Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 15

Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Aspergillosis at a Chinese Tertiary Teaching Hospital

Authors Xiao C , Qiao D, Xiong L, Tian W, Wang D, Deng S, Guo J

Received 24 September 2022

Accepted for publication 23 November 2022

Published 11 December 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 7249—7257

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S391069

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Suresh Antony



Chenlu Xiao,1,2,* Dan Qiao,1,* Lijuan Xiong,3,* Wenjie Tian,4 Dongjiang Wang,4 Shuwen Deng,5 Jian Guo4

1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Clinical Microbiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guizhou University, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Medical Microbiology, People’s Hospital of Suzhou New District, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Jian Guo; Shuwen Deng, Email [email protected]; [email protected]

Background: Aspergillus spp. infection in immunocompromised patients results in increasing morbidity and mortality. This study investigated clinical and microbiological characteristics of aspergillosis in a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital.
Methods: A total of 114 patients with aspergillosis were included over a 5-year period at Ruijin Hospital. In sum, 114 Aspergillus strains were isolated and identified at species level using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, confirmed by ITS gene region and β-tubulin (BenA) gene sequencing. Sensititre YeastOne was used in vitro to test susceptibility to antifungal drugs: amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, micafungin, anidulafungin, and caspofungin.
Results: The median age of the patients was 61 (19) years, men accounted for 53.5% (n=61) of the sample, about 64% were immunocompromised, and 36% had underlying diseases. Pulmonary diseases accounted for 27.2%. Aspergillus isolates were mainly isolated from sputum (n=42, 36.8%). Antifungal therapy was administered to 106 (93.0%) patients and voriconazole (n=76, 66.7%) was the most frequently used as empirical therapy. Aspergillus fumigatus (n=69, 60.5%) was the most common species. There was a 73.7% concordance between MALDI-TOF MS and molecular identification. All Aspergillus isolates showed good susceptibility to anidulafungin and caspofungin.
Conclusion: Immunocompromised patients are an at-risk population for aspergillosis, and voriconazole was used as empirical therapy in Ruijin Hospital, China. A. fumigatus was the predominant Aspergillus species causing aspergillosis, and A. flavus — as non–A. fumigatus species are increasing — the second-leading cause of aspergillosis. Anidulafungin and caspofungin were the most active in vitro against the Aspergillus isolates tested. The MALDI-TOF MS method showed good accuracy for identification of common Aspergillus spp. In vitro antifungal-susceptibility testing is crucially important for decisions on effective therapy with aspergillosis.

Keywords: aspergillosis, epidemiology, Aspergillus spp., MALDI-TOF MS, molecular identification, antifungal susceptibility

Introduction

Aspergillosis is an infection caused by Aspergillus spp. that mainly occurs in immunocompromised individuals. Recently, influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis and CAPA (COVID-19–associated pulmonary aspergillosis) have been reported in many studies as causing the clinical attention.1–3 Aspergillus fumigatus is the predominant Aspergillus species causing aspergillosis. However, the incidence of infections with non–A. fumigatus spp., such as A. flavus, A. niger, and A. terreus, to date has been increasing, especially in immunocompromised hosts.4 Triazoles and polyene amphotericin B have been licensed for primary therapy of aspergillosis. However, triazole resistance to Aspergillus spp. have been reported globally and remain a big challenge for the treatment of aspergillosis.5,6

With molecular methods, numerous cryptic species and new species have been identified within the genus Aspergillus. Many studies have indicated that antifungal susceptibility varies in particular Aspergillus spp.7,8 Thus, Aspergillus identification at the species level become crucial for clinicians to make effective treatment of aspergillosis. The partial internal transcribed spacer (ITS1–4) method combined with β-tubulin (BenA) gene sequences have been used for the identification of Aspergillus spp.9,10 In addition, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been demonstrated to be a useful method for rapid identification of Aspergillus species in a clinical lab.10

Although epidemiological surveillance of Aspergillus diseases has been reported in many countries,11 few surveillance data on aspergillosis involving large sets of patients are available in China.12,13 This 5-year (2017–2021) retrospective study on a large cohort of patients with aspergillosis was conducted to investigate the clinical and microbiological characteristics of aspergillosis in a tertiary teaching hospital in Shanghai, China.

