Back to Journals » Open Access Medical Statistics » Volume 2

Comparison of various modeling approaches in the analysis of longitudinal data with a binary outcome: The Ontario Mother and Infant Study (TOMIS) III

Authors Bai YQ, Foster G, Sword, Krueger, Landy K, Watt, Thabane L

Received 17 April 2012

Accepted for publication 22 May 2012

Published 19 July 2012 Volume 2012:2 Pages 43—51

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OAMS.S33060

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3


Yu Qing Bai,1 Gary Foster,2 Wendy Sword,3,4 Paul Krueger,5 Christine Kurtz Landy,6 Susan Watt,7 Lehana Thabane2,3

1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 2Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 4School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 5Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 6School of Nursing, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada; 7School of Social Work, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Background: Longitudinal studies are often used to investigate the developmental trends of outcomes over time. Several modeling strategies can be applied for the analyses of longitudinal data. In this study, various statistical approaches were discussed and compared using data from The Ontario Mother and Infant Study (TOMIS) III. TOMIS III was a longitudinal cohort study that assessed the associations between the method of delivery and health outcomes and service utilizations. The primary outcome of postpartum depression was used as an example.
Methods: Generalized estimating equations (GEE) assuming a serial correlation structure were used as the primary method of analysis to assess the association between the method of delivery and postpartum depression over 12 months. We performed sensitivity analyses using three other methods – namely, the (1) generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM), (2) hierarchical generalized linear model (HGLM), and (3) Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM), to compare the robustness of the results.
Results: The results from all four models indicated that the method of delivery had no significant effect on postpartum depression. However, GEE, GLMM, and BHM identified the following seven predictors of depression: annual household income; urinary incontinence (bladder problems); English or French (Canada's official languages) spoken at home; a lower SF-12 mental component score; unmet learning needs in the hospital; lower social support; and a lower SF-12 physical component score. HGLM showed similar results to the above three models with the exception of language spoken at home, which was not significant. GEE provided the good fit statistics for the data.
Conclusion: Method of delivery had no significant effect on postpartum depression, based on GEE analysis. This result remained robust under different methods of analyses. GEE demonstrated a good fit for the TOMIS III data.

Keywords: longitudinal data, generalized estimating equations, hierarchical model, TOMIS

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]