Back to Journals » International Journal of General Medicine » Volume 8

Comparative seroprevalence of measles virus immunoglobulin M antibodies in children aged 0–8 months and a control population aged 9–23 months presenting with measles-like symptoms in selected hospitals in Kaduna State

Authors Olaitan A, Ella EE, Ameh JB

Received 17 December 2014

Accepted for publication 29 January 2015

Published 10 March 2015 Volume 2015:8 Pages 101—108

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S79423

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser



AE Olaitan, EE Ella, JB Ameh

Department of Microbiology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria


Background: Measles remains the leading cause of vaccine-preventable childhood mortality in developing countries, with its greatest incidence in children younger than 2 years of age. The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of measles virus in children (aged 0–8 months) and older children (aged 9–23 months) presenting with measles-like symptoms.
Methods: A total of 273 blood samples comprising 200 from children aged 0–8 months and 73 from children aged 9–23 months were collected and analyzed for measles virus IgM antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Results: An overall prevalence of 21.2% was obtained, with a prevalence of 6.5% in children aged 0–8 months and 61.6% in children aged 9–23 months. The prevalence of measles virus increased with age in children aged 0–8 months and decreased with age in older children (aged 9–23 months), showing a significant association between measles virus and age of the child (P=0.000). A higher prevalence was found in females (27.5%) than in males (16.3%) and this difference was significant (odds ratio 1.942, P=0.025). There was no significant association with the level of parental education, parental occupation, or number of children in the family (P>0.05). With respect to children's vaccination status and breastfeeding, there was a significant association (P<0.05). The marital status of the family, place of residence, and household size showed no significant association with the prevalence of measles virus. However, a significant association was observed in relation to maternal measles history (odds ratio 2.535, P=0.005) and maternal vaccination status (odds ratio 1.791, P=0.049), as well as between measles virus infection and all presenting symptoms, except for vomiting, malaria, typhoid, and pneumonia, which showed no significant association (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The findings of this study confirm the presence of measles virus infection in children aged 0–8 months.

Keywords: measles virus, malaria, vaccination, breastfeeding

Introduction

Measles, also known as rubeola, is an infection of the respiratory system caused by measles virus (MV), a spherical, enveloped, single-stranded, negative-sense RNA virus.1 It is transmitted primarily from person to person by large respiratory droplets, but can also be spread by aerosolized droplets1 as well as close personal contact or direct contact with nasal or throat secretions from infected persons.

Measles is most infectious during the prodrome phase. The prodromal period begins with fever, malaise, cough, coryza, and conjunctivitis. Koplik spots appear on the buccal mucosa 1–2 days before rash onset and may be noticeable for an additional 1–2 days after rash onset. In developed countries, the most commonly cited complications associated with measles infection are otitis media, pneumonia, post-infection encephalitis, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, and corneal ulceration (leading to corneal scarring). The risks of serious complications and death are increased in young children and adults. Complications are usually more severe in adults.2

Measles occurs worldwide, and is still a significant cause of childhood morbidity and mortality despite the existence of an effective vaccine. It is a highly infectious immunization-controllable disease, but is still responsible for high mortality among children, particularly in developing nations, including Nigeria, where it is still endemic.3,4 After an effective measles vaccine was introduced in 1963, the incidence of measles decreased significantly. Vaccination coverage of measles-containing vaccine in Nigeria according to the World Health Organization (WHO)/United Nations Children’s Fund is currently put at 62%. The National Program on Immunization in Nigeria stipulates that children be vaccinated against measles by a single injection at 9 months. This is because children below this age are believed to possess passively acquired maternal antibodies that protect them against the virus. However, in developing countries where measles is highly endemic, the WHO recommends two doses of vaccine be given at 6 and 9 months of age.5

The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of MV in children aged 0–8 months as compared with older children (9–23 months) presenting with measles-like symptoms at selected hospitals in Kaduna State. It also sought to determine some sociodemographic and possible risk factors associated with the infection.

