Back to Journals » Open Access Emergency Medicine » Volume 6

Clinical impact of extending after-hours radiology coverage for emergency department computed tomography imaging

Authors Dabbo S, Varner C, Bleakney R, Ovens H

Received 26 December 2013

Accepted for publication 19 February 2014

Published 3 May 2014 Volume 2014:6 Pages 33—35

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S59750

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3


Samer Dabbo,1 Catherine Varner,2,3 Robert Bleakney,1,2 Howard Ovens2,3

1University Health Network, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 2Division of Emergency Medicine, Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 3Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Background: Academic emergency departments (EDs) are often reliant on preliminary interpretation by radiology residents for after-hours computed tomography (CT) images. Identifying residents’ errors in diagnostic interpretation and ensuring appropriate contact with affected patients are areas of continuing concern.
Objective: The Mount Sinai Hospital ED and Medical Imaging Department in Toronto, Canada sought to examine the clinical impact of extending reporting hours of senior attending radiologists for ED patients undergoing CT imaging.
Methods: All evening CT studies were read by the on-call sub-specialist staff radiologist before 10 pm; while studies done after 10 pm were read by 8 am, permitting review of final reports by the ordering ED physician. A retrospective review of radiology and ED metrics was performed on ED patients undergoing CT imaging 12 weeks before and 12 weeks after implementation of the extended reading hours.
Results: In the 12 weeks prior to implementation of extended senior attending radiologist coverage, 871 CT scans were performed as compared to 944 CT scans after implementation. Time from performance of CT scan to obtaining a dictated report decreased from 10.4 hours to 2.8 hours (P<0.001), and time from performance of CT scan to report verification by the radiologist decreased from 29.7 hours to 9.4 hours (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant changes in ED length of stay, rates of admission, or rates of consultation. However, there was a significant reduction in (median) time taken for ED physicians to resolve discrepant reports in the radiology information system queue (20.7 hours versus 13.3 hours, P<0.001).
Conclusion: The extension of reporting hours reduced the time for ED physicians to review discrepant reports, while balancing educational needs of residents. This project has been considered a success by stakeholders and has now been implemented on a permanent basis.

Keywords: quality assurance, clinical competence, diagnostic errors, interns, residents

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]