Back to Journals » ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research » Volume 13

Budgetary Impact of Bendamustine Ready-to-Dilute Products in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma to a United States Infusion Facility

Authors James E, Trautman H, Thompson S, Ribalov R, Choudhry A

Received 6 January 2021

Accepted for publication 5 March 2021

Published 22 March 2021 Volume 2021:13 Pages 201—211

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S297284

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Samer Hamidi


Elizabeth James,1 Holly Trautman,1 Stephen Thompson,2 Rinat Ribalov,3 Azhar Choudhry4

1Aventine Consulting LLC, Marblehead, MA, USA; 2Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Parsippany, NJ, USA; 3Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Petah Tikva, Israel; 4Medical Affairs, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Parsippany, NJ, USA

Correspondence: Elizabeth James Tel +1 425 290 2148
Email [email protected]

Background: Bendamustine hydrochloride (BND HCl) is indicated for first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). There are two ready-to-dilute (RTD) formulations of BND HCl on the US market: a large-volume, long-duration infusion (BND-L) and a small-volume, short-duration infusion (BND-S). It is estimated that the shorter duration infusion could result in cost savings to infusion facilities.
Objective: Estimate the one-year budget impact between BND-S and BND-L for use in the treatment of CLL and iNHL when all current BND-L utilization is replaced with BND-S, from the US infusion facility perspective.
Methods: An illustrative budget impact model estimated the change in costs associated with a projected increase from 50% to 100% market share for BND-S. The model included CLL and iNHL patient populations. Budgetary costs reflected facility expenditures on drug acquisition and administration based on recommended dosing for BND-S and BND-L. The base-case model assumptions and inputs were derived from scientific literature and publicly available resources. The total budget impact was calculated annually, along with the differences in per patient cost; one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted.
Results: Per-patient savings with BND-S use after the utilization shift were estimated at $2812.24 for CLL and $4769.01 for iNHL. Across both indications, the total annual incremental savings after the utilization shift were estimated at $452,209 for 250 CLL and iNHL patients in a 10,000-patient infusion facility, resulting in cost savings of $150.74 per BND HCI patient per month and $1808.84 per BND HCI patient per year. The model was sensitive to changes in proportion of patients receiving BND HCI infusions for CLL and iNHL, patient body surface area, and BND-S wholesale acquisition cost.
Conclusion: This analysis estimated over $450,000 in annual savings for a 10,000-patient chemotherapy infusion facility following a utilization shift from 50% use of each RTD product to 100% use of BND-S in CLL and iNHL patients, driven by lower acquisition costs for BND-S and lower administration labor costs associated with rapid infusion.

Keywords: chronic lymphocytic leukemia, indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, budget impact, bendamustine, infusion

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]