Materials and methods

Study area and population

The study was conducted in three major hospitals in Kaduna State, including Hajia Gambo Sawaba General Hospital, Kofar-Gayan, located in the Zaria Local Government Area, and Yusuf Dantsoho Memorial Hospital and Gwamna-Awan Hospital, both located in Kaduna metropolis. The study population included children aged 0–8 months presenting with measles-like symptoms and attending the hospitals selected for the study. These symptoms include fever, cough, coryza, conjunctivitis, diarrhea, vomiting, rash, and Koplik spots, as well as some non-specific symptoms characteristic of typhoid fever, pneumonia, and malaria. Children aged 9–23 months presenting with measles-like symptoms and attending the hospitals were used as the control population. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee at Kaduna State Ministry of Health. The purpose and procedure of the study were explained to the parents or caregivers and their consent was obtained before enrollment in the study.

Sample size

The sample size was determined using the following equation of Naing et al:6

where n is the sample size; Z is the standard normal distribution at a 95% confidence interval of 1.96; p is the prevalence (8%7); q = 1 − p; and d is the absolute desired precision (0.05). Therefore:

However, a total of 292 samples were collected for the study and distributed in a ratio of 3:1 to arrive at 219 for children aged 0–8 months (study population) and 73 for children aged 9–23 months (control population). However, 19 samples were not suitable for assay, being lipemic, and were discarded, giving a total of 273 samples. Of the 273 samples assayed, 200 were from children aged 0–8 months (study population) and 73 were from children aged 9–23 months (control population).

Sample collection and processing

Using a sterile disposable syringe, a 2 mL blood sample was collected from each patient aseptically by venipuncture and dispensed into sterile, labeled, anticoagulant containers containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The blood samples were transported in an ice box to the laboratory. The blood samples were allowed to settle and the plasma was separated using clean Pasteur pipettes into sterile plain sample containers. The samples were stored at refrigeration temperature (4°C) until required for analysis.

The samples were analyzed using immunoglobulin M measles enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reagent (Diagnostic Automation and Cortez, Calabasas, CA, USA). All samples and reagents were removed from the refrigerator and allowed to come to room temperature (25°C). The coated strips were placed in a holder and labeled (one blank well, one negative control, two calibrators, one positive control, and 91 wells for sample specimens). About 3 μL of the test samples, negative control, positive control, and calibrators, was added to 240 μL of the serum diluent and mixed well to make 1:80 dilutions. Next, 100 μL each of the diluted samples was dispensed into appropriate wells, ensuring that there were no air bubbles. Air bubbles present in the liquid were removed by tapping the holder, and 100 μL of the serum diluent was then added into the reagent blank well. The wells were incubated at room temperature (21°C–25°C) for 30 minutes. After incubation, the liquid from all wells was removed by washing three times with 300 μL of wash buffer. Next, 100 μL of enzyme conjugate was added into each well and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. Excess enzyme conjugate was removed by washing three times with the buffer; 100 μL of chromogen/substrate solution was then dispensed into each well and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. The reaction was stopped by addition of 100 μL of stop solution (1 M H2SO4) and the plate was tapped gently to mix the contents of the wells. The reading was done using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay microplate reader at 450 nm.

Statistical analysis

Data generated from questionnaires and results obtained from laboratory analysis were entered into Microsoft Excel. The data obtained were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to determine the significance of variables at a 95% confidence interval, and a P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The odds ratio (OR) was used to measure association for 2×2 contingency tables and an OR >1 was taken as a positive association. Side-by-side bar charts were used to visually display the results of cross-classification data for disease prevalence.

Results

The prevalence of MV immunoglobulin M antibodies obtained in this study was 21.2%, with Yusuf Dantsoho Hospital having the highest prevalence (25%), followed by Hajia Gambo Sawaba General Hospital (24.4%), and Gwamna-Awan Hospital, which had the lowest prevalence (12.7%, Table 1).

