Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 11

Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided Visx iDesign, topography guided WaveLight Allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz

Authors Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, Skanchy DF, Linn SH, Kang P, Durrie DS

Received 18 June 2016

Accepted for publication 8 September 2016

Published 4 January 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 135—147

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S115270

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Lucy Goodman

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser

Majid Moshirfar,1,2 Tirth J Shah,3 David Franklin Skanchy,4 Steven H Linn,1 Paul Kang,3 Daniel S Durrie5

1HDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 3University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, 4McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, 5Durrie Vision, Kansas City, KS, USA

Purpose: To compare and analyze the differences in visual outcomes between Visx iDesign Advanced WaveScan Studio™ System, Alcon Wavelight Allegro Topolyzer and Nidek EC-5000 using Final Fit™ Custom Ablation Treatment Software from the submitted summary of safety and effectiveness of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data.
Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, 334 eyes from Visx iDesign, 212 eyes from Alcon Contour, and 135 eyes from Nidek CATz platforms were analyzed for primary and secondary visual outcomes. These outcomes were compared via side-by-side graphical and tabular representation of the FDA data. Statistical significance was calculated when appropriate to assess differences. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 12 months was 20/19.25±8.76, 20/16.59±5.94, and 20/19.17±4.46 for Visx iDesign, Alcon Contoura, and Nidek CATz, respectively. In at least 90% of treated eyes at 3 months and 12 months, all three lasers showed either no change or a gain of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Mesopic contrast sensitivity at 6 months showed a clinically significant increase of 41.3%, 25.1%, and 10.6% for eyes using Visx iDesign, Alcon Contoura, and Nidek CATz, respectively. Photopic contrast sensitivity at 6 months showed a clinically significant increase of 19.2%, 31.9%, and 10.6% for eyes using Visx iDesign, Alcon Contoura, and Nidek CATz, respectively.
Conclusion: FDA data for the three platforms shows all three were excellent with respect to efficacy, safety, accuracy, and stability. However, there are some differences between the platforms with certain outcome measurements. Overall, patients using all three lasers showed significant improvements in primary and secondary visual outcomes after LASIK surgery.

Keywords: wavefront-guided, topography-guided, LASIK, wavefront optimized

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other articles by this author:

Corneal biomechanical properties after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy

Hwang ES, Stagg BC, Swan R, Fenzl CR, McFadden M, Muthappan V, Santiago-Caban L, Mifflin MD, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2017, 11:1785-1789

Published Date: 3 October 2017

Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature

Moshirfar M, Albarracin JC, Desautels JD, Birdsong OC, Linn SH, Hoopes Sr PC

Clinical Ophthalmology 2017, 11:1683-1688

Published Date: 15 September 2017

Stereoacuity after small aperture corneal inlay implantation

Linn SH, Skanchy DF, Quist TS, Desautels JD, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2017, 11:233-235

Published Date: 24 January 2017

Short-term visual result after simultaneous photorefractive keratectomy and small-aperture cornea inlay implantation

Moshirfar M, Wallace RT, Skanchy DF, Desautels JD, Linn SH, Hoopes Jr PC, Durrie DS

Clinical Ophthalmology 2016, 10:2265-2270

Published Date: 11 November 2016

Rainbow glare after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: a review of literature

Moshirfar M, Desautels JD, Quist TS, Skanchy DF, Williams MT, Wallace RT

Clinical Ophthalmology 2016, 10:2245-2249

Published Date: 9 November 2016

Six-month visual outcomes for the correction of presbyopia using a small-aperture corneal inlay: single-site experience

Moshirfar M, Quist TS, Skanchy DF, Wallace RT, Linn SH, Hoopes Jr PC

Clinical Ophthalmology 2016, 10:2191-2198

Published Date: 2 November 2016

Use of angle kappa in myopic photorefractive keratectomy

Khakshoor H, McCaughey MV, Vejdani AH, Daneshvar R, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2015, 9:193-195

Published Date: 29 January 2015

Accuracy of corneal trephination depth using the Moria single-use adjustable depth vacuum trephine system

Fenzl CR, Gess AJ, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:2391-2396

Published Date: 27 November 2014

What we know about ocular manifestations of Ebola

Moshirfar M, Fenzl CR, Li Z

Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:2355-2357

Published Date: 21 November 2014

Rate of ectasia and incidence of irregular topography in patients with unidentified preoperative risk factors undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK

Moshirfar M, Smedley JG, Muthappan V, Jarsted A, Ostler EM

Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:35-42

Published Date: 10 December 2013

Laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with collagen vascular disease: a review of the literature

Simpson RG, Moshirfar M, Edmonds JN, Christiansen SM, Behunin N

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1827-1837

Published Date: 5 November 2012

Anesthetic keratopathy presenting as bilateral Mooren-like ulcers

Khakshoor H, Moshirfar M, Simpson RG, Gharaee H, Vejdani AH, Christiansen SM, Edmonds JN, Behunin NL

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1719-1722

Published Date: 26 October 2012

Laser in-situ keratomileusis in patients with diabetes mellitus: a review of the literature

Simpson RG, Moshirfar M, Edmonds JN, Christiansen SM

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1665-1674

Published Date: 12 October 2012

The effect of preoperative keratometry on visual outcomes after moderate myopic LASIK

Christiansen SM, Neuffer MC, Sikder S, Semnani RT, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:459-464

Published Date: 21 March 2012

Radial keratotomy associated endothelial degeneration

Moshirfar M, Ollerton A, Semnani RT, Hsu M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:213-218

Published Date: 2 February 2012

Bilateral total Descemet's membrane detachments after strangulation

Moshirfar M, Betts BS, Hsu M, Holz HHA, McEntire W

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1221-1222

Published Date: 29 August 2011

In vivo and in vitro analysis of topographic changes secondary to DSAEK venting incisions

Moshirfar M, Lependu MT, Church D, Neuffer MC

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1195-1199

Published Date: 25 August 2011

Comparison of Hanna and Hessburg-Barron trephine and punch systems using histological, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and elliptical curve fitting models

Moshirfar M, Calvo CM, Kinard KI, Williams LB, Sikder S, Neuffer MC

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1121-1125

Published Date: 12 August 2011

Femtosecond-assisted preparation of donor tissue for Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis

Moshirfar M, Neuffer MC, Kinard K, Lependu MT, Sikder S

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:1017-1020

Published Date: 22 July 2011

A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function

Hatch BB, Moshirfar M, Ollerton AJ, Sikder S, Mifflin MD

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:451-457

Published Date: 21 April 2011

Complications of NewColorIris implantation in phakic eyes: a review

Sikder S, Davis SW, Holz H, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:435-438

Published Date: 5 April 2011

Corrigendum: Softec HD hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: biocompatibility and precision

Espandar L, Sikder S, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:159-160

Published Date: 6 February 2011

Softec HD hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: biocompatibility and precision

Ladan Espandar, Shameema Sikder, Majid Moshirfar

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:65-70

Published Date: 10 January 2011

Epithelial growth over the optic surface of the type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis: histopathology and implications for biointegration

Yousuf M Khalifa, Don Davis, Nick Mamalis, et al

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:1069-1071

Published Date: 17 September 2010