Clinical outcome of advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy: is there a difference between young and old patients?
Authors Zhang G, Zhu Y, Dong D, Gu W, Zhang H, Sun L, Ye D
Received 25 June 2014
Accepted for publication 18 September 2014
Published 3 November 2014 Volume 2014:7 Pages 2043—2052
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 4
Editor who approved publication: Dr Faris Farassati
Guiming Zhang,1,2,* Yao Zhu,1,2,* Dahai Dong,3 Weijie Gu,1,2 Hailiang Zhang,1,2 Lijiang Sun,3 Dingwei Ye1,2
1Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; 2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; 3Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, People's Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Background: To assess whether the clinical outcome of advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with targeted therapy differs between young and old patients.
Patients and methods: A total of 327 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and mRCC who received targeted therapy in two Chinese clinical centers were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were stratified into three groups: young (aged <45 years), middle-aged (aged 45–64 years), and old (aged ≥65 years). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were drawn using the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox's proportional hazard regression model was used to compare OS and PFS within age groups.
Results: There were no significant differences among young, middle-aged, and old groups in terms of OS (P=0.087), whereas PFS in the old group was significantly better than in the young and middle-aged groups (P=0.043). Both OS and PFS in the younger groups (aged <65 years) were significantly worse than in the old group (age ≥65 years; median OS, 28.1 vs 28.7 months [P=0.029]; median PFS, 11.4 vs 14 months [P=0.015]). No difference in OS or PFS was found between the young and middle-aged groups. After adjusting for sex, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, history of cytokines, and Fuhrman grade, old age was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS and PFS compared with younger age (<65 years) (OS, hazard ratio, 0.552 [95% confidence interval, 0.329–0.828; P=0.006]; PFS, hazard ratio, 0.584 [95% confidence interval, 0.401–0.850; P=0.005]).
Conclusion: Younger patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and mRCC receiving targeted therapy have a poorer prognosis compared with old patients. These results remain to be examined in prospective cohorts.
Keywords: kidney cancer, metastasis, targeted therapy, prognosis, age
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]