Table 1 Seroprevalence of measles virus infection in children in relation to hospital location
Note: χ2=4.910, df=2, P=0.086.
Abbreviations: GAH, Gwamna-Awan Hospital; YDMH, Yusuf Dantsoho Memorial Hospital; HGSGH, Hajia Gambo Sawaba General Hospital.

Children aged 0–8 months had a prevalence of 6.5%, but the prevalence was significantly higher in children aged older than 8 months (61.6%), showing a significant association between MV infection and age of the child (P=0.00, Figure 1). The prevalence was also significantly higher in female children (27.5%) than in male children (16.3%) indicating a possible association between MV infection and sex of the child (P=0.025, Figure 2).

Figure 1 Seroprevalence of measles virus infection in children in relation to their age category (χ2=97.195, df=1, odds ratio 23.118, P=0.00).

Figure 2 Seroprevalence of measles virus infection in children in relation to their sex (χ2=5.006, df=1, odds ratio 1.942, P=0.025).

The parents’ sociodemographic data were assessed in relation to MV infection in their children. There was no significant association between MV infection and level of parental education (P=0.687), occupation of parents (P=0.207), or number of children in the family (P=0.828, Table 2).

Table 2 Seroprevalence of measles virus infection in children in relation to parental sociodemographic data
Notes: Educational status, χ2=1.480, df=3, P=0.687; occupation, χ2=3.146, df=2, P=0.207; number of children, χ2=0.891, df=3, P=0.828.

The study established a significant association between MV infection and the child’s vaccination status (P=0.031), with vaccinated children having a lower prevalence (10.0%) than unvaccinated children (23.8%). There was also a significant association between MV infection and breastfeeding babies (P=0.000, Table 3). The findings did not establish any significant association in relation to type of family (P=0.716), place of residence (P=0.966), or number of persons living in the household (Table 4).

Table 3 Seroprevalence of measles virus infection in children in relation to their vaccination and nutritional status
Notes: Vaccination status, χ2=4.828, df=1, OR 2.806, P=0.031; breastfeeding, χ2=29.048, df=1, OR 7.69, P=0.000; vitamin A intake, χ2=23.568, df=1, OR 7.28, P=0.00. *Significant association exists at P<0.05; **significant association exists at P<0.01.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Table 4 Seroprevalence of measles virus infection in children in relation to family type and possible risk factors
Notes: Family type, χ2=0.132, df=1, OR 1.118, P=0.716; type of residence, χ2=0.002, df=1, OR 1.013, P=0.966; household number, χ2=0.007, df=1, OR 1.028, P=0.931.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

There was a significant association between MV infection in children and maternal measles history (P=0.005). Children of mothers with a past history of measles had a lower prevalence (12.7%) than children of mothers with no history of measles (27.0%). Likewise, MV infection was significantly associated with maternal vaccine status (P=0.049). Children of vaccinated mothers had a lower prevalence (17.1%) than children of unvaccinated mothers (27.0%, Table 5).

Table 5 Seroprevalence of measles virus infection in children in relation to maternal measles history and vaccination status
Notes: Measles history, χ2=7.989, df=1, OR 2.535, P=0.005; vaccination status, χ2=3.873, df=1, OR 1.791; P=0.04. *Significant association exists at P<0.05.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Of 273 children with fever, 58 (21.2%) were positive for MV immunoglobulin M antibodies. There was a significant association between MV infection and all presenting symptoms, except for vomiting, which showed no significant association (P=0.053, Table 6). There was no significant association (P>0.05) between MV infection and malaria, typhoid, or pneumonia, which are common childhood illnesses with measles-like symptoms (Table 7).

