Back to Journals » Open Access Journal of Contraception » Volume 4

Comparison of the pharmacologic and clinical profiles of new combined oral contraceptives containing estradiol

Authors Jensen J, Bitzer J, Serrani M

Received 28 June 2013

Accepted for publication 8 September 2013

Published 29 November 2013 Volume 2013:4 Pages 39—50


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Download Article [PDF] 

Jeffrey T Jensen,1 Johannes Bitzer,2 Marco Serrani3

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; 2Department of Social Medicine and Psychosomatics, Women’s Hospital, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 3Global Medical Affairs, Women’s Healthcare, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany

Abstract: Three estradiol (E2)-containing oral contraceptives, estradiol valerate/cyproterone acetate (E2V/CPA, Femilar®), estradiol valerate/dienogest (E2V/DNG, Qlaira®/Natazia™), and estradiol/nomegestrol acetate (E2/NOMAC; Zoely®), have received approval for use in general practice. Only Finnish women currently have access to all three E2-based formulations. E2/NOMAC is currently approved only in Europe, while E2V/DNG is approved globally. To assist clinicians counseling women considering use of one of these formulations, we conducted a review of the published information about the current E2-containing oral contraceptives. A literature search was conducted using the Ovid interface and a combination of free search terms relevant to estradiol and oral contraception to identify suitable articles for inclusion in this review. The available data show that E2V/DNG, E2/NOMAC, and E2V/CPA are all effective oral contraceptives. While direct comparisons are lacking, indirect evidence suggests that E2V/DNG and E2/NOMAC may have better bleeding profiles than E2V/CPA. E2V/DNG is also approved for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. Both E2V/DNG and E2/NOMAC have minimal influence on hemostatic, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism parameters, or induce less change in these parameters relative to ethinylestradiol-based oral contraceptives. However, the predictive value of these surrogate parameters is a matter of debate, and whether these differences can be translated into meaningful clinical outcomes needs to be established in large-scale, post-marketing, prospective, Phase IV cohort studies. Future studies are required to determine whether E2-based oral contraceptives confer additional benefits compared with those of ethinylestradiol-based COCs.

Keywords: estradiol valerate, dienogest, nomegestrol acetate, cyproterone acetate

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]