Methods

Patients and Fungal Isolation

In this study, 114 patients diagnosed with aspergillosis were recruited from 2017 to 2021 in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China, a tertiary care teaching hospital that has 3624 beds and admits around 130,000 patients each year. Diagnosis of aspergillosis was based on guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA).14 Ethics approval (2019204) for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Ruijin Hospital, and all patients involved understood and agreed to the use of these clinical specimens.

Patients’ clinical information collected comprised age, sex, specimen type, site of isolation, underlying diseases and antifungal treatment based on medical records. Specimens from patients with aspergillosis — bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), exudate, and drainage fluid — were sent to the Clinical Microbiology Department at Ruijin Hospital for fungal detection. All patients had Aspergillus cultures detected twice in consecutive weeks.

Mycological criteria were positive direct microscopy with hyphae presented in specimen and positive culture of Aspergillus, with Sabouraud glucose agar (SGA; Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) containing chloramphenicol (50 mg/L) used for the isolation of Aspergillus spp., repeated culturing of the Aspergillus spp. for three times and samples, and molecular identification of the Aspergillus isolates. Direct microscopic examination was performed using a 20% KOH solution. All isolation plates were incubated at 27°C for up to 4 weeks.

Identification Based on MALDI-TOF MS

All 114 Aspergillus isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF MS (Knowledge Base 3.0 system, BioMérieux, Marcy-I’Etoile, France) and the Mould kit and Auto kits to prepare samples, for which the overall rate of correct identification was excellent. Sample preparation strictly followed the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cotton swabs were dipped into about 1 cm2 mold colony, then added to 900 μL ethanol (70%) and spun for 2 min at 14,000 g. Next, the ethanol was removed and the residual pellet resuspended in 40 μL 70% formic acid and 40 μL acetonitrile for extraction of proteins. After centrifugation for 2 min at 14,000 g, 1 μL supernatant was spotted onto a slide, dried naturally, then covered with 1 μL saturated alphacyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution in 50% acetonitrile + 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid. Instrument calibration (using a reference strain of Escherichia coli ATCC 8739) and the quality control (A. fumigatus ATCC 204305) was performed every 12 samples.

Sequence-Based Identification

DNA was extracted with cultures grown on SGA plates for 5–7 days at 27°C using a genomic DNA isolation kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). All 114 isolates were identified by sequencing a part of BenA gene and ITS1–4 DNA primer sequences and PCR reaction conditions described previously.15,16 The obtained sequences were compared to the NCBI nucleotide database (BLAST; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). GenBank accession numbers for the generated ITS1–4 and BenA sequences are listed in the CNCB Genome Warehouse under accession number PRJCA01048.

Antifungal-Susceptibility Testing

The in vitro susceptibility of all the Aspergillus isolates to the antifungal drugs itraconazole (Itr), voriconazole (Vor), posaconazole (Pos), isavuconazole (Isa), micafungin (Mcf), anidulafungin (Afg), and caspofungin (Cas) was determined with Sensititre YeastOne CMC1JHY methodology (Thermo Fisher Scientific). An amphotericin B (AmB) microbroth dilution kit (Bio-Kont, Wenzhou, China) was used for AmB. A standard A. fumigatus ATCC MYA-3626 strain was used as the quality control. The results were interpreted based on the clinical breakpoints or epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (Itr ECV ≥1 μg/mL, Vor ≥2 mg/mL, and Isa ≥1 μg/mL for A. fumigatus).17

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are given as medians and interquartile ranges, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient Characteristics and Prevalence of Aspergillus Isolates

A total of 114 patients were diagnosed with aspergillosis based on the guidelines of the IDSA14 from 2017 to 2021 in Ruijin Hospital. Median age was 61 (19) years in both the immunocompromised and underlying disease groups, 53.5% (61/114) were male, 64% (73/114) had immunocompromised conditions, and 36% (41/114) underlying diseases. The most frequent diseases were chronic renal failure (27/114), followed by autoimmune diseases (15/114), solid tumors (15/114), and septic shock (15/114) in the immunocompromised group, and pulmonary disease (31/114) was the most common in patients with underlying disease.