Table 6 Seroprevalence of measles virus infection in children in relation to disease symptoms
Note: *Significant association exists at P<0.05.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Table 7 Seroprevalence of measles virus infection in children in relation to common childhood diseases with measles-like symptoms
Notes: Malaria, χ2=0.050, df=1, OR 0.913, P=0.823; typhoid, χ2=3.981, df=1, P=0.056; pneumonia, χ2=1.095, df=1, P=0.295.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

The prevalence of MV found in children aged 0–8 months in this study is in agreement with the prevalence of 7.0% reported for Akwa Ibom State in children younger than 9 months8 and the prevalence of 6% reported in Maiduguri, Borno State.9 A prevalence of 61.6% was obtained in children aged 9–23 months in this study. The cumulative prevalence obtained in this study was 21.2%, suggesting that measles is endemic in Kaduna State and probably in Nigeria as a whole.10 This was also reflected in the comparative prevalence between the hospitals, which showed no significant difference. This early presentation of measles has been attributed to waning maternal antibodies, especially in the setting where immunity is from vaccination not natural infection.

The overall prevalence of 21.2% obtained in children aged 0–23 months is lower than the prevalence of 30.2% reported in Akwa Ibom State11 and 32.2% among older children in Giwa,10 but higher than the 15.6% reported in another study from Southwestern Nigeria.12 The reason for the observed differences may be attributed to the seriousness and dedication of relevant authorities in ensuring better measles vaccine coverage in their region. Accelerated measles control activities, including improved routine immunization coverage, provision of a second dose of measles vaccine as part of supplementary vaccination activities in certain countries of the world, and case-based surveillance with laboratory confirmation may have reduced measles-associated morbidity and mortality.13

In this study, females were seen to be more susceptible to measles infection than their male counterparts. This result is in agreement with previous studies in other parts of Nigeria11 and Bolivia,14 which documented that measles antibody is marginally higher in females than in males, but disagrees with the work of Chechet et al,10 who reported the contrary. This finding showed that female children had two times higher odds of being infected with MV than their male counterparts.1517

The test of association between parental level of education and the seroprevalence of measles showed no significant association. This finding disagrees with findings in Malawi18 and Bolivia,14 where seroprevalence was higher in children of mothers with less than a secondary education level, but lower in children of highly educated parents. The reason for this could be that infection with the virus remains endemic in Nigeria; as such, all the populace is equally exposed to it irrespective of their educational status.

There was no significant association between parental occupation and MV infection, contrary to the finding of Holmes et al,19 where children of working class parents were more susceptible to infection. There was also no significant association between number of children in the family and the prevalence of MV infection in this study.

The vaccination status of children was significantly associated with the prevalence of measles infection. Measles prevalence was higher in unvaccinated children (23.8%) than in children who were vaccinated (10%). The low level recorded for vaccinated children may reflect vaccine failure as well as effectiveness of vaccination. This study conforms to an acceptable measles vaccination threshold of >90%10 as well as in early indication of failure stipulated in the range of 2%–10% reported by Wilkins and Wehle.20 Problems with storage, transport, and maintenance of a cold chain system can easily affect the potency of vaccines in developing nations.12,21 Diversification in measles strains has also been reported to account for the early presentation of measles and occurrence of measles in vaccinated children.22

The prevalence of MV was higher in children who were not breast feeding, compared with breastfeeding children, and non-breastfeeding children were at a 7.69 higher risk of being infected with MV than breastfeeding children. The low prevalence among breastfeeding children may be the result of a high level of antibodies and antimicrobials, as well as some probiotics contained in breast milk that confer immunity in these children. This study is in agreement with previous studies23,24 showing that breastfeeding children are more resistant to measles infection.

