Back to Journals » Risk Management and Healthcare Policy » Volume 7

Clinical risk-scoring algorithm to forecast scrub typhus severity

Authors Sriwongpan P, Krittigamas P, Tantipong H, Patumanond J, Tawichasri C, Namwongprom S

Received 3 October 2013

Accepted for publication 30 October 2013

Published 16 December 2013 Volume 2014:7 Pages 11—17

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S55305

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Pamornsri Sriwongpan,1,2 Pornsuda Krittigamas,3 Hutsaya Tantipong,4 Jayanton Patumanond,5 Chamaiporn Tawichasri,6 Sirianong Namwongprom1,7

1Clinical Epidemiology Program, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; 2Department of Social Medicine, Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Rai, Thailand; 3Department of General Pediatrics, Nakornping Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand; 4Department of Medicine, Chonburi Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand; 5Clinical Epidemiology Program, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand; 6Clinical Epidemiology Society at Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand; 7Department of Radiology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Purpose: To develop a simple risk-scoring system to forecast scrub typhus severity.
Patients and methods: Seven years' retrospective data of patients diagnosed with scrub typhus from two university-affiliated hospitals in the north of Thailand were analyzed. Patients were categorized into three severity groups: nonsevere, severe, and dead. Predictors for severity were analyzed under multivariable ordinal continuation ratio logistic regression. Significant coefficients were transformed into item score and summed to total scores.
Results: Predictors of scrub typhus severity were age >15 years, (odds ratio [OR] =4.09), pulse rate >100/minute (OR 3.19), crepitation (OR 2.97), serum aspartate aminotransferase >160 IU/L (OR 2.89), serum albumin ≤3.0 g/dL (OR 4.69), and serum creatinine >1.4 mg/dL (OR 8.19). The scores which ranged from 0 to 16, classified patients into three risk levels: non-severe (score ≤5, n=278, 52.8%), severe (score 6–9, n=143, 27.2%), and fatal (score ≥10, n=105, 20.0%). Exact severity classification was obtained in 68.3% of cases. Underestimations of 5.9% and overestimations of 25.8% were clinically acceptable.
Conclusion: The derived scrub typhus severity score classified patients into their severity levels with high levels of prediction, with clinically acceptable under- and overestimations. This classification may assist clinicians in patient prognostication, investigation, and management. The scoring algorithm should be validated by independent data before adoption into routine clinical practice.

Keywords: severe scrub typhus, risk-scoring system, clinical prediction rule, prognostic predictors

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other articles by this author:

Validation of dengue infection severity score

Pongpan S, Patumanond J, Wisitwong A, Tawichasri C, Namwongprom S

Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2014, 7:45-49

Published Date: 6 March 2014

Validation of a clinical risk-scoring algorithm for severe scrub typhus

Sriwongpan P, Patumanond J, Krittigamas P, Tantipong H, Tawichasri C, Namwongprom S

Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2014, 7:29-34

Published Date: 18 February 2014

Effect of fat mass and lean mass on bone mineral density in postmenopausal and perimenopausal Thai women

Namwongprom S, Rojanasthien S, Mangklabruks A, Soontrapa S, Wongboontan C, Ongphiphadhanakul B

International Journal of Women's Health 2013, 5:87-92

Published Date: 27 February 2013