Sputum (42/114, 36.8%) was the most common specimen from which Aspergillus isolates were recovered, followed by BALF (38/114, 33.3%), wound (18/114, 15.8%), exudate (9/114, 7.9%), and drainage fluid (7/114, 6.1%). The intensive care unit (ICU) (32/114, 28.1%) and Respiratory Department (31/114, 27.2%) were the wards where Aspergillus was recovered frequently, followed by the Burns (9/114, 7.9%), Dermatology, and Cardiology Departments (7, 6.14%). A few isolates (≤5) were recovered from the other hospital wards. In sum, 22 of 69 A. fumigatus isolates were recovered from the Respiratory Department and 22 of 69 A. fumigatus isolates from ICUs. Eleven of 32 isolates of A. flavus were recovered from ICUs (Table S1). Almost all (93%, 106/114) patients received antifungal therapy, while no antifungal treatment was administered for 7% (8/114). Vor (76/114, 66.7%) was the most frequently used empirical therapy, with similar outcomes between the immunocompromised and underlying diseases group. The clinical characteristics of 114 patients diagnosed with aspergillosis are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of 114 patients with aspergillosis

Based on ITS/BenA gene sequencing combined with MALDI-TOF MS, A. fumigatus (n=69, 60.5%) was the most common Aspergillus species causing aspergillosis, followed by A. flavus (n=30, 26.3%), A. niger (n=6, 5.3%), A. terreus (n=4, 3.5%), A. tubingensis (n=3, 2.6%), A. lacticoffeatus (n=1), and A. nidulans (n=1) (Table 2). A 73.7% concordance between MALDI-TOF MS and molecular identification was found, and MALDI-TOF MS allowed the identification of the four common species — A. fumigatus, (accuracy 20/30, 66.7%), A. flavus (accuracy 3/6, 50%), A. niger and A. terrus (accuracy 4/4, 100%) — but failed to identify A. tubingensis, A. nidulans, and A. lacticoffeatus.

Table 2 Species identification of 114 Aspergillus isolates based on ITS/BenA gene sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS

Antifungal Susceptibility

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)/minimum effective concentration (MEC) ranges, geometric mean, distribution, modal MIC/MEC, and MIC/MEC for 90% patients (MEC90) of the eight antifungal agents against 114 Aspergillus isolates are presented in Table 3. The lowest modal MIC/MEC (<0.008 μg/mL) was Mcf, followed by Afg, and Pos (both 0.016 μg/mL), while 90% of isolates were inhibited at 0.5 μg/mL of MIC for Vor and Itr. Cas, Mcf, and AmB showed great activity against all Aspergillus isolates tested. A. fumigatus was susceptible to echinocandins (Cas, Mcf, Afg, MIC90 0.016 μg/mL, 0.008 μg/mL, and 0.016 μg/mL, respectively) and AmB (MIC90 1 μg/mL). Two isolates of A. fumigatus exhibited MICs values ≥2 mg/mL for three azoles.

Table 3 MIC/MEC ranges, geometric mean, distribution, and modal MIC/MEC, MIC/MEC90 of eight antifungal agents against 114 Aspergillus isolates

All isolates of A. flavus showed similar susceptibility to echinocandins (Cas, Mcf, and Afg, MIC90 0.06 μg/mL, 0.03 μg/mL, and 0.016 μg/mL, respectively) and AmB (MIC90 0.006 μg/mL) as those of A. fumigatus. One isolate of A. flavus had an MIC value ≥4 μg/mL to Isa, while others were susceptible to Itr, Vor, and Pos. For the one isolate each of A. lacticoffeatus and A. terrus in this study, AmB was the most active drug against A. lacticoffeatus in vitro with the lowest MIC (0.03 μg/mL), followed by Pos (0.12 μg/mL), Itr, Vor, and Isa (0.25 μg/mL), Mcf (0.5 μg/mL), Afg (1 μg/mL), and Cas (2 μg/mL). For A. terrus, AmB was the most active drug with the lowest MIC (0.008 μg/mL), followed by Pos, Isa, and Afg (0.03 μg/mL), Itr (0.06 μg/mL), and Vor (0.12 μg/mL).