Large family size and crowding in the home have been associated with the incidence of measles14 but this was not established in our study. Similarly, no association was found between measles infection and type of residence or type of family, in contrast with the work of Burstrom et al,25 and number of individuals in the household was established in this study in agreement with previous study carried out in the USA where there was no significant relationship between crowding and measles infection,26 but in contrast with a study carried out in Bangladesh.27

This study established a relationship between maternal measles history and vaccination status with regard to the prevalence of measles in children. Children of mothers with no measles history had a higher prevalence than children of mothers with a measles history. This low observed prevalence in children of mothers with a measles history can be explained by the fact that these mothers have naturally acquired immunity against measles, which provides passive protection to their infants. This agrees with previous studies by Brugha et al28 and Nicoara et al.29 Likewise, children of unvaccinated mothers had a higher prevalence and were at 1.8 times higher risk of being infected than children of vaccinated mothers. This could also be the result of vaccine-induced maternal immunity conferred to the children.28,29

This study established that all symptoms (fever, cough, coryza, diarrhea, rash, conjunctiva, and Koplik spots) had a significant association with MV. This means that a child with MV must present with some or all of these symptoms, and agrees with the work of Chechet et al;10 it also agrees with the WHO clinical case definition, ie, any person presenting with a history of fever (39°C–41°C) lasting 3 days or more and generalized maculopapular rash with one of the following: coryza, cough, or conjunctivitis.30

There was no significant association between MV infection and other common childhood illnesses with measles-like symptoms. Although these illnesses present symptoms similar to those of measles, they may not necessarily be present in a child with MV infection.

Conclusion

The findings of this study confirm the presence of MV in children aged 0–8 months in Kaduna State, with a seroprevalence comparable with rates obtained in other parts of the country. The prevalence of 6.5% obtained in children aged 0–8 months and 21.2% in children aged 0–23 months is an indication that measles is endemic in Kaduna State and still poses a public health problem, despite the availability of a safe and effective vaccine. Therefore, it is important for health providers and policy makers to recognize the health implications of this virus, review the vaccination age of infants, and intensify vaccination campaign programs. This study recognized age, sex, vaccination, breastfeeding, vitamin A intake, and maternal vaccination and measles history as important demographic risk factors for MV infection in children.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.


References

1.

Perry RT, Halsey NA. The clinical significance of measles: a review. J Infect Dis. 2004;189 Suppl 1:S4–S16.

2.

Sension MG, Quinn TC, Markowitz LE, et al. Measles in hospitalized African children with human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Dis Child. 1988;142:1271–1272.

3.

Papania MJ, Orenstein WA. Defining and assessing measles elimination goals. J Infect Dis. 2004;189 Suppl 1:S23–S26.

4.

Adetunji OO, Olusola EP, Ferdinad FF, Olorunyomi OS, Idowu JV, Ademola OG. Measles among hospitalized Nigerian children. Internet J Pediatr Neonatol. 2007;7:29.

5.

Helfand RF, Witte D, Fowlkes A, et al. Evaluation of the immune response to a 2-dose measles vaccination schedule administered at 6 and 9 months of age to HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected children in Malawi. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:1457–1465.

6.

Naing L, Winn T, Rusli BN. Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence. Studies Archives of Orofacial Sciences. 2006;1:9–14.

7.

Adeboye M, Adesiyun O Adegboye, et al. Measles in a tertiary institution in Bida, Niger State, Nigeria: prevalence, immunization status and mortality pattern. Oman Med J. 2011;26:114–117.

8.

Chukwuemeka AU, Hycienth PA. The impact of declining vaccination coverage on measles control: a case study of Abia State Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2013;15:105.

9.

Ahmadu BU, Mava Y, Ambe JP, Abdallah JA, Ovansa EO. Predicting changing measles epidemiology in an urban West African population. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2013;6:179–182.

10.

Chechet J, Ella EE, Ige SO. Seroprevalence of measles IgM in children 5–12 years from selected primary schools in Giwa Local Government Area, Zaria, Kaduna State. Scientific Journal of Microbiology. 2014;3:19–24.

11.

Bassey EB, Moses AE, Udo SU, Umo AN. The impact of immunization control activities on measles in Akwa Ibom State. Online J Health Allied Sci. 2010;9:3.

12.

Omilabu SA, Oyefolu AO, Ojo OO, Audu RA. Potency status and efficacy of the measles vaccine administered in Nigeria: a case study of three EPI centers in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr J Med Sci. 1999;28:209–212.

13.

Manirakiza A, Kipela JM, Sosler S, Daba RM, Vasilache IG. Seroprevalence of measles and natural rubella antibodies among children in Bangui, Central African Republic. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:1471–2458.

14.

Masuet-Aumatell C, Ramon-Torrell JM, Casanova-Rituerto A, Banqué Navarro M, Dávalos Gamboa Mdel R, Montaño Rodríguez SL. Measles in Bolivia: a honeymoon period. Vaccine. 2013;31:2097–2102.

15.

Fauveau V, Chakraborty J, Sarder AM, Khan MA, Koenig MA. Measles among under-9-month-olds in rural Bangladesh: its significance for age at immunization. Bull World Health Organ. 1991;69:67–72.

16.

Grais RF, Dubray C, Gerstl S, et al. Unacceptably high mortality related to measles epidemics in Niger, Nigeria, and Chad. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e16.

17.

Tharmaphornpilas P, Yoocharean P, Rasdjarmrearnsook A, Theamboonlers A, Yong P. Seroprevalence of antibodies to measles, mumps, and rubella among Thai population: evaluation of measles/MMR immunization programme. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:80–86.

18.

Fowlkes A, Witte D, Beeler J, Audet S. Persistence of vaccine-induced measles antibody beyond age 12 months: a comparison of response to one and two doses of Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine among HIV-infected and uninfected children in Malawi. J Infect Dis. 2011;204 Suppl 1:S149–S157.

19.

Holmes SJ, Morrow AL, Pickering LK. Child-care practices: effects of social change on the epidemiology of infectious diseases and antibiotic resistance. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18:10–27.

20.

Wilkins J, Wehle PF. Evidence for reinstatement of infants 12 to 14 months of age into routine measles immunization programs. Am J Dis Child. 1978;132:164–166.

21.

Adu FD, Adedeji AA, Esan JS, Odusanya OG. Live viral vaccine potency: an index for assessing the cold chain system. Public Health. 1996;110:325–330.

22.

Kouomou DW, Nerrienet E, Mfoupouendoun J, Tene G, Whittle H, Wild TF. Measles virus strains circulating in Central and West Africa: geographical distribution of two B3 genotypes. J Med Virol. 2002;68:433–440.

23.

Adu FD, Adeniji JA. Measles antibodies in the breast milk of nursing mothers. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995;24:385–388.

24.

Katona P, Katona-Apte J. The interaction between nutrition and infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1582–1588.

25.

Burstrom B, Diderichsen F, Smedman L. Child mortality in Stockholm during 1885–1910: the impact of household size and number of children in the family on the risk of death from measles. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149:1134–1141.

26.

Butler JC, Proctor ME, Fessler K, Hopfensperger DJ, Sosin DM, Davis JP. Household-acquisition of measles and illness severity in an urban community in the United States. Epidemiol Infect Dis. 1994;112:569–577.

27.

Koenig MA, Bishai D, Khan MA. Health interventions and health equity: the example of measles vaccination in Bangladesh. Population Development Revised. 2001;27:283–302.

28.

Brugha R, Ramsay M, Forsey T, Brown D. A study of maternally derived measles antibody in infants born to naturally infected and vaccinated women. Epidemiol Infect Dis. 1996;117:519–524.

29.

Nicoara C, Zäch K, Trachsel D, Germann D, Matter L. Decay of passively acquired maternal antibodies against measles, mumps and rubella viruses. Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 1999;6:868–871.

30.

Wharton M, Chorba TL, Vogt RL, Morse DL, Buehler JW. Case definitions for public health surveillance. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1990;39:1–43.

Creative Commons License © 2015 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.