzed the concordance between two methods for measuring treatment adherence (TA) and studied the determinants of TA in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study in a primary care center, involving 320 diabetic patients. TA was measured using the Haynes–Sackett (H–S) adherence test during the patient interview and based on pharmacy refill data. TA was calculated globally and by drug groups (antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antidiabetic drugs).
Results: Poor TA as measured by the H–S test was observed in 11.2% of the patients. Based on pharmacy refill data, there was a poor global TA rate of 30.3%, which was 33.3%, 26.6%, and 34.2% for oral antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering drugs, respectively. Concordance between the two methods was poor. There was no relationship between the degree of disease control and TA as measured by the H–S test. Good TA measured based on pharmacy refill data for antidiabetic and antihypertensive drugs was associated with lower glycosylated hemoglobin and diastolic blood pressure values, respectively. Patients with good global TA showed lower glycosylated hemoglobin, diastolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values. The multivariate analysis found good oral antidiabetic adherence to be associated to free pharmacy service; good antihypertensive drug adherence to the existence of comorbidities; and good lipid-lowering drug adherence to a history of ischemic heart disease, and a more experienced physician and/or female physician.
Conclusion: Concordance between the two methods in assessing TA was low. Approximately one-third of the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus presented poor TA in relation to antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antidiabetic medication. An improved TA was associated with a better control of the studied parameters. Comorbidities, such as ischemic heart disease and access to free pharmacy service, were identified as determinants of good TA.
Keywords: medication adherence, determinants of adherence, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, validation study
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]