Discussion

Here, we presented a 5-year retrospective study on the clinical and microbiological characteristics of aspergillosis at a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital. Of infected people among all age-groups, more than 50% of cases occurred in adulthood, with about 50% between the ages of 35 and 70 years, in agreement with a previous study.18,19 Previous studies had found that sputum and BALF were the most common specimens from which Aspergillus isolates were recovered20,21 and A. fumigatus and A. flavus were mainly found in respiratory tract isolates.22 Half were immunocompromised patients, in line with that reported in previous studies.23,24

Our study highlights that A. fumigatus (60.5%, 69/114) was the predominant species causing invasive aspergillosis in Shanghai, China, similar to that reported from previous studies in China25 and outside China, such as Italy26 and the UK.27 However, it is different from results reported in Cameroon,28 Turkey,29 India,30 and Iran,19 where A. niger, A. terreus, and A. flavus were the most common Aspergillus spp., respectively. A. flavus (26.3%, 30/114) were also the second-leading cause of aspergillosis at Ruijin Hospital, in agreement with Pasqualotto, where A. flavus was the second-leading cause of invasive and noninvasive aspergillosis.31 Aspergillus niger and A. tubingensis have previously been reported as an emerging causal agents of aspergillosis.32 In our study, A. niger (n=6, 5.3%), A. tubingensis (n=3, 2.6%), and A. terreus (n=4, 3.5%) were frequently isolated from aspergillosis, which is in line with previous reports.33

A multicenter study from the US reported that Vitek MS 3.0 provided a 98% accuracy rate on identification of filamentous fungi when considering all isolates tested in the database.34 However, a study in France reported that MALD-ITOF MS had lower accuracy in identification of filamentous fungi of 51% for the MS system database 3.0.35 Recently, a South Korean study evaluated the performance of the Vitek MS 3.0, with accuracy of 79.6% for filamentous fungi.36 In our study, only three cryptic species were misidentified, due to those species not being included in the Vitek MS 3.0 system. Our results indicated that the MALDI-TOF MS method could be a useful tool for identification of filamentous fungi in a routine clinical laboratory.

In vitro susceptibility tests revealed that most A. fumigatus isolates were susceptible to all the antifungals tested in this study, similar to a recent report by a Chinese research group.37 A retrospective study from Portugual reported that the activity of Afg and Cas against A. fumigatus isolates was 100%, while ITC, Vor, and Pos were effective against 95.8%, 97.4%, and 84.7% of A. fumigatus isolates, respectively, which is in good agreement with the results in our study.38 The susceptibility results also showed that AmB was more effective than triazoles against A. fumigatus at multiple hospitals in Shanghai, China,39 due to the fact that AmB is a polyene fungicidal agent with excellent activity.40 For fungicidal actions, AmB, Afg, and Cas were superior to triazoles. On the other hand, the nephrotoxicity of AmB hinders its clinical use. Afg, Mcf, and Cas could be alternative agents to AmB for treatment of Aspergillus infection.

A 20-year antifungal-susceptibility study of Aspergillus spp. at a Chinese tertiary hospital21 revealed that Vor was more active than Itr and AmB against A. flavus, in agreement with our findings. However, our results were limited by the retrospective design and data collection being dependent on information in medical records perhaps not representing characteristics of aspergillosis in China overall. In our hospital, the physicians administered prophylactic antifungal and empirical therapy according to the patient’s clinical manifestations and risk factors. Vor is recommended by the IDSA guidelines,14 and was the most used empirical antifungal therapy during the study period. There was a significant difference between outcomes of patients who received Vor antifungal therapy and those who did not.

Conclusion

Aspergillosis commonly occurs in immunocompromised patients and is mainly treated with empirical therapy in China. A. fumigatus was found to be the predominant Aspergillus species causing aspergillosis. Of note, A. flavus, a non–A. fumigatus species, is increasing, and is the second-leading cause of aspergillosis. In vitro antifungal-susceptibility testing is crucially important for decisions on effective therapy with aspergillosis. The Vitek MS method has demonstrated fast and effective identification of common Aspergillus spp. in clinical laboratories.

Data Sharing

The data presented in this study are openly available at the CNCB Genome Warehouse under the accession number PRJCA010148.

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine (protocol RJ2019204, August 2, 2019), conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and required written informed consent to be taken from each participant (or a parent/legal guardian for patients under the age of 18 years) before enrollment in the study.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation, or all these areas, took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article, gave final approval to the version to be published, have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Key Discipline of Public Health in Shanghai (GWV-10.1-XK04) and Excellent Technology Leader in Shanghai (20XD1434500), partly supported by a grant from Suzhou Bureau of Science and technology (SKY2022037) and from the People’s Hospital of SND (SGY2019D02).

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Dellière S, Dudoignon E, Fodil S, et al. Risk factors associated with COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis in ICU patients: a French multicentric retrospective cohort. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;27(5):790.e1–5. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.005

2. Wang J, Yang Q, Zhang P, Sheng J, Zhou J, Qu T. Clinical characteristics of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COVID-19 in Zhejiang, China: a retrospective case series. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):299. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03046-7

3. Arastehfar A, Carvalho A, van de Veerdonk FL, et al. COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA)-from immunology to treatment. J Fungi. 2020;6(2). doi:10.3390/jof6020091

4. Pagano L, Busca A, Candoni A, et al. Risk stratification for invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies: SEIFEM recommendations. Blood Rev. 2017;31(2):17–29. doi:10.1016/j.blre.2016.09.002

5. Araujo R, Oliveira M, Amorim A, Sampaio-Maia B. Unpredictable susceptibility of emerging clinical moulds to tri-azoles: review of the literature and upcoming challenges for mould identification. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(7):1289–1301. doi:10.1007/s10096-015-2374-1

6. Cruciani M, Mengoli C, Malena M, Bosco O, Serpelloni G, Grossi P. Antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Transpl. 2006;12(5):850–858. doi:10.1002/lt.20690

7. Ahmadikia K, Aghaei Gharehbolagh S, Fallah B, et al. Distribution, prevalence, and causative agents of fungal keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis (1990 to 2020). Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:698780. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.698780

8. Bongomin F, Asio LG, Olum R, Denning DW. Intravenous therapy for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mycoses. 2020;63(9):921–927. doi:10.1111/myc.13131

9. Houbraken J, de Vries RP, Samson RA. Modern taxonomy of biotechnologically important Aspergillus and Penicillium species. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2014;86:199–249. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800262-9.00004-4

10. Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B. Susceptibility testing of fungi to antifungal drugs. J Fungi. 2018;4(3). doi:10.3390/jof4030110

11. Vermeulen E, Maertens J, De Bel A, et al. Nationwide surveillance of azole resistance in aspergillus diseases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(8):4569–4576. doi:10.1128/aac.00233-15

12. Deng S, Zhang L, Ji Y, et al. Triazole phenotypes and genotypic characterization of clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in China. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2017;6(12):e109. doi:10.1038/emi.2017.97

13. Su H, Zhu M, Tsui CK, et al. Potency of olorofim (F901318) compared to contemporary antifungal agents against clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates, and review of azole resistance phenotype and genotype epidemiology in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65(5). doi:10.1128/aac.02546-20

14. Patterson TF, Thompson GR, Denning DW, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(4):e1–e60. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw326

15. Xu X, Naseri A, Houbraken J, et al. Identification and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of causative agents of onychomycosis due to Aspergillus species in Mashhad, Iran. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6808. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86038-z

16. Zhang L, Wang X, Houbraken J, et al. Molecular identification and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of aspergillus isolates recovered from otomycosis patients in Western China. Mycopathologia. 2020;185(3):527–535. doi:10.1007/s11046-020-00448-7

17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017:1–62.

18. Cadena J, Thompson GR, Patterson TF. Aspergillosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2021;35(2):415–434. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2021.03.008

19. Barati B, Okhovvat SA, Goljanian A, Omrani MR. Otomycosis in central Iran: a clinical and mycological study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2011;13(12):873–876. doi:10.1159/000249653

20. Chan JF, Lau SK, Wong SC, et al. A 10-year study reveals clinical and laboratory evidence for the ‘semi-invasive’ properties of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016;5(4):e37. doi:10.1038/emi.2016.31

21. Yang X, Chen W, Liang T, et al. A 20-year antifungal susceptibility surveillance (from 1999 to 2019) for Aspergillus spp. and proposed epidemiological cutoff values for aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillus flavus: a study in a tertiary hospital in China. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:680884. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.680884

22. Aneja KR, Sharma C, Joshi R. Fungal infection of the ear: a common problem in the north eastern part of Haryana. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74(6):604–607. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.03.001

23. Danion F, Rouzaud C, Dureault A, et al. Why are so many cases of invasive aspergillosis missed? Med Mycol. 2019;57(Supplement_2):S94–S103. doi:10.1093/mmy/myy081

24. Morgan J, Wannemuehler KA, Marr KA, et al. Incidence of invasive aspergillosis following hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation: interim results of a prospective multicenter surveillance program. Med Mycol. 2005;43(Suppl 1):S49–58. doi:10.1080/13693780400020113

25. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Wu D, et al. Clinical experience with isavuconazole in healthy volunteers and patients with invasive aspergillosis in China, and the results from an exposure-response analysis. Mycoses. 2021;64(4):445–456. doi:10.1111/myc.13233

26. Gianni C, Romano C. Clinical and histological aspects of toenail onychomycosis caused by Aspergillus spp.: 34 cases treated with weekly intermittent terbinafine. Dermatology. 2004;209(2):104–110. doi:10.1159/000079593

27. English MP, Atkinson R. Onychomycosis in elderly chiropody patients. Br J Dermatol. 1974;91(1):67–72. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1974.tb06718.x

28. Nkondjo Minkoumou S, Fabrizi V, Papini M. Onychomycosis in Cameroon: a clinical and epidemiological study among dermatological patients. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51(12):1474–1477. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05509.x

29. Hilmioğlu-Polat S, Metin DY, Inci R, Dereli T, Kilinç I, Tümbay E. Non-dermatophytic molds as agents of onychomycosis in Izmir, Turkey - A prospective study. Mycopathologia. 2005;160(2):125–128. doi:10.1007/s11046-005-6872-z

30. Das NK, Ghosh P, Das S, Bhattacharya S, Dutta RN, Sengupta SR. A study on the etiological agent and clinico-mycological correlation of fingernail onychomycosis in eastern India. Indian J Dermatol. 2008;53(2):75–79. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.41651

31. Pasqualotto AC. Differences in pathogenicity and clinical syndromes due to Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus. Med Mycol. 2009;47(Suppl 1):S261–70. doi:10.1080/13693780802247702

32. Tsang CC, Hui TW, Lee KC, et al. Genetic diversity of Aspergillus species isolated from onychomycosis and Aspergillus hongkongensis sp. nov., with implications to antifungal susceptibility testing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;84(2):125–134. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.10.027

33. Krishnan S, Manavathu EK, Chandrasekar PH. Aspergillus flavus: an emerging non-fumigatus Aspergillus species of significance. Mycoses. 2009;52(3):206–222. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01642.x

34. Rychert J, Slechta ES, Barker AP, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the Vitek MS v3.0 system for the identification of filamentous fungi. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(2). doi:10.1128/jcm.01353-17

35. Dupont D, Normand AC, Persat F, Hendrickx M, Piarroux R, Wallon M. Comparison of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems for the identification of moulds in the routine microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(7):892–897. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.10.013

36. Shin JH, Kim SH, Lee D, et al. Performance evaluation of VITEK MS for the identification of a wide spectrum of clinically relevant filamentous fungi using a Korean Collection. Ann Lab Med. 2021;41(2):214–220. doi:10.3343/alm.2021.41.2.214

37. Espinel-Ingroff A, Turnidge J. The role of epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) in antifungal susceptibility testing and interpretation for uncommon yeasts and moulds. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2016;33(2):63–75. doi:10.1016/j.riam.2016.04.001

38. Perlin DS, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Alastruey-Izquierdo A. The global problem of antifungal resistance: prevalence, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(12):e383–e392. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30316-x

39. Wiederhold NP. The antifungal arsenal: alternative drugs and future targets. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51(3):333–339. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.09.002

40. Gupta AK, Renaud HJ, Quinlan EM, Shear NH, Piguet V. The growing problem of antifungal resistance in onychomycosis and other superficial mycoses. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22(2):149–157. doi:10.1007/s40257-020-00580-6

Creative Commons License © 